bearister;842735724 said:
Oskie, Dumpster Muffin or the former Dean of Boalt Hall? That's all I got.
im 83. graduated in 55. waiting for turnaround. buh and sandy responsible for our problems.
bearister;842735724 said:
Oskie, Dumpster Muffin or the former Dean of Boalt Hall? That's all I got.
MinotStateBeav;842735592 said:
Seriously, we haven't been to the Rose Bowl since 59...it's 2016. How do you guys manage to completely keep hope? That's nearly 55 years of bad football sprinkled with 5-6 good seasons? I love my dad (RIP)...but f' me man....he couldn't of just decided i'm not putting my son through this. I mean I'm only 40...so it's not like I got the worst of it. How do you guys do it? I mean we should of accidentally had a good Rose Bowl season by now...Washington F'ing State has been to the Rose man. Aren't sanctions worth it at this point for 1 year of joy? I'm ready for a coaching staff of Tosh Lupoi, Coach Ogeron, Les Miles for More Money and Pete Carroll.
okaydo;842735607 said:
I keep reminiscing about our last Rose Bowl victory, which I vividly remember attending in 1938.
LethalFang;842735740 said:
Our problem is that we feel obliged to stick with a failing coach to the bitter end, when we're absolutely the worst team in the conference with a totally dried up recruiting pipeline, and then we go out to search for a new coach. That adds 4-5 years to anyone's rebuilding effort.
tommie317;842735766 said:
I don't want my offspring to endure the same torture when they grow up so I watch the games by myself
59bear;842735771 said:
Never mix hope and expectation. Hope is the lottery; expectation is reality. It may be easier for me since I'm not a donor or ticket buyer and have only been to a handful of games since leaving school so I kind of detached decades ago although I still follow the team closely. I can celebrate successes but rarely agonize over disappointments although once in a while a particularly egregious collapse (see AZ 2 years ago) can still bring some heartburn. I think the fact that the participants, coaches and players have become largely mercenaries, with only a few having a real attachment to Cal, has made it a bit easier to let go emotionally.
burritos;842735827 said:
burritos;842735827 said:
365Bear;842735603 said:
Believe me, it hasn't been easy, and the temptation to bail has arisen more than once. But my early college days were about fall colors and glorious wins at Memorial captained by Joe Roth with a great team and coach behind him. This had been burned into my genetic code to a degree that just walking from my car through the falling leaves and past my fraternity brings those extraordinary feelings back. Almost overwhelming sometimes. Then the occasional, truly uplifting win comes (Cal 42, UCLA 13) but more often the loss, and I console myself at the faculty club and Top Dog and, godammit, I get sucked in for the next game, the next season, the next decade of waiting...
mbBear;842735879 said:
I think for those of us who experienced Joe, its a great motivation, helps us to keep going. The Citrus Bowl win over Clemson helps too. There has been greatness, just not Rose Bowls.
goldenokiebear;842735891 said:
How do you older Bears do it?
Lowered expectations, patience, alcohol, substances, enhanced ability to not take it so seriously, resignation, perspective...
BeachedBear;842735900 said:
This! I will admit however, that the forces of TV (weeknight games, long commercial breaks, easy out NOT to attend in person) - are mitigating my primary reason for season tickets; Tailgating with friends.
Also, none of my progeny were able to attend Cal, so maybe there is hope for the future.
:gobears:
510Bear;842735637 said:
It's not just about the results, but how you go about pursuing them. No matter how many 4th-quarter leads our FB team coughs up, Cal is still an awesome place with an amazing culture and amazing people. We're smart, but not pretentious. We're the people's university. We believe in making the world a better place. And we do it with our own unique flair.
Our football team reflects that, and attracts student-athletes and even coaches (yes, that means Dykes) who buy into that. Our administrators and faculty are the Achilles' heel, the group who get in the way of our revenue sports delivering the results a great university like Cal should have, but at the same time, the latter group also add to what makes our university special, so....we just need to go to group therapy and sort out our issues somehow.
philly1121;842735983 said:
1. Go for it like other schools have and hire a big name coach to recruit and fill the stadium and try to compete for P12 North title, possible P12 Championship, upper tier bowl game or Rose Bowl and top 10 ranking...or;
2. Do as much we can to go 8-5, 7-6 each year with some 9-4 years every so often, beat SC, UCLA or Stanfurd every 4-7 years and be content with it.
philly1121;842735983 said:
So I don't want to flame this post but - I think that this mentality is part of the problem. We (and by WE I mean many posters on this board) believe that we are somehow special because of our academic standing. And while I do think that since we are a university and academics is the most important thing, its also the single greatest argument that holds us back.
We need to revise our thought processes regarding hiring a coach who can recruit and make us competitive again. I guess Admin has two choices:
1. Go for it like other schools have and hire a big name coach to recruit and fill the stadium and try to compete for P12 North title, possible P12 Championship, upper tier bowl game or Rose Bowl and top 10 ranking...or;
2. Do as much we can to go 8-5, 7-6 each year with some 9-4 years every so often, beat SC, UCLA or Stanfurd every 4-7 years and be content with it.
I don't know. I think that our belief that Cal is somehow above the fray is what holds us back. We cry and howl over programs that hire people that we deem have questionable ethics or we just don't like and so forth. But at the end of the day - they are winning. We're not.
Strykur;842736002 said:
A "big name" coach means big money. Unless we pick up a coach like that on the cheap under unique circumstances (like Les Miles now or Bobby Petrino a few years back), we are not in the picture for a Tom Herman unless we have a $3-4 million floor currently, which is where Oregon and UCLA are around. We hire cheap and hope the coach can succeed to earn the big-time money (like Shaw at Furd), because unless Ron Rivera decides to come knocking we are not putting out $4-5 million.
philly1121;842736028 said:
True. I agree with that. I guess that's why I always bring Jim Tressel's name up. No way we can afford Les Miles or a Bobby Petrino. Not sure we could afford Tressel either.
Strykur;842736037 said:
Tressel insists he is done with coaching, don't know why he would leave a job he can have forever for a coaching gig in Berkeley.
Strykur;842736037 said:
Tressel insists he is done with coaching, don't know why he would leave a job he can have forever for a coaching gig in Berkeley.
oski003;842736025 said:
I believe we are building towards #2 but have been hindered because of a house-cleaning resulting from poor APR and attitudes. I do think we should throw big money at a DC this offseason. We need a DC with the credibility to bring us some recruits. We have poor depth and overall talent on D.
LethalFang;842736119 said:
What kind of DC wants to work for a head coach who's on the hot seat himself? 90 snaps/game won't help his defensive stats either (which makes it a bad springboard for his next job).
LethalFang;842735740 said:
Our problem is that we feel obliged to stick with a failing coach to the bitter end, when we're absolutely the worst team in the conference with a totally dried up recruiting pipeline, and then we go out to search for a new coach. That adds 4-5 years to anyone's rebuilding effort.
DrDanger;842736319 said:
What "big time" coach do you really think Cal could lure here under those conditions?
None.