What if.......

2,375 Views | 12 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by dimitrig
Trumpanzee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
First I want to apologize to Cal Nation, Coaches and players for the disparaging comments I let loose after Sunday's game. True fans stick through good times and bad times. I didn't want to use excuses for this weekend, but it's obvious you need to practice in order to perform at a high level. Berkeley Health District put unnecessary restrictions that hampered our play against UCLA. But back to my question, What if we were able to play the Huskies 2 weeks ago, how do you think we would performed? I'm optimistic that Wilcox will turn this ship around! Not ready to bag this season even though it will be a short one....

Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Probably not great (certainly better than this past Sunday anyway), but Washington didn't look too sharp this past weekend against Oregon State, so would have been pretty even perhaps.
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Saw them during the Holmoecaust.
Bring back It’s It’s to Haas Pavillion!
KoreAmBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Of course that wasn't indicative of a Wilcox team, especially on D. But I was a little disturbed by Musgrave's offense. I hope his style works, or at least he adjusts to what is not working. I did not like @killa22's initial read on this topic.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
killa22
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KoreAmBear said:

Of course that wasn't indicative of a Wilcox team, especially on D. But I was a little disturbed by Musgrave's offense. I hope his style works, or at least he adjusts to what is not working. I did not like @killa22's initial read on this topic.
Yeah sorry, I'm a little bearish on this whole pro-style offense thing.

Musgraves has a tremendous resume, and I have no doubt he knows what he's doing, within his system. But honestly, when he started talking about his roots as being Erhardt-Perkins thats when my skepticism radar started pinging hard.

That's kind of like stating you are "Proficient in Windows 95" on your resume.

If i recall correctly, you're from Hawaii right? You probably saw the abortion that was Norm Chow's legendary west coast offense play out live, right? This has kind of has all the makings of something similar, but to be fair, if Musgraves is Windows 95, Norm Chow is still running MS-DOS.

My hope is that Musgraves can quickly adapt to what he saw, cut the crap from the playbook and just focus on the good. There's film there of what we can do well, and what we should avoid with a 10 foot barge pole.

This all underscores the bigger point -- since when has anyone going "Pro-Style" in the modern era worked out?

Remember Mack Brown's Texas Pro-Style experiment? How'd that work out for Garrett Gilbert? That guy was a force @ SMU in a Air Raid / Run and Shoot Hybrid more in line w/ what he did @ Lake Travis -- keeping with your Hawaii paradigm here, June Jones had to rehab that guy. Look where he's at now -- likely starter for the Cowboys lol.

Well back to Mack Brown -- when he decided to come out of retirement, do you think he dialed up some Pro Style Guru? Nope, he went straight to Longo and went all in on Air Raid. North Carolina is more relevant now than they have ever been in the past.

Harbaughs Furd crap wasn't working at Michigan so he went the Penn State route -- but Moorehead was probably the true mind behind that deal anyway, and now Oregon upgraded with that guy (he's definitely better served as an OC than a HC -- and Stark Vegas is kind of a bizarre place anyway. Jury's out on whether Leach can fix that mess -- history says he will, but he should've gotten a better QB than Costello - that guy is brutally turnover prone.

Ask Gene Chizik how going Pro-Style worked out for Auburn. They almost dropped an opener to Utah State lol -- Chuckie Keeton was the man, btw. Oh Gary Anderson shoutout too.

Who else tried this pro-style move? Not completely sure, but yeah it probably didn't work out.

I know you guys weren't fans of Sonny, but he did some stuff that was actually cool and make you look @ it and be like wow, I really want to steal that and use it in my offense. He still does some cool stuff with budget Lincoln Riley as his OC.

Honestly, I cannot say I would borrow anything from that UCLA game. Kill it. Kill it with fire.

