OT: New WSJ/Times Higher Education Rankings

6,791 Views | 43 Replies | Last: 9 yr ago by OdontoBear66
socaliganbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
juarezbear;842736749 said:

If they're from Back East, that makes sense as the cost is roughly the same. I guess I have an over-inflated impression of my alma mater.


I picked Cal over Brown in part because College Hill seemed way too boring and waspy. Fit matters I suppose.
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
burritos;842736721 said:

Yeah but how does another physics nobel prize winner on staff help the regular student? Being from Ventura County, two local Valedictorians in our area went to Georgetown fast track pre med over going to Cal. These aren't kids of wealthy parents either. I also encountered a local kid who went the Cal Lutheran(?!?!?) with a partial soccer schollie over Cal. Yes a lot of the kids in this area are still picking Cal/Ucla(often times kids of Asian descent) but the millennials just aren't as enamored with Cal as we are.


Just FYI: The freshmen who started at UC Berkeley in fall 2000 represent the first class of millennial students, so this fall we are in the 17th millennial freshmen class.

And I'm pretty sure it's safe to say that it's been harder to get into UC Berkeley since this century began than it was in the '90s, when it was already pretty rigorous.
OdontoBear66
How long do you want to ignore this user?
juarezbear;842736740 said:

Who in their right mind would pick Georgetown over Cal? That's nutty. Furd is really gaining ground on Harvard. I remember one of these charts in the NY Times about 5 years ago and it ws 80% Harvard/20% Furd.


I am there right now Juarez. Rightfully, or wrongfully, a lot of people would pick G'town over Cal. Having been a Cal grad and UCSF grad, I could easily make the case for G'town. The campus, its location in DC, it's access to speakers all powerful, the talent drawn upon for education, not to mention the village of Gtown and its charm, the difficulty of admissions, the diversity, the give back of the alums in support, and a measured fun/control environment (party but don't mess the neighborhood), sports league in which they participate (the Big East) with all schools of generally similar academic focus---no ASUs, UofAs, WSUs, OSUs, UofOs in their league---making the playing field level.

The climate in G'town and DC easily rivals Berkeley unless you enjoy life to the extremes. Concepts and thoughts are challenged and for a non Catholic religion is minor (as in two general religion classes as a freshman). I suggest you might research better what you don't know.
GB54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
burritos;842736731 said:

Maybe that's because there is a rising population?


More that there are more kids going to college. In the old days being admitted was a matter of showing up
tommie317
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Luckily our football team lost because our football team with this defense ranking ahead of our academic ranking would be totally embarrassing *sarcasm*
philly1121
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OdontoBear66;842736778 said:

I am there right now Juarez. Rightfully, or wrongfully, a lot of people would pick G'town over Cal. Having been a Cal grad and UCSF grad, I could easily make the case for G'town. The campus, its location in DC, it's access to speakers all powerful, the talent drawn upon for education, not to mention the village of Gtown and its charm, the difficulty of admissions, the diversity, the give back of the alums in support, and a measured fun/control environment (party but don't mess the neighborhood), sports league in which they participate (the Big East) with all schools of generally similar academic focus---no ASUs, UofAs, WSUs, OSUs, UofOs in their league---making the playing field level.

The climate in G'town and DC easily rivals Berkeley unless you enjoy life to the extremes. Concepts and thoughts are challenged and for a non Catholic religion is minor (as in two general religion classes as a freshman). I suggest you might research better what you don't know.


I think I agree. I'd rather have my kids go to a smaller school - something a bit more intimate. Plus diversity is key for me. The school is becoming less and less diverse in terms of Latino and Afro-Am representation. Also I think the number of Nobel Laureates is overblown. It only matters to a degree if you're a pre-med, science or EECS major.
rahbears
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I haven't yet having fully studied the methodology, but any such list that excludes the U.S. Military, Naval, and Air Force Academies is questionable on its face. Perhaps the students at those institutions were too busy to provide information. Or perhaps the administrators at those academies did not fully participate -- but maybe that is to be expected when they too are busy, matriculating U.S. Presidents, military leaders of renown, and more CEOs than one can count. In the meantime, I will have satisfy myself with not-so-difficult objective comparisons, such as juxtaposing the "debt repayment rate" metric with the credit forever due the literally hundreds of Medal of Honor recipients from those academies. And, as just one example that we civilians can relate to, I bet Captain Sullenberger's passengers have no trouble at all measuring the "outcome" of the time he spent at the Air Force Academy (Class of '73).
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
See the Wisconsin vs. Michigan thread to see why this poll might have been rigged....
juarezbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OdontoBear66;842736778 said:

I am there right now Juarez. Rightfully, or wrongfully, a lot of people would pick G'town over Cal. Having been a Cal grad and UCSF grad, I could easily make the case for G'town. The campus, its location in DC, it's access to speakers all powerful, the talent drawn upon for education, not to mention the village of Gtown and its charm, the difficulty of admissions, the diversity, the give back of the alums in support, and a measured fun/control environment (party but don't mess the neighborhood), sports league in which they participate (the Big East) with all schools of generally similar academic focus---no ASUs, UofAs, WSUs, OSUs, UofOs in their league---making the playing field level.

