Defense

3,956 Views | 37 Replies | Last: 8 mo ago by barsad
RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Had a great time at the game yesterday. Great vibe.

I'm gonna keep this simple. The first 15 games, one of the biggest complaints by all of us was our defense. Well yesterday Oregon was 20/57 (4/18 on 3's), for 35%. In addition to that, we had our usual slow start (which is still an issue), they made their first four shots. Take that away, and they're 16/53 - 30%.

Some of this is attributed to Kennedy, some to Cone's improvement, and you gotta give credit to MM on this one. In addition, Daws gave Donte a good amount of resistance, even if he didn't completely shut him down.

Hope this continues, and hopefully we can see it from start to finish.
ducky23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RedlessWardrobe said:

Had a great time at the game yesterday. Great vibe.

I'm gonna keep this simple. The first 15 games, one of the biggest complaints by all of us was our defense. Well yesterday Oregon was 20/57 (4/18 on 3's), for 35%. In addition to that, we had our usual slow start (which is still an issue), they made their first four shots. Take that away, and they're 16/53 - 30%.

Some of this is attributed to Kennedy, some to Cone's improvement, and you gotta give credit to MM on this one. In addition, Daws gave Donte a good amount of resistance, even if he didn't completely shut him down.

Hope this continues, and hopefully we can see it from start to finish.


I've posted this in another thread, but one of the biggest reasons for our early defensive struggles was figuring out what to do with Daws on the defensive end. We ended up making two huge adjustments as the season went on

1. Defending the PnR: early in the season we either switched or hedged a lot of PnR when Daws' man was the screener. It became clear that Daws didn't have the lateral quickness for this, which explains the vast number of open threes to start the year. We've now switched to either drop or ICE coverage. Which basically allows Daws to just drop and keeps him away from the perimeter. It's not my preferred PnR coverage (nor madsen's) but it's what you have to do when your big isn't super mobile

2. Low post defense: early in the season, we were basically leaving Daws on an island when the ball was entered into the post, which led to some opposing centers having career games against us (example the Montana st big had a season high 26 against us).
We've since brought a lot more help in the post, which has made it much more difficult for opposing bigs. It's also helped that our rotations our very on point right now (as compared to earlier in the year) so helping doesn't hurt us as much as it did earlier.

The above, with the addition of Kennedy mid season and the improvement of cone from a liability to a plus defender has gotten our defense from one of the worst in P4 to average/slightly above average.

Huge credit to MM.
4thGenCal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ducky23 said:

RedlessWardrobe said:

Had a great time at the game yesterday. Great vibe.

I'm gonna keep this simple. The first 15 games, one of the biggest complaints by all of us was our defense. Well yesterday Oregon was 20/57 (4/18 on 3's), for 35%. In addition to that, we had our usual slow start (which is still an issue), they made their first four shots. Take that away, and they're 16/53 - 30%.

Some of this is attributed to Kennedy, some to Cone's improvement, and you gotta give credit to MM on this one. In addition, Daws gave Donte a good amount of resistance, even if he didn't completely shut him down.

Hope this continues, and hopefully we can see it from start to finish.


I've posted this in another thread, but one of the biggest reasons for our early defensive struggles was figuring out what to do with Daws on the defensive end. We ended up making two huge adjustments as the season went on

1. Defending the PnR: early in the season we either switched or hedged a lot of PnR when Daws' man was the screener. It became clear that Daws didn't have the lateral quickness for this, which explains the vast number of open threes to start the year. We've now switched to either drop or ICE coverage. Which basically allows Daws to just drop and keeps him away from the perimeter. It's not my preferred PnR coverage (nor madsen's) but it's what you have to do when your big isn't super mobile

2. Low post defense: early in the season, we were basically leaving Daws on an island when the ball was entered into the post, which led to some opposing centers having career games against us (example the Montana st big had a season high 26 against us).
We've since brought a lot more help in the post, which has made it much more difficult for opposing bigs. It's also helped that our rotations our very on point right now (as compared to earlier in the year) so helping doesn't hurt us as much as it did earlier.

The above, with the addition of Kennedy mid season and the improvement of cone from a liability to a plus defender has gotten our defense from one of the worst in P4 to average/slightly above average.

Huge credit to MM.
Really good observations. Also Madsen met with Daws outside of practice(mid pre season) and challenged him to give much better/consistent effort on the defensive end. Certainly not gifted with even average lateral movement, but is giving much better effort overall defensively. Team also would give spurts of defensive effort, but only after a team/coaches mtg after the ASU home loss, did the team bring consistent defensive effort over the entire game. The lack of depth is a factor as 5 guys are forced to play 32-36 minutes/game. Really just 2 subs available for minimum of 8-12 minutes/game. Losing Askew and ND though not starter level guys - still hurt as one has the savvy and the other could bring physicality in spurts. Staff and players have really improved the results and execution on the court from the early to mid stages of the season.
drizzlybear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4thGenCal said:

ducky23 said:

RedlessWardrobe said:

Had a great time at the game yesterday. Great vibe.

I'm gonna keep this simple. The first 15 games, one of the biggest complaints by all of us was our defense. Well yesterday Oregon was 20/57 (4/18 on 3's), for 35%. In addition to that, we had our usual slow start (which is still an issue), they made their first four shots. Take that away, and they're 16/53 - 30%.

Some of this is attributed to Kennedy, some to Cone's improvement, and you gotta give credit to MM on this one. In addition, Daws gave Donte a good amount of resistance, even if he didn't completely shut him down.

Hope this continues, and hopefully we can see it from start to finish.


I've posted this in another thread, but one of the biggest reasons for our early defensive struggles was figuring out what to do with Daws on the defensive end. We ended up making two huge adjustments as the season went on

1. Defending the PnR: early in the season we either switched or hedged a lot of PnR when Daws' man was the screener. It became clear that Daws didn't have the lateral quickness for this, which explains the vast number of open threes to start the year. We've now switched to either drop or ICE coverage. Which basically allows Daws to just drop and keeps him away from the perimeter. It's not my preferred PnR coverage (nor madsen's) but it's what you have to do when your big isn't super mobile

2. Low post defense: early in the season, we were basically leaving Daws on an island when the ball was entered into the post, which led to some opposing centers having career games against us (example the Montana st big had a season high 26 against us).
We've since brought a lot more help in the post, which has made it much more difficult for opposing bigs. It's also helped that our rotations our very on point right now (as compared to earlier in the year) so helping doesn't hurt us as much as it did earlier.

The above, with the addition of Kennedy mid season and the improvement of cone from a liability to a plus defender has gotten our defense from one of the worst in P4 to average/slightly above average.

Huge credit to MM.
Really good observations. Also Madsen met with Daws outside of practice(mid pre season) and challenged him to give much better/consistent effort on the defensive end. Certainly not gifted with even average lateral movement, but is giving much better effort overall defensively. Team also would give spurts of defensive effort, but only after a team/coaches mtg after the ASU home loss, did the team bring consistent defensive effort over the entire game. The lack of depth is a factor as 5 guys are forced to play 32-36 minutes/game. Really just 2 subs available for minimum of 8-12 minutes/game. Losing Askew and ND though not starter level guys - still hurt as one has the savvy and the other could bring physicality in spurts. Staff and players have really improved the results and execution on the court from the early to mid stages of the season.

I think this team finally came together once Askew was shut down for the season. It was at that point that the team found its core identity, especially on offense. It's not a knock on Askew, personally, but while he was available there was uncertainty and confusion about roles, especially among the guards. And that confusion was made worse by the uncertainty of when/whether Askew would be available for any given game.

Since that time (after the first ucla game), the offensive approach has coalesced around, and the team seems to have fully bought into, Tyson being the primary focus, lots of P&R with Aimaq, and perhaps most importantly, Cone isn't trying to prove himself and earn/preserve minutes by trying to do too much (which caused a lot of poor shot selection earlier in the season).

Askew did not provide enough individual positives (even simply in the form of a needed body for depth) to overcome these more broad effects on the team.

It's neat to see the team really discover and utilize their roles so effectively now. It's too bad (but understandable for a team so heavy on new transfers) it took 2 months for that to happen.

I do think it would be very helpful for NDO to return, if possible. Aimaq will need lots more rest and help when we try to win on four consecutive days.
4thGenCal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
drizzlybear said:

4thGenCal said:

ducky23 said:

RedlessWardrobe said:

Had a great time at the game yesterday. Great vibe.

I'm gonna keep this simple. The first 15 games, one of the biggest complaints by all of us was our defense. Well yesterday Oregon was 20/57 (4/18 on 3's), for 35%. In addition to that, we had our usual slow start (which is still an issue), they made their first four shots. Take that away, and they're 16/53 - 30%.

Some of this is attributed to Kennedy, some to Cone's improvement, and you gotta give credit to MM on this one. In addition, Daws gave Donte a good amount of resistance, even if he didn't completely shut him down.

Hope this continues, and hopefully we can see it from start to finish.


I've posted this in another thread, but one of the biggest reasons for our early defensive struggles was figuring out what to do with Daws on the defensive end. We ended up making two huge adjustments as the season went on

1. Defending the PnR: early in the season we either switched or hedged a lot of PnR when Daws' man was the screener. It became clear that Daws didn't have the lateral quickness for this, which explains the vast number of open threes to start the year. We've now switched to either drop or ICE coverage. Which basically allows Daws to just drop and keeps him away from the perimeter. It's not my preferred PnR coverage (nor madsen's) but it's what you have to do when your big isn't super mobile

2. Low post defense: early in the season, we were basically leaving Daws on an island when the ball was entered into the post, which led to some opposing centers having career games against us (example the Montana st big had a season high 26 against us).
We've since brought a lot more help in the post, which has made it much more difficult for opposing bigs. It's also helped that our rotations our very on point right now (as compared to earlier in the year) so helping doesn't hurt us as much as it did earlier.

The above, with the addition of Kennedy mid season and the improvement of cone from a liability to a plus defender has gotten our defense from one of the worst in P4 to average/slightly above average.

Huge credit to MM.
Really good observations. Also Madsen met with Daws outside of practice(mid pre season) and challenged him to give much better/consistent effort on the defensive end. Certainly not gifted with even average lateral movement, but is giving much better effort overall defensively. Team also would give spurts of defensive effort, but only after a team/coaches mtg after the ASU home loss, did the team bring consistent defensive effort over the entire game. The lack of depth is a factor as 5 guys are forced to play 32-36 minutes/game. Really just 2 subs available for minimum of 8-12 minutes/game. Losing Askew and ND though not starter level guys - still hurt as one has the savvy and the other could bring physicality in spurts. Staff and players have really improved the results and execution on the court from the early to mid stages of the season.