Right now, in the Pac 12, Oregon and Wazzu do the coolest ***** USC is like milque-toast Air-Raid. Were it not for Pittman and the rest of their elite receivers, we would've murdered them again likely. Drop 8 that to death a la Jimmy Lake and the rest of the current SEC minus LSU (Bcuz Bo Pelini is a lunatic, but still is the best Nebraska Coach of the last 15 years, if that's crazy enough).

Honestly, if you're a student of the game as a coach you kind of have to be a history fan. There's a ton of cool film to look @ & borrow from. Guys all over the place are creative. Random quote -- Mark Twain once said History never repeats itself, but it rhymes.

Well the whole let's be physical and run a pro-style offense approach -- we've seen that play out before. I know what that song sounds like, and it kind of sucks.

I'm sure we can check in with Arizona State in a little bit and see how that works out for them as well, but at least Zak Hill did some cool stuff @ Eastern Washington (he really was the guy we shouldve gone after, not Baldwin, if we wanted Eastern Washington offense), and then Boise (which as I said earlier, is really the only program that has ever pulled that multiple crap off well).

Coastal Carolina does some real cool **** from the pistol using flexbone like principles. That looks like a real ***** to stop.

Run and Shoot up at Wazzu? Screw that as a defensive coach. Ask anyone in the NFL how much fun it was to defend. Belicheck still has nightmares about the Run and Shoot. ****'s unstoppable if its clicking -- which makes sense since its a we keep the chalk last type offense. This gets especially more relevant if they get the dudes to make that thing really hum. Those guys turned a 2 Star white dude with dreads into one of the scariest players @ QB the last two years (scary to both themselves and their opponents) he was Jameis Winston like with his ability to throw TDs and INTs. If I recall correctly, Rolovich had Hawaii with a 5k Passer, a 1K rusher, and 3 1K receivers at one point. Then almost did the same last year, but played two guys @ Q. Those guys will put up numbers, it's just a matter of time.

Oregon does some nasty stuff too. They didn't go complete cold turkey from last year, but its a pistol based spread offense built around solidly paired run schemes, play action, screens, and QB Run / RPO.

UCLA (but Chip is tame compared to what he was @ Oregon) -- option based run game, air raid based pass concepts -- Chip runs Y cross more than the Air Raid guys do, but the pro-style game rubbed off on him in the wrong way TBH. He finally got away from using TE's with DTR and now that guys just going off of dudes.

UW? They're going to be below average on offense. That guy sucked at Vanderbilt, and sucked at Penn State too. Probably gonna suck at UW. Im calling it.

Arizona? -- Mazzone runs decent stuff, like he's not the greatest, but he's not bad either. I would borrow stuff from that guy.

Stanfurd? -- screw those guys. The fact that people here want to emulate them has gotta be the weakest thing I've ever seen.

Oregon State? That guy is like Zak Hill, another Boise type offense guy, but with less talent. Still, they can put up points, which is a problem for us next week, because we cannot put up points. They don't have a good receiver anymore, just the midget guy who i like, and the TE who is our OC's nephew who is decent. RB is legit, but Smith knows how to use his dudes, that's the scary part. The QB isn't great, but he played decent.

Utah? Andy Ludwig is probably overpaid, they are probably going to be average on offense. But they will be sound, and they will have enough QB run option elements to give guys problems. Good thing Moss is gone, that guy was legit.

That about covers it for the PAC 12. But yeah, I'm not too excited about our prospects. But I like it that way, because if they do pull it off, I'll be surprised and not disappointed.


LateHit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
killa22, you win the relevant name-drop award.
Gene Chizik, Ray Perkins and Utah State!
Air-raid prose energy, too.
75bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I thought you were going to try and make us feel better!
KoreAmBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's kind of like stating you are "Proficient in Windows 95" on your resume.

killa22
How long do you want to ignore this user?
75bear said:

I thought you were going to try and make us feel better!
I've been Cal fan long enough to know the soul crushing pain caused by hope and pre-season expectations. I enjoy watching football, and our team in particular. The potential in the program is there. The formula just has never been correctly balanced.

