oskiwow;567443 said:
Stream will be on calbears.com All Access: http://www.calbears.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/091211aad.html
It costs $7.95 for a month's access to All Access.
TheScientist;567461 said:
So lame!
(And bump so others can see.)
KoreAmBear;567472 said:
It's probably a cost to produce a game that otherwise would not be available. So if it's to meet those costs, why would it be lame? I'm just happy there's an option. And there is a chance someone may hijack the stream as well and provide it for free.
KoreAmBear;567472 said:
It's probably a cost to produce a game that otherwise would not be available. So if it's to meet those costs, why would it be lame? I'm just happy there's an option. And there is a chance someone may hijack the stream as well and provide it for free.
TheScientist;567497 said:
From what I understand, other teams in similar situations have streamed the game for free. I understand it can't be free, but I also think $8 is a little excessive for a game against a team that's on the bottom tier of the FCS.
PHBear;567540 said:
Well hopefully, it will break down to 35 cents per touchdown we should be scoring in that game.
Serious question, the "S" word has come up a couple of times on this thread and of course in others for the past couple of weeks. Should we be avoiding that in order to evade the L----- S------ Nazis? I'm new to this French underground resistance stuff.
beeasyed;567517 said:
still, it misses the point. the fact is that you'll be needing to pay $8 to watch a bottom-tier team. many wouldn't even want to watch this game for free, so how would one justify charging $8 for it?? another athletic department mistake in my opinion...
CalBear68;567551 said:
No --- this thread is about getting a paid stream from an authorized source that gets a waiver from the primary provider (Fox in this case).
The other threads are about, well, they're not about that.
Ironic that someone wants to be careful about what words he posts in this thread, but no one seems to give a darn about the stupid stuff they post in the "other" threads.
Ah, the humanity!
beeasyed;567517 said:
still, it misses the point. the fact is that you'll be needing to pay $8 to watch a bottom-tier team. many wouldn't even want to watch this game for free, so how would one justify charging $8 for it?? another athletic department mistake in my opinion...
jgoldenbear1;567643 said:
you wouldn't pay $8 to watch a cal game? That is not expensive and it's completely reasonable for cal to try to recoup their costs or make money. I'd pay $8 a game to have access on tv, without hesitation. Skip one beer at your next game and it's paid for
grandmastapoop;567560 said:
Who cares about the people who wouldn't want to watch it for free? Complaining about it for $8 is ridiculous. Some people will never be satisfied.
KoreAmBear;567662 said:
Having the option to see Cal's first home game when there's no regular TV coverage, for $8 > no option at all.
TightwadHill99;567842 said:
Have used the live audio feed in the past (which was also a paid feature), so I'm hoping the video stream will be OK as well.
BombayBear;567906 said:
From out of the US?