I think this team finally came together once Askew was shut down for the season. It was at that point that the team found its core identity, especially on offense. It's not a knock on Askew, personally, but while he was available there was uncertainty and confusion about roles, especially among the guards. And that confusion was made worse by the uncertainty of when/whether Askew would be available for any given game.

Since that time (after the first ucla game), the offensive approach has coalesced around, and the team seems to have fully bought into, Tyson being the primary focus, lots of P&R with Aimaq, and perhaps most importantly, Cone isn't trying to prove himself and earn/preserve minutes by trying to do too much (which caused a lot of poor shot selection earlier in the season).

Askew did not provide enough individual positives (even simply in the form of a needed body for depth) to overcome these more broad effects on the team.

It's neat to see the team really discover and utilize their roles so effectively now. It's too bad (but understandable for a team so heavy on new transfers) it took 2 months for that to happen.

I do think it would be very helpful for NDO to return, if possible. Aimaq will need lots more rest and help when we try to win on four consecutive days.
Definitely w/o Askew the roles were clearly laid out simply because there became very few alternative line ups (especially at point/ball handling versus the various presses). However to be accurate - Askew was shut down in early December(2nd planter fasciitis injury) and the team didn't come together fully until early January after a open team mtg that motivated everyone to take ownership to be better. Cone is a "win first" guy and realized his forced shots were hurting the team (and teams know that to shut down his open looks, greatly hinders Cal's offense). But the coaches are adamant that having Askew available would be a net positive - there simply is a big drop off at handling the ball when Cone(Brown just not ready for major minutes) is out versus the press and or creating penetration in the paint/creating a shot etc. For now - Tyson is doing fantastic at handling the ball and or creating when He is needed to take over, But that is a very tough pattern to depend on consistently.
Cone and most of the first 5 are in excellent shape and can handle easily 32-34 minutes/game - however on a short rest (games less than 48 hours apart or in a conf tournament of 3 potential games back to back - it will pay its toll and make it likely too tough to overcome. The staff is on Tyson to make sure that He is continually hydrating himself through out the day, but the commitment to do so, for whatever reason has not been consistent - though much better lately. NDO is taking his redshirt year and will not be back this season. That hurts (when Daws needs a blow) since Larson is very smart and is nearly always in the correct position - rotations etc, but is physically dominated due to needing another 15+lbs, Curtis is long but extremely inexperienced and not ready for major minutes and Newell while skilled and experienced, is not big/long enough to guard the better bigs down low. Tyson is so good that He can literally carry a team when a key bucket is needed. Hopefully He can continue his high level of play.
sonofabear51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TY 4thGenCal for that update.

Much appreciated.

GO BEARS!!
Start Slowly and taper off
drizzlybear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4thGenCal said:

drizzlybear said:

4thGenCal said:

ducky23 said:

RedlessWardrobe said:

Had a great time at the game yesterday. Great vibe.

I'm gonna keep this simple. The first 15 games, one of the biggest complaints by all of us was our defense. Well yesterday Oregon was 20/57 (4/18 on 3's), for 35%. In addition to that, we had our usual slow start (which is still an issue), they made their first four shots. Take that away, and they're 16/53 - 30%.

Some of this is attributed to Kennedy, some to Cone's improvement, and you gotta give credit to MM on this one. In addition, Daws gave Donte a good amount of resistance, even if he didn't completely shut him down.

Hope this continues, and hopefully we can see it from start to finish.


I've posted this in another thread, but one of the biggest reasons for our early defensive struggles was figuring out what to do with Daws on the defensive end. We ended up making two huge adjustments as the season went on

1. Defending the PnR: early in the season we either switched or hedged a lot of PnR when Daws' man was the screener. It became clear that Daws didn't have the lateral quickness for this, which explains the vast number of open threes to start the year. We've now switched to either drop or ICE coverage. Which basically allows Daws to just drop and keeps him away from the perimeter. It's not my preferred PnR coverage (nor madsen's) but it's what you have to do when your big isn't super mobile

2. Low post defense: early in the season, we were basically leaving Daws on an island when the ball was entered into the post, which led to some opposing centers having career games against us (example the Montana st big had a season high 26 against us).
We've since brought a lot more help in the post, which has made it much more difficult for opposing bigs. It's also helped that our rotations our very on point right now (as compared to earlier in the year) so helping doesn't hurt us as much as it did earlier.

The above, with the addition of Kennedy mid season and the improvement of cone from a liability to a plus defender has gotten our defense from one of the worst in P4 to average/slightly above average.

Huge credit to MM.
Really good observations. Also Madsen met with Daws outside of practice(mid pre season) and challenged him to give much better/consistent effort on the defensive end. Certainly not gifted with even average lateral movement, but is giving much better effort overall defensively. Team also would give spurts of defensive effort, but only after a team/coaches mtg after the ASU home loss, did the team bring consistent defensive effort over the entire game. The lack of depth is a factor as 5 guys are forced to play 32-36 minutes/game. Really just 2 subs available for minimum of 8-12 minutes/game. Losing Askew and ND though not starter level guys - still hurt as one has the savvy and the other could bring physicality in spurts. Staff and players have really improved the results and execution on the court from the early to mid stages of the season.

I think this team finally came together once Askew was shut down for the season. It was at that point that the team found its core identity, especially on offense. It's not a knock on Askew, personally, but while he was available there was uncertainty and confusion about roles, especially among the guards. And that confusion was made worse by the uncertainty of when/whether Askew would be available for any given game.

Since that time (after the first ucla game), the offensive approach has coalesced around, and the team seems to have fully bought into, Tyson being the primary focus, lots of P&R with Aimaq, and perhaps most importantly, Cone isn't trying to prove himself and earn/preserve minutes by trying to do too much (which caused a lot of poor shot selection earlier in the season).

Askew did not provide enough individual positives (even simply in the form of a needed body for depth) to overcome these more broad effects on the team.

It's neat to see the team really discover and utilize their roles so effectively now. It's too bad (but understandable for a team so heavy on new transfers) it took 2 months for that to happen.

I do think it would be very helpful for NDO to return, if possible. Aimaq will need lots more rest and help when we try to win on four consecutive days.
Definitely w/o Askew the roles were clearly laid out simply because there became very few alternative line ups (especially at point/ball handling versus the various presses). However to be accurate - Askew was shut down in early December(2nd planter fasciitis injury) and the team didn't come together fully until early January after a open team mtg that motivated everyone to take ownership to be better. Cone is a "win first" guy and realized his forced shots were hurting the team (and teams know that to shut down his open looks, greatly hinders Cal's offense). But the coaches are adamant that having Askew available would be a net positive - there simply is a big drop off at handling the ball when Cone(Brown just not ready for major minutes) is out versus the press and or creating penetration in the paint/creating a shot etc. For now - Tyson is doing fantastic at handling the ball and or creating when He is needed to take over, But that is a very tough pattern to depend on consistently.
Cone and most of the first 5 are in excellent shape and can handle easily 32-34 minutes/game - however on a short rest (games less than 48 hours apart or in a conf tournament of 3 potential games back to back - it will pay its toll and make it likely too tough to overcome. The staff is on Tyson to make sure that He is continually hydrating himself through out the day, but the commitment to do so, for whatever reason has not been consistent - though much better lately. NDO is taking his redshirt year and will not be back this season. That hurts (when Daws needs a blow) since Larson is very smart and is nearly always in the correct position - rotations etc, but is physically dominated due to needing another 15+lbs, Curtis is long but extremely inexperienced and not ready for major minutes and Newell while skilled and experienced, is not big/long enough to guard the better bigs down low. Tyson is so good that He can literally carry a team when a key bucket is needed. Hopefully He can continue his high level of play.

4thGen, I love your insights, but you're incorrect about when Askew went down. He played several games in late December including the Arizona games at the end of December. Moraga posted an article on Jan 9 saying Madsen made the announcement at the presser following those early-January LA games that Askew was being officially shut down at that time. And that was when, as you note, the team really came together.

I don't doubt you that the real reason they came together at that time was a team meeting, and that the coaches contend Askew is a value-added asset to the team. You have that insider access. But as a regular fan, I wasn't aware of the meeting. I just noticed that they were suddenly/finally playing better together, with much more evident purpose, organization, and execution on offense. As an outsider I saw that Askew (whose play, i have to say, I've never been particularly impressed with, including under Madsen) was not only no longer playing but, more importantly, after a month of sporadic and uncertain availability into early January, was announced that he was out for good. It was at that very moment, as you note, the team started playing organized basketball. The defense was still yet to come, but the offense started to take off at that time.

So that's why I made that connection to the timing of Askew being shut down for good. I was unaware of the behind-the-scenes things that were happening at the same time.

As always, I appreciate your insights very much.
4thGenCal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
drizzlybear said:

4thGenCal said:

drizzlybear said:

4thGenCal said:

ducky23 said:

RedlessWardrobe said:

Had a great time at the game yesterday. Great vibe.

I'm gonna keep this simple. The first 15 games, one of the biggest complaints by all of us was our defense. Well yesterday Oregon was 20/57 (4/18 on 3's), for 35%. In addition to that, we had our usual slow start (which is still an issue), they made their first four shots. Take that away, and they're 16/53 - 30%.

Some of this is attributed to Kennedy, some to Cone's improvement, and you gotta give credit to MM on this one. In addition, Daws gave Donte a good amount of resistance, even if he didn't completely shut him down.

Hope this continues, and hopefully we can see it from start to finish.


I've posted this in another thread, but one of the biggest reasons for our early defensive struggles was figuring out what to do with Daws on the defensive end. We ended up making two huge adjustments as the season went on

1. Defending the PnR: early in the season we either switched or hedged a lot of PnR when Daws' man was the screener. It became clear that Daws didn't have the lateral quickness for this, which explains the vast number of open threes to start the year. We've now switched to either drop or ICE coverage. Which basically allows Daws to just drop and keeps him away from the perimeter. It's not my preferred PnR coverage (nor madsen's) but it's what you have to do when your big isn't super mobile

2. Low post defense: early in the season, we were basically leaving Daws on an island when the ball was entered into the post, which led to some opposing centers having career games against us (example the Montana st big had a season high 26 against us).
We've since brought a lot more help in the post, which has made it much more difficult for opposing bigs. It's also helped that our rotations our very on point right now (as compared to earlier in the year) so helping doesn't hurt us as much as it did earlier.

The above, with the addition of Kennedy mid season and the improvement of cone from a liability to a plus defender has gotten our defense from one of the worst in P4 to average/slightly above average.

