Lars might be successful if.........

2,091 Views | 22 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by stu
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
if we could pass him the ball at shoulder height or higher. We keep passing him the ball where he gets it below his waist. There was one stretch against K state where we attempted 5 passes to him and either he failed to handle them, or the ball was stolen, and all those passes were below his waist. You can't expect a seven foot tall player to handle these low passes. For a seven footer, if a pass is below his waist, the smaller defenders have at least as much chance at getting a hand on the ball as he does. If a pass comes to him at shoulder level or higher, the 7-footer has a better chance of catching it than the defender does.

Of those 5 passes yesterday, two of them were bounce passes, one from Joel Brown. For 4 years, I've watched Brown make bounce passes into a post player, and I can't remember one time where it has been successful. The bounce pass is a weapon, but bounce-passing to a 7 footer is almost sure to fail, unless you can bounce it off the floor high enough so the player receives it shoulder height or above, and the area near the basket is usually too crowded to attempt such a pass. It happens, usually as a stunt on fast break, but is very rare.
SFCityBear
KoreAmBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

if we could pass him the ball at shoulder height or higher. We keep passing him the ball where he gets it below his waist. There was one stretch against K state where we attempted 5 passes to him and either he failed to handle them, or the ball was stolen, and all those passes were below his waist. You can't expect a seven foot tall player to handle these low passes. For a seven footer, if a pass is below his waist, the smaller defenders have at least as much chance at getting a hand on the ball as he does. If a pass comes to him at shoulder level or higher, the 7-footer has a better chance of catching it than the defender does.

Of those 5 passes yesterday, two of them were bounce passes, one from Joel Brown. For 4 years, I've watched Brown make bounce passes into a post player, and I can't remember one time where it has been successful. The bounce pass is a weapon, but bounce-passing to a 7 footer is almost sure to fail, unless you can bounce it off the floor high enough so the player receives it shoulder height or above, and the area near the basket is usually too crowded to attempt such a pass. It happens, usually as a stunt on fast break, but is very rare.
Unless he is 2 feet from the basket, if you throw it shoulder height, he will try to dribble it in a crowd and lose it anyway. He just has bad hands/instincts. Don't try to blame it on others. He has improved though I will give you that, and he seems like a very good dude.
bluesaxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

if we could pass him the ball at shoulder height or higher. We keep passing him the ball where he gets it below his waist. There was one stretch against K state where we attempted 5 passes to him and either he failed to handle them, or the ball was stolen, and all those passes were below his waist. You can't expect a seven foot tall player to handle these low passes. For a seven footer, if a pass is below his waist, the smaller defenders have at least as much chance at getting a hand on the ball as he does. If a pass comes to him at shoulder level or higher, the 7-footer has a better chance of catching it than the defender does.

Of those 5 passes yesterday, two of them were bounce passes, one from Joel Brown. For 4 years, I've watched Brown make bounce passes into a post player, and I can't remember one time where it has been successful. The bounce pass is a weapon, but bounce-passing to a 7 footer is almost sure to fail, unless you can bounce it off the floor high enough so the player receives it shoulder height or above, and the area near the basket is usually too crowded to attempt such a pass. It happens, usually as a stunt on fast break, but is very rare.
Seems backwards to me. If a big man is posted up, has any hands at all and knows how to position his body, a bounce pass as the entry pass should be fine. Shoulder high passes get picked off too easily if there's any traffic around. On the run is a different deal altogether.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think everyone is right here

I've seen plenty of bounce or low passes that have a low probability of Lars catching and doing something positive with it. Are there 7 footers who could handle those passes? Yes, but we should know by year 4 that Lars isn't one of them.

It would be the same as trying to throw alley oops to a player without enough hops to catch and jam with any kind of consistency. You just shouldn't try that play to that player, even if it's a good pass for someone who could elevate higher/quicker

Passing the ball higher can also be picked off but has its advantage that Lars would more easily catch it.

But more importantly... Our offense is just too slow and mechanical

We don't move the ball crisply or with precision often enough, and therefore the passes are often telegraphed and/or 1 or 2 or 3 seconds late

This gives Defenses time to react and get set and prepare for the pass, and without shooters help will collapse even before the ball hits his hands

Making matters worse, Lars doesn't have good hands so he doesn't cleanly catch the ball, nor move his hands quick enough when he does. When a defender has much quicker hands it's tough to compete. AND no defender is going to let you cleanly catch a ball without significant contact if they are right there and knows the pass is coming.

