okaydo;842286205 said:
The chick from last night's episode was a masterpiece.
2 things: She wasn't alive when Cheers was on the air. (Born 2 months after the series finale).
On the day Woody Harrelson celebrated his 32nd birthday, she was born.
bearister;842286194 said:
sycasey;842286355 said:
Also, Marty's first mistress was hotter.
sycasey;842286355 said:
Are we sure this isn't just his advice for Cal football fans?
This show is awesome so far -- can't wait to see where they take it.
Also, Marty's first mistress was hotter.
Big C_Cal;842293413 said:
Now that busy people have had a week to watch the finale at their leisure...
I thought the finale was good, but fell short in some places. Still, an A+ series, all in all.



gb54;842286235 said:
true. This show has seriously ramped up trailer trash skanks to stratospheric heights. If the downton abbey girls put out like that, someone might watch it.
sycasey;842293425 said:
I think that in many cases people's expectations and wacky theories had gone so far that the finale was only going to fail to live up to them. Personally, I was satisfied. I liked that the final episode reinforced that the show was really about the two detectives and the changes to their worldviews rather than any kind of crazy plot twists or mystical subtext.
My only criticism is that I don't know if it was really that important to see so much of the killer's home life. It was still compelling, but in retrospect I don't know how much it added to the show.
GB54;842293477 said:
I thought the detail on the killer's home was fantastic-just because it really added a mood of horror and foreboding to those scenes.

GB54;842293477 said:
I agree. This was basically a buddy movie. In the end the two guys reunite, kick a$$ and are better for it. The plot was incidental.
I thought the detail on the killer's home was fantastic-just because it really added a mood of horror and foreboding to those scenes.
GB54;842293617 said:
Yes Big C you are right about next season. I believe the same creative force .
YuSeeBerkeley;842293641 said:
My initial reaction after watching the finale was the realization that Breaking Bad and Bryan Cranston might lose at the Emmys.
prospeCt;842293563 said:
:Lindsay
okaydo;842293716 said:
Actually, that's definitely not going to happen.
1. True Detective will compete in the Emmy category for TV miniseries, Breaking Bad will compete as a TV drama.
As an anthology series with a different cast each season, True Detective can compete as a miniseries. And it most certainly will to avoid the Breaking Bad competition.
If you look at American Horror Story, several of its actresses have been nominated in the TV movie/miniseries category in recent years because it, too, is an anthology series.
Click here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primetime_Emmy_Award_for_Outstanding_Lead_Actress_in_a_Miniseries_or_a_Movie#2010s
2. For the first time in several years, the TV movie and the TV miniseries category will be split in two (they were combined due to the lack of quality TV movies in recent years. But TV movies made a comeback.)
So True Detective will have its own TV miniseries category to itself.
GB54;842286204 said:
The scene a few weeks ago where MattM is undercover in the drug house and the cops are coming and the bullets flying was a masterpiece of film making.
YuSeeBerkeley;842297007 said:
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/emmys-hbos-true-detective-compete-684153?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_term=hollywoodreporter_breakingnews&utm_campaign=THR%20Breaking%20News_2014-03-25%2016%3A00%3A00%20America%2FLos_Angeles_moconnell
I guess this is what happens when you base your assumptions on something you read on Wikipedia. Should be a fierce battle for best drama. I wonder who the odds makers would favor between True Detective and Breaking Bad.
okaydo;842297100 said:
My only mistake was using the word "will" -- something I learned not to do at the Daily Cal. Should've said "is expected."
Because HBO was widely expected, not based on Wikipedia, to submit True Detective for the easy miniseries category.
So, yes, it's a shocker that they're going with the drama category. And so, so unexpected.
Which is why HBO's decision is so newsworthy, with headlines like:
"The Emmy Race Just Got Crazier"
http://www.vulture.com/2014/03/emmy-race-just-got-crazier.html
"Is HBO Submitting 'True Detective' as a Drama Series at the Emmys to Teach Netflix a Lesson?"
http://www.thewire.com/entertainment/2014/03/is-hbo-submitting-true-detective-as-a-drama-series-at-the-emmys-to-teach-netflix-a-lesson/359623/
"True Detective to Compete for Emmy As Drama, Takes Aim at Breaking Bad"
http://time.com/38081/true-detective-hbo-drama-emmy/
"It's Emmy war: 'True Detective' battles for Best Drama Series"
http://www.goldderby.com/news/5945/true-detective-emmy-best-drama-series-entertainment-news-481630925.html
As for who will win, maybe HBO is banking on Emmy voters thinking it rewarded Breaking Bad for its final season already.
YuSeeBerkeley;842297307 said:
You also said "that's definitely not going to happen" when I mentioned the prospects of Breaking Bad going against True Detective for best drama and best actor. If I had to predict right now, I'd guess that BB wins best drama, but Cranston loses to McConaughey for best actor. From what I understand, just one episode is submitted, and Ozymandias was easily better than any single episode from True Detective. At the same time, Emmy voters seem to want to reward movie stars. Hence, McConaughey beats out Cranston. But who knows. It's been a pretty long time since Breaking Bad went off the air. Could be out of sight, out of mind.