Huge credit to MM.
Really good observations. Also Madsen met with Daws outside of practice(mid pre season) and challenged him to give much better/consistent effort on the defensive end. Certainly not gifted with even average lateral movement, but is giving much better effort overall defensively. Team also would give spurts of defensive effort, but only after a team/coaches mtg after the ASU home loss, did the team bring consistent defensive effort over the entire game. The lack of depth is a factor as 5 guys are forced to play 32-36 minutes/game. Really just 2 subs available for minimum of 8-12 minutes/game. Losing Askew and ND though not starter level guys - still hurt as one has the savvy and the other could bring physicality in spurts. Staff and players have really improved the results and execution on the court from the early to mid stages of the season.

I think this team finally came together once Askew was shut down for the season. It was at that point that the team found its core identity, especially on offense. It's not a knock on Askew, personally, but while he was available there was uncertainty and confusion about roles, especially among the guards. And that confusion was made worse by the uncertainty of when/whether Askew would be available for any given game.

Since that time (after the first ucla game), the offensive approach has coalesced around, and the team seems to have fully bought into, Tyson being the primary focus, lots of P&R with Aimaq, and perhaps most importantly, Cone isn't trying to prove himself and earn/preserve minutes by trying to do too much (which caused a lot of poor shot selection earlier in the season).

Askew did not provide enough individual positives (even simply in the form of a needed body for depth) to overcome these more broad effects on the team.

It's neat to see the team really discover and utilize their roles so effectively now. It's too bad (but understandable for a team so heavy on new transfers) it took 2 months for that to happen.

I do think it would be very helpful for NDO to return, if possible. Aimaq will need lots more rest and help when we try to win on four consecutive days.
Definitely w/o Askew the roles were clearly laid out simply because there became very few alternative line ups (especially at point/ball handling versus the various presses). However to be accurate - Askew was shut down in early December(2nd planter fasciitis injury) and the team didn't come together fully until early January after a open team mtg that motivated everyone to take ownership to be better. Cone is a "win first" guy and realized his forced shots were hurting the team (and teams know that to shut down his open looks, greatly hinders Cal's offense). But the coaches are adamant that having Askew available would be a net positive - there simply is a big drop off at handling the ball when Cone(Brown just not ready for major minutes) is out versus the press and or creating penetration in the paint/creating a shot etc. For now - Tyson is doing fantastic at handling the ball and or creating when He is needed to take over, But that is a very tough pattern to depend on consistently.
Cone and most of the first 5 are in excellent shape and can handle easily 32-34 minutes/game - however on a short rest (games less than 48 hours apart or in a conf tournament of 3 potential games back to back - it will pay its toll and make it likely too tough to overcome. The staff is on Tyson to make sure that He is continually hydrating himself through out the day, but the commitment to do so, for whatever reason has not been consistent - though much better lately. NDO is taking his redshirt year and will not be back this season. That hurts (when Daws needs a blow) since Larson is very smart and is nearly always in the correct position - rotations etc, but is physically dominated due to needing another 15+lbs, Curtis is long but extremely inexperienced and not ready for major minutes and Newell while skilled and experienced, is not big/long enough to guard the better bigs down low. Tyson is so good that He can literally carry a team when a key bucket is needed. Hopefully He can continue his high level of play.

4thGen, I love your insights, but you're incorrect about when Askew went down. He played several games in late December including the Arizona games at the end of December. Moraga posted an article on Jan 9 saying Madsen made the announcement at the presser following those early-January LA games that Askew was being officially shut down at that time. And that was when, as you note, the team really came together.

I don't doubt you that the real reason they came together at that time was a team meeting, and that the coaches contend Askew is a value-added asset to the team. You have that insider access. But as a regular fan, I wasn't aware of the meeting. I just noticed that they were suddenly/finally playing better together, with much more evident purpose, organization, and execution on offense. As an outsider I saw that Askew (whose play, i have to say, I've never been particularly impressed with, including under Madsen) was not only no longer playing but, more importantly, after a month of sporadic and uncertain availability into early January, was announced that he was out for good. It was at that very moment, as you note, the team started playing organized basketball. The defense was still yet to come, but the offense started to take off at that time.

So that's why I made that connection to the timing of Askew being shut down for good. I was unaware of the behind-the-scenes things that were happening at the same time.

As always, I appreciate your insights very much.
Thank you for the correction - I should have been more detailed. Askew convinced the staff/coach to give him another try and it went from pain(in limited minutes) to another tear in the foot. Totally agree that Askew for all his previous accolades, and accumulated experience has not been able to meaningful contribute to the program. The end result is a very thin depth at the ball handling/point positions. Meadows leaving along with Askew, hurt impacts the flexibility the staff has and come tournament time, could be a tough obstacle to overcome.
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4thGenCal said:

drizzlybear said:

4thGenCal said:

drizzlybear said:

4thGenCal said:

ducky23 said:

RedlessWardrobe said:

Had a great time at the game yesterday. Great vibe.

I'm gonna keep this simple. The first 15 games, one of the biggest complaints by all of us was our defense. Well yesterday Oregon was 20/57 (4/18 on 3's), for 35%. In addition to that, we had our usual slow start (which is still an issue), they made their first four shots. Take that away, and they're 16/53 - 30%.

Some of this is attributed to Kennedy, some to Cone's improvement, and you gotta give credit to MM on this one. In addition, Daws gave Donte a good amount of resistance, even if he didn't completely shut him down.

Hope this continues, and hopefully we can see it from start to finish.


I've posted this in another thread, but one of the biggest reasons for our early defensive struggles was figuring out what to do with Daws on the defensive end. We ended up making two huge adjustments as the season went on

1. Defending the PnR: early in the season we either switched or hedged a lot of PnR when Daws' man was the screener. It became clear that Daws didn't have the lateral quickness for this, which explains the vast number of open threes to start the year. We've now switched to either drop or ICE coverage. Which basically allows Daws to just drop and keeps him away from the perimeter. It's not my preferred PnR coverage (nor madsen's) but it's what you have to do when your big isn't super mobile

2. Low post defense: early in the season, we were basically leaving Daws on an island when the ball was entered into the post, which led to some opposing centers having career games against us (example the Montana st big had a season high 26 against us).
We've since brought a lot more help in the post, which has made it much more difficult for opposing bigs. It's also helped that our rotations our very on point right now (as compared to earlier in the year) so helping doesn't hurt us as much as it did earlier.

The above, with the addition of Kennedy mid season and the improvement of cone from a liability to a plus defender has gotten our defense from one of the worst in P4 to average/slightly above average.

Huge credit to MM.
Really good observations. Also Madsen met with Daws outside of practice(mid pre season) and challenged him to give much better/consistent effort on the defensive end. Certainly not gifted with even average lateral movement, but is giving much better effort overall defensively. Team also would give spurts of defensive effort, but only after a team/coaches mtg after the ASU home loss, did the team bring consistent defensive effort over the entire game. The lack of depth is a factor as 5 guys are forced to play 32-36 minutes/game. Really just 2 subs available for minimum of 8-12 minutes/game. Losing Askew and ND though not starter level guys - still hurt as one has the savvy and the other could bring physicality in spurts. Staff and players have really improved the results and execution on the court from the early to mid stages of the season.

I think this team finally came together once Askew was shut down for the season. It was at that point that the team found its core identity, especially on offense. It's not a knock on Askew, personally, but while he was available there was uncertainty and confusion about roles, especially among the guards. And that confusion was made worse by the uncertainty of when/whether Askew would be available for any given game.

Since that time (after the first ucla game), the offensive approach has coalesced around, and the team seems to have fully bought into, Tyson being the primary focus, lots of P&R with Aimaq, and perhaps most importantly, Cone isn't trying to prove himself and earn/preserve minutes by trying to do too much (which caused a lot of poor shot selection earlier in the season).

Askew did not provide enough individual positives (even simply in the form of a needed body for depth) to overcome these more broad effects on the team.

It's neat to see the team really discover and utilize their roles so effectively now. It's too bad (but understandable for a team so heavy on new transfers) it took 2 months for that to happen.

I do think it would be very helpful for NDO to return, if possible. Aimaq will need lots more rest and help when we try to win on four consecutive days.
Definitely w/o Askew the roles were clearly laid out simply because there became very few alternative line ups (especially at point/ball handling versus the various presses). However to be accurate - Askew was shut down in early December(2nd planter fasciitis injury) and the team didn't come together fully until early January after a open team mtg that motivated everyone to take ownership to be better. Cone is a "win first" guy and realized his forced shots were hurting the team (and teams know that to shut down his open looks, greatly hinders Cal's offense). But the coaches are adamant that having Askew available would be a net positive - there simply is a big drop off at handling the ball when Cone(Brown just not ready for major minutes) is out versus the press and or creating penetration in the paint/creating a shot etc. For now - Tyson is doing fantastic at handling the ball and or creating when He is needed to take over, But that is a very tough pattern to depend on consistently.
Cone and most of the first 5 are in excellent shape and can handle easily 32-34 minutes/game - however on a short rest (games less than 48 hours apart or in a conf tournament of 3 potential games back to back - it will pay its toll and make it likely too tough to overcome. The staff is on Tyson to make sure that He is continually hydrating himself through out the day, but the commitment to do so, for whatever reason has not been consistent - though much better lately. NDO is taking his redshirt year and will not be back this season. That hurts (when Daws needs a blow) since Larson is very smart and is nearly always in the correct position - rotations etc, but is physically dominated due to needing another 15+lbs, Curtis is long but extremely inexperienced and not ready for major minutes and Newell while skilled and experienced, is not big/long enough to guard the better bigs down low. Tyson is so good that He can literally carry a team when a key bucket is needed. Hopefully He can continue his high level of play.

4thGen, I love your insights, but you're incorrect about when Askew went down. He played several games in late December including the Arizona games at the end of December. Moraga posted an article on Jan 9 saying Madsen made the announcement at the presser following those early-January LA games that Askew was being officially shut down at that time. And that was when, as you note, the team really came together.

I don't doubt you that the real reason they came together at that time was a team meeting, and that the coaches contend Askew is a value-added asset to the team. You have that insider access. But as a regular fan, I wasn't aware of the meeting. I just noticed that they were suddenly/finally playing better together, with much more evident purpose, organization, and execution on offense. As an outsider I saw that Askew (whose play, i have to say, I've never been particularly impressed with, including under Madsen) was not only no longer playing but, more importantly, after a month of sporadic and uncertain availability into early January, was announced that he was out for good. It was at that very moment, as you note, the team started playing organized basketball. The defense was still yet to come, but the offense started to take off at that time.

So that's why I made that connection to the timing of Askew being shut down for good. I was unaware of the behind-the-scenes things that were happening at the same time.

As always, I appreciate your insights very much.
Thank you for the correction - I should have been more detailed. Askew convinced the staff/coach to give him another try and it went from pain(in limited minutes) to another tear in the foot. Totally agree that Askew for all his previous accolades, and accumulated experience has not been able to meaningful contribute to the program. The end result is a very thin depth at the ball handling/point positions. Meadows leaving along with Askew, hurt impacts the flexibility the staff has and come tournament time, could be a tough obstacle to overcome.