What Wilcox does on defense is schematic poetry -- that one call where I believe it was Scott from depth picking up DTR on the Q keep from Zone read, that was some brilliant stuff. Our Safety whiffed, but damn that was a beautiful call. Wilcox knows how to attack guys with his defense, he just didn't have enough time to really get in a full game plan.

What happens on offense, is simply hard to watch...

Kelly on the other hand, was able to do what he does on offense with tempo and a dual threat QB and put stress on our defense.

From what it sounded like, the gameplan from ASU to UCLA didn't exactly translate well. But what good is your offensive scheme if you cannot show up and do anything without a weeks worth of preparation? particularly during a pandemic?

Seems like a bad choice from a system standpoint to go all in on something that you know is gonna take more time to properly implement, and then you need to do it all again when your talent either gets hurt or matriculates through the program. It's like showing up to a drag race with an unfinished car --- just wait till I put together my boosted build!!!! meanwhile some dude with a 250 shot of Nos just smokes you.

Success @ the CFB level is all about simplicity and scalability. I don't see how hard it would be to implement an reasonably effective offense -- we do not lack for talent at either QB, Skill, or OL.

If you want perennial success you need a system that is simple to implement and scale. Injuries happen, you need depth, that depth needs to be able to fill in without issue.

Focus on Intellectualism & understanding systems / organizations were my major takeaways from my Cal education (Shoutout Haas) -- most don't think about it, but Football Programs serve as an excellent corollary / example for the application of business management theory.

Guys tend to gravitate to what they are familiar with (from a coaching philosophy standpoint). Coaches love to talk trash about other styles and schemes -- it's what we do, but there is also a genuine interest in and appreciation for how different people do things. It's always interesting to see the difference in focus between defensive and offensive HC led programs.

back to the point of making you feel better -- what I will say is this. Things are never as bad as they are, nor are they as good as they are. Theres not enough of a sample size of data to judge these guys.

My whole shtick is that I've seen this play out before (the whole, lets run a pro-style offense agenda) -- and the result has typically sucked (history rhymes, yay!). So I'm not exactly holding my breath here.

The one upside that I can see is that Musgraves made stuff work with the Raiders -- but the NFL is a completely different game from college. That stuff doesn't translate backwards, it never has. Ask Lovie Smith how that's working out for him. Saban doesnt count, he went NFL, then sucked, then came back.

I'll go back to the June Jones analogy here for Koreambear -- he's literally the only dude who successfully transitioned from the NFL to College -- and he didn't do it with a Pro-Style offense, he did it with something that is incredibly unique, and also a system (the Run and Shoot). Proven to work in the NFL (in a pure form, suck it Kingsbury -- you had to adapt your air raid to the point its not an air raid -- June Jones went to the playoffs running four wides in Atlanta of all places lol), and also proven to work in College (dude took Hawaii to a fricken BCS Bowl, yes, they got annihilated by Georgia, but seriously, who didn't that year? Stafford, Knowshon Moreno, Geno Atkins, a bunch of other dudes against a Hawaii team, lol? Although those dudes with dreads were pretty good, I forget their names, Koreambear probably remembers).

I'm ultra curious to see how Rolovich pans out -- I think he keeps Wazzu relevant, and makes Jimmy Lake feel the heat in the apple cup -- theyre not gonna just roll over and die when you drop 8 like Leach did. They had a chance against Oregon -- and that's with putting in a new system in one year.

That's the maddening part, I suppose -- mountain west staff comes in, installs a system and runs it better than this vaunted NFL coordinator.
MrGPAC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
killa22 said:

75bear said:

I thought you were going to try and make us feel better!
I've been Cal fan long enough to know the soul crushing pain caused by hope and pre-season expectations. I enjoy watching football, and our team in particular. The potential in the program is there. The formula just has never been correctly balanced.

What Wilcox does on defense is schematic poetry -- that one call where I believe it was Scott from depth picking up DTR on the Q keep from Zone read, that was some brilliant stuff. Our Safety whiffed, but damn that was a beautiful call. Wilcox knows how to attack guys with his defense, he just didn't have enough time to really get in a full game plan.

