beelzebear;841955537 said:
in the si speed issue there's a article on how fast bolt would be in the 40 with electronic timing....some suggest a sub 4.0 for the 40.
hahahahahahahaha....
beelzebear;841955537 said:
in the si speed issue there's a article on how fast bolt would be in the 40 with electronic timing....some suggest a sub 4.0 for the 40.
polkeem;841955579 said:
I'm not sure if Bolt could even beat his teammate Blake in the 40. Bolt always seems to be coming from behind. I would guess Bolt could be in the 4.2s closer to 4.3. I actually think Chris Johnson might be able to give Bolt a run for his money in the 40. Any sprint longer than that would be no competition.
Quote:
"Johnson has repeatedly suggested that he could beat Bolt in a 40, but the numbers aren't in his favor. Johnson was an outstanding 100-meter runner in high school but lost the Florida state championship in '04 to Walter Dix, who was third behind Bolt at the '08 Games. (Bolt is only 11 months younger than Johnson, and both ran the 200 as high schoolers in '04 -- Johnson in a lightning 21.30 and Bolt in a unprecedented 19.93).
According to an SI analysis that used data from Bolt's world-record 100 (9.58) and two methods of estimating Bolt's 40 potential, the Jamaican might flirt with four seconds flat. In his '09 record run, Bolt hit 40 meters in 4.64. Given his velocity, the conversion to yards and his reaction time to the starter's gun, Bolt ran a 4.19 40, but that was in a phase of the 100 in which he was not yet at top speed. Plus, the average difference between handheld times -- like those at the combine -- and an electronic time like Bolt's is 0.22. Subtract that, and Bolt is under 4."
beelzebear;841955600 said:
From SI, take it for what it's worth:
Unit2Sucks;841955611 said:
the combine is not timed by hand - Johnson ran a 4.24 electronic timed. I would be willing to bet that the track that Johnson ran on wasn't as fast as the one that Bolt ran on either. On the other hand, Bolt didn't train for the 40 and wasn't optimizing the first 40 in his race. I'm not saying that Johnson would beat Bolt in a short race, but I would be shocked if Bolt broke 4 in a 40.
Quote:
"Then again, there are other factors, such as the softer (therefore slower) surface at the combine and the lack of starting blocks, both of which would add fractions of a second to Bolt's time. "All things considered," says Ralph Mann, USA Track & Field director of elite athletes sprint-and-hurdle program and a world renown bio-mechanist, "I would guess he may just be able to break four seconds. It would be close."
Unit2Sucks;841955592 said:
I don't think it's fair to call DAT frail - the kid was a hard hitting defender and I'm not aware of any injuries. It's like all the people who assumed Sofele would be frail due to his size but he's never sustained an injury (knock on wood).
I don't think DAT could keep up with Bigelow in a straight line but I'm not sure DAT spends much time running in a straight line either. He is plenty fast, off the charts agility and has terrific instincts. If he was 2 or 3 inches taller he would be the top skill position player taken in the draft when he's eligible in 2013.
6bear6;841955532 said:
Regardless, they're both almost one second slower than Usain Bolt.
BellottiBold;841955782 said:
Much of the perception of DAT's speed is in my opinion a direct result of his decisive cuts, and how explosive he is into and through them.
I don't want to get all mcshay or kuiper or whatever on this, but his acceleration once he plants is just absurd, and perhaps more to the point, his instincts as a runner always seem to lead him "correctly."
Unit2Sucks;841955611 said:
the combine is not timed by hand - Johnson ran a 4.24 electronic timed. I would be willing to bet that the track that Johnson ran on wasn't as fast as the one that Bolt ran on either. On the other hand, Bolt didn't train for the 40 and wasn't optimizing the first 40 in his race. I'm not saying that Johnson would beat Bolt in a short race, but I would be shocked if Bolt broke 4 in a 40.