Can Wren Robinson play some minutes down the stretch. He looked better last year than this year. He looked faster than everyone last year but seems slower this year and not making the few shots he takes. What about getting a few minutes from Bowser. We are going to die on the road trip at altitude if we do notplay the subs more.
Go Bears!
drizzlybear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oskidunker said:

4thGenCal said:

drizzlybear said:

4thGenCal said:

drizzlybear said:

4thGenCal said:

ducky23 said:

RedlessWardrobe said:

Had a great time at the game yesterday. Great vibe.

I'm gonna keep this simple. The first 15 games, one of the biggest complaints by all of us was our defense. Well yesterday Oregon was 20/57 (4/18 on 3's), for 35%. In addition to that, we had our usual slow start (which is still an issue), they made their first four shots. Take that away, and they're 16/53 - 30%.

Some of this is attributed to Kennedy, some to Cone's improvement, and you gotta give credit to MM on this one. In addition, Daws gave Donte a good amount of resistance, even if he didn't completely shut him down.

Hope this continues, and hopefully we can see it from start to finish.


I've posted this in another thread, but one of the biggest reasons for our early defensive struggles was figuring out what to do with Daws on the defensive end. We ended up making two huge adjustments as the season went on

1. Defending the PnR: early in the season we either switched or hedged a lot of PnR when Daws' man was the screener. It became clear that Daws didn't have the lateral quickness for this, which explains the vast number of open threes to start the year. We've now switched to either drop or ICE coverage. Which basically allows Daws to just drop and keeps him away from the perimeter. It's not my preferred PnR coverage (nor madsen's) but it's what you have to do when your big isn't super mobile

2. Low post defense: early in the season, we were basically leaving Daws on an island when the ball was entered into the post, which led to some opposing centers having career games against us (example the Montana st big had a season high 26 against us).
We've since brought a lot more help in the post, which has made it much more difficult for opposing bigs. It's also helped that our rotations our very on point right now (as compared to earlier in the year) so helping doesn't hurt us as much as it did earlier.

The above, with the addition of Kennedy mid season and the improvement of cone from a liability to a plus defender has gotten our defense from one of the worst in P4 to average/slightly above average.

Huge credit to MM.
Really good observations. Also Madsen met with Daws outside of practice(mid pre season) and challenged him to give much better/consistent effort on the defensive end. Certainly not gifted with even average lateral movement, but is giving much better effort overall defensively. Team also would give spurts of defensive effort, but only after a team/coaches mtg after the ASU home loss, did the team bring consistent defensive effort over the entire game. The lack of depth is a factor as 5 guys are forced to play 32-36 minutes/game. Really just 2 subs available for minimum of 8-12 minutes/game. Losing Askew and ND though not starter level guys - still hurt as one has the savvy and the other could bring physicality in spurts. Staff and players have really improved the results and execution on the court from the early to mid stages of the season.

I think this team finally came together once Askew was shut down for the season. It was at that point that the team found its core identity, especially on offense. It's not a knock on Askew, personally, but while he was available there was uncertainty and confusion about roles, especially among the guards. And that confusion was made worse by the uncertainty of when/whether Askew would be available for any given game.

Since that time (after the first ucla game), the offensive approach has coalesced around, and the team seems to have fully bought into, Tyson being the primary focus, lots of P&R with Aimaq, and perhaps most importantly, Cone isn't trying to prove himself and earn/preserve minutes by trying to do too much (which caused a lot of poor shot selection earlier in the season).

Askew did not provide enough individual positives (even simply in the form of a needed body for depth) to overcome these more broad effects on the team.

It's neat to see the team really discover and utilize their roles so effectively now. It's too bad (but understandable for a team so heavy on new transfers) it took 2 months for that to happen.

I do think it would be very helpful for NDO to return, if possible. Aimaq will need lots more rest and help when we try to win on four consecutive days.
Definitely w/o Askew the roles were clearly laid out simply because there became very few alternative line ups (especially at point/ball handling versus the various presses). However to be accurate - Askew was shut down in early December(2nd planter fasciitis injury) and the team didn't come together fully until early January after a open team mtg that motivated everyone to take ownership to be better. Cone is a "win first" guy and realized his forced shots were hurting the team (and teams know that to shut down his open looks, greatly hinders Cal's offense). But the coaches are adamant that having Askew available would be a net positive - there simply is a big drop off at handling the ball when Cone(Brown just not ready for major minutes) is out versus the press and or creating penetration in the paint/creating a shot etc. For now - Tyson is doing fantastic at handling the ball and or creating when He is needed to take over, But that is a very tough pattern to depend on consistently.
Cone and most of the first 5 are in excellent shape and can handle easily 32-34 minutes/game - however on a short rest (games less than 48 hours apart or in a conf tournament of 3 potential games back to back - it will pay its toll and make it likely too tough to overcome. The staff is on Tyson to make sure that He is continually hydrating himself through out the day, but the commitment to do so, for whatever reason has not been consistent - though much better lately. NDO is taking his redshirt year and will not be back this season. That hurts (when Daws needs a blow) since Larson is very smart and is nearly always in the correct position - rotations etc, but is physically dominated due to needing another 15+lbs, Curtis is long but extremely inexperienced and not ready for major minutes and Newell while skilled and experienced, is not big/long enough to guard the better bigs down low. Tyson is so good that He can literally carry a team when a key bucket is needed. Hopefully He can continue his high level of play.

4thGen, I love your insights, but you're incorrect about when Askew went down. He played several games in late December including the Arizona games at the end of December. Moraga posted an article on Jan 9 saying Madsen made the announcement at the presser following those early-January LA games that Askew was being officially shut down at that time. And that was when, as you note, the team really came together.

I don't doubt you that the real reason they came together at that time was a team meeting, and that the coaches contend Askew is a value-added asset to the team. You have that insider access. But as a regular fan, I wasn't aware of the meeting. I just noticed that they were suddenly/finally playing better together, with much more evident purpose, organization, and execution on offense. As an outsider I saw that Askew (whose play, i have to say, I've never been particularly impressed with, including under Madsen) was not only no longer playing but, more importantly, after a month of sporadic and uncertain availability into early January, was announced that he was out for good. It was at that very moment, as you note, the team started playing organized basketball. The defense was still yet to come, but the offense started to take off at that time.

So that's why I made that connection to the timing of Askew being shut down for good. I was unaware of the behind-the-scenes things that were happening at the same time.

As always, I appreciate your insights very much.
Thank you for the correction - I should have been more detailed. Askew convinced the staff/coach to give him another try and it went from pain(in limited minutes) to another tear in the foot. Totally agree that Askew for all his previous accolades, and accumulated experience has not been able to meaningful contribute to the program. The end result is a very thin depth at the ball handling/point positions. Meadows leaving along with Askew, hurt impacts the flexibility the staff has and come tournament time, could be a tough obstacle to overcome.


Can Wren Robinson play some minutes down the stretch. He looked better last year than this year. He looked faster than everyone last year but seems slower this year and not making the few shots he takes. What about getting a few minutes from Bowser. We are going to die on the road trip at altitude if we do notplay the subs more.

I think the guys mostly susceptible to fatigue are Aimaq and Tyson, and we don't really have anyone to replace them. Unfortunately, those two are also the two players most critical to Cal's success. It's not a good situation. I think we'll be seeing much more of Newell, which I don't mind. Even climbing to #4 seed might be a pyrrhic victory if Arizona is the #1 seed and would face us in game 2.

The one little boost we do have is that we have a bye the week before the tournament, so we'll be a little more rested than most other teams in the tournament. That's especially good because the tournament is an early week (starts Wednesday mid-day) and is a travel week. Having those couple extra days of rest will be a help.
RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not that I ever want us to lose. But as the league plays out, if Arizona finishes on top and we dont finish 4th, we're better off finishing 6th or 7th instead of 5th.
ducky23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oskidunker said:

4thGenCal said:

drizzlybear said:

4thGenCal said:

drizzlybear said:

4thGenCal said:

ducky23 said:

RedlessWardrobe said:

Had a great time at the game yesterday. Great vibe.

I'm gonna keep this simple. The first 15 games, one of the biggest complaints by all of us was our defense. Well yesterday Oregon was 20/57 (4/18 on 3's), for 35%. In addition to that, we had our usual slow start (which is still an issue), they made their first four shots. Take that away, and they're 16/53 - 30%.

Some of this is attributed to Kennedy, some to Cone's improvement, and you gotta give credit to MM on this one. In addition, Daws gave Donte a good amount of resistance, even if he didn't completely shut him down.

Hope this continues, and hopefully we can see it from start to finish.


I've posted this in another thread, but one of the biggest reasons for our early defensive struggles was figuring out what to do with Daws on the defensive end. We ended up making two huge adjustments as the season went on

1. Defending the PnR: early in the season we either switched or hedged a lot of PnR when Daws' man was the screener. It became clear that Daws didn't have the lateral quickness for this, which explains the vast number of open threes to start the year. We've now switched to either drop or ICE coverage. Which basically allows Daws to just drop and keeps him away from the perimeter. It's not my preferred PnR coverage (nor madsen's) but it's what you have to do when your big isn't super mobile

2. Low post defense: early in the season, we were basically leaving Daws on an island when the ball was entered into the post, which led to some opposing centers having career games against us (example the Montana st big had a season high 26 against us).
We've since brought a lot more help in the post, which has made it much more difficult for opposing bigs. It's also helped that our rotations our very on point right now (as compared to earlier in the year) so helping doesn't hurt us as much as it did earlier.

The above, with the addition of Kennedy mid season and the improvement of cone from a liability to a plus defender has gotten our defense from one of the worst in P4 to average/slightly above average.

Huge credit to MM.
Really good observations. Also Madsen met with Daws outside of practice(mid pre season) and challenged him to give much better/consistent effort on the defensive end. Certainly not gifted with even average lateral movement, but is giving much better effort overall defensively. Team also would give spurts of defensive effort, but only after a team/coaches mtg after the ASU home loss, did the team bring consistent defensive effort over the entire game. The lack of depth is a factor as 5 guys are forced to play 32-36 minutes/game. Really just 2 subs available for minimum of 8-12 minutes/game. Losing Askew and ND though not starter level guys - still hurt as one has the savvy and the other could bring physicality in spurts. Staff and players have really improved the results and execution on the court from the early to mid stages of the season.

I think this team finally came together once Askew was shut down for the season. It was at that point that the team found its core identity, especially on offense. It's not a knock on Askew, personally, but while he was available there was uncertainty and confusion about roles, especially among the guards. And that confusion was made worse by the uncertainty of when/whether Askew would be available for any given game.

