TheFiatLux said:
BearlyCareAnymore said:
eastcoastcal said:
BearlyCareAnymore said:
BeachedBear said:
Big C said:
BeachedBear said:
blungld said:
Since I started being a Cal fan in 1982 I have not missed a Cal football or basketball game live or broadcast (sometimes on delay). That's a lot of games. And a lot of commitment. I did not watch the last 2 Cal MBB games. And worse. I didn't even check the schedule to know I missed them or the results until another day to know we had lost.
If I am any kind of litmus, the program has destroyed all the good will slowly built at the end of Kutchen and through Lou with KJ, Butler, Washington, LT, Javius, Sears, etc. The "upgrade" to Harmon killed a lot of traditions and adversely effected the fan base, but that is nothing to the destruction that these past few years have wrought. It's criminal the disregard to the traditions and supporters and donors and athletes who built Cal into an upper echelon PAC team that has now fallen to the conference doormat.
I actually recorded the game so I could watch an early holiday movie with my daughter. Then I didn't even watch the recording. I'll probably erase it before watching.
I'm frustrated but can deal with losing. But after Knowlton's staff explained to me TWO YEARS AGO that I'm not a significant enough booster and that JK wants to de-emphasize MBB - apparently because he feels it distracts him from revenue Football and championship caliber sports. Well - that just destroyed my hope.
They actually said that?!? Isn't that supposed to be the proverbial "quiet part that isn't said out loud"?
What other college AD is on record as saying they want to de-emphasize Men's Basketball? Or even thinks that. Good God...
It was his staffer(s), NOT JK. Since being hired, JK has come to our football tailgate on numerous occasions - just for a few minutes of glad handing. The first time we met - I gave him a polite but very clear earful about Wyking Jones (who was still our coach). The next time, he had one of his staffers intercept me and chat with me about MBB before I could confront him again. While the chat covered disappointment in the program, most of it was about how hard Jim was working and how busy he was recovering from his 'listening tour'. After Jones was replaced, the same staffer shared with me their thoughts on the Jones program and lots of positive vibes about FOX. At that point, I believe Covid was impacting our attendance and tailgates and I had no further personal interaction with staffers (who I believe are no longer on staff). At the end of FOX season 2, I told my 'rep' (not sure what they are called these days, used to be bearbackers and gold team - they turnover frequently), that I wouldn't renew my Sec 2 Chairbacks and annual donation if FOX was retained for year 3. At a minimum, I needed assurances that a search/review was underway. I volunteered to help and provided a list of dozens of names for them to start vetting (including Golden at USF - just go watch a couple games and practices and compare).
There were two or three phone calls around this and then very little since then.
Those few exchanges at the end is where the rep shared three things:
1. I was one of many disgruntled MBB supporters who were leaving. A lot of 'I understand'. Absolutely zero "what would make you stay" - probably because I made it very clear already.
2. Not a lot of positive feelings among JK staff or reps. No Cal spirit. Very bureaucratic. Felt like working at a call center. JK was not focused on MBB, but Football and the successful non-revenue sports. JK didn't understand why MBB fans weren't like the other non-revenue fan groups and that they seemed to distract him from his primary duties. THIS POINT WAS THE END FOR ME.
3. The departing rep actually left me my tickets because no one was willing to buy them. They were subsequently removed from my account before conference play that season.
AGAIN - this was from the last rep I was interacting with (who was very unhappy with working for Cal AD). JK intentionally stopped interacting with me after the Jones discussion in his first year. I'm sure he doesn't recall my name and always brought a staffer to run interference with me.
I feel for you, but you have done the right thing. It is a painful process, but you've done the right thing. Haven't seen a game in 3 years. Barely saw any in the couple years before. Life without Cal sports is bliss. You are in a dysfunctional relationship. When you fully end it and put your energy and time into more positive pursuits, you will be a much happier person.
They are right. Basketball is a non-revenue sport for Cal. Cal doesn't make any money on it. Cal will never make money on it. Made money with Jason Kidd, but even if Cal could get those days back (it can't), circumstances have changed. Winning will not cure anything. The people that spent money in those days are dying off. Students don't care. Young alums don't care. Under 50's don't care. And they won't care even if we win. Therefore, Cal doesn't care, and one could argue they shouldn't. The community has spoken or rather has remained silent while Rome burned.
Cal basketball serves two purposes. Simply fielding a team enables Cal to stay in the Pac12 and collect the conference payout. Pretending to care to the right people, namely senile octogenarians with a lot of money keeps a few big checks rolling in. What happened to you was you don't give enough for them to care to lie to you. Hiring Wyking Jones and paying him beans made the strategy obvious. Too obvious. Mark Fox is here and is drastically overpaid because Fox was at least someone the octogenarians had heard of, and the salary makes it look like we may care. Cal thinks the extra money for Fox over Jones pays for itself by bamboozling a few poor old fools into keeping the checks coming.