What happens on offense, is simply hard to watch...

Kelly on the other hand, was able to do what he does on offense with tempo and a dual threat QB and put stress on our defense.

From what it sounded like, the gameplan from ASU to UCLA didn't exactly translate well. But what good is your offensive scheme if you cannot show up and do anything without a weeks worth of preparation? particularly during a pandemic?

Seems like a bad choice from a system standpoint to go all in on something that you know is gonna take more time to properly implement, and then you need to do it all again when your talent either gets hurt or matriculates through the program. It's like showing up to a drag race with an unfinished car --- just wait till I put together my boosted build!!!! meanwhile some dude with a 250 shot of Nos just smokes you.

Success @ the CFB level is all about simplicity and scalability. I don't see how hard it would be to implement an reasonably effective offense -- we do not lack for talent at either QB, Skill, or OL.

If you want perennial success you need a system that is simple to implement and scale. Injuries happen, you need depth, that depth needs to be able to fill in without issue.

Focus on Intellectualism & understanding systems / organizations were my major takeaways from my Cal education (Shoutout Haas) -- most don't think about it, but Football Programs serve as an excellent corollary / example for the application of business management theory.

Guys tend to gravitate to what they are familiar with (from a coaching philosophy standpoint). Coaches love to talk trash about other styles and schemes -- it's what we do, but there is also a genuine interest in and appreciation for how different people do things. It's always interesting to see the difference in focus between defensive and offensive HC led programs.

back to the point of making you feel better -- what I will say is this. Things are never as bad as they are, nor are they as good as they are. Theres not enough of a sample size of data to judge these guys.

My whole shtick is that I've seen this play out before (the whole, lets run a pro-style offense agenda) -- and the result has typically sucked (history rhymes, yay!). So I'm not exactly holding my breath here.

The one upside that I can see is that Musgraves made stuff work with the Raiders -- but the NFL is a completely different game from college. That stuff doesn't translate backwards, it never has. Ask Lovie Smith how that's working out for him. Saban doesnt count, he went NFL, then sucked, then came back.

I'll go back to the June Jones analogy here for Koreambear -- he's literally the only dude who successfully transitioned from the NFL to College -- and he didn't do it with a Pro-Style offense, he did it with something that is incredibly unique, and also a system (the Run and Shoot). Proven to work in the NFL (in a pure form, suck it Kingsbury -- you had to adapt your air raid to the point its not an air raid -- June Jones went to the playoffs running four wides in Atlanta of all places lol), and also proven to work in College (dude took Hawaii to a fricken BCS Bowl, yes, they got annihilated by Georgia, but seriously, who didn't that year? Stafford, Knowshon Moreno, Geno Atkins, a bunch of other dudes against a Hawaii team, lol? Although those dudes with dreads were pretty good, I forget their names, Koreambear probably remembers).

I'm ultra curious to see how Rolovich pans out -- I think he keeps Wazzu relevant, and makes Jimmy Lake feel the heat in the apple cup -- theyre not gonna just roll over and die when you drop 8 like Leach did. They had a chance against Oregon -- and that's with putting in a new system in one year.

That's the maddening part, I suppose -- mountain west staff comes in, installs a system and runs it better than this vaunted NFL coordinator.


I may have blocked some of the game out of my head...but I saw a lot of empty backfield, and not a lot of tight ends. I saw a QB running for his life a lot..almost as if the OL hasn't had a DL to practice against in 2 weeks.

While I was watching I would squint and it almost looked like Baldwin's offense out there. I didn't see an identity at all, which is what I wanted more than anything. Plays that build on each other and misdirection to keep the defense on their toes and off balance.

To my completely untrained eye, it almost looked like Musgrave was calling plays out of Baldwins book because he felt the team was more comfortable with it and didn't have enough time to practice/gel with the new scheme. Also...was there anything thrown over the middle all game?