Since that time (after the first ucla game), the offensive approach has coalesced around, and the team seems to have fully bought into, Tyson being the primary focus, lots of P&R with Aimaq, and perhaps most importantly, Cone isn't trying to prove himself and earn/preserve minutes by trying to do too much (which caused a lot of poor shot selection earlier in the season).

Askew did not provide enough individual positives (even simply in the form of a needed body for depth) to overcome these more broad effects on the team.

It's neat to see the team really discover and utilize their roles so effectively now. It's too bad (but understandable for a team so heavy on new transfers) it took 2 months for that to happen.

I do think it would be very helpful for NDO to return, if possible. Aimaq will need lots more rest and help when we try to win on four consecutive days.
Definitely w/o Askew the roles were clearly laid out simply because there became very few alternative line ups (especially at point/ball handling versus the various presses). However to be accurate - Askew was shut down in early December(2nd planter fasciitis injury) and the team didn't come together fully until early January after a open team mtg that motivated everyone to take ownership to be better. Cone is a "win first" guy and realized his forced shots were hurting the team (and teams know that to shut down his open looks, greatly hinders Cal's offense). But the coaches are adamant that having Askew available would be a net positive - there simply is a big drop off at handling the ball when Cone(Brown just not ready for major minutes) is out versus the press and or creating penetration in the paint/creating a shot etc. For now - Tyson is doing fantastic at handling the ball and or creating when He is needed to take over, But that is a very tough pattern to depend on consistently.
Cone and most of the first 5 are in excellent shape and can handle easily 32-34 minutes/game - however on a short rest (games less than 48 hours apart or in a conf tournament of 3 potential games back to back - it will pay its toll and make it likely too tough to overcome. The staff is on Tyson to make sure that He is continually hydrating himself through out the day, but the commitment to do so, for whatever reason has not been consistent - though much better lately. NDO is taking his redshirt year and will not be back this season. That hurts (when Daws needs a blow) since Larson is very smart and is nearly always in the correct position - rotations etc, but is physically dominated due to needing another 15+lbs, Curtis is long but extremely inexperienced and not ready for major minutes and Newell while skilled and experienced, is not big/long enough to guard the better bigs down low. Tyson is so good that He can literally carry a team when a key bucket is needed. Hopefully He can continue his high level of play.

4thGen, I love your insights, but you're incorrect about when Askew went down. He played several games in late December including the Arizona games at the end of December. Moraga posted an article on Jan 9 saying Madsen made the announcement at the presser following those early-January LA games that Askew was being officially shut down at that time. And that was when, as you note, the team really came together.

I don't doubt you that the real reason they came together at that time was a team meeting, and that the coaches contend Askew is a value-added asset to the team. You have that insider access. But as a regular fan, I wasn't aware of the meeting. I just noticed that they were suddenly/finally playing better together, with much more evident purpose, organization, and execution on offense. As an outsider I saw that Askew (whose play, i have to say, I've never been particularly impressed with, including under Madsen) was not only no longer playing but, more importantly, after a month of sporadic and uncertain availability into early January, was announced that he was out for good. It was at that very moment, as you note, the team started playing organized basketball. The defense was still yet to come, but the offense started to take off at that time.

So that's why I made that connection to the timing of Askew being shut down for good. I was unaware of the behind-the-scenes things that were happening at the same time.

As always, I appreciate your insights very much.
Thank you for the correction - I should have been more detailed. Askew convinced the staff/coach to give him another try and it went from pain(in limited minutes) to another tear in the foot. Totally agree that Askew for all his previous accolades, and accumulated experience has not been able to meaningful contribute to the program. The end result is a very thin depth at the ball handling/point positions. Meadows leaving along with Askew, hurt impacts the flexibility the staff has and come tournament time, could be a tough obstacle to overcome.


Can Wren Robinson play some minutes down the stretch. He looked better last year than this year. He looked faster than everyone last year but seems slower this year and not making the few shots he takes. What about getting a few minutes from Bowser. We are going to die on the road trip at altitude if we do notplay the subs more.
Robinson and Bowser have no chance playing at the level we need against our final 3 opponents.

I feel comfortable giving Newell, Brown and Curtis more minutes, if need be
drizzlybear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RedlessWardrobe said:

Not that I ever want us to lose. But as the league plays out, if Arizona finishes on top and we dont finish 4th, we're better off finishing 6th or 7th instead of 5th.

6th or 7th (or 10/11) might even be better than 4th.
RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
drizzlybear said:

RedlessWardrobe said:

Not that I ever want us to lose. But as the league plays out, if Arizona finishes on top and we dont finish 4th, we're better off finishing 6th or 7th instead of 5th.

6th or 7th (or 10/11) might even be better than 4th.
You could make a case for that except 4th means a first round bye which is basically like a first round win.
RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ducky23 said:

oskidunker said:

4thGenCal said:

drizzlybear said:

4thGenCal said:

drizzlybear said:

4thGenCal said:

ducky23 said:

RedlessWardrobe said:

Had a great time at the game yesterday. Great vibe.

I'm gonna keep this simple. The first 15 games, one of the biggest complaints by all of us was our defense. Well yesterday Oregon was 20/57 (4/18 on 3's), for 35%. In addition to that, we had our usual slow start (which is still an issue), they made their first four shots. Take that away, and they're 16/53 - 30%.

Some of this is attributed to Kennedy, some to Cone's improvement, and you gotta give credit to MM on this one. In addition, Daws gave Donte a good amount of resistance, even if he didn't completely shut him down.

Hope this continues, and hopefully we can see it from start to finish.


I've posted this in another thread, but one of the biggest reasons for our early defensive struggles was figuring out what to do with Daws on the defensive end. We ended up making two huge adjustments as the season went on

1. Defending the PnR: early in the season we either switched or hedged a lot of PnR when Daws' man was the screener. It became clear that Daws didn't have the lateral quickness for this, which explains the vast number of open threes to start the year. We've now switched to either drop or ICE coverage. Which basically allows Daws to just drop and keeps him away from the perimeter. It's not my preferred PnR coverage (nor madsen's) but it's what you have to do when your big isn't super mobile

2. Low post defense: early in the season, we were basically leaving Daws on an island when the ball was entered into the post, which led to some opposing centers having career games against us (example the Montana st big had a season high 26 against us).
We've since brought a lot more help in the post, which has made it much more difficult for opposing bigs. It's also helped that our rotations our very on point right now (as compared to earlier in the year) so helping doesn't hurt us as much as it did earlier.

The above, with the addition of Kennedy mid season and the improvement of cone from a liability to a plus defender has gotten our defense from one of the worst in P4 to average/slightly above average.

Huge credit to MM.
Really good observations. Also Madsen met with Daws outside of practice(mid pre season) and challenged him to give much better/consistent effort on the defensive end. Certainly not gifted with even average lateral movement, but is giving much better effort overall defensively. Team also would give spurts of defensive effort, but only after a team/coaches mtg after the ASU home loss, did the team bring consistent defensive effort over the entire game. The lack of depth is a factor as 5 guys are forced to play 32-36 minutes/game. Really just 2 subs available for minimum of 8-12 minutes/game. Losing Askew and ND though not starter level guys - still hurt as one has the savvy and the other could bring physicality in spurts. Staff and players have really improved the results and execution on the court from the early to mid stages of the season.

I think this team finally came together once Askew was shut down for the season. It was at that point that the team found its core identity, especially on offense. It's not a knock on Askew, personally, but while he was available there was uncertainty and confusion about roles, especially among the guards. And that confusion was made worse by the uncertainty of when/whether Askew would be available for any given game.

Since that time (after the first ucla game), the offensive approach has coalesced around, and the team seems to have fully bought into, Tyson being the primary focus, lots of P&R with Aimaq, and perhaps most importantly, Cone isn't trying to prove himself and earn/preserve minutes by trying to do too much (which caused a lot of poor shot selection earlier in the season).

Askew did not provide enough individual positives (even simply in the form of a needed body for depth) to overcome these more broad effects on the team.

It's neat to see the team really discover and utilize their roles so effectively now. It's too bad (but understandable for a team so heavy on new transfers) it took 2 months for that to happen.

I do think it would be very helpful for NDO to return, if possible. Aimaq will need lots more rest and help when we try to win on four consecutive days.
Definitely w/o Askew the roles were clearly laid out simply because there became very few alternative line ups (especially at point/ball handling versus the various presses). However to be accurate - Askew was shut down in early December(2nd planter fasciitis injury) and the team didn't come together fully until early January after a open team mtg that motivated everyone to take ownership to be better. Cone is a "win first" guy and realized his forced shots were hurting the team (and teams know that to shut down his open looks, greatly hinders Cal's offense). But the coaches are adamant that having Askew available would be a net positive - there simply is a big drop off at handling the ball when Cone(Brown just not ready for major minutes) is out versus the press and or creating penetration in the paint/creating a shot etc. For now - Tyson is doing fantastic at handling the ball and or creating when He is needed to take over, But that is a very tough pattern to depend on consistently.
Cone and most of the first 5 are in excellent shape and can handle easily 32-34 minutes/game - however on a short rest (games less than 48 hours apart or in a conf tournament of 3 potential games back to back - it will pay its toll and make it likely too tough to overcome. The staff is on Tyson to make sure that He is continually hydrating himself through out the day, but the commitment to do so, for whatever reason has not been consistent - though much better lately. NDO is taking his redshirt year and will not be back this season. That hurts (when Daws needs a blow) since Larson is very smart and is nearly always in the correct position - rotations etc, but is physically dominated due to needing another 15+lbs, Curtis is long but extremely inexperienced and not ready for major minutes and Newell while skilled and experienced, is not big/long enough to guard the better bigs down low. Tyson is so good that He can literally carry a team when a key bucket is needed. Hopefully He can continue his high level of play.

4thGen, I love your insights, but you're incorrect about when Askew went down. He played several games in late December including the Arizona games at the end of December. Moraga posted an article on Jan 9 saying Madsen made the announcement at the presser following those early-January LA games that Askew was being officially shut down at that time. And that was when, as you note, the team really came together.

I don't doubt you that the real reason they came together at that time was a team meeting, and that the coaches contend Askew is a value-added asset to the team. You have that insider access. But as a regular fan, I wasn't aware of the meeting. I just noticed that they were suddenly/finally playing better together, with much more evident purpose, organization, and execution on offense. As an outsider I saw that Askew (whose play, i have to say, I've never been particularly impressed with, including under Madsen) was not only no longer playing but, more importantly, after a month of sporadic and uncertain availability into early January, was announced that he was out for good. It was at that very moment, as you note, the team started playing organized basketball. The defense was still yet to come, but the offense started to take off at that time.

So that's why I made that connection to the timing of Askew being shut down for good. I was unaware of the behind-the-scenes things that were happening at the same time.