Playing through contact whether it's dribbling, shooting or catching the ball is a big part of basketball

We need to move the ball quickly as the post player moves so the defense hasn't set up and the pass (bounce, to the chest, or high) gets to the post cleanly. A better offense would set more inside screens to give Lars more space to catch the ball cleanly without contact or swiping hands.

That rarely happens in our offense, and it's not only on Lars



TilWeWobble
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hoop Dreams nailed it: too slow and mechanical.
Also, when was the last time we saw, on a pick n' roll, any real effort to pass to the roller much less a successful play off the screen? We just go through the motions and end up with last second one on one situations.
KoreAmBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TilWeWobble said:

Hoop Dreams nailed it: too slow and mechanical.
Also, when was the last time we saw, on a pick n' roll, any real effort to pass to the roller much less a successful play off the screen? We just go through the motions and end up with last second one on one situations.
There was one executed pick and roll to Lars from Askew. It was actually nice.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KoreAmBear said:

TilWeWobble said:

Hoop Dreams nailed it: too slow and mechanical.
Also, when was the last time we saw, on a pick n' roll, any real effort to pass to the roller much less a successful play off the screen? We just go through the motions and end up with last second one on one situations.
There was one executed pick and roll to Lars from Askew. It was actually nice.
Lars isn't a natural pick-and-roll post (Rabb was a prototype) and one could argue it should be harder for him to catch a ball while moving, dribble it once and go up for a shot.

Yet it worked (and he caught it) because the defense didn't expect it and the pass was well thrown. Lars didn't have anyone bump him or swiping at the ball or his hands at the catch or directly after
KoreAmBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

KoreAmBear said:

TilWeWobble said:

Hoop Dreams nailed it: too slow and mechanical.
Also, when was the last time we saw, on a pick n' roll, any real effort to pass to the roller much less a successful play off the screen? We just go through the motions and end up with last second one on one situations.
There was one executed pick and roll to Lars from Askew. It was actually nice.
Lars isn't a natural pick-and-roll post (Rabb was a prototype) and one could argue it should be harder for him to catch a ball while moving, dribble it once and go up for a shot.

Yet it worked (and he caught it) because the defense didn't expect it and the pass was well thrown. Lars didn't have anyone bump him or swiping at the ball or his hands at the catch or directly after
Yes I wouldn't make any entry pass to Lars a go to thing.
HearstMining
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KoreAmBear said:

HoopDreams said:

KoreAmBear said:

TilWeWobble said:

Hoop Dreams nailed it: too slow and mechanical.
Also, when was the last time we saw, on a pick n' roll, any real effort to pass to the roller much less a successful play off the screen? We just go through the motions and end up with last second one on one situations.
There was one executed pick and roll to Lars from Askew. It was actually nice.
Lars isn't a natural pick-and-roll post (Rabb was a prototype) and one could argue it should be harder for him to catch a ball while moving, dribble it once and go up for a shot.

Yet it worked (and he caught it) because the defense didn't expect it and the pass was well thrown. Lars didn't have anyone bump him or swiping at the ball or his hands at the catch or directly after
Yes I wouldn't make any entry pass to Lars a go to thing.
Lars ends up with no good options when he gets the ball in the high post. Nobody cuts to the hoop to receive a pass. All he can do is hand it back to a guard, which is done at waist-level where a defender can slap the ball.
OdontoBear66
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Have to disagree with SFCityBear. When Lars gets a rebound up high he brings it down. He always looks for movement to get a good shot.

But two years ago I beat the "Lars lacks the twitch factor" to death. Molasses runs down a wall quicker. Watching the game the other night he is just the same. Same mistakes over and over. But beyond his control his synapses just don't respond that quickly. Hopefully his back up develops quickly. Cal BB is very hard to watch.
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OdontoBear66 said:

Have to disagree with SFCityBear. When Lars gets a rebound up high he brings it down. He always looks for movement to get a good shot.

