Nice to have a back up QB. Great to get him some time.He seemed to really throw the ball with velocity.
Agureghian;571805 said:
dude, it was Presbyterian. I hope he is that good against a decent pack-12 school.
Agureghian;571805 said:
dude, it was Presbyterian. I hope he is that good against a decent pack-12 school.
calbb;571807 said:
Dude, he was accurate!
calbb;571807 said:
Dude, he was accurate!
CMHBear;571817 said:
Did he even complete 50% of his passes?
Calcoholic;571808 said:
Dude, many of our QBs in the past few years didn't look good against anyone. Mansion didn't look good against Presbyterian.
Besides, accuracy is accuracy regardless of the competition.
Agureghian;571805 said:
dude, it was Presbyterian. I hope he is that good against a decent pack-12 school.
vanity;571834 said:
- lol, do any of our QBs complete 50% of their passes? seems unfair to hold allan to a higher standard than zack...
oskidunker;571777 said:
nice to have a back up qb. Great to get him some time.he seemed to really throw the ball with velocity.
LodeBear;572106 said:
if he were really good , he would be starting. he is second best to zach. he wont get any more playing time.
OzoneTheCat;572068 said:
He showed good pocket presence. On one play in particular there was a decent a rush..he was calm stepped up and then delivered a strike to his receiver. He throws a nice catchable ball. Maynard gives us the best option to win, but I did like what I saw from Bridgford.
LethalFang;571895 said:
Exactly!
Mansion and Sweeney both looked bad against UC Davis!
Ayoob went 0-10 against Sac State, and then missed the couch when he tried to toss his jacket on it!