Gates to Mizzou?

9,157 Views | 87 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by stu
OneTopOneChickenApple
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/33542101/sources-missouri-tigers-targeting-dennis-gates-cleveland-state-vikings-men-basketball-coach
bipolarbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Damn
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How did the Golden Gates end up east of the Rocky Mountains?
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
stu said:

How did the Golden Gates end up east of the Rocky Mountains?

Too bad Bill Bridges is no longer with us.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OneTopOneChickenApple said:

https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/33542101/sources-missouri-tigers-targeting-dennis-gates-cleveland-state-vikings-men-basketball-coach


F Knowlton
Econ141
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

OneTopOneChickenApple said:

https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/33542101/sources-missouri-tigers-targeting-dennis-gates-cleveland-state-vikings-men-basketball-coach


F Knowlton


F them all - Christ is just watching the crash and burn. They should be forced to watch each and every basket game next year in person. See the lack of interest and money going down the drain.
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fat_slice said:

F them all - Christ is just watching the crash and burn. They should be forced to watch each and every basket game next year in person. See the lack of interest and money going down the drain.
As in Clockwork Orange.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
prediction: Gates to Missouri for $18M six year contract

rkt88edmo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am just full of sighs.
touchdownbears43
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There's an unhealthy obsession over Gates on this board.
Cal8285
How long do you want to ignore this user?
touchdownbears43 said:

There's an unhealthy obsession over Gates on this board.
Anyone who posts is someone who hasn't simply given up on thinking about Cal basketball. Given the state of the program, anyone who is thinking about Cal basketball to the extent he or she posts here has an unhealthy obsession with Cal basketball. Is it any surprise that there are components of that unhealthy obsession that are unhealthy obsessions?

socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
touchdownbears43 said:

There's an unhealthy obsession over Gates on this board.
I agree.

The sheriff was a GREAT Bear but was very much a Ben Braun recruit - a kid from Chicago who then came back to Assistant for Ben for 2 years (I believe the last 2 years) before moving back to East of the Mississippi.

We REALLY need a coaching candidate with DEEP roots in California and especially SOUTHERN California. I just do not see why others do not see what is obvious - that Cal _FOR REVENUE SPORTS_ is very much regional in its recruiting - mostly west coast kids and even more particularly California kids. Add in the fact that 70% of the state's population is South of the Grapevine and it means that our future coach needs to understand the southland.

Really that is the FIRST questions JK should ask - "Tell me about your recruiting successes in Southern California." Candidates who can not answer that question should get a hard pass.

(PS. This isn't to dismiss the need to recruit the Bay Area really well. We should frankly have the Soldiers over to Haas as many times as possible. It is just that only 30% of the state's population lives in the Bay Area/Sacto region and it is even more pronounced if you look at the age demographic since the Bay Area tends to skew a bit older, whiter and childless.)
Take care of your Chicken
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I Agree with touchdownbears43
Go Bears!
mdbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
touchdownbears43 said:

There's an unhealthy obsession over Gates on this board.
I completely disagree. Gates is a hot coaching candidate who shows lots of promise. Given that he both played and coached at Cal, we might have had a chance at luring him here and retaining him if he succeeded (still do not know what Missouri has offered him and whether we could have been competitive). Instead of making a move, we stick with Fox who has proven in 12 seasons of Power 5 coaching that he does not have the right stuff. We could have taken a risk, but instead the university administrators have decided to hope that Fox can turn Cal into the mediocrity he achieved at Georgia, despite minimal evidence of improvement. Seriously, what hot prospect coach is going to want to come to Cal after we are at the bottom of the conference for 6 six years in a row?
3Cats4CAL
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unlikely any so why are those candidates even brought up for discussion?
OneTopOneChickenApple
How long do you want to ignore this user?
socaltownie said:

touchdownbears43 said:

There's an unhealthy obsession over Gates on this board.
I agree.

The sheriff was a GREAT Bear but was very much a Ben Braun recruit - a kid from Chicago who then came back to Assistant for Ben for 2 years (I believe the last 2 years) before moving back to East of the Mississippi.

