Why Knowlton is embracing NIL

2,231 Views | 7 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by parentswerebears
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe knowing the university doesn't have to pay the players but can reap the rewards of enhanced ticket and concession sales.
Go Bears!
Shocky1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski, ur just making **** up, knowlton isn't embracing anything other than his $1,300,000+ paychecks

fake news#
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NIL is the law of land, both as passed by the California legislature and signed into law by the governor (ie Knowlton's ultimate boss) and as strongly endorsed by the United States Supreme Court in a rare unanimous decision (with indications of going much further and likely pushing for pay for play) and now included in NCAA rules.

Knowlton has made it clear he is for doing it "the right way" (strict amateurism) and is pushing back against pay for play and is trying to force Cal to adhere to the narrowest, most literal, narrow definition of NIL, as the NCAA has set forth but cannot even enforce. That is probably why he eliminated Pasternak early.

Under the circumstances we are very lucky we ended up with Madsen and we have Sebasta and the California Legends to support him.

Knowlton sucks. He has to go.
mbBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oskidunker said:

Maybe knowing the university doesn't have to pay the players but can reap the rewards of enhanced ticket and concession sales.
Not sure what there is about Cal NIL that shows Knowlton as a positive, and/or embracing. Nor do I think it matters. I don't believe he is going to survive the swimming investigation...
BeachedBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calumnus said:

....

Knowlton sucks. He has to go.

Calumnus, its confusing comments like this that make it all murky.

What are you trying to say?
parentswerebears
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think Calumnus is saying that Knowlton is really bad at his job and due to his bad decision making, poor performance and lack of general awareness of what the job of athletic director is supposed to do for sports other than hockey, along with his poor handling of a major scandal that hurt many student athletes, he die not deserve the job he has and should be terminated with all post haste. I think. Correct me if I am wrong.
BeachedBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
parentswerebears said:

I think Calumnus is saying that Knowlton is really bad at his job and due to his bad decision making, poor performance and lack of general awareness of what the job of athletic director is supposed to do for sports other than hockey, along with his poor handling of a major scandal that hurt many student athletes, he die not deserve the job he has and should be terminated with all post haste. I think. Correct me if I am wrong.
But.... the listening tour.
parentswerebears
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In one and… nothing. The decision was already made.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.