Were my eyes (or memory) deceiving me here?
Trumpanzee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
killa22 said:

KoreAmBear said:

Of course that wasn't indicative of a Wilcox team, especially on D. But I was a little disturbed by Musgrave's offense. I hope his style works, or at least he adjusts to what is not working. I did not like @killa22's initial read on this topic.
Yeah sorry, I'm a little bearish on this whole pro-style offense thing.

Musgraves has a tremendous resume, and I have no doubt he knows what he's doing, within his system. But honestly, when he started talking about his roots as being Erhardt-Perkins thats when my skepticism radar started pinging hard.

That's kind of like stating you are "Proficient in Windows 95" on your resume.

If i recall correctly, you're from Hawaii right? You probably saw the abortion that was Norm Chow's legendary west coast offense play out live, right? This has kind of has all the makings of something similar, but to be fair, if Musgraves is Windows 95, Norm Chow is still running MS-DOS.

My hope is that Musgraves can quickly adapt to what he saw, cut the crap from the playbook and just focus on the good. There's film there of what we can do well, and what we should avoid with a 10 foot barge pole.

This all underscores the bigger point -- since when has anyone going "Pro-Style" in the modern era worked out?

Remember Mack Brown's Texas Pro-Style experiment? How'd that work out for Garrett Gilbert? That guy was a force @ SMU in a Air Raid / Run and Shoot Hybrid more in line w/ what he did @ Lake Travis -- keeping with your Hawaii paradigm here, June Jones had to rehab that guy. Look where he's at now -- likely starter for the Cowboys lol.

Well back to Mack Brown -- when he decided to come out of retirement, do you think he dialed up some Pro Style Guru? Nope, he went straight to Longo and went all in on Air Raid. North Carolina is more relevant now than they have ever been in the past.

Harbaughs Furd crap wasn't working at Michigan so he went the Penn State route -- but Moorehead was probably the true mind behind that deal anyway, and now Oregon upgraded with that guy (he's definitely better served as an OC than a HC -- and Stark Vegas is kind of a bizarre place anyway. Jury's out on whether Leach can fix that mess -- history says he will, but he should've gotten a better QB than Costello - that guy is brutally turnover prone.

Ask Gene Chizik how going Pro-Style worked out for Auburn. They almost dropped an opener to Utah State lol -- Chuckie Keeton was the man, btw. Oh Gary Anderson shoutout too.

Who else tried this pro-style move? Not completely sure, but yeah it probably didn't work out.

I know you guys weren't fans of Sonny, but he did some stuff that was actually cool and make you look @ it and be like wow, I really want to steal that and use it in my offense. He still does some cool stuff with budget Lincoln Riley as his OC.

Honestly, I cannot say I would borrow anything from that UCLA game. Kill it. Kill it with fire.

Right now, in the Pac 12, Oregon and Wazzu do the coolest ***** USC is like milque-toast Air-Raid. Were it not for Pittman and the rest of their elite receivers, we would've murdered them again likely. Drop 8 that to death a la Jimmy Lake and the rest of the current SEC minus LSU (Bcuz Bo Pelini is a lunatic, but still is the best Nebraska Coach of the last 15 years, if that's crazy enough).

Honestly, if you're a student of the game as a coach you kind of have to be a history fan. There's a ton of cool film to look @ & borrow from. Guys all over the place are creative. Random quote -- Mark Twain once said History never repeats itself, but it rhymes.

Well the whole let's be physical and run a pro-style offense approach -- we've seen that play out before. I know what that song sounds like, and it kind of sucks.

I'm sure we can check in with Arizona State in a little bit and see how that works out for them as well, but at least Zak Hill did some cool stuff @ Eastern Washington (he really was the guy we shouldve gone after, not Baldwin, if we wanted Eastern Washington offense), and then Boise (which as I said earlier, is really the only program that has ever pulled that multiple crap off well).

Coastal Carolina does some real cool **** from the pistol using flexbone like principles. That looks like a real ***** to stop.