We REALLY need a coaching candidate with DEEP roots in California and especially SOUTHERN California. I just do not see why others do not see what is obvious - that Cal _FOR REVENUE SPORTS_ is very much regional in its recruiting - mostly west coast kids and even more particularly California kids. Add in the fact that 70% of the state's population is South of the Grapevine and it means that our future coach needs to understand the southland.

Really that is the FIRST questions JK should ask - "Tell me about your recruiting successes in Southern California." Candidates who can not answer that question should get a hard pass.

(PS. This isn't to dismiss the need to recruit the Bay Area really well. We should frankly have the Soldiers over to Haas as many times as possible. It is just that only 30% of the state's population lives in the Bay Area/Sacto region and it is even more pronounced if you look at the age demographic since the Bay Area tends to skew a bit older, whiter and childless.)
He is from Chicago, yet recruited well in Florida, showing he can do it in "unknown" territory.
I remember a young Dennis Gates actually saying he would like to coach at Cal.
ducky23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
socaltownie said:

touchdownbears43 said:

There's an unhealthy obsession over Gates on this board.
I agree.

The sheriff was a GREAT Bear but was very much a Ben Braun recruit - a kid from Chicago who then came back to Assistant for Ben for 2 years (I believe the last 2 years) before moving back to East of the Mississippi.

We REALLY need a coaching candidate with DEEP roots in California and especially SOUTHERN California. I just do not see why others do not see what is obvious - that Cal _FOR REVENUE SPORTS_ is very much regional in its recruiting - mostly west coast kids and even more particularly California kids. Add in the fact that 70% of the state's population is South of the Grapevine and it means that our future coach needs to understand the southland.

Really that is the FIRST questions JK should ask - "Tell me about your recruiting successes in Southern California." Candidates who can not answer that question should get a hard pass.

(PS. This isn't to dismiss the need to recruit the Bay Area really well. We should frankly have the Soldiers over to Haas as many times as possible. It is just that only 30% of the state's population lives in the Bay Area/Sacto region and it is even more pronounced if you look at the age demographic since the Bay Area tends to skew a bit older, whiter and childless.)


While I don't disagree that it would be great to have a coach who could recruit socal, historically speaking, our best players typically don't come from that area.

Let's just start with the Kidd era and go from there

Kidd (bay)
Murray (bay)
Shareef (Georgia)
Gray (socal but transferred from Tennessee)
Duck (Texas)
Lampley (Chicago)
Shipp and wethers (socal)
Tamir (Isreal)
Powe (bay)
Ubaka (bay)
Anderson (sac)
Randle (Chicago)
Jorge (Mexico)
Crabbe (socal)
Bird (bay)
Wallace (central cal)
Rabb (bay)
Brown (Georgia)

So really. We've gotten just as many star players from Chicago and Georgia as we've gotten from socal.

I'd argue someone who can recruit the bay and internationally is probably more useful, especially with usc and ucla on the rise.





PtownBear1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
3Cats4CAL said:

Unlikely any so why are those candidates even brought up for discussion?


Because this is the last year we have any chance of hiring someone decent before we're ****ed for probably the next decade.

As several people have pointed out, there will be 6 scholarships available next year. A new coach hired now would have the whole year to recruit for those spots. Whereas Fox will likely fill them with D2 players, and the roster will take many years to correct when he's inevitably fired. And no decent coach will want any part of that.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ducky23 said:

socaltownie said:

touchdownbears43 said:

There's an unhealthy obsession over Gates on this board.
I agree.

The sheriff was a GREAT Bear but was very much a Ben Braun recruit - a kid from Chicago who then came back to Assistant for Ben for 2 years (I believe the last 2 years) before moving back to East of the Mississippi.

We REALLY need a coaching candidate with DEEP roots in California and especially SOUTHERN California. I just do not see why others do not see what is obvious - that Cal _FOR REVENUE SPORTS_ is very much regional in its recruiting - mostly west coast kids and even more particularly California kids. Add in the fact that 70% of the state's population is South of the Grapevine and it means that our future coach needs to understand the southland.

Really that is the FIRST questions JK should ask - "Tell me about your recruiting successes in Southern California." Candidates who can not answer that question should get a hard pass.

(PS. This isn't to dismiss the need to recruit the Bay Area really well. We should frankly have the Soldiers over to Haas as many times as possible. It is just that only 30% of the state's population lives in the Bay Area/Sacto region and it is even more pronounced if you look at the age demographic since the Bay Area tends to skew a bit older, whiter and childless.)


