dan1997 said:
We need the best fit for Cal and it's Pasternack. In 6 seasons at UCSB, he has a .714 win percentage and set a school record with 27 wins this season. He's been to NCAA Tournament 2 of last 3 years. He is extremely versed in the NIL landscape and has had to deal with tough admissions. He has recruited to a high level at both Cal and Arizona, plus beat high majors for recruits at UCSB. Most importantly for Cal, he engineered the greatest turnaround in the history of college basketball, inheriting a 6-win team and won 23 games in his first season at UCSB.
Abdur-Rahim has had one good season and has a .378 win percentage in 4 years at Kennesaw State, he is 29 games below .500. He was impressive but has only one good season. Doesn't have the west coast ties, especially in California, which is critical to success at Cal. Plus, has not had to deal academics like Pasternack has.
In what way is he "extremely versed in the NIL landscape"?? He has studied it? Whatever UCSB has done in terms of NIL, it is insignificant compared to what would need to be done at Cal.
Let's face it, NIL is just getting started, and really, NOBODY is "extremely versed in the NIL landscape" yet. Starting to get it figured out? Sure. And it is different to "embrace" NIL versus understanding it.
In that respect, all we need is someone smart enough to understand and figure it out as best as anybody can figure it out. Any intelligent coach, whether Pasternack or AAR or someone else with brains, can get enough help to figure out how to navigate the NIL landscape, as long as they are interested in doing so. If power conference NIL had been around for 10 years, I might say we want someone who has been at a power conference school to understand NIL. Which still could be Pasternack or AAR or someone else. But since it is still in its infancy, neither Pasternack nor AAR has power conference experience with NIL, which is more important than mid-major experience.
West coast ties are very helpful in hitting the ground running, but I care more about the long term, a good coach will build west coast ties fast, plus, with the right assistants, there will be some west coast ties right away.
The best argument for JP in your post is experience with academic issues.
I don't know who the best choice is, I'm hoping those helping Knowlton can figure it out and persuade Knowlton. But I'm not sure it matters who the best choice is, because I'm not confident Knowlton will pick the best choice.