I feel bad for players who have to be led to slaughter game in and game out so that Cal can get a few extra dollars, but I don't need to participate in the abuse.
Hey, you're Oaktownbear! On a different thread, pretty recently, people pointed out your on-the-money take about the Fox hire back when it initially happened. Great to see you back even though sorry to hear you're not engaged with the program anymore. Would you tune in again if Fox's replacement is a quality hire?
Correction. I was OaktownBear. That dude is gone. That dude started going to football games when he was 5 and showed up 4 hours before game time with a bunch of class reading to pass the time in his first game freshman year to make sure he got the exact seat in the rooting section he had always wanted. Love that dude. He has passed on.
I very occasionally pop in here to see how some of my ol' mates are doing because the state of things is that I care more about the community here than the underlying reason it came together. I will say east - I've seen your posts on occasion and I feel for you a little bit because you are 30 years too late here. Wish I could give you what I had - which was not necessarily winning but was a great experience. Then again, you still get to be part of a great school and a great community - just one that doesn't value sports like you. My advice to you would be to have a blast, win or lose.
Cal won't do what is necessary to bring me back, and you won't want them to. (yet. Give it 20 years). And that is to play schools who prioritize football and basketball in a similar fashion. People here are so wrapped up in national relevance that they miss that we aren't relevant in Berkeley. Games are no fun and nobody goes or cares. It's no fun to watch sports teams that have zero chance of ever competing over the course of a season. Nor is it fun to go to games that have been stripped of all tradition and fun because people thought that the payoff for allowing that was that we could be in a better position to compete.
And they won't make a quality hire as you want and even if they did, they won't provide the institutional support for that coach to succeed. I'm not bitter about that. I got to have the college experience I wanted, and I won't judge those that came after me for not wanting the same things I did. What I am bitter about is the disgraceful mismanagement that leads to the absolute gross negligence of extending Fox and Knowlton on the terms they did. (Wilcox's extension is merely negligence). As far as I'm concerned the coach next year should be Fox and it should be until his buyout expires. No one should pay one penny to bail them out of that decision. Fox should stay until they can fire him without any buyout. Nor will it make a difference. Cal's days as a basketball high major are done. Hell, this year if they dropped down to mid major, they'd still be winless. Cal should pay coaching salaries commensurate with being the mid major that it wants to be and quit the charade.
There you are!!!! Tell the story about how you first met me (but I didn't meet you!)
I've sort of drifted to where you are now, but not quite so far. A few things:
Re hoops, it was only a few years ago we won every game at home and averaged over 10,000+ people a game. It was absolutely a revenue sports and has been for a while. There's no reason we can't get back to that. While not world beaters, up until Jones and the Fox debacle, we've been relatively relevant on the national scene for the better part of 30 years. Again, not world beaters, but certainly a part of the conversation going all the way back to when you and I were barely shaving. Think about that. That's a good run. I'd argue what we're experiencing now in hoops with the disastrous Fox situation is the anomaly, not us reverting back to the mean.
Also, while we all loved Harmon, I don't agree that Haas ruined or really even took down too much the gameday experience. When Haas has over 10,000 people it rocks. It looks great on TV (especially from the floor baseline shots). What screwed us is when they decided to completely destroy the student section. I've said this before, but not only did they remove 1/3 of the section so they could put in seat backs, they took out 1/2 of the remaining rows for ADA classification so they could free up the other ADA seats to sell... oh so clever (not). And also those awful entrances to the stupid east side club. So the east side student section now has only 1/3 the students in it that it used to.
For football, well I don't know. Can we replicate the Tedford years? Is an eight year stretch every few decades enough? It's hard to argue that football wasn't FUN from 2003 - 2010ish. Again, we had a four-year stretch where we averaged over 64K people a game. Over a 5 game stretch from 2006 UCLA through 2007 Tennessee we sold out 4 of those game... in the old 72,000 seat place. Even Dykes first year we were still getting big crowds. We're playing in a 1/2 Billion dollar facility. It's hard to argue we didn't commit resources.
You and I are cut from the same cloth when it comes to growing up with Cal. I made so many friends (including a life long best friend) waiting in line for hours to get into Harmon. It's hard for students of the last 25 years to believe this, but we used to do cheers at football games 1/2 hour before the game even started... I'd be warming up the crowd there were already so many students there. Times change. Some things are better, some were better.
But, like you, my interest level has cratered. Not only do I not care about hoops right now, when I do bother to think about it, it makes me clench in anger. Unlike you, I don't think it's actually that hard to fix. Like you, I just don't think we have the people in place to do it.
Good to hear from you, Ken. You are one of the people I have felt for in particular given how much you have put into the program. I've seen some of your posts as I've popped in and out. I think you and I are pretty close in our positions about where Cal is. I think we depart in where we can go (or are likely to).
First, let's be clear. Cal massively mismanages its athletic department. Nothing I'm going to say is meant to excuse that. The Fox regime was predictable and a drastic overpay.