While I don't disagree that it would be great to have a coach who could recruit socal, historically speaking, our best players typically don't come from that area.

Let's just start with the Kidd era and go from there

Kidd (bay)
Murray (bay)
Shareef (Georgia)
Gray (socal but transferred from Tennessee)
Duck (Texas)
Lampley (Chicago)
Shipp and wethers (socal)
Tamir (Isreal)
Powe (bay)
Ubaka (bay)
Anderson (sac)
Randle (Chicago)
Jorge (Mexico)
Crabbe (socal)
Bird (bay)
Wallace (central cal)
Rabb (bay)
Brown (Georgia)

So really. We've gotten just as many star players from Chicago and Georgia as we've gotten from socal.

I'd argue someone who can recruit the bay and internationally is probably more useful, especially with usc and ucla on the rise.
agree we should recruit the bay
I think we should recruit the rest of California too (so I don't agree there)
Agree we should recruit int'l

i don't agree we should focus on east coast which is our current other region

fun fact: I remember Braun specifically recruited Chicago (probably had someone on staff with recruiting ties to the city). Result:

Gates
Lampley
Randle

I'd say that was quite successful
Econ141
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

ducky23 said:

socaltownie said:

touchdownbears43 said:

There's an unhealthy obsession over Gates on this board.
I agree.

The sheriff was a GREAT Bear but was very much a Ben Braun recruit - a kid from Chicago who then came back to Assistant for Ben for 2 years (I believe the last 2 years) before moving back to East of the Mississippi.

We REALLY need a coaching candidate with DEEP roots in California and especially SOUTHERN California. I just do not see why others do not see what is obvious - that Cal _FOR REVENUE SPORTS_ is very much regional in its recruiting - mostly west coast kids and even more particularly California kids. Add in the fact that 70% of the state's population is South of the Grapevine and it means that our future coach needs to understand the southland.

Really that is the FIRST questions JK should ask - "Tell me about your recruiting successes in Southern California." Candidates who can not answer that question should get a hard pass.

(PS. This isn't to dismiss the need to recruit the Bay Area really well. We should frankly have the Soldiers over to Haas as many times as possible. It is just that only 30% of the state's population lives in the Bay Area/Sacto region and it is even more pronounced if you look at the age demographic since the Bay Area tends to skew a bit older, whiter and childless.)


While I don't disagree that it would be great to have a coach who could recruit socal, historically speaking, our best players typically don't come from that area.

Let's just start with the Kidd era and go from there

Kidd (bay)
Murray (bay)
Shareef (Georgia)
Gray (socal but transferred from Tennessee)
Duck (Texas)
Lampley (Chicago)
Shipp and wethers (socal)
Tamir (Isreal)
Powe (bay)
Ubaka (bay)
Anderson (sac)
Randle (Chicago)
Jorge (Mexico)
Crabbe (socal)
Bird (bay)
Wallace (central cal)
Rabb (bay)
Brown (Georgia)

So really. We've gotten just as many star players from Chicago and Georgia as we've gotten from socal.

I'd argue someone who can recruit the bay and internationally is probably more useful, especially with usc and ucla on the rise.
agree we should recruit the bay
I think we should recruit the rest of California too (so I don't agree there)
Agree we should recruit int'l

i don't agree we should focus on east coast which is our current other region

fun fact: I remember Braun specifically recruited Chicago (probably had someone on staff with recruiting ties to the city). Result:

Gates
Lampley
Randle

I'd say that was quite successful


2 player of the years! Charlie Moore could have been a third.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/33565516/miami-point-guard-charlie-moore-six-year-four-school-odyssey-takes-back-home-chicago-sweet-16


fat_slice said:

HoopDreams said:

ducky23 said:

socaltownie said:

touchdownbears43 said:

There's an unhealthy obsession over Gates on this board.
I agree.

The sheriff was a GREAT Bear but was very much a Ben Braun recruit - a kid from Chicago who then came back to Assistant for Ben for 2 years (I believe the last 2 years) before moving back to East of the Mississippi.