As always, I appreciate your insights very much.
Thank you for the correction - I should have been more detailed. Askew convinced the staff/coach to give him another try and it went from pain(in limited minutes) to another tear in the foot. Totally agree that Askew for all his previous accolades, and accumulated experience has not been able to meaningful contribute to the program. The end result is a very thin depth at the ball handling/point positions. Meadows leaving along with Askew, hurt impacts the flexibility the staff has and come tournament time, could be a tough obstacle to overcome.


Can Wren Robinson play some minutes down the stretch. He looked better last year than this year. He looked faster than everyone last year but seems slower this year and not making the few shots he takes. What about getting a few minutes from Bowser. We are going to die on the road trip at altitude if we do notplay the subs more.
Robinson and Bowser have no chance playing at the level we need against our final 3 opponents.

I feel comfortable giving Newell, Brown and Curtis more minutes, if need be
Kind of a strong opinion there on Bowser. I know its only one game, but his performance in last year's Pac12 tourney was very solid.
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RedlessWardrobe said:

ducky23 said:

oskidunker said:

4thGenCal said:

drizzlybear said:

4thGenCal said:

drizzlybear said:

4thGenCal said:

ducky23 said:

RedlessWardrobe said:

Had a great time at the game yesterday. Great vibe.

I'm gonna keep this simple. The first 15 games, one of the biggest complaints by all of us was our defense. Well yesterday Oregon was 20/57 (4/18 on 3's), for 35%. In addition to that, we had our usual slow start (which is still an issue), they made their first four shots. Take that away, and they're 16/53 - 30%.

Some of this is attributed to Kennedy, some to Cone's improvement, and you gotta give credit to MM on this one. In addition, Daws gave Donte a good amount of resistance, even if he didn't completely shut him down.

Hope this continues, and hopefully we can see it from start to finish.


I've posted this in another thread, but one of the biggest reasons for our early defensive struggles was figuring out what to do with Daws on the defensive end. We ended up making two huge adjustments as the season went on

1. Defending the PnR: early in the season we either switched or hedged a lot of PnR when Daws' man was the screener. It became clear that Daws didn't have the lateral quickness for this, which explains the vast number of open threes to start the year. We've now switched to either drop or ICE coverage. Which basically allows Daws to just drop and keeps him away from the perimeter. It's not my preferred PnR coverage (nor madsen's) but it's what you have to do when your big isn't super mobile

2. Low post defense: early in the season, we were basically leaving Daws on an island when the ball was entered into the post, which led to some opposing centers having career games against us (example the Montana st big had a season high 26 against us).
We've since brought a lot more help in the post, which has made it much more difficult for opposing bigs. It's also helped that our rotations our very on point right now (as compared to earlier in the year) so helping doesn't hurt us as much as it did earlier.

The above, with the addition of Kennedy mid season and the improvement of cone from a liability to a plus defender has gotten our defense from one of the worst in P4 to average/slightly above average.

Huge credit to MM.
Really good observations. Also Madsen met with Daws outside of practice(mid pre season) and challenged him to give much better/consistent effort on the defensive end. Certainly not gifted with even average lateral movement, but is giving much better effort overall defensively. Team also would give spurts of defensive effort, but only after a team/coaches mtg after the ASU home loss, did the team bring consistent defensive effort over the entire game. The lack of depth is a factor as 5 guys are forced to play 32-36 minutes/game. Really just 2 subs available for minimum of 8-12 minutes/game. Losing Askew and ND though not starter level guys - still hurt as one has the savvy and the other could bring physicality in spurts. Staff and players have really improved the results and execution on the court from the early to mid stages of the season.

I think this team finally came together once Askew was shut down for the season. It was at that point that the team found its core identity, especially on offense. It's not a knock on Askew, personally, but while he was available there was uncertainty and confusion about roles, especially among the guards. And that confusion was made worse by the uncertainty of when/whether Askew would be available for any given game.

Since that time (after the first ucla game), the offensive approach has coalesced around, and the team seems to have fully bought into, Tyson being the primary focus, lots of P&R with Aimaq, and perhaps most importantly, Cone isn't trying to prove himself and earn/preserve minutes by trying to do too much (which caused a lot of poor shot selection earlier in the season).

Askew did not provide enough individual positives (even simply in the form of a needed body for depth) to overcome these more broad effects on the team.

It's neat to see the team really discover and utilize their roles so effectively now. It's too bad (but understandable for a team so heavy on new transfers) it took 2 months for that to happen.

I do think it would be very helpful for NDO to return, if possible. Aimaq will need lots more rest and help when we try to win on four consecutive days.
Definitely w/o Askew the roles were clearly laid out simply because there became very few alternative line ups (especially at point/ball handling versus the various presses). However to be accurate - Askew was shut down in early December(2nd planter fasciitis injury) and the team didn't come together fully until early January after a open team mtg that motivated everyone to take ownership to be better. Cone is a "win first" guy and realized his forced shots were hurting the team (and teams know that to shut down his open looks, greatly hinders Cal's offense). But the coaches are adamant that having Askew available would be a net positive - there simply is a big drop off at handling the ball when Cone(Brown just not ready for major minutes) is out versus the press and or creating penetration in the paint/creating a shot etc. For now - Tyson is doing fantastic at handling the ball and or creating when He is needed to take over, But that is a very tough pattern to depend on consistently.
Cone and most of the first 5 are in excellent shape and can handle easily 32-34 minutes/game - however on a short rest (games less than 48 hours apart or in a conf tournament of 3 potential games back to back - it will pay its toll and make it likely too tough to overcome. The staff is on Tyson to make sure that He is continually hydrating himself through out the day, but the commitment to do so, for whatever reason has not been consistent - though much better lately. NDO is taking his redshirt year and will not be back this season. That hurts (when Daws needs a blow) since Larson is very smart and is nearly always in the correct position - rotations etc, but is physically dominated due to needing another 15+lbs, Curtis is long but extremely inexperienced and not ready for major minutes and Newell while skilled and experienced, is not big/long enough to guard the better bigs down low. Tyson is so good that He can literally carry a team when a key bucket is needed. Hopefully He can continue his high level of play.

4thGen, I love your insights, but you're incorrect about when Askew went down. He played several games in late December including the Arizona games at the end of December. Moraga posted an article on Jan 9 saying Madsen made the announcement at the presser following those early-January LA games that Askew was being officially shut down at that time. And that was when, as you note, the team really came together.

I don't doubt you that the real reason they came together at that time was a team meeting, and that the coaches contend Askew is a value-added asset to the team. You have that insider access. But as a regular fan, I wasn't aware of the meeting. I just noticed that they were suddenly/finally playing better together, with much more evident purpose, organization, and execution on offense. As an outsider I saw that Askew (whose play, i have to say, I've never been particularly impressed with, including under Madsen) was not only no longer playing but, more importantly, after a month of sporadic and uncertain availability into early January, was announced that he was out for good. It was at that very moment, as you note, the team started playing organized basketball. The defense was still yet to come, but the offense started to take off at that time.

So that's why I made that connection to the timing of Askew being shut down for good. I was unaware of the behind-the-scenes things that were happening at the same time.

As always, I appreciate your insights very much.
Thank you for the correction - I should have been more detailed. Askew convinced the staff/coach to give him another try and it went from pain(in limited minutes) to another tear in the foot. Totally agree that Askew for all his previous accolades, and accumulated experience has not been able to meaningful contribute to the program. The end result is a very thin depth at the ball handling/point positions. Meadows leaving along with Askew, hurt impacts the flexibility the staff has and come tournament time, could be a tough obstacle to overcome.


Can Wren Robinson play some minutes down the stretch. He looked better last year than this year. He looked faster than everyone last year but seems slower this year and not making the few shots he takes. What about getting a few minutes from Bowser. We are going to die on the road trip at altitude if we do notplay the subs more.
Robinson and Bowser have no chance playing at the level we need against our final 3 opponents.

I feel comfortable giving Newell, Brown and Curtis more minutes, if need be
Kind of a strong opinion there on Bowser. I know its only one game, but his performance in last year's Pac12 tourney was very solid.


Early in the season when asked who he would like to go to dinner with, Madsen replied, " Monty Bowser" My guess is Brown has played better in practice.
Go Bears!
RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm sure he has. But that doesn't automatically mean there's no way Madsen uses Bowser.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
At the end of last season I thought Bowser had a shot at being a rotation role player as a long 2, but he'd have to get stronger and get PT largely because he improved on defense

But I didn't think Roberson had a chance, and thought his transfer was best for everyone

I guess I was wrong about Bowser and right about Roberson

ducky23 said:

oskidunker said:

4thGenCal said:

drizzlybear said:

4thGenCal said:

drizzlybear said:

4thGenCal said:

ducky23 said:

RedlessWardrobe said:

Had a great time at the game yesterday. Great vibe.

I'm gonna keep this simple. The first 15 games, one of the biggest complaints by all of us was our defense. Well yesterday Oregon was 20/57 (4/18 on 3's), for 35%. In addition to that, we had our usual slow start (which is still an issue), they made their first four shots. Take that away, and they're 16/53 - 30%.

Some of this is attributed to Kennedy, some to Cone's improvement, and you gotta give credit to MM on this one. In addition, Daws gave Donte a good amount of resistance, even if he didn't completely shut him down.

Hope this continues, and hopefully we can see it from start to finish.


I've posted this in another thread, but one of the biggest reasons for our early defensive struggles was figuring out what to do with Daws on the defensive end. We ended up making two huge adjustments as the season went on

1. Defending the PnR: early in the season we either switched or hedged a lot of PnR when Daws' man was the screener. It became clear that Daws didn't have the lateral quickness for this, which explains the vast number of open threes to start the year. We've now switched to either drop or ICE coverage. Which basically allows Daws to just drop and keeps him away from the perimeter. It's not my preferred PnR coverage (nor madsen's) but it's what you have to do when your big isn't super mobile

2. Low post defense: early in the season, we were basically leaving Daws on an island when the ball was entered into the post, which led to some opposing centers having career games against us (example the Montana st big had a season high 26 against us).
We've since brought a lot more help in the post, which has made it much more difficult for opposing bigs. It's also helped that our rotations our very on point right now (as compared to earlier in the year) so helping doesn't hurt us as much as it did earlier.

The above, with the addition of Kennedy mid season and the improvement of cone from a liability to a plus defender has gotten our defense from one of the worst in P4 to average/slightly above average.