I would agree with all of your arguments if it were 2012. I fought my whole life against the notion that Cal can't compete. I believe we could have competed. I actually think there was a moment where we almost got over the hump in football and created a sustaining program. It's not that I've changed my mind about that. It is that I believe circumstances have changed.
The first point that overarches the whole thing. To people who say that winning solves everything. In college, winning programs don't make money because they win. They win because they have money. (See Oregon and Phil Knight) If Alabama loses, their fans dump money into the program. If Cal loses, the much smaller fan base they have leaves. The Cal community, the school, the students, the alums have never prioritized football and basketball to the extent many other schools do, and that disparity is only getting worse. Cal sports have to break even or come darned close to it, and quite simply we are fighting against a group of schools that make a ton of cash and an even larger group that will chuck a ton of cash at a loss to compete in sports. In the old days, NCAA restrictions kept things not even, but in the ballpark of even. Donors could only chuck money at facilities. Those restrictions are largely gone and we simply do not have the fan numbers, fan loyalty, or donor dollars to compete in what is basically now an unfettered marketplace.
New headwind #1 Interest in college sports is cratering in a lot of places, but especially the west. Forget Cal. Attendance at UCLA football games is half what it was less than 10 years ago and is significantly down this year even with more success than they have had in years. No one on campus cares about it. Their storied basketball program maintains a following, but their athletic department is in deep financial trouble. Cal has been slammed by the same trends.
"New" headwind #2 Students are different. Students at elite colleges, and frankly at a lot of less elite colleges, spend less time on social activities than in the past. With the expense, a lot of kids are trying to get out as quickly as they can, some coming in with a pile of AP credits and trying to graduate early. They are competing with their classmates for graduate school, internships, and jobs. They aren't reliving Animal House. Now, if you are Michigan, where THE social activity in the fall is football, you are fine. If you are Cal, you ain't. The interest level has cratered among students, but that has been happening for a long time and you don't have young alumni interest either.
New headwind #3 NIL. I can't believe people didn't see this coming. We don't have the alumni money to compete in this area. Those that think we can are just in fantasy land. No cavalry is coming. Yes, I know. We have alums with tons of money. That isn't the question. We don't have alums willing to spend that money on this. Winning will not create that base. If those rich alums cared, they'd be buying the best basketball team they can right now. Bottom line is that there are probably at least 50 schools that offer a better deal to revenue athletes right now. Even when Cal increases its commitment, it is always a day late and a dollar short.
New headwind #4 Player mobility. Quite simply, players don't have the school allegiance they used to and the new rules make it easy to change programs. We need to re-recruit anyone who excels every year, and again, there are probably at least 50 schools that offer a better deal to revenue athletes right now.
Predictable headwind #5 the big sports donors are aging out and they aren't being replaced. A lot of the big donors remember the days when Cal was a sports power, and frankly, that group is starting to look like a WWII reunion. Big donors who experienced basketball championships and a Rose Bowl at Cal were 70 in the height of Tedford are approaching mid 80's now. This is a huge problem Cal has known about for a long time but has not made significant progress in. On top of that, a lot of our donors prefer to donate to non-revenue sports.
These aren't things that we can just do something about. We are who we are. College Prep in Oakland is not going to compete with De La Salle in football. That is due to priorities, not resources. If most of the Cal community woke up tomorrow deciding that football and basketball are top priority, we would kick ass. It's not going to happen.
Look, the Cal administration has been telling us this with their actions for a while now, and they are starting to tell us this in actual words, especially with respect to NIL. I stand by my assertion that they are doing the minimum necessary to keep the old donors on the hook as long as they can. In the end, the Pac-12 is in for a big pay cut, and our donor base and fan base is shrinking in a way that winning will not solve. The money is drying up and sooner or later things are going to change.
As for the fan base, look at this place. Guys that were here for 15 or 20 years are gone. A lot who are still around are here to complain. There was a long line of less interested fans than I am who jumped before I ever would have. If they lost me, they are doomed. If they lost Ken Montgomery, geez, is anyone left? There are so many former posters I could never imagined jumping ship. Frankly, I think most that are left are there out of habit.
For me, football and basketball have made the full transition to being an overpaid Triple A league. Paying top dollar for bad football and basketball doesn't interest me. And I will tell you that doing college visits with my kids and further research afterward was an eye opener. Many of them do care about sports and students do attend with a lot of school spirit. They just don't care that they aren't "nationally relevant". Personally, if I have a choice between playing UC Davis and maybe winning while getting rid of all the baggage the dollars bring with them, or fielding a body bag program who we send out to get their asses handed to them by Oregon, so we can fund field hockey, I choose playing Davis. Believe me, I would love a third option, but I don't see it.
SJSU used to have body bag games against Nebraska to fund their football program. We have whole body bag sports to fund the rest of the athletic department. I can't argue with the financial strategy, but I don't have to be a part of it.