We REALLY need a coaching candidate with DEEP roots in California and especially SOUTHERN California. I just do not see why others do not see what is obvious - that Cal _FOR REVENUE SPORTS_ is very much regional in its recruiting - mostly west coast kids and even more particularly California kids. Add in the fact that 70% of the state's population is South of the Grapevine and it means that our future coach needs to understand the southland.

Really that is the FIRST questions JK should ask - "Tell me about your recruiting successes in Southern California." Candidates who can not answer that question should get a hard pass.

(PS. This isn't to dismiss the need to recruit the Bay Area really well. We should frankly have the Soldiers over to Haas as many times as possible. It is just that only 30% of the state's population lives in the Bay Area/Sacto region and it is even more pronounced if you look at the age demographic since the Bay Area tends to skew a bit older, whiter and childless.)


While I don't disagree that it would be great to have a coach who could recruit socal, historically speaking, our best players typically don't come from that area.

Let's just start with the Kidd era and go from there

Kidd (bay)
Murray (bay)
Shareef (Georgia)
Gray (socal but transferred from Tennessee)
Duck (Texas)
Lampley (Chicago)
Shipp and wethers (socal)
Tamir (Isreal)
Powe (bay)
Ubaka (bay)
Anderson (sac)
Randle (Chicago)
Jorge (Mexico)
Crabbe (socal)
Bird (bay)
Wallace (central cal)
Rabb (bay)
Brown (Georgia)

So really. We've gotten just as many star players from Chicago and Georgia as we've gotten from socal.

I'd argue someone who can recruit the bay and internationally is probably more useful, especially with usc and ucla on the rise.
agree we should recruit the bay
I think we should recruit the rest of California too (so I don't agree there)
Agree we should recruit int'l

i don't agree we should focus on east coast which is our current other region

fun fact: I remember Braun specifically recruited Chicago (probably had someone on staff with recruiting ties to the city). Result:

Gates
Lampley
Randle

I'd say that was quite successful


2 player of the years! Charlie Moore could have been a third.
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The fact that Monty or Fox or Martin didn't recruit So Cal well isn't a reason to say we CAN"T.

UCLA - Jaquez, Juzang, Bernard all Socal kids. Indeed, I think of they have all of 3 players who are NOT SOCAL products on the roster

USC - Mobly and Ellis and Agbonkpolo all Socal kids

Zona has ALWAYS needed to recruit well in SoCal because not enough kids/talents just in Tucson and Phoenix. This years roster is a bit of a odd duck in that respect but I also don't recall off top of head where their starters prepped/AAU.

Yes. We are best off if we can lock down the best couple of kids from NorCal every 2-3 year cycle. But Cal also needs to grab 4 stars from the southland and given the population there are usually 4 of 5 of them each year.

Take care of your Chicken
bluesaxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
mdbear said:

touchdownbears43 said:

There's an unhealthy obsession over Gates on this board.
I completely disagree. Gates is a hot coaching candidate who shows lots of promise. Given that he both played and coached at Cal, we might have had a chance at luring him here and retaining him if he succeeded (still do not know what Missouri has offered him and whether we could have been competitive). Instead of making a move, we stick with Fox who has proven in 12 seasons of Power 5 coaching that he does not have the right stuff. We could have taken a risk, but instead the university administrators have decided to hope that Fox can turn Cal into the mediocrity he achieved at Georgia, despite minimal evidence of improvement. Seriously, what hot prospect coach is going to want to come to Cal after we are at the bottom of the conference for 6 six years in a row?
The time to take a shot with Gates was when Wyking was fired and Gates had no track record as a head coach. But that's not what Cal does. Cal does retreads and "safe" picks.
mdbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
socaltownie said:

The fact that Monty or Fox or Martin didn't recruit So Cal well isn't a reason to say we CAN"T.

UCLA - Jaquez, Juzang, Bernard all Socal kids. Indeed, I think of they have all of 3 players who are NOT SOCAL products on the roster

USC - Mobly and Ellis and Agbonkpolo all Socal kids

Zona has ALWAYS needed to recruit well in SoCal because not enough kids/talents just in Tucson and Phoenix. This years roster is a bit of a odd duck in that respect but I also don't recall off top of head where their starters prepped/AAU.

Yes. We are best off if we can lock down the best couple of kids from NorCal every 2-3 year cycle. But Cal also needs to grab 4 stars from the southland and given the population there are usually 4 of 5 of them each year.


