have us go 1-11 or 2-10 with Tedford being fired at the end of the year or win the rest of our games (going 7-4) and getting into the Pac12 championship game?
Personally, I would rather have the latter even if it means keeping Tedford for another year... wins over Fuskies, Furd and Ducks would be so very sweet.

The latter only if it leads to a BCS Bowl. Else, I'd go with former.

I would take the second, in a heartbeat. That is only possible with a complete turnaround by JT. If that were to happen then all our problems would be solved.

The second but that would be like whether I preferred the Green Party candidate to be President

I am so apathetic right now ,I really don't care. Although I would like to beat Chip Kelly and be a spoiler

I still would rather we go 7-5 or even 6-6 and make a bowl game but that's not realistic. Of the realistic outcomes, I rather we go 1-11 than win 2 to 5 games, just so there's no doubt left even among the most irrational Terdford supporters that he needs to go.

If JT starts creating exciting football at Cal, I'm all for it. A super boring 7-4 that features others losing rather than Cal winning just wouldn't cut it if it is anything short of making the pac-12 championship game. If JT somehow makes the P-12 title game, I'd give him another year.

I always want Cal to win. Period.

1979bear;841964768 said:

---

I always want Cal to win. Period.

---

CAL winning is more important than any one person or any one coach.

It doesn't make any difference what I want. We're not going to beat the Huskies, Furd, or Oregon, and it's very unlikely we'll beat Oregon State, UCLA, an Utah. That leaves WSU as he only remaining possiblity for a victory. In that scenario, it matters little whether we win or lose. 2-10 vsl 1-11 doesn't get me all that excited. Tedford just needs to be shown the door, and sooner rather than later.