But two years ago I beat the "Lars lacks the twitch factor" to death. Molasses runs down a wall quicker. Watching the game the other night he is just the same. Same mistakes over and over. But beyond his control his synapses just don't respond that quickly. Hopefully his back up develops quickly. Cal BB is very hard to watch.
I agree with everything you say, except that my post wasn't about rebounding, it was about passes into Lars in the post. Nearly all big players who come to college as freshmen have the habit of bringing the ball down after the snatch a rebound. It is instinctive for them to do that, and I think they bring the ball down to protect it, shelter it with their body, before they then do something with it, like shoot it, pass it, or dribble it.

When I told my dad that I planned to try out for the Cal frosh in 1959, hoping to follow in his footsteps, he gave me this advice: "Look, the players you will be competing against are all going to be bigger than anyone you ever played against before. Remember that when a big guy gets a rebound, he will ALWAYS bring the ball down. So be ready, because that is where you can steal the ball from him." In the tryouts,
all of the players in those scrimmages were either MVPs or POYs or All-league in high school. I was nothing, and yet with my dad's advice, in 3 full days of scrimmages, I stole all of those big guys blind. It was like taking candy from a baby - big babies.

That was long ago. Today the better high school players have exposure to better competition, in AAU and competing against college players and even pros in the off season. However, I think the coaching they get in fundamentals is severely lacking, from what I see in watching Cal games. Not bringing the ball down after a rebound is something learned by most bigs when they get to college. If it is not learned, they do not become successful. After 4 years, Lars still brings it down. Not as often perhaps, but he still does it, too much.



SFCityBear
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KoreAmBear said:

SFCityBear said:

if we could pass him the ball at shoulder height or higher. We keep passing him the ball where he gets it below his waist. There was one stretch against K state where we attempted 5 passes to him and either he failed to handle them, or the ball was stolen, and all those passes were below his waist. You can't expect a seven foot tall player to handle these low passes. For a seven footer, if a pass is below his waist, the smaller defenders have at least as much chance at getting a hand on the ball as he does. If a pass comes to him at shoulder level or higher, the 7-footer has a better chance of catching it than the defender does.

Of those 5 passes yesterday, two of them were bounce passes, one from Joel Brown. For 4 years, I've watched Brown make bounce passes into a post player, and I can't remember one time where it has been successful. The bounce pass is a weapon, but bounce-passing to a 7 footer is almost sure to fail, unless you can bounce it off the floor high enough so the player receives it shoulder height or above, and the area near the basket is usually too crowded to attempt such a pass. It happens, usually as a stunt on fast break, but is very rare.
Unless he is 2 feet from the basket, if you throw it shoulder height, he will try to dribble it in a crowd and lose it anyway. He just has bad hands/instincts. Don't try to blame it on others. He has improved though I will give you that, and he seems like a very good dude.
You may be right. However, I was not trying to blame others for any failure of Lars. My post was about Cal players doing what is best to make every teammate who is on the floor with them successful, or at the very least not give a teammate a pass where it has a good chance of failing. We have to play to each of our teammate's strong points, and try to help him to succeed. I agree with giving Okafor as many minutes as we can as long as he does not give up the ball too often or make other mistakes too often in games we might win. No matter who plays, Lars or Okafor, that should be the case. Okafor, or some one else will have to play, because Lars is not likely capable of playing 40 minutes. So if Lars loses far less high passes, and loses most low passes, then it would seem common sense to give him the ball up higher, wouldn't it? The same would be true for Okafor. Wouldn't that benefit the team? It is likely that Okafor can not play 40 minutes either, so Lars will have to play some. Our players have few strong points, but they all have one or more strong points, and our plays from the coach and our player's decisions on the court, should all be focused on making each other successful.
SFCityBear
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
agree with SF
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCB, have you read this book about when Pat Conroy played PG for The Citadel? If not, immediately do so:

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

KoreAmBear said:

SFCityBear said:

if we could pass him the ball at shoulder height or higher. We keep passing him the ball where he gets it below his waist. There was one stretch against K state where we attempted 5 passes to him and either he failed to handle them, or the ball was stolen, and all those passes were below his waist. You can't expect a seven foot tall player to handle these low passes. For a seven footer, if a pass is below his waist, the smaller defenders have at least as much chance at getting a hand on the ball as he does. If a pass comes to him at shoulder level or higher, the 7-footer has a better chance of catching it than the defender does.

