Ihmo the sdsu model works. Everyone get the same amount. Made a non profit by having the stipend require x number of community hours by these celebs to nonprofits that apply. Fund raising ask modest (300k gets each player a 2k a month spipend)

I will send a check to legends this week but it isn't sustainable over time and when market prices are being set by sports obsessed billionaires

socaltownie said:

---

Ihmo the sdsu model works. Everyone get the same amount. Made a non profit by having the stipend require x number of community hours by these celebs to nonprofits that apply. Fund raising ask modest (300k gets each player a 2k a month spipend)

I will send a check to legends this week but it isn't sustainable over time and when market prices are being set by sports obsessed billionaires

---

Matt Bradley is also signed by Glacier Athletes, which is separate from that fund.

Do we know if that is a direct play to play thing or just an nil conduit for true marketing plays

socaltownie said:

---

Do we know if that is a direct play to play thing or just an nil conduit for true marketing plays

---

. No.

They wouldn't do that.

Econ141 said:

---

This is a chicken-and-egg fiasco. Why plow money into a program where leadership keeps doing things the wrong way and hasn't (for years) shown any competence?

Even if I like the current individuals on the team, I am paying in to see Cal thrive ... But there is no thriving with second rate coaches and a chancellor that could care less about basketball let alone football. Now is there thriving without quality players ... But in this case, I think you need the right leadership in place before throwing money around. I will wait to see how Madsen does his first year.

---

No matter who he's left with, they can still play defense and be expected to.