Run and Shoot up at Wazzu? Screw that as a defensive coach. Ask anyone in the NFL how much fun it was to defend. Belicheck still has nightmares about the Run and Shoot. ****'s unstoppable if its clicking -- which makes sense since its a we keep the chalk last type offense. This gets especially more relevant if they get the dudes to make that thing really hum. Those guys turned a 2 Star white dude with dreads into one of the scariest players @ QB the last two years (scary to both themselves and their opponents) he was Jameis Winston like with his ability to throw TDs and INTs. If I recall correctly, Rolovich had Hawaii with a 5k Passer, a 1K rusher, and 3 1K receivers at one point. Then almost did the same last year, but played two guys @ Q. Those guys will put up numbers, it's just a matter of time.

Oregon does some nasty stuff too. They didn't go complete cold turkey from last year, but its a pistol based spread offense built around solidly paired run schemes, play action, screens, and QB Run / RPO.

UCLA (but Chip is tame compared to what he was @ Oregon) -- option based run game, air raid based pass concepts -- Chip runs Y cross more than the Air Raid guys do, but the pro-style game rubbed off on him in the wrong way TBH. He finally got away from using TE's with DTR and now that guys just going off of dudes.

UW? They're going to be below average on offense. That guy sucked at Vanderbilt, and sucked at Penn State too. Probably gonna suck at UW. Im calling it.

Arizona? -- Mazzone runs decent stuff, like he's not the greatest, but he's not bad either. I would borrow stuff from that guy.

Stanfurd? -- screw those guys. The fact that people here want to emulate them has gotta be the weakest thing I've ever seen.

Oregon State? That guy is like Zak Hill, another Boise type offense guy, but with less talent. Still, they can put up points, which is a problem for us next week, because we cannot put up points. They don't have a good receiver anymore, just the midget guy who i like, and the TE who is our OC's nephew who is decent. RB is legit, but Smith knows how to use his dudes, that's the scary part. The QB isn't great, but he played decent.

Utah? Andy Ludwig is probably overpaid, they are probably going to be average on offense. But they will be sound, and they will have enough QB run option elements to give guys problems. Good thing Moss is gone, that guy was legit.

That about covers it for the PAC 12. But yeah, I'm not too excited about our prospects. But I like it that way, because if they do pull it off, I'll be surprised and not disappointed.

Damn bro! Nice mic drop!




Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MrGPAC said:

killa22 said:

75bear said:

I thought you were going to try and make us feel better!
I've been Cal fan long enough to know the soul crushing pain caused by hope and pre-season expectations. I enjoy watching football, and our team in particular. The potential in the program is there. The formula just has never been correctly balanced.

What Wilcox does on defense is schematic poetry -- that one call where I believe it was Scott from depth picking up DTR on the Q keep from Zone read, that was some brilliant stuff. Our Safety whiffed, but damn that was a beautiful call. Wilcox knows how to attack guys with his defense, he just didn't have enough time to really get in a full game plan.

What happens on offense, is simply hard to watch...

Kelly on the other hand, was able to do what he does on offense with tempo and a dual threat QB and put stress on our defense.

From what it sounded like, the gameplan from ASU to UCLA didn't exactly translate well. But what good is your offensive scheme if you cannot show up and do anything without a weeks worth of preparation? particularly during a pandemic?

Seems like a bad choice from a system standpoint to go all in on something that you know is gonna take more time to properly implement, and then you need to do it all again when your talent either gets hurt or matriculates through the program. It's like showing up to a drag race with an unfinished car --- just wait till I put together my boosted build!!!! meanwhile some dude with a 250 shot of Nos just smokes you.

Success @ the CFB level is all about simplicity and scalability. I don't see how hard it would be to implement an reasonably effective offense -- we do not lack for talent at either QB, Skill, or OL.

If you want perennial success you need a system that is simple to implement and scale. Injuries happen, you need depth, that depth needs to be able to fill in without issue.