Good coaches can recruit anywhere. For example, Tony Bennett was a completely Midwestern guy. He went to Washington State and recruited Klay Thompson from Southern California. Thompson became a lottery pick, and Bennett got Washington State the most wins in a season in school history. Then he switched to the East Coast and recruited well enough to win a national championship. Top recruits want to play for winners, particularly coaches they think can get them to the NBA. Cal has been terrible for five years in a row with no new energy, so no surprise recruits do not want to come here.
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
mdbear said:

socaltownie said:

The fact that Monty or Fox or Martin didn't recruit So Cal well isn't a reason to say we CAN"T.

UCLA - Jaquez, Juzang, Bernard all Socal kids. Indeed, I think of they have all of 3 players who are NOT SOCAL products on the roster

USC - Mobly and Ellis and Agbonkpolo all Socal kids

Zona has ALWAYS needed to recruit well in SoCal because not enough kids/talents just in Tucson and Phoenix. This years roster is a bit of a odd duck in that respect but I also don't recall off top of head where their starters prepped/AAU.

Yes. We are best off if we can lock down the best couple of kids from NorCal every 2-3 year cycle. But Cal also needs to grab 4 stars from the southland and given the population there are usually 4 of 5 of them each year.


Good coaches can recruit anywhere. For example, Tony Bennett was a completely Midwestern guy. He went to Washington State and recruited Klay Thompson from Southern California. Thompson became a lottery pick, and Bennett got Washington State the most wins in a season in school history. Then he switched to the East Coast and recruited well enough to win a national championship. Top recruits want to play for winners, particularly coaches they think can get them to the NBA. Cal has been terrible for five years in a row with no new energy, so no surprise recruits do not want to come here.
That isn't true. Kids generally stay generally local. Part of it is that they want to allow their family to see them. Even DUKE or Kenutcky LARGELY recruit within a 300 mile radius. We can always find the exception - but even Tony Bennet had a LOT of kids from the PNW/Northern Inner Basin.
Take care of your Chicken
Jeff82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Braun is from Chicago. He we to New Trier High in Evanston. He recruited Israel because he's Jewish. He basically used where he had contacts to recruit. From what I can tell, Fox either doesn't really have the contacts, or doesn't use them, which is why his recruiting as poor. He comes across as totally passive in that process, which is why I want him replaced.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jeff82 said:

Braun is from Chicago. He we to New Trier High in Evanston. He recruited Israel because he's Jewish. He basically used where he had contacts to recruit. From what I can tell, Fox either doesn't really have the contacts, or doesn't use them, which is why his recruiting as poor. He comes across as totally passive in that process, which is why I want him replaced.

I agree with your take. Coaches recruit from wherever they have connections. It really doesn't matter where we draw from, as long as we get talent. But, we are not. Not enough.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wallace and Bradley are from southern cal area (just not LA)
diva1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We have one of the best aau programs in the nation locally and other than Leon Powe and the others that class we do a lousy job bringing them to Cal
GMP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bluesaxe said:

mdbear said:

touchdownbears43 said:

There's an unhealthy obsession over Gates on this board.
I completely disagree. Gates is a hot coaching candidate who shows lots of promise. Given that he both played and coached at Cal, we might have had a chance at luring him here and retaining him if he succeeded (still do not know what Missouri has offered him and whether we could have been competitive). Instead of making a move, we stick with Fox who has proven in 12 seasons of Power 5 coaching that he does not have the right stuff. We could have taken a risk, but instead the university administrators have decided to hope that Fox can turn Cal into the mediocrity he achieved at Georgia, despite minimal evidence of improvement. Seriously, what hot prospect coach is going to want to come to Cal after we are at the bottom of the conference for 6 six years in a row?
The time to take a shot with Gates was when Wyking was fired and Gates had no track record as a head coach. But that's not what Cal does. Cal does retreads and "safe" picks.


This is not really true before Fox.

Jones was not a retread or a safe pick. He didn't work out, but he was neither safe nor a retread.

Cuonzo was hired away, coming off good success at Tennessee. Not a retread, and not "safe" in this context.

Monty had been wildly successful at Stanford, so not a retread. But he had a long layoff and was older, so also not safe.