The climate in G'town and DC easily rivals Berkeley unless you enjoy life to the extremes. Concepts and thoughts are challenged and for a non Catholic religion is minor (as in two general religion classes as a freshman). I suggest you might research better what you don't know.


Odonto - I probably reacted too harshly because I'm annoyed by all of these rankings that are obviously skewed totally against the public schools, and I absolutely acknowledge that Georgetown is a premier university. Sadly one ranking that never seems to hit the radar is how many undergrads continue on to get PhD degrees in areas that aren't necessarily financially based. The number one school would be Berkeley. That being said, I've actually researched Georgetown, have several friends who are alums, and spent a little time on the campus. As you mentioned, positives include access to the inside the beltway world, first class diplomacy school, smaller class size, decent diversity, quaint neighborhood, Catholic sports league with similar traits among the schools, no cut-throat competition among students. Basically, a safe, fun environment for the college experience. Absolutely nothing wrong with that. Now for the flip side of Cal vs G'Town...Aside from diplomacy/political areas of study, name ONE Georgetown department with a worldwide reputation. How's their engineering, life sciences, or hard sciences? What about English, Econ, Comp Lit, Computer Science, Architecture, Business, Natural Resources or Philosophy? If I wanted to be really nasty, I would call Georgetown something like Duke Lite. Largely preppy, private or parochial school grads who want to live in the city (as you said measured fun/controlled environment), but don't really want to go out on a limb and do something extraordinary. As for the Pac 12 versus the Catholic League (or whatever they now call the Big East), once again, you either want to play with the big boys or your don't. I was a golf recruit and wanted to play against the best in the country while getting the best possible education. That's what the Pac 12 can offer if you attend any of the California schools, Udub, or Colorado. When my high school friends from Dartmouth, Rice, Duke, and other smaller schools questioned me about class size at Cal, my response was the following: Berkeley isn't for everybody. Being an undergrad requires one to take initiative to get access to some of the brightest minds on the planet across every imaginable discipline. If you want to skate thru from the back of the room for four years, that's fine. I was a pesky student who sought out my profs and dug as deep as I could. The absence of coddling put a stick up my ass and taught me that if I wanted or needed something, I had to deal with it first-hand. I know the medical field is difficult and you're obviously a really bright guys if you graduated from UCSF. I made my way in an insanely competitive and cut-throat business (movie production) partly because at Berkeley, I learned I had to bring my A Game and not take no for an answer.
OdontoBear66
How long do you want to ignore this user?
juarezbear;842737197 said:

Odonto - I probably reacted too harshly because I'm annoyed by all of these rankings that are obviously skewed totally against the public schools, and I absolutely acknowledge that Georgetown is a premier university. Sadly one ranking that never seems to hit the radar is how many undergrads continue on to get PhD degrees in areas that aren't necessarily financially based. The number one school would be Berkeley. That being said, I've actually researched Georgetown, have several friends who are alums, and spent a little time on the campus. As you mentioned, positives include access to the inside the beltway world, first class diplomacy school, smaller class size, decent diversity, quaint neighborhood, Catholic sports league with similar traits among the schools, no cut-throat competition among students. Basically, a safe, fun environment for the college experience. Absolutely nothing wrong with that. Now for the flip side of Cal vs G'Town...Aside from diplomacy/political areas of study, name ONE Georgetown department with a worldwide reputation. How's their engineering, life sciences, or hard sciences? What about English, Econ, Comp Lit, Computer Science, Architecture, Business, Natural Resources or Philosophy? If I wanted to be really nasty, I would call Georgetown something like Duke Lite. Largely preppy, private or parochial school grads who want to live in the city (as you said measured fun/controlled environment), but don't really want to go out on a limb and do something extraordinary. As for the Pac 12 versus the Catholic League (or whatever they now call the Big East), once again, you either want to play with the big boys or your don't. I was a golf recruit and wanted to play against the best in the country while getting the best possible education. That's what the Pac 12 can offer if you attend any of the California schools, Udub, or Colorado. When my high school friends from Dartmouth, Rice, Duke, and other smaller schools questioned me about class size at Cal, my response was the following: Berkeley isn't for everybody. Being an undergrad requires one to take initiative to get access to some of the brightest minds on the planet across every imaginable discipline. If you want to skate thru from the back of the room for four years, that's fine. I was a pesky student who sought out my profs and dug as deep as I could. The absence of coddling put a stick up my ass and taught me that if I wanted or needed something, I had to deal with it first-hand. I know the medical field is difficult and you're obviously a really bright guys if you graduated from UCSF. I made my way in an insanely competitive and cut-throat business (movie production) partly because at Berkeley, I learned I had to bring my A Game and not take no for an answer.


This is one of those you pat my back, I will pat yours. I agree with everything you say, and the last half of your writing was exactly what was so capturing for me. Competing against the best and finding out whether you could or could not cut it. And I think you apologized in a way for the excessiveness of your earlier post: "Who in the world would pick G'twon over Cal?" So with that I think we have little disagreement. I, like you, go crazy with the rankings that give "weaker" Ivy equivalents a higher status than Cal due to alum giveback, small class size, etc. It is not right, just like Money magazine types will never have a #1 city in the USA in California as it is just too plain expensive. Some of those places this list are laughable compared to cities and towns in Calif.
So with that Cheers, and beat the Utes.
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.