Of those 5 passes yesterday, two of them were bounce passes, one from Joel Brown. For 4 years, I've watched Brown make bounce passes into a post player, and I can't remember one time where it has been successful. The bounce pass is a weapon, but bounce-passing to a 7 footer is almost sure to fail, unless you can bounce it off the floor high enough so the player receives it shoulder height or above, and the area near the basket is usually too crowded to attempt such a pass. It happens, usually as a stunt on fast break, but is very rare.
Unless he is 2 feet from the basket, if you throw it shoulder height, he will try to dribble it in a crowd and lose it anyway. He just has bad hands/instincts. Don't try to blame it on others. He has improved though I will give you that, and he seems like a very good dude.
You may be right. However, I was not trying to blame others for any failure of Lars. My post was about Cal players doing what is best to make every teammate who is on the floor with them successful, or at the very least not give a teammate a pass where it has a good chance of failing. We have to play to each of our teammate's strong points, and try to help him to succeed. I agree with giving Okafor as many minutes as we can as long as he does not give up the ball too often or make other mistakes too often in games we might win. No matter who plays, Lars or Okafor, that should be the case. Okafor, or some one else will have to play, because Lars is not likely capable of playing 40 minutes. So if Lars loses far less high passes, and loses most low passes, then it would seem common sense to give him the ball up higher, wouldn't it? The same would be true for Okafor. Wouldn't that benefit the team? It is likely that Okafor can not play 40 minutes either, so Lars will have to play some. Our players have few strong points, but they all have one or more strong points, and our plays from the coach and our player's decisions on the court, should all be focused on making each other successful.


Nice post SF.
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

SFCB, have you read this book about when Pat Conroy played PG for The Citadel? If not, immediately do so:


Thanks for the recommendation.

I just bought a pair of sneakers like the ones in the picture. Converse Chuck Taylor All Stars. Every kid in the City trying to get good at playing basketball in my day wore those shoes, except they were high tops. All the Cal players wore them when they won the NCAA title, as I remember. The Celtics wore the black low top model. White was the favorite. A teammate of mine claimed that the black shoes cut 2-3 points off the Celtics' average score for a game. The ones I just bought are not the same (nothing is). They are made in the Vietnam, and the rubber is hard, making them difficult to break in. The canvas is flimsy, and sizes are not quite right (I've tried two different ones. They just fell different, but then my feet feel different too. Dang.
SFCityBear
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

bearister said:

SFCB, have you read this book about when Pat Conroy played PG for The Citadel? If not, immediately do so:


Thanks for the recommendation.

I just bought a pair of sneakers like the ones in the picture. Converse Chuck Taylor All Stars. Every kid in the City trying to get good at playing basketball in my day wore those shoes, except they were high tops. All the Cal players wore them when they won the NCAA title, as I remember. The Celtics wore the black low top model. White was the favorite. A teammate of mine claimed that the black shoes cut 2-3 points off the Celtics' average score for a game. The ones I just bought are not the same (nothing is). They are made in the Vietnam, and the rubber is hard, making them difficult to break in. The canvas is flimsy, and sizes are not quite right (I've tried two different ones. They just fell different, but then my feet feel different too. Dang.
very fashionable SF, especially for teen/twenties women

SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

SFCityBear said:

bearister said:

SFCB, have you read this book about when Pat Conroy played PG for The Citadel? If not, immediately do so:


Thanks for the recommendation.

I just bought a pair of sneakers like the ones in the picture. Converse Chuck Taylor All Stars. Every kid in the City trying to get good at playing basketball in my day wore those shoes, except they were high tops. All the Cal players wore them when they won the NCAA title, as I remember. The Celtics wore the black low top model. White was the favorite. A teammate of mine claimed that the black shoes cut 2-3 points off the Celtics' average score for a game. The ones I just bought are not the same (nothing is). They are made in the Vietnam, and the rubber is hard, making them difficult to break in. The canvas is flimsy, and sizes are not quite right (I've tried two different ones. They just fell different, but then my feet feel different too. Dang.
very fashionable SF, especially for teen/twenties women