Huge credit to MM.
Really good observations. Also Madsen met with Daws outside of practice(mid pre season) and challenged him to give much better/consistent effort on the defensive end. Certainly not gifted with even average lateral movement, but is giving much better effort overall defensively. Team also would give spurts of defensive effort, but only after a team/coaches mtg after the ASU home loss, did the team bring consistent defensive effort over the entire game. The lack of depth is a factor as 5 guys are forced to play 32-36 minutes/game. Really just 2 subs available for minimum of 8-12 minutes/game. Losing Askew and ND though not starter level guys - still hurt as one has the savvy and the other could bring physicality in spurts. Staff and players have really improved the results and execution on the court from the early to mid stages of the season.

I think this team finally came together once Askew was shut down for the season. It was at that point that the team found its core identity, especially on offense. It's not a knock on Askew, personally, but while he was available there was uncertainty and confusion about roles, especially among the guards. And that confusion was made worse by the uncertainty of when/whether Askew would be available for any given game.

Since that time (after the first ucla game), the offensive approach has coalesced around, and the team seems to have fully bought into, Tyson being the primary focus, lots of P&R with Aimaq, and perhaps most importantly, Cone isn't trying to prove himself and earn/preserve minutes by trying to do too much (which caused a lot of poor shot selection earlier in the season).

Askew did not provide enough individual positives (even simply in the form of a needed body for depth) to overcome these more broad effects on the team.

It's neat to see the team really discover and utilize their roles so effectively now. It's too bad (but understandable for a team so heavy on new transfers) it took 2 months for that to happen.

I do think it would be very helpful for NDO to return, if possible. Aimaq will need lots more rest and help when we try to win on four consecutive days.
Definitely w/o Askew the roles were clearly laid out simply because there became very few alternative line ups (especially at point/ball handling versus the various presses). However to be accurate - Askew was shut down in early December(2nd planter fasciitis injury) and the team didn't come together fully until early January after a open team mtg that motivated everyone to take ownership to be better. Cone is a "win first" guy and realized his forced shots were hurting the team (and teams know that to shut down his open looks, greatly hinders Cal's offense). But the coaches are adamant that having Askew available would be a net positive - there simply is a big drop off at handling the ball when Cone(Brown just not ready for major minutes) is out versus the press and or creating penetration in the paint/creating a shot etc. For now - Tyson is doing fantastic at handling the ball and or creating when He is needed to take over, But that is a very tough pattern to depend on consistently.
Cone and most of the first 5 are in excellent shape and can handle easily 32-34 minutes/game - however on a short rest (games less than 48 hours apart or in a conf tournament of 3 potential games back to back - it will pay its toll and make it likely too tough to overcome. The staff is on Tyson to make sure that He is continually hydrating himself through out the day, but the commitment to do so, for whatever reason has not been consistent - though much better lately. NDO is taking his redshirt year and will not be back this season. That hurts (when Daws needs a blow) since Larson is very smart and is nearly always in the correct position - rotations etc, but is physically dominated due to needing another 15+lbs, Curtis is long but extremely inexperienced and not ready for major minutes and Newell while skilled and experienced, is not big/long enough to guard the better bigs down low. Tyson is so good that He can literally carry a team when a key bucket is needed. Hopefully He can continue his high level of play.

4thGen, I love your insights, but you're incorrect about when Askew went down. He played several games in late December including the Arizona games at the end of December. Moraga posted an article on Jan 9 saying Madsen made the announcement at the presser following those early-January LA games that Askew was being officially shut down at that time. And that was when, as you note, the team really came together.

I don't doubt you that the real reason they came together at that time was a team meeting, and that the coaches contend Askew is a value-added asset to the team. You have that insider access. But as a regular fan, I wasn't aware of the meeting. I just noticed that they were suddenly/finally playing better together, with much more evident purpose, organization, and execution on offense. As an outsider I saw that Askew (whose play, i have to say, I've never been particularly impressed with, including under Madsen) was not only no longer playing but, more importantly, after a month of sporadic and uncertain availability into early January, was announced that he was out for good. It was at that very moment, as you note, the team started playing organized basketball. The defense was still yet to come, but the offense started to take off at that time.

So that's why I made that connection to the timing of Askew being shut down for good. I was unaware of the behind-the-scenes things that were happening at the same time.

As always, I appreciate your insights very much.
Thank you for the correction - I should have been more detailed. Askew convinced the staff/coach to give him another try and it went from pain(in limited minutes) to another tear in the foot. Totally agree that Askew for all his previous accolades, and accumulated experience has not been able to meaningful contribute to the program. The end result is a very thin depth at the ball handling/point positions. Meadows leaving along with Askew, hurt impacts the flexibility the staff has and come tournament time, could be a tough obstacle to overcome.


Can Wren Robinson play some minutes down the stretch. He looked better last year than this year. He looked faster than everyone last year but seems slower this year and not making the few shots he takes. What about getting a few minutes from Bowser. We are going to die on the road trip at altitude if we do notplay the subs more.
Robinson and Bowser have no chance playing at the level we need against our final 3 opponents.

I feel comfortable giving Newell, Brown and Curtis more minutes, if need be
4thGenCal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

At the end of last season I thought Bowser had a shot at being a rotation role player as a long 2, but he'd have to get stronger and get PT largely because he improved on defense

But I didn't think Roberson had a chance, and thought his transfer was best for everyone

I guess I was wrong about Bowser and right about Roberson

ducky23 said:

oskidunker said:

4thGenCal said:

drizzlybear said:

4thGenCal said:

drizzlybear said:

4thGenCal said:

ducky23 said:

RedlessWardrobe said:

Had a great time at the game yesterday. Great vibe.

I'm gonna keep this simple. The first 15 games, one of the biggest complaints by all of us was our defense. Well yesterday Oregon was 20/57 (4/18 on 3's), for 35%. In addition to that, we had our usual slow start (which is still an issue), they made their first four shots. Take that away, and they're 16/53 - 30%.

Some of this is attributed to Kennedy, some to Cone's improvement, and you gotta give credit to MM on this one. In addition, Daws gave Donte a good amount of resistance, even if he didn't completely shut him down.

Hope this continues, and hopefully we can see it from start to finish.


I've posted this in another thread, but one of the biggest reasons for our early defensive struggles was figuring out what to do with Daws on the defensive end. We ended up making two huge adjustments as the season went on

1. Defending the PnR: early in the season we either switched or hedged a lot of PnR when Daws' man was the screener. It became clear that Daws didn't have the lateral quickness for this, which explains the vast number of open threes to start the year. We've now switched to either drop or ICE coverage. Which basically allows Daws to just drop and keeps him away from the perimeter. It's not my preferred PnR coverage (nor madsen's) but it's what you have to do when your big isn't super mobile

2. Low post defense: early in the season, we were basically leaving Daws on an island when the ball was entered into the post, which led to some opposing centers having career games against us (example the Montana st big had a season high 26 against us).
We've since brought a lot more help in the post, which has made it much more difficult for opposing bigs. It's also helped that our rotations our very on point right now (as compared to earlier in the year) so helping doesn't hurt us as much as it did earlier.

The above, with the addition of Kennedy mid season and the improvement of cone from a liability to a plus defender has gotten our defense from one of the worst in P4 to average/slightly above average.

Huge credit to MM.
Really good observations. Also Madsen met with Daws outside of practice(mid pre season) and challenged him to give much better/consistent effort on the defensive end. Certainly not gifted with even average lateral movement, but is giving much better effort overall defensively. Team also would give spurts of defensive effort, but only after a team/coaches mtg after the ASU home loss, did the team bring consistent defensive effort over the entire game. The lack of depth is a factor as 5 guys are forced to play 32-36 minutes/game. Really just 2 subs available for minimum of 8-12 minutes/game. Losing Askew and ND though not starter level guys - still hurt as one has the savvy and the other could bring physicality in spurts. Staff and players have really improved the results and execution on the court from the early to mid stages of the season.

I think this team finally came together once Askew was shut down for the season. It was at that point that the team found its core identity, especially on offense. It's not a knock on Askew, personally, but while he was available there was uncertainty and confusion about roles, especially among the guards. And that confusion was made worse by the uncertainty of when/whether Askew would be available for any given game.

Since that time (after the first ucla game), the offensive approach has coalesced around, and the team seems to have fully bought into, Tyson being the primary focus, lots of P&R with Aimaq, and perhaps most importantly, Cone isn't trying to prove himself and earn/preserve minutes by trying to do too much (which caused a lot of poor shot selection earlier in the season).

Askew did not provide enough individual positives (even simply in the form of a needed body for depth) to overcome these more broad effects on the team.

It's neat to see the team really discover and utilize their roles so effectively now. It's too bad (but understandable for a team so heavy on new transfers) it took 2 months for that to happen.

I do think it would be very helpful for NDO to return, if possible. Aimaq will need lots more rest and help when we try to win on four consecutive days.
Definitely w/o Askew the roles were clearly laid out simply because there became very few alternative line ups (especially at point/ball handling versus the various presses). However to be accurate - Askew was shut down in early December(2nd planter fasciitis injury) and the team didn't come together fully until early January after a open team mtg that motivated everyone to take ownership to be better. Cone is a "win first" guy and realized his forced shots were hurting the team (and teams know that to shut down his open looks, greatly hinders Cal's offense). But the coaches are adamant that having Askew available would be a net positive - there simply is a big drop off at handling the ball when Cone(Brown just not ready for major minutes) is out versus the press and or creating penetration in the paint/creating a shot etc. For now - Tyson is doing fantastic at handling the ball and or creating when He is needed to take over, But that is a very tough pattern to depend on consistently.
Cone and most of the first 5 are in excellent shape and can handle easily 32-34 minutes/game - however on a short rest (games less than 48 hours apart or in a conf tournament of 3 potential games back to back - it will pay its toll and make it likely too tough to overcome. The staff is on Tyson to make sure that He is continually hydrating himself through out the day, but the commitment to do so, for whatever reason has not been consistent - though much better lately. NDO is taking his redshirt year and will not be back this season. That hurts (when Daws needs a blow) since Larson is very smart and is nearly always in the correct position - rotations etc, but is physically dominated due to needing another 15+lbs, Curtis is long but extremely inexperienced and not ready for major minutes and Newell while skilled and experienced, is not big/long enough to guard the better bigs down low. Tyson is so good that He can literally carry a team when a key bucket is needed. Hopefully He can continue his high level of play.

4thGen, I love your insights, but you're incorrect about when Askew went down. He played several games in late December including the Arizona games at the end of December. Moraga posted an article on Jan 9 saying Madsen made the announcement at the presser following those early-January LA games that Askew was being officially shut down at that time. And that was when, as you note, the team really came together.

I don't doubt you that the real reason they came together at that time was a team meeting, and that the coaches contend Askew is a value-added asset to the team. You have that insider access. But as a regular fan, I wasn't aware of the meeting. I just noticed that they were suddenly/finally playing better together, with much more evident purpose, organization, and execution on offense. As an outsider I saw that Askew (whose play, i have to say, I've never been particularly impressed with, including under Madsen) was not only no longer playing but, more importantly, after a month of sporadic and uncertain availability into early January, was announced that he was out for good. It was at that very moment, as you note, the team started playing organized basketball. The defense was still yet to come, but the offense started to take off at that time.

