Cal’s Meteoric Defensive Turnaround — In Stat Trends

Excellent article. Love the stat stuff. As a nit, you may want to correct this statement

Quote:

---

The pass defense received a lot of recognition last year deservedly so but rushing first downs allowed have dropped from 158 in 2016 to 2016 last year. That's salty.

---

2,016 rushing first downs by opponents would indeed be salty, but probably more in the "salt encrusted mummy" sort of way.

Wonderful article!

Scoring 30 out of 33 attempts is deceiving if the successful scores were field goals and not touchdowns. The breakdown of those two will tell us a lot more.

Imagine how we would be rated nationally for total scores allowed if some of those interceptions against Oregon, among others did not occur. Without blaming any particular player, the interceptions positively ruined our mid-season after going 3-0 in OOC.

And to think we might be even better in 2019! (knock on wood... and get some offense)

As much as I would like to think it was coaching that caused the change, I have to attribute some of it to the maturation of the players. S&C makes a big contribution, as they say the speed of the game slows down, you're smarter as a defensive player and you know where your teammate is going to be at any given moment. Then, there is also smart coaching, accurate placement of the players, assignments, and play calling. So it's not just one thing, but being a senior out there is one helluva lot different than being a frosh. As an example, Phil Steele often rates teams higher in his magazine based on the number of returning upperclassmen.

Bear8 said:

---

As much as I would like to think it was coaching that caused the change, I have to attribute some of it to the maturation of the players. S&C makes a big contribution, as they say the speed of the game slows down, you're smarter as a defensive player and you know where your teammate is going to be at any given moment. Then, there is also smart coaching, accurate placement of the players, assignments, and play calling. So it's not just one thing, but being a senior out there is one helluva lot different than being a frosh. As an example, Phil Steele often rates teams higher in his magazine based on the number of returning upperclassmen.

---

Yes - but credit must be given to the coaches to be able to retain those players, something the offensive side of the ball hasn't been able to do.

Bear8 said:

---

As much as I would like to think it was coaching that caused the change, I have to attribute some of it to the maturation of the players. S&C makes a big contribution, as they say the speed of the game slows down, you're smarter as a defensive player and you know where your teammate is going to be at any given moment. Then, there is also smart coaching, accurate placement of the players, assignments, and play calling. So it's not just one thing, but being a senior out there is one helluva lot different than being a frosh. As an example, Phil Steele often rates teams higher in his magazine based on the number of returning upperclassmen.

---

I agree that the maturation / S&C helps a ton, but even Davis is saying it was the coaching - doubt it's all lip service:

"The change in the coaching staff is something that was tremendous in terms of getting this program going in the right direction," Davis said. "My position coach (Gerald Alexander), especially."

The defensive players know they are now in a program where "D" is no longer left on the back burner. It's certainly no coincidence that pretty much all of the defensive players came back (exceptions: Rambo and Psalms), whereas 4-5 years ago, many would probably have transferred, grad transferred or tried the NFL.

The offensive players, OTOH...

On balance, we are in a better place than before, without question.

How does it compare to our meteoric fall in offense?

ClevelandBear said:

---

How does it compare to our meteoric fall in offense?

---

Great question......

ClevelandBear said:

---

How does it compare to our meteoric fall in offense?

---

I never particularly cared for Dykes' offense. For all the hype, I expected more points, and his team was on the field mostly for very short stretches, either a quick score or a a quick 3 and out, so the defense rarely had time to rest between possessions. Not a winning strategy, IMO. A few long sustained drives are better. Tire out the defense, and give your defense time to rest when we have the ball. I think we are on the right track with Wilcox. I would like him to start landing better offensive recruits, especially in the O line.