They sure do come in some ugly colors. I am embarrassed to say that I did consult with a young lady of the type you described. This fox (not the evil M. Fox) was standing in front of me in the line for hot dogs at Spreckel's Lake in the Park, wearing the white high top All-Stars. I had been thinking about getting the shoes, but they are nothing but canvas and rubber, and cost $85 a pair, so I asked her advice, if they were comfortable, and she replied that they were really comfortable, much more so than the earlier model. So I got sucked in and sprang for the $85, and am waiting for the rubber sole to get softer. At least the hot dog was outstanding. Best in San Francisco. Next time I'll ask the vendor if he can make a cheese dog, like the ones I used to get at Oscar's.
SFCityBear
RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

KoreAmBear said:

SFCityBear said:

if we could pass him the ball at shoulder height or higher. We keep passing him the ball where he gets it below his waist. There was one stretch against K state where we attempted 5 passes to him and either he failed to handle them, or the ball was stolen, and all those passes were below his waist. You can't expect a seven foot tall player to handle these low passes. For a seven footer, if a pass is below his waist, the smaller defenders have at least as much chance at getting a hand on the ball as he does. If a pass comes to him at shoulder level or higher, the 7-footer has a better chance of catching it than the defender does.

Of those 5 passes yesterday, two of them were bounce passes, one from Joel Brown. For 4 years, I've watched Brown make bounce passes into a post player, and I can't remember one time where it has been successful. The bounce pass is a weapon, but bounce-passing to a 7 footer is almost sure to fail, unless you can bounce it off the floor high enough so the player receives it shoulder height or above, and the area near the basket is usually too crowded to attempt such a pass. It happens, usually as a stunt on fast break, but is very rare.
Unless he is 2 feet from the basket, if you throw it shoulder height, he will try to dribble it in a crowd and lose it anyway. He just has bad hands/instincts. Don't try to blame it on others. He has improved though I will give you that, and he seems like a very good dude.
You may be right. However, I was not trying to blame others for any failure of Lars. My post was about Cal players doing what is best to make every teammate who is on the floor with them successful, or at the very least not give a teammate a pass where it has a good chance of failing. We have to play to each of our teammate's strong points, and try to help him to succeed. I agree with giving Okafor as many minutes as we can as long as he does not give up the ball too often or make other mistakes too often in games we might win. No matter who plays, Lars or Okafor, that should be the case. Okafor, or some one else will have to play, because Lars is not likely capable of playing 40 minutes. So if Lars loses far less high passes, and loses most low passes, then it would seem common sense to give him the ball up higher, wouldn't it? The same would be true for Okafor. Wouldn't that benefit the team? It is likely that Okafor can not play 40 minutes either, so Lars will have to play some. Our players have few strong points, but they all have one or more strong points, and our plays from the coach and our player's decisions on the court, should all be focused on making each other successful.
I guess I have to beat this into the ground. Why can't there be time when both Lars AND Okafor are on the court at the same time? Why do we have to always regard these guys as an OR alternative?
sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RedlessWardrobe said:

SFCityBear said:

KoreAmBear said:

SFCityBear said:

if we could pass him the ball at shoulder height or higher. We keep passing him the ball where he gets it below his waist. There was one stretch against K state where we attempted 5 passes to him and either he failed to handle them, or the ball was stolen, and all those passes were below his waist. You can't expect a seven foot tall player to handle these low passes. For a seven footer, if a pass is below his waist, the smaller defenders have at least as much chance at getting a hand on the ball as he does. If a pass comes to him at shoulder level or higher, the 7-footer has a better chance of catching it than the defender does.