Focus on Intellectualism & understanding systems / organizations were my major takeaways from my Cal education (Shoutout Haas) -- most don't think about it, but Football Programs serve as an excellent corollary / example for the application of business management theory.

Guys tend to gravitate to what they are familiar with (from a coaching philosophy standpoint). Coaches love to talk trash about other styles and schemes -- it's what we do, but there is also a genuine interest in and appreciation for how different people do things. It's always interesting to see the difference in focus between defensive and offensive HC led programs.

back to the point of making you feel better -- what I will say is this. Things are never as bad as they are, nor are they as good as they are. Theres not enough of a sample size of data to judge these guys.

My whole shtick is that I've seen this play out before (the whole, lets run a pro-style offense agenda) -- and the result has typically sucked (history rhymes, yay!). So I'm not exactly holding my breath here.

The one upside that I can see is that Musgraves made stuff work with the Raiders -- but the NFL is a completely different game from college. That stuff doesn't translate backwards, it never has. Ask Lovie Smith how that's working out for him. Saban doesnt count, he went NFL, then sucked, then came back.

I'll go back to the June Jones analogy here for Koreambear -- he's literally the only dude who successfully transitioned from the NFL to College -- and he didn't do it with a Pro-Style offense, he did it with something that is incredibly unique, and also a system (the Run and Shoot). Proven to work in the NFL (in a pure form, suck it Kingsbury -- you had to adapt your air raid to the point its not an air raid -- June Jones went to the playoffs running four wides in Atlanta of all places lol), and also proven to work in College (dude took Hawaii to a fricken BCS Bowl, yes, they got annihilated by Georgia, but seriously, who didn't that year? Stafford, Knowshon Moreno, Geno Atkins, a bunch of other dudes against a Hawaii team, lol? Although those dudes with dreads were pretty good, I forget their names, Koreambear probably remembers).

I'm ultra curious to see how Rolovich pans out -- I think he keeps Wazzu relevant, and makes Jimmy Lake feel the heat in the apple cup -- theyre not gonna just roll over and die when you drop 8 like Leach did. They had a chance against Oregon -- and that's with putting in a new system in one year.

That's the maddening part, I suppose -- mountain west staff comes in, installs a system and runs it better than this vaunted NFL coordinator.


I may have blocked some of the game out of my head...but I saw a lot of empty backfield, and not a lot of tight ends. I saw a QB running for his life a lot..almost as if the OL hasn't had a DL to practice against in 2 weeks.

While I was watching I would squint and it almost looked like Baldwin's offense out there. I didn't see an identity at all, which is what I wanted more than anything. Plays that build on each other and misdirection to keep the defense on their toes and off balance.

To my completely untrained eye, it almost looked like Musgrave was calling plays out of Baldwins book because he felt the team was more comfortable with it and didn't have enough time to practice/gel with the new scheme. Also...was there anything thrown over the middle all game?

Were my eyes (or memory) deceiving me here?

Are you sure you were "squinting" and not "wincing"? Or maybe a squint is the physical manifestation of a wince.
dimitrig
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MrGPAC said:

killa22 said:

75bear said:

I thought you were going to try and make us feel better!
I've been Cal fan long enough to know the soul crushing pain caused by hope and pre-season expectations. I enjoy watching football, and our team in particular. The potential in the program is there. The formula just has never been correctly balanced.

What Wilcox does on defense is schematic poetry -- that one call where I believe it was Scott from depth picking up DTR on the Q keep from Zone read, that was some brilliant stuff. Our Safety whiffed, but damn that was a beautiful call. Wilcox knows how to attack guys with his defense, he just didn't have enough time to really get in a full game plan.

What happens on offense, is simply hard to watch...

Kelly on the other hand, was able to do what he does on offense with tempo and a dual threat QB and put stress on our defense.

From what it sounded like, the gameplan from ASU to UCLA didn't exactly translate well. But what good is your offensive scheme if you cannot show up and do anything without a weeks worth of preparation? particularly during a pandemic?

