We demand our entertainment!

1,576 Views | 4 Replies | Last: 12 yr ago by heartofthebear
Bobodeluxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And this is how we get it.

http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=10671809

:facepalm
heartofthebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That woman has my utmost respect and I wonder how long it will take before someone tries to smear her rep.

Does anybody else realize how ironic it is that ESPN is reporting this? Where do you think think the NCAA gets so much of their $$? Who do you think is pressuring the NCAA to pretend nothing is wrong?
SonOfCalVa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
heartofthebear;842297586 said:

That woman has my utmost respect and I wonder how long it will take before someone tries to smear her rep.

Does anybody else realize how ironic it is that ESPN is reporting this? Where do thing the ESPN gets so much of their $$? Who do you think is pressuring the NCAA to pretend nothing is wrong?


Just WIN, baby.
College football is badly broken and has been for a long time.

----------------------
follow-on interview
http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=10671809
Cal_Fan2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
heartofthebear;842297586 said:

That woman has my utmost respect and I wonder how long it will take before someone tries to smear her rep.

Does anybody else realize how ironic it is that ESPN is reporting this? Where do thing the ESPN gets so much of their $$? Who do you think is pressuring the NCAA to pretend nothing is wrong?


UNC already suspended her right to research months ago with some bogus claims of students' names remaining secret and said her research was suspect...
http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=9396667

UNC tried to smear her but now they are in hot water for doing that to a whistleblower....

Quote:

GAP's letter, authored by President Louis Clark, details how actions by school officials subsequent to the CNN piece are "disgraceful, morally wrong and legally questionable." The letter identifies three instances where school officials may have harassed or intimidated Willingham, a potential violation of the school's anti-retaliation policy and the North Carolina state employee whistleblower protection law. Specifically, Clark's letter takes issue with: an erroneous press release that the school distributed the day after the CNN piece, a UNC-CH faculty meeting where Folt and Vice Chancellor & Provost Jim Dean made a presentation to staff chastising Willingham's data (while simultaneously ordering an independent investigation), and Dean's subsequent claims to the media that Willingham was lying.

http://www.whistleblower.org/blog/48-2014/3266-unc-challenged-by-gap-on-whistleblower-treatment-daily-whistleblower-news
heartofthebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal_Fan2;842297595 said:

UNC already suspended her right to research months ago with some bogus claims of students' names remaining secret and said her research was suspect...
http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/local&id=9396667

UNC tried to smear her but now they are in hot water for doing that to a whistleblower....


http://www.whistleblower.org/blog/48-2014/3266-unc-challenged-by-gap-on-whistleblower-treatment-daily-whistleblower-news


Thanks for clueing me in, CF2. But IMO that water isn't nearly hot enough. After all her story is entirely corroberated by one of UNC most noteworthy players in the piece. By the way, I did not know this was a CNN story. How come it is on ESPN?
heartofthebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
For those that qouted me, I corrected some typos so my OP makes sense. Sorry about that.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.