Braun was seen as an up and coming coach. Not a retread, not safe.

Bozeman was seen as an up and coming coach. Not a retread, not safe.

That goes back 30 years. Fox is the first retread.
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Going back a bit farther:

Campanelli was a successful HC at a smaller school (James Madison).

Kuchen was a top assistant at a big-time program (Notre Dame).

Edwards had done well as HC at Santa Clara.

Padgett and Herrerias were Cal assistants.

Newell was the closest to a retread, going 70-37 at USF but only 45-42 at Michigan State. Kinda mirrors Fox's records at Nevada and Georgia. However basketball has changed since 1954. In Newell's 3rd year Cal went 21-5, 14-2 in conference. Maybe that's what Knowlton is dreaming.
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
stu said:

Going back a bit farther:

Campanelli was a successful HC at a smaller school (James Madison).

Kuchen was a top assistant at a big-time program (Notre Dame).

Edwards had done well as HC at Santa Clara.

Padgett and Herrerias were Cal assistants.

Newell was the closest to a retread, going 70-37 at USF but only 45-42 at Michigan State. Kinda mirrors Fox's records at Nevada and Georgia. However basketball has changed since 1954. In Newell's 3rd year Cal went 21-5, 14-2 in conference. Maybe that's what Knowlton is dreaming.


I doubt Knowlton knows who Newell was, but you might have hit on an explanation for SFCity.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

stu said:

Going back a bit farther:

Campanelli was a successful HC at a smaller school (James Madison).

Kuchen was a top assistant at a big-time program (Notre Dame).

Edwards had done well as HC at Santa Clara.

Padgett and Herrerias were Cal assistants.

Newell was the closest to a retread, going 70-37 at USF but only 45-42 at Michigan State. Kinda mirrors Fox's records at Nevada and Georgia. However basketball has changed since 1954. In Newell's 3rd year Cal went 21-5, 14-2 in conference. Maybe that's what Knowlton is dreaming.


I doubt Knowlton knows who Newell was, but you might have hit on an explanation for SFCity.

Neither Pete Newell, nor Grant Newell.

Also, to Stu, I could be wrong, but didn't Dick Edwards coach at UOP, not Santa Clara?
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You're right, Edwards coached at UOP. Apologies to Santa Clara and UOP.
mdbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
socaltownie said:

mdbear said:

socaltownie said:

The fact that Monty or Fox or Martin didn't recruit So Cal well isn't a reason to say we CAN"T.

UCLA - Jaquez, Juzang, Bernard all Socal kids. Indeed, I think of they have all of 3 players who are NOT SOCAL products on the roster

USC - Mobly and Ellis and Agbonkpolo all Socal kids

Zona has ALWAYS needed to recruit well in SoCal because not enough kids/talents just in Tucson and Phoenix. This years roster is a bit of a odd duck in that respect but I also don't recall off top of head where their starters prepped/AAU.

Yes. We are best off if we can lock down the best couple of kids from NorCal every 2-3 year cycle. But Cal also needs to grab 4 stars from the southland and given the population there are usually 4 of 5 of them each year.


Good coaches can recruit anywhere. For example, Tony Bennett was a completely Midwestern guy. He went to Washington State and recruited Klay Thompson from Southern California. Thompson became a lottery pick, and Bennett got Washington State the most wins in a season in school history. Then he switched to the East Coast and recruited well enough to win a national championship. Top recruits want to play for winners, particularly coaches they think can get them to the NBA. Cal has been terrible for five years in a row with no new energy, so no surprise recruits do not want to come here.
That isn't true. Kids generally stay generally local. Part of it is that they want to allow their family to see them. Even DUKE or Kenutcky LARGELY recruit within a 300 mile radius. We can always find the exception - but even Tony Bennet had a LOT of kids from the PNW/Northern Inner Basin.
I don't think we are disagreeing. Your point is that many players (like most other college students), like to go to college within driving distance of home. My point is that good coaches can be successful in recruiting regardless of their home region because winning and charisma attract good prospects. I readily acknowledge that Tony Bennett recruited a lot of players from the West when he was at WSU and and from the East during his time at Virginia even though Bennett was originally a Midwestern guy.
Last Page
Page 1 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.