Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Johnfox said:
Offense has been way better without Cone in the lineup
HoopDreams said:
I also hate it when you foul with 2.5 seconds left
Just pads their score
Johnfox said:
If Brown can put some muscle on this offseason, he's primed for a strong sophomore season.
75bear said:When Cone isn't producing offense, and is a liablity on defense, it's a recipe for bad results.HoopDreams said:
Their entire game plan is to attack Cone
We're 342nd in the nation coming into this game for opponent 3pt FG%. At this point in the season, we can't claim it's a statistical anomaly. It's because we give everyone wide open 3s, don't close out on shooters, or fight hard enough through screens.
We need to start by changing something up on defense, we can't keep trying the same things over and over again and expecting different results. USC mixed in zone a few times, and it resulted in Cal turnovers and easy buckets.
Let's try something new for the 2nd half!
This game isn't over yet. USC is clearly more talented than us, but they are a bit undisciplined, and seem like a team that is still figuring itself out. We're not out of this yet, but we need to pivot.
Exactly. But the here and now has its own challenges: 1) compiling essentially a roster of new guys that haven't played together (too bad we burned the Europe trip on Fox which could have helped players gel) and 2) Mad Dog being a newer coach, does he or someone on the staff know how to get guys to buy in and play elite defense, which is more of a willingness to commit rather than pure talent?bearister said:
Don MacLean said in the intro that D is basically Cal's issue. Isn't that more of a here and now coaching issue and not a 3 years from now amassing more talent issue?
Big C said:75bear said:When Cone isn't producing offense, and is a liablity on defense, it's a recipe for bad results.HoopDreams said:
Their entire game plan is to attack Cone
We're 342nd in the nation coming into this game for opponent 3pt FG%. At this point in the season, we can't claim it's a statistical anomaly. It's because we give everyone wide open 3s, don't close out on shooters, or fight hard enough through screens.
We need to start by changing something up on defense, we can't keep trying the same things over and over again and expecting different results. USC mixed in zone a few times, and it resulted in Cal turnovers and easy buckets.
Let's try something new for the 2nd half!
This game isn't over yet. USC is clearly more talented than us, but they are a bit undisciplined, and seem like a team that is still figuring itself out. We're not out of this yet, but we need to pivot.
this needed to be said
This is Mark Madsen's fifth year as a head coach. I understand that this is his first year with these guys, but after four years of coaching he really should be past the "seemingly tries to learn from every situation" stage.KoreAmBear said:
It's still very early in Mad Dog's coaching career arc, and I can already see from the way he talks, seemingly tries to learn from every situation, and is not deflective, he will just get better.
That said, I don't buy the this is such a complete rebuild it has to take 3+ years to win, esp in basketball.
He has already rebuilt the roster with pretty much solid talent. I don't think talent is quite the issue. This team shouldn't be losing so many games. There is lack of cohesion on offense and defense where the whole is less than the sum of its parts right now. You still have guys like Tyson and Aimaq getting their numbers. With those consistent numbers, that usually should be enough to win games if the team is on the same page.
The number one thing though is willing to sell out on defense. I don't think anyone can accuse our team of maxing out our defensive effort. That's also not a talent issue.
I didn't realize he has been coaching for that long. Still relatively green.RedlessWardrobe said:This is Mark Madsen's fifth year as a head coach. I understand that this is his first year with these guys, but after four years of coaching he really should be past the "seemingly tries to learn from every situation" stage.KoreAmBear said:
It's still very early in Mad Dog's coaching career arc, and I can already see from the way he talks, seemingly tries to learn from every situation, and is not deflective, he will just get better.
That said, I don't buy the this is such a complete rebuild it has to take 3+ years to win, esp in basketball.
He has already rebuilt the roster with pretty much solid talent. I don't think talent is quite the issue. This team shouldn't be losing so many games. There is lack of cohesion on offense and defense where the whole is less than the sum of its parts right now. You still have guys like Tyson and Aimaq getting their numbers. With those consistent numbers, that usually should be enough to win games if the team is on the same page.
The number one thing though is willing to sell out on defense. I don't think anyone can accuse our team of maxing out our defensive effort. That's also not a talent issue.
With MM he came aboard so late that it had to be difficult in putting a team together over and above what was left on the roster. Unfortunately that required he had to go heavily to the transfer portal and they are mostly the player getting playing time. Thank goodness we have them, but it leaves the door open to next year being like this year. We have to develop a core of good recruits or if transfer portal players, those with a few years left. With four players, maybe more, being gone next year having had but one year left, I just hope we don't repeat this year even though same was pretty necessary.KoreAmBear said:I didn't realize he has been coaching for that long. Still relatively green.RedlessWardrobe said:This is Mark Madsen's fifth year as a head coach. I understand that this is his first year with these guys, but after four years of coaching he really should be past the "seemingly tries to learn from every situation" stage.KoreAmBear said:
It's still very early in Mad Dog's coaching career arc, and I can already see from the way he talks, seemingly tries to learn from every situation, and is not deflective, he will just get better.
That said, I don't buy the this is such a complete rebuild it has to take 3+ years to win, esp in basketball.
He has already rebuilt the roster with pretty much solid talent. I don't think talent is quite the issue. This team shouldn't be losing so many games. There is lack of cohesion on offense and defense where the whole is less than the sum of its parts right now. You still have guys like Tyson and Aimaq getting their numbers. With those consistent numbers, that usually should be enough to win games if the team is on the same page.
The number one thing though is willing to sell out on defense. I don't think anyone can accuse our team of maxing out our defensive effort. That's also not a talent issue.
As far as playing D, I am sure all 320+ D1 teams want to play elite D. But only a few do it (and not necessarily teams that have athletic/skilled talent). I think it does require a combo of the players completely buying in and coaching scheme. Right now we appear to be lacking in both.
He's got a wealth of informal consultants around him with connections to our program -- Monty, Ben, and Jay John (is he still around)?bearister said:
"…..he'll definitely spend the off-season speaking with other coaches about what changes to make and what went right or wrong."
Don't you just assume Monty has his ear? If not, why not?
Generally, you'd be correct, but Cone and Aimaq have some specific inherent defensive liabilities that cannot be fixed with coaching. Daws is just slow, and no amount of cocahing or training will give him quick first step. Cone is not only small but also makes bad decisions on D. And since he also makes bad decisions on O as a 5th player, that aint' fixable either.bearister said:
Don MacLean said in the intro that D is basically Cal's issue. Isn't that more of a here and now coaching issue and not a 3 years from now amassing more talent issue?
Big Dog said:Generally, you'd be correct, but Cone and Aimaq have some specific inherent defensive liabilities that cannot be fixed with coaching. Daws is just slow, and no amount of cocahing or training will give him quick first step. Cone is not only small but also makes bad decisions on D. And since he also makes bad decisions on O as a 5th player, that aint' fixable either.bearister said:
Don MacLean said in the intro that D is basically Cal's issue. Isn't that more of a here and now coaching issue and not a 3 years from now amassing more talent issue?