Or perhaps this question could be asked in another way: <br /><br />How many head coaches in the Pac-12 would lose (potentially, at this point) so many big recruits because they lost one assistant coach, albeit the main recruiting guy? <br /><br />It's hard to imagine Chip Kelly, Pete Carroll, Jim Harbough, or other top head coaches losing so many recruits because one 31 year old assistant bolted. Especially not when the coach, like Tedford, has been entrenched at the university for a decade. I think a lot of this has to do with Tedford's noted character traits/deficits, namely his reticent and stoic nature lacking almost completely in charisma and the ability to motivate or fire up kids or even connect on a personal level with people (besides his famed 'ethics' and 'classiness'). He is just out of touch most likely and unable to close the deal with recruits that are not completely solid. <br /><br />Or maybe if Douche Lupoi hadn't bolted so late in the game Tedford would have been able to sway those recruits who were wavering. <br /><br />But if Tedford can't coach, and he can't even recruit well without a young assistant who is plays Xbox and twitters to connect with recruits, then what exactly is he getting paid upwards of $3million a year for?