This finally explains why Sofele ever even got on the field. Ahead of Bigelow/Anderson?? I've always felt Gould was just as much to blame as Tedford.
grandmastapoop;842019211 said:
Ridiculous. What the hell are WE going to learn that WE won't repeat? We are fans. We are not in charge of the program.
BearyWhite;842019150 said:
I agree. Banded posters are much easier to identify once you catch them, and if they use colored bands you can usually even identify them through binoculars in the field.
SnoozerBear;842019167 said:
Clearly everyone must have an agenda right?
Be brave, fight hard, fight for what you believe in. Your resilience is to be admired...
and I envy your bliss.
bar20;842019213 said:
This whole thread sounds like a bunch of girls sitting around a table at The Cheesecake Factory sipping Cosmopolitans and gossiping about their husbands and boyfriends. I could care less what happened last season. The coach got fired for a myriad of reasons. I am looking forward to the 2013 season, 2012's is over.
okaydo;842019157 said:
2 photos.
Look: There are many things that make me think this is legit. That this isn't some troll.
Unfortunately, if I go into detail, it'll give a hint as to who it is or who it is not.
ayetee11;842019090 said:
My gut feeling says Allen just wanted the receptions record. I am happy he's gone if so, I just refuse to believe a parent would feel the need to pm a poster and go so far to send pictures to prove it.
mbBear;842019242 said:
So, it was your sense it was a parent who followed the board? A parent who took the time to figure who should be PM'd?" How many people got PM'd, as alas, I did not?
What was the point contacting you/others considering Tedford has already been fired?
CALiforniALUM;842019247 said:
All I can say is the PM was not completely unsolicited, as it was in response to something specific I said in a thread. I have no reason to believe the person wasn't telling the truth. They didn't ask me to do anything with the information they provided. I wouldn't have even brought the content of the PM up if it wasn't for this thread. I believe it is a parent who does follow this board enough to know how to use the board. I'd have to ask you why it is you think the person would allegedly target me? Am I such a force of nature on this board that the person knew if they could convince me I could sway all the powers of evil against all that is good? :rollinglaugh:
I only have 2458 posts - who am I?
okaydo;842019253 said:
As I wrote above, I've found enough evidence -- aside from the photos!!! -- that proves the person who contacted me is who he/she says he/she is.
Of course, there is still the possibility that the person isn't who he/she says he/she is, but that would require 2 things:
1) Years of planning.
2) Great psychic ability.
Otherwise, it looks legit.
freshfunk;842019248 said:
I also don't see how JT can stay head coach for so long with such excessive lack of discipline. It also doesn't jive with public comments for players like Isi that "we all respect Coach Tedford" when asked about going for it on 4th and 1 against tOSU. Would you hug a coach like he was your father if you lacked respect for him?
okaydo;842019157 said:
2 photos.
Look: There are many things that make me think this is legit. That this isn't some troll.
Unfortunately, if I go into detail, it'll give a hint as to who it is or who it is not.
6956bear;842019171 said:
I have heard many stories about uneven discipline being applied in the Cal program. I have not heard about KA only playing if ZM was at QB. I was told that despite what we saw these past 2 seasons that ZM was in fact the best QB on the team. Kline may have more ability but was not going to unseat ZM this Fall. The choice to RS Kline was a good one IMO. Hinder may have been the overlooked QB at least from what I have heard.
The football culture at Cal needs to be transformed. There is talent (although not as much as some think) and a winning season next year is possible. A strong coach and staff can turn things around quickly IMO. The program is in need of real leadership. Starts at the top but players can and should play a role. With early entrees into the NFL it is hard to find really good seniors that can be team leaders. But this off season the team will need some guys to step up and assume a real leadership role.
On defense I think Nick Forbes and Avery Sebastien have enough ability and the right mentality to become leaders. On offense it looks less certain to me. You would love seniors to assume the role. That will have to built from within.
The general concern that the program lacks discipline has been told to me many times as well. That the ship was not that tightly run. This will be one of the first orders of business the next coach needs to address. Look at Stanford. Harbaugh transformed that program completely. Shaw has taken over and they look the same. Look at USC. Kiffin continues to run a less tightly run ship, and they underperform relative to talent.
Discipline and commitment are essential in football. There is so much preparation time and hard work that goes into football. If you lack discipline it shows up in the results. This thread is the single biggest reason I believe Cal needs a PROVEN HC. The ship needs to get righted and now.
cal98;842019027 said:
So much for the theory that JT always played those that practiced best.
txwharfrat;842019310 said:
With Dykes as our HC we may have 3-4 receivers that pass up Allen within the next three years.
txwharfrat;842019310 said:
With Dykes as our HC we may have 3-4 receivers that pass up Allen within the next three years.
going4roses;842019275 said:
i see the reason for this post but why now need to move forward not backward( NO IF JT HAD NOT BEEN FIRED ) ... i have spoken about this topic with a few posters ... well damn he is gone hope all that senior plays first crap is out PLAY THE BEST PLAYERS!!!!!!!!!
ONE MORE NOTE IF THIS IS REMOTELY TRUE COACH M HAS TO GO AND ARROYO ALONG ANYONE INVOLVED IN THIS MESS
sycasey;842019273 said:
It makes sense if you think of the discipline as gradually slipping throughout his tenure. When he started as head coach, discipline was a big deal and it showed on the field. As the years went on (most likely from 2007 onward) the discipline started slipping until it became the mess we saw last year. That explains how he remained coach for so long: he started extremely well, and then the decline was so gradual as to be almost imperceptible (until many years have gone by).
As for why players wouldn't have made public comments: well, would YOU want to publicly criticize a coach who could bury you on the bench? Also, no one is saying that every player disliked the man; part of having a locker room divide is that there are guys who support the coach and guys who don't, and they split into factions.
freshfunk;842019248 said:
Much of what was said could be misinterpretations. I also don't believe KA goes around parading that if ZM doesn't play then he doesn't play.
....I find stuff like OL whiffing to be less plausible. That would really hurt a players prospect for the future and assume that most D1 student athletes (particularly at Cal) have more pride in their personal performance than to do something like this. Also the worst OL player was a senior who never started until this year so it's easier to conclude that this had more to do with inability.
mbBear;842019331 said:
I have no reason doubt any of you. The timing doesn't question the credibility, but it certainly questions the motivation. Of course, they could respond to me that they would never have written what they did if Tedford was remaining as the coach, so as to not rock the boat. But now it just comes across as trying to make sure Tedford isn't remembered too fondly, unless I am missing the point.