incredible
ultramantaro;842176698 said:
the espn recap made it sound like wisc screwed it up.

gobears3000;842177321 said:
Shades of our game against Oregon State and Riley's mistake... the turning point in the Tedford era...
run2win;842176688 said:
Disaster. PAC 12 refs choked the finish.
wifeisafurd;842177803 said:
Maybe my eyes deceived me, but they totally blew the throw in the corner of the end zone where the replay showed the WR was in (they didn't even review) and there was a reception that clearly bounced to a TOSU Wr on a critical "reception" they didn't bother to review. In fact, I was also expecting a review of the Goff fumble (from our side of the field, his arm was in motion, but the ref was on the wrong side (as usual for a Pac 12 ref) out of position. Any truth to the rumor no replays because the replay official was still giving Larry Scott a blow job from last game?
Calcoholic;842176777 said:
For those that didn't see it, ASU was holding onto a 2 point lead, and Wisconsin was driving inside ASU's 20 yard line with about 10 seconds left (this is just from memory - could be a little off). No time outs left. The Wisconsin QB takes the snap at the right hash and runs the ball left to center it for a game winning field goal. Except, instead of taking a knee at the center of the field, he just sets the ball on the ground!
The ASU defenders look at each other perplexed, then dive on the ball, thinking it's a live ball. The refs are blowing their whistles to indicate that it is not a live ball because, apparently, the ball is down if the runner does any action to indicate that he is "giving himself up." But the clock is still ticking while an ASU player is still laying on the ball. Then when he gets off, the Pac-12 ref spots the ball with about 2 seconds left and Wisconsin lines up to try to spike it, but the ref holds his hand out to the Wisconsin QB indicating that he should not snap it until the ref is ready. Time runs out while the ref is holding his hand out.
So arguably the refs screwed up, but Wisconsin also screwed the pooch bigtime by,
1. Not taking a knee. OK, maybe it was a legal way to down the ball, but why take the chance and leave it up to the referee's interpretation of whether he "gave himself up"? This lead to the confusion that led to the extra delay.
2. Having no time outs with about 10 seconds left, Whisky should have just kicked the field goal from the right hash. You never want to rely on the refs to spot the ball in time for you to spike it with more than 3 seconds left.
ColoradoBear1;842177930 said:
that was an unbelievable ending. pac 12 refs strike again. One day, and probaby sometime soon, big time teams are going to start to think twice about scheduling pac 12 teams due to the crappy refs and the insistence, against common practice, of using p12 refs for home games instead of neutral refs.
The question is what the correct response should be in that situation? On TV it was not at all obvious that the QB down the ball. It really looked like a live ball. If an ASU player jumps on that ball, you really can't blame him or penalize him. What the refs need to do is stop the clock, and discuss the situation and get it right.
That said, P12 ref incompetence set up wisky's drive. They got like 25 extra yards (into FG range) on that pass play where a players feet were out on consecutive steps.
wifeisafurd;842177803 said:
Maybe my eyes deceived me, but they totally blew the throw in the corner of the end zone where the replay showed the WR was in (they didn't even review) and there was a reception that clearly bounced to a TOSU Wr on a critical "reception" they didn't bother to review. In fact, I was also expecting a review of the Goff fumble (from our side of the field, his arm was in motion, but the ref was on the wrong side (as usual for a Pac 12 ref) out of position. Any truth to the rumor no replays because the replay official was still giving Larry Scott a blow job from last game?
ducktilldeath;842176812 said:
1. You are way off. There was no (mis)interpretation. They blew the play dead. Why fire off all the whistles and point at the ground if they didn't know he had legally ended the play? There is absolutely zero question, none, that the play was ended in Wisconsin's possession and that ASU jumped on a dead ball. That is textbook delay of game. It doesn't matter if the ASU player(s) didn't know that, they violated the rule. And anyway, THE WHISTLES BLEW LIKE CRAZY.
2. Yep. Andersen is an idiot, as if centering the ball for a 30 yard FG was worth the risk.
StillNoStanfurdium;842178230 said:
In regards to the TD pass rules incomplete, they didn't show a good replay in the stadium, but I heard some people near me saying that Treggs (I think it was Treggs) got his feet in but lost the ball when he went to the ground which is why it was an easy incompletion call.
However, I do remember that some Cal people on our sideline were gesturing pretty strongly after the replay call but I'd imagine that Sonny would've had to throw a challenge if the WR had full control over the ball and it was just a matter of feet in-bounds.
pingpong2;842176778 said:
It would appear a knee was indeed taken:
Regardless, the play was blown dead by the officials, so ASU should have been penalized with a delay of game for jumping on the ball after the whistle had already blown.
BobbyGBear;842178233 said:
I for one actually have no problem with what the refs did. This was a coaching error. If you are losing with 18 seconds left and you don't have any timeouts you shouldn't run the ball and expect to have another play.
tommie317;842177808 said:
That was a goff fumble, no forward movement of the football, out before the motion started.
StillNoStanfurdium;842178230 said:
In regards to the TD pass rules incomplete, they didn't show a good replay in the stadium, but I heard some people near me saying that Treggs (I think it was Treggs) got his feet in but lost the ball when he went to the ground which is why it was an easy incompletion call.
However, I do remember that some Cal people on our sideline were gesturing pretty strongly after the replay call but I'd imagine that Sonny would've had to throw a challenge if the WR had full control over the ball and it was just a matter of feet in-bounds.
wifeisafurd;842178262 said:
it sure looked like a pass, we were looking straight at Goff, and his arm was in a passing motion. In slow motion maybe the ball was already out. My problem is the ref was completely out of position to make any call, especially without a replay.
ColoradoBear1;842177930 said:
that was an unbelievable ending. pac 12 refs strike again. One day, and probaby sometime soon, big time teams are going to start to think twice about scheduling pac 12 teams due to the crappy refs and the insistence, against common practice, of using p12 refs for home games instead of neutral refs.
The question is what the correct response should be in that situation? On TV it was not at all obvious that the QB down the ball. It really looked like a live ball. If an ASU player jumps on that ball, you really can't blame him or penalize him. What the refs need to do is stop the clock, and discuss the situation and get it right.
That said, P12 ref incompetence set up wisky's drive. They got like 25 extra yards (into FG range) on that pass play where a players feet were out on consecutive steps.
UrsaMajor;842178231 said:
According to the rules (any action toward downing...), he did take a knee regardless of whether or not the knee actually hit the ground. Once the whistles blew, the refs had to either: 1. stop the clock, or 2. penalize ASU for delay of game (lying on the ball). Where Wisky is partly culpable is that the QB shouldn't have put the ball down, he should have handed it to the ref; no doubt there and there would have been time for the spike and then FG.
Bottom line: Pac-12 refs continue to embarrass the conference despite Scott's efforts.
Californication;842178315 said:
Things happen all the time right as a whistle blows, or just after. The delay of game aspect of this is bogus. Everyone was confused and players can innocently fall on the ball when it's set down. If I were a defender, if you were a defender, if anyone on this planet were a defender in that situation, they would fall on the ball which was not downed and SHOULD have been ruled a fumble. I don't care if the announcers or anyone else claims he "gave himself up". He didn't. He thought his knee was down and he put the ball down. By this same argument, players who drop the ball just before the endzone are "giving themselves up" because they think they are in the endzone and thus the ball should be ruled down.
Alternatively, the refs could have simply stopped the clock if there was a pile up and they are trying to spot the ball. That happens every now and again when the defenders try to stall. It's NEVER called delay of game. They just stop the clock and make players get off the field.