Official random daydrinking bowl + beat Air Force game thread

33,806 Views | 578 Replies | Last: 10 yr ago by OneKeg
TandemBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Welcome to OUR world, Air Force!!!
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm not a fan of the application of this penalty.
kaplanfx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp;842622831 said:

I'm not a fan of the application of this penalty.


Agreed, that probably deserves 15 yards to discourage it, but an ejection???
bencgilmore
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal Bears Great;842622825 said:

Whole team looked superior on that Watson run, I think it's going to be a question of whether our D can adapt


Usually takes a few drives vs option, but they looked ok on drive one.
TandemBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you're serious about reducing head injury, you GOTTA enforce this rule. Totally justified. Change your tackling and you won't be called for it.
beelzebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SadbutTrue999;842622827 said:

Captain Steelhamer.. good name for military.

Looks borderline but dont' see how you can overturn the targeting.


Or it's a name that garners fragging.
NWBear90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp;842622831 said:

I'm not a fan of the application of this penalty.


15 yards yes, ejection no. Feel bad for the kid. And odd being on the other end of this for once.
TandemBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nice!
TandemBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NWBear90;842622836 said:

15 yards yes, ejection no. Feel bad for the kid. And odd being on the other end of this for once.


For anyone at Air Force whining about the ejection, please show them the Skov video. We had one owed to us big time. Sure, I realize it has NO relation to this game. But if the rule states ejection is a possible punishment for the violation, don't commit the penalty!
bearsandgiants
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SadbutTrue999;842622827 said:

Captain Steelhamer.. good name for military.

Looks borderline but dont' see how you can overturn the targeting.


Thank you for your service!
blungld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TandemBear;842622834 said:

If you're serious about reducing head injury, you GOTTA enforce this rule. Totally justified. Change your tackling and you won't be called for it.


By rule that was absolutely correct call, but does suck for AF and that kid.
kaplanfx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The o-line is looking good, not sure if that's because AF D line is pretty weak?

Also I like the playcalling with Enwere and the big guys on short yardage and not forcing the passing game.
Bear Ass
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TandemBear;842622834 said:

If you're serious about reducing head injury, you GOTTA enforce this rule. Totally justified. Change your tackling and you won't be called for it.


Disagree. There are too many variables that can lead to helmet to helmet contact. See the TEXAS game for us...that kid did not deserve to be ejected.

Ejection is fine if it's a truly dangerous play...but this play did not deserve ejection.
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We only completed a few passes on that drive, hm.
Troll On You Bears
How long do you want to ignore this user?
blungld;842622841 said:

By rule that was absolutely correct call, but does suck for AF and that kid.


Yeah, he took like three or four steps towards Treggs after the ball had already deflected, I think that was enough room for him to change trajectory but he didn't. Good call in my book even though it sucks for him.
Bear Ass
How long do you want to ignore this user?
blungld;842622841 said:

By rule that was absolutely correct call, but does suck for AF and that kid.


"By Rule" - one of my biggest pet peeves. By definition every call should be "by rule." If it's not "by rule" then that implies that the refs are just making it up as they go. Of course it's by rule, everything is by rule!

"By Rule" = Refs love to say it because they get to blame someone else for their call.
blungld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bear Ass;842622843 said:

Disagree. There are too many variables that can lead to helmet to helmet contact. See the TEXAS game for us...that kid did not deserve to be ejected.

Ejection is fine if it's a truly dangerous play...but this play did not deserve ejection.


He absolutely could have pulled out of that hit. He wanted to send a message early, and THAT is why the rule is in place. Being tough guy on WR head when defenseless. The correct call. Ejection harsh, but he completely knew the rule and brought it on himself.
beelzebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
3 minutes later...TOUCHDOWN BEARS!
Bear Ass
How long do you want to ignore this user?
By the way...re: "Timothy McVeigh" and "Timothy McVey"

There is another very important military person with that name...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McVeigh_v._Cohen
kaplanfx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
beelzebear;842622848 said:

3 minutes later...TOUCHDOWN BEARS!


Nobody cares about this, it's Bearinsider, we'd rather argue about calls (even those in our favor).
bencgilmore
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hope they throw it some more after that one lol
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Their QB's passes have no zip, our DBs won't have too much work.
kaplanfx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SadbutTrue999;842622852 said:

hope they throw it some more after that one lol


Your wish was granted.
TandemBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bear Ass;842622843 said:

Disagree. There are too many variables that can lead to helmet to helmet contact. See the TEXAS game for us...that kid did not deserve to be ejected.

Ejection is fine if it's a truly dangerous play...but this play did not deserve ejection.


Nope, the safety tackled high and made helmet-to-helmet contact. Had he hit low and tackled with his shoulders, no penalty. If the receiver had dropped his head at the last second, then I don't think ejection was justified. But the way it happened, the safety made the type of hit and tackle the NCAA is discouraging.
blungld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
kaplanfx;842622851 said:

Nobody cares about this, it's Bearinsider, we'd rather argue about calls (even those in our favor).


Now THAT is funny!
TandemBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good stop!
NYCGOBEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
blungld;842622857 said:

Now THAT is funny!


+1
TandemBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Break off another big run, Bears! That'll leave 'em with their heads spinning!
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Goff overthrowing open guys again...
TandemBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dang, another overthrow - on an open receiver for a sure TD. Dang.
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
At least he is a sure thing mid-range.
TandemBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Absolute BULLET that was CAUGHT!!! Sweet!
bar20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NYCGOBEARS;842622790 said:

Dr Browns Black Cherry Soda.


Have you tried Henry Weinhard's Black Cherry Cream? I think it's better tasting than Dr. Browns. It's also bottled in Colfax, CA
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bleh!
TandemBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Noooooooooooo!
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.