Seems like a bad choice from a system standpoint to go all in on something that you know is gonna take more time to properly implement, and then you need to do it all again when your talent either gets hurt or matriculates through the program. It's like showing up to a drag race with an unfinished car --- just wait till I put together my boosted build!!!! meanwhile some dude with a 250 shot of Nos just smokes you.

Success @ the CFB level is all about simplicity and scalability. I don't see how hard it would be to implement an reasonably effective offense -- we do not lack for talent at either QB, Skill, or OL.

If you want perennial success you need a system that is simple to implement and scale. Injuries happen, you need depth, that depth needs to be able to fill in without issue.

Focus on Intellectualism & understanding systems / organizations were my major takeaways from my Cal education (Shoutout Haas) -- most don't think about it, but Football Programs serve as an excellent corollary / example for the application of business management theory.

Guys tend to gravitate to what they are familiar with (from a coaching philosophy standpoint). Coaches love to talk trash about other styles and schemes -- it's what we do, but there is also a genuine interest in and appreciation for how different people do things. It's always interesting to see the difference in focus between defensive and offensive HC led programs.

back to the point of making you feel better -- what I will say is this. Things are never as bad as they are, nor are they as good as they are. Theres not enough of a sample size of data to judge these guys.

My whole shtick is that I've seen this play out before (the whole, lets run a pro-style offense agenda) -- and the result has typically sucked (history rhymes, yay!). So I'm not exactly holding my breath here.

The one upside that I can see is that Musgraves made stuff work with the Raiders -- but the NFL is a completely different game from college. That stuff doesn't translate backwards, it never has. Ask Lovie Smith how that's working out for him. Saban doesnt count, he went NFL, then sucked, then came back.

I'll go back to the June Jones analogy here for Koreambear -- he's literally the only dude who successfully transitioned from the NFL to College -- and he didn't do it with a Pro-Style offense, he did it with something that is incredibly unique, and also a system (the Run and Shoot). Proven to work in the NFL (in a pure form, suck it Kingsbury -- you had to adapt your air raid to the point its not an air raid -- June Jones went to the playoffs running four wides in Atlanta of all places lol), and also proven to work in College (dude took Hawaii to a fricken BCS Bowl, yes, they got annihilated by Georgia, but seriously, who didn't that year? Stafford, Knowshon Moreno, Geno Atkins, a bunch of other dudes against a Hawaii team, lol? Although those dudes with dreads were pretty good, I forget their names, Koreambear probably remembers).

I'm ultra curious to see how Rolovich pans out -- I think he keeps Wazzu relevant, and makes Jimmy Lake feel the heat in the apple cup -- theyre not gonna just roll over and die when you drop 8 like Leach did. They had a chance against Oregon -- and that's with putting in a new system in one year.

That's the maddening part, I suppose -- mountain west staff comes in, installs a system and runs it better than this vaunted NFL coordinator.


I may have blocked some of the game out of my head...but I saw a lot of empty backfield, and not a lot of tight ends. I saw a QB running for his life a lot..almost as if the OL hasn't had a DL to practice against in 2 weeks.

While I was watching I would squint and it almost looked like Baldwin's offense out there. I didn't see an identity at all, which is what I wanted more than anything. Plays that build on each other and misdirection to keep the defense on their toes and off balance.

To my completely untrained eye, it almost looked like Musgrave was calling plays out of Baldwins book because he felt the team was more comfortable with it and didn't have enough time to practice/gel with the new scheme. Also...was there anything thrown over the middle all game?

Were my eyes (or memory) deceiving me here?

Last year Brown had 18 carries for 111 yards against UCLA and the rushing game as a whole had 182 yards on 5.1 YPC.

This year Brown had 8 carries for 25 yards and the team gained only 54 yards on the ground with 1.9 YPC.

The point behind having those TEs and a FB on the roster is that we should have more of a bruising running game but that is not at all what we tried to do.



Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.