Of those 5 passes yesterday, two of them were bounce passes, one from Joel Brown. For 4 years, I've watched Brown make bounce passes into a post player, and I can't remember one time where it has been successful. The bounce pass is a weapon, but bounce-passing to a 7 footer is almost sure to fail, unless you can bounce it off the floor high enough so the player receives it shoulder height or above, and the area near the basket is usually too crowded to attempt such a pass. It happens, usually as a stunt on fast break, but is very rare.
Unless he is 2 feet from the basket, if you throw it shoulder height, he will try to dribble it in a crowd and lose it anyway. He just has bad hands/instincts. Don't try to blame it on others. He has improved though I will give you that, and he seems like a very good dude.
You may be right. However, I was not trying to blame others for any failure of Lars. My post was about Cal players doing what is best to make every teammate who is on the floor with them successful, or at the very least not give a teammate a pass where it has a good chance of failing. We have to play to each of our teammate's strong points, and try to help him to succeed. I agree with giving Okafor as many minutes as we can as long as he does not give up the ball too often or make other mistakes too often in games we might win. No matter who plays, Lars or Okafor, that should be the case. Okafor, or some one else will have to play, because Lars is not likely capable of playing 40 minutes. So if Lars loses far less high passes, and loses most low passes, then it would seem common sense to give him the ball up higher, wouldn't it? The same would be true for Okafor. Wouldn't that benefit the team? It is likely that Okafor can not play 40 minutes either, so Lars will have to play some. Our players have few strong points, but they all have one or more strong points, and our plays from the coach and our player's decisions on the court, should all be focused on making each other successful.
I guess I have to beat this into the ground. Why can't there be time when both Lars AND Okafor are on the court at the same time? Why do we have to always regard these guys as an OR alternative?
As shown at the end against UCSD, a good alternative is NEITHER. Both are poor passers and neither can shoot from farther than five feet from the basket. Cal's offense, if you can call it that, is most effective at dribble penetration. Neither can dribble, and neither is great on the roll. I think Newell, Kuany and Alajiki are big enough in the post if the team plays zone. I think it is worth looking at this approach.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Agree, but depends on match ups

sluggo said:

RedlessWardrobe said:

SFCityBear said:

KoreAmBear said:

SFCityBear said:

if we could pass him the ball at shoulder height or higher. We keep passing him the ball where he gets it below his waist. There was one stretch against K state where we attempted 5 passes to him and either he failed to handle them, or the ball was stolen, and all those passes were below his waist. You can't expect a seven foot tall player to handle these low passes. For a seven footer, if a pass is below his waist, the smaller defenders have at least as much chance at getting a hand on the ball as he does. If a pass comes to him at shoulder level or higher, the 7-footer has a better chance of catching it than the defender does.

Of those 5 passes yesterday, two of them were bounce passes, one from Joel Brown. For 4 years, I've watched Brown make bounce passes into a post player, and I can't remember one time where it has been successful. The bounce pass is a weapon, but bounce-passing to a 7 footer is almost sure to fail, unless you can bounce it off the floor high enough so the player receives it shoulder height or above, and the area near the basket is usually too crowded to attempt such a pass. It happens, usually as a stunt on fast break, but is very rare.
Unless he is 2 feet from the basket, if you throw it shoulder height, he will try to dribble it in a crowd and lose it anyway. He just has bad hands/instincts. Don't try to blame it on others. He has improved though I will give you that, and he seems like a very good dude.
You may be right. However, I was not trying to blame others for any failure of Lars. My post was about Cal players doing what is best to make every teammate who is on the floor with them successful, or at the very least not give a teammate a pass where it has a good chance of failing. We have to play to each of our teammate's strong points, and try to help him to succeed. I agree with giving Okafor as many minutes as we can as long as he does not give up the ball too often or make other mistakes too often in games we might win. No matter who plays, Lars or Okafor, that should be the case. Okafor, or some one else will have to play, because Lars is not likely capable of playing 40 minutes. So if Lars loses far less high passes, and loses most low passes, then it would seem common sense to give him the ball up higher, wouldn't it? The same would be true for Okafor. Wouldn't that benefit the team? It is likely that Okafor can not play 40 minutes either, so Lars will have to play some. Our players have few strong points, but they all have one or more strong points, and our plays from the coach and our player's decisions on the court, should all be focused on making each other successful.
I guess I have to beat this into the ground. Why can't there be time when both Lars AND Okafor are on the court at the same time? Why do we have to always regard these guys as an OR alternative?
As shown at the end against UCSD, a good alternative is NEITHER. Both are poor passers and neither can shoot from farther than five feet from the basket. Cal's offense, if you can call it that, is most effective at dribble penetration. Neither can dribble, and neither is great on the roll. I think Newell, Kuany and Alajiki are big enough in the post if the team plays zone. I think it is worth looking at this approach.

sluggo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

Agree, but depends on match ups

Yes. Against a very athletic Kstate it made sense to play Okafor more. Against some other team, particularly weak teams, LT's inside scoring can be helpful. Overall, I think small ball and zone defense is the way to go.
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Going back to (and away from) the thread title Lars might be successful if.........

We had a better coach.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.