So that's why I made that connection to the timing of Askew being shut down for good. I was unaware of the behind-the-scenes things that were happening at the same time.

As always, I appreciate your insights very much.
Thank you for the correction - I should have been more detailed. Askew convinced the staff/coach to give him another try and it went from pain(in limited minutes) to another tear in the foot. Totally agree that Askew for all his previous accolades, and accumulated experience has not been able to meaningful contribute to the program. The end result is a very thin depth at the ball handling/point positions. Meadows leaving along with Askew, hurt impacts the flexibility the staff has and come tournament time, could be a tough obstacle to overcome.


Can Wren Robinson play some minutes down the stretch. He looked better last year than this year. He looked faster than everyone last year but seems slower this year and not making the few shots he takes. What about getting a few minutes from Bowser. We are going to die on the road trip at altitude if we do notplay the subs more.
Robinson and Bowser have no chance playing at the level we need against our final 3 opponents.

I feel comfortable giving Newell, Brown and Curtis more minutes, if need be

Bowser is a well liked and candidly sweet/respectful young man and his focus is to get his Cal degree. Striving to be the best they can be in College athletics and putting in the extra hours needed to achieve a meaningful role, is not for everyone. The guys that the staff brought in, all have an excellent work ethic and put in the extra time needed to improve their skills/game. Will be interesting to see which eligible returning players, are on the roster next season - no inside knowledge at all, just some tough decisions to be made by the staff.
drizzlybear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

At the end of last season I thought Bowser had a shot at being a rotation role player as a long 2, but he'd have to get stronger and get PT largely because he improved on defense

But I didn't think Roberson had a chance, and thought his transfer was best for everyone

I guess I was wrong about Bowser and right about Roberson

ducky23 said:

oskidunker said:

4thGenCal said:

drizzlybear said:

4thGenCal said:

drizzlybear said:

4thGenCal said:

ducky23 said:

RedlessWardrobe said:

Had a great time at the game yesterday. Great vibe.

I'm gonna keep this simple. The first 15 games, one of the biggest complaints by all of us was our defense. Well yesterday Oregon was 20/57 (4/18 on 3's), for 35%. In addition to that, we had our usual slow start (which is still an issue), they made their first four shots. Take that away, and they're 16/53 - 30%.

Some of this is attributed to Kennedy, some to Cone's improvement, and you gotta give credit to MM on this one. In addition, Daws gave Donte a good amount of resistance, even if he didn't completely shut him down.

Hope this continues, and hopefully we can see it from start to finish.


I've posted this in another thread, but one of the biggest reasons for our early defensive struggles was figuring out what to do with Daws on the defensive end. We ended up making two huge adjustments as the season went on

1. Defending the PnR: early in the season we either switched or hedged a lot of PnR when Daws' man was the screener. It became clear that Daws didn't have the lateral quickness for this, which explains the vast number of open threes to start the year. We've now switched to either drop or ICE coverage. Which basically allows Daws to just drop and keeps him away from the perimeter. It's not my preferred PnR coverage (nor madsen's) but it's what you have to do when your big isn't super mobile

2. Low post defense: early in the season, we were basically leaving Daws on an island when the ball was entered into the post, which led to some opposing centers having career games against us (example the Montana st big had a season high 26 against us).
We've since brought a lot more help in the post, which has made it much more difficult for opposing bigs. It's also helped that our rotations our very on point right now (as compared to earlier in the year) so helping doesn't hurt us as much as it did earlier.

The above, with the addition of Kennedy mid season and the improvement of cone from a liability to a plus defender has gotten our defense from one of the worst in P4 to average/slightly above average.

Huge credit to MM.
Really good observations. Also Madsen met with Daws outside of practice(mid pre season) and challenged him to give much better/consistent effort on the defensive end. Certainly not gifted with even average lateral movement, but is giving much better effort overall defensively. Team also would give spurts of defensive effort, but only after a team/coaches mtg after the ASU home loss, did the team bring consistent defensive effort over the entire game. The lack of depth is a factor as 5 guys are forced to play 32-36 minutes/game. Really just 2 subs available for minimum of 8-12 minutes/game. Losing Askew and ND though not starter level guys - still hurt as one has the savvy and the other could bring physicality in spurts. Staff and players have really improved the results and execution on the court from the early to mid stages of the season.

I think this team finally came together once Askew was shut down for the season. It was at that point that the team found its core identity, especially on offense. It's not a knock on Askew, personally, but while he was available there was uncertainty and confusion about roles, especially among the guards. And that confusion was made worse by the uncertainty of when/whether Askew would be available for any given game.

Since that time (after the first ucla game), the offensive approach has coalesced around, and the team seems to have fully bought into, Tyson being the primary focus, lots of P&R with Aimaq, and perhaps most importantly, Cone isn't trying to prove himself and earn/preserve minutes by trying to do too much (which caused a lot of poor shot selection earlier in the season).

Askew did not provide enough individual positives (even simply in the form of a needed body for depth) to overcome these more broad effects on the team.

It's neat to see the team really discover and utilize their roles so effectively now. It's too bad (but understandable for a team so heavy on new transfers) it took 2 months for that to happen.

I do think it would be very helpful for NDO to return, if possible. Aimaq will need lots more rest and help when we try to win on four consecutive days.
Definitely w/o Askew the roles were clearly laid out simply because there became very few alternative line ups (especially at point/ball handling versus the various presses). However to be accurate - Askew was shut down in early December(2nd planter fasciitis injury) and the team didn't come together fully until early January after a open team mtg that motivated everyone to take ownership to be better. Cone is a "win first" guy and realized his forced shots were hurting the team (and teams know that to shut down his open looks, greatly hinders Cal's offense). But the coaches are adamant that having Askew available would be a net positive - there simply is a big drop off at handling the ball when Cone(Brown just not ready for major minutes) is out versus the press and or creating penetration in the paint/creating a shot etc. For now - Tyson is doing fantastic at handling the ball and or creating when He is needed to take over, But that is a very tough pattern to depend on consistently.
Cone and most of the first 5 are in excellent shape and can handle easily 32-34 minutes/game - however on a short rest (games less than 48 hours apart or in a conf tournament of 3 potential games back to back - it will pay its toll and make it likely too tough to overcome. The staff is on Tyson to make sure that He is continually hydrating himself through out the day, but the commitment to do so, for whatever reason has not been consistent - though much better lately. NDO is taking his redshirt year and will not be back this season. That hurts (when Daws needs a blow) since Larson is very smart and is nearly always in the correct position - rotations etc, but is physically dominated due to needing another 15+lbs, Curtis is long but extremely inexperienced and not ready for major minutes and Newell while skilled and experienced, is not big/long enough to guard the better bigs down low. Tyson is so good that He can literally carry a team when a key bucket is needed. Hopefully He can continue his high level of play.

4thGen, I love your insights, but you're incorrect about when Askew went down. He played several games in late December including the Arizona games at the end of December. Moraga posted an article on Jan 9 saying Madsen made the announcement at the presser following those early-January LA games that Askew was being officially shut down at that time. And that was when, as you note, the team really came together.

I don't doubt you that the real reason they came together at that time was a team meeting, and that the coaches contend Askew is a value-added asset to the team. You have that insider access. But as a regular fan, I wasn't aware of the meeting. I just noticed that they were suddenly/finally playing better together, with much more evident purpose, organization, and execution on offense. As an outsider I saw that Askew (whose play, i have to say, I've never been particularly impressed with, including under Madsen) was not only no longer playing but, more importantly, after a month of sporadic and uncertain availability into early January, was announced that he was out for good. It was at that very moment, as you note, the team started playing organized basketball. The defense was still yet to come, but the offense started to take off at that time.

So that's why I made that connection to the timing of Askew being shut down for good. I was unaware of the behind-the-scenes things that were happening at the same time.

As always, I appreciate your insights very much.
Thank you for the correction - I should have been more detailed. Askew convinced the staff/coach to give him another try and it went from pain(in limited minutes) to another tear in the foot. Totally agree that Askew for all his previous accolades, and accumulated experience has not been able to meaningful contribute to the program. The end result is a very thin depth at the ball handling/point positions. Meadows leaving along with Askew, hurt impacts the flexibility the staff has and come tournament time, could be a tough obstacle to overcome.


Can Wren Robinson play some minutes down the stretch. He looked better last year than this year. He looked faster than everyone last year but seems slower this year and not making the few shots he takes. What about getting a few minutes from Bowser. We are going to die on the road trip at altitude if we do notplay the subs more.
Robinson and Bowser have no chance playing at the level we need against our final 3 opponents.

I feel comfortable giving Newell, Brown and Curtis more minutes, if need be


I've thought the same about Bowser, and have no reason not to think he still has that capability.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4thGenCal said:

drizzlybear said:

4thGenCal said:

drizzlybear said:

4thGenCal said:

ducky23 said:

RedlessWardrobe said:

Had a great time at the game yesterday. Great vibe.

I'm gonna keep this simple. The first 15 games, one of the biggest complaints by all of us was our defense. Well yesterday Oregon was 20/57 (4/18 on 3's), for 35%. In addition to that, we had our usual slow start (which is still an issue), they made their first four shots. Take that away, and they're 16/53 - 30%.

Some of this is attributed to Kennedy, some to Cone's improvement, and you gotta give credit to MM on this one. In addition, Daws gave Donte a good amount of resistance, even if he didn't completely shut him down.

Hope this continues, and hopefully we can see it from start to finish.


I've posted this in another thread, but one of the biggest reasons for our early defensive struggles was figuring out what to do with Daws on the defensive end. We ended up making two huge adjustments as the season went on

1. Defending the PnR: early in the season we either switched or hedged a lot of PnR when Daws' man was the screener. It became clear that Daws didn't have the lateral quickness for this, which explains the vast number of open threes to start the year. We've now switched to either drop or ICE coverage. Which basically allows Daws to just drop and keeps him away from the perimeter. It's not my preferred PnR coverage (nor madsen's) but it's what you have to do when your big isn't super mobile

2. Low post defense: early in the season, we were basically leaving Daws on an island when the ball was entered into the post, which led to some opposing centers having career games against us (example the Montana st big had a season high 26 against us).
We've since brought a lot more help in the post, which has made it much more difficult for opposing bigs. It's also helped that our rotations our very on point right now (as compared to earlier in the year) so helping doesn't hurt us as much as it did earlier.

The above, with the addition of Kennedy mid season and the improvement of cone from a liability to a plus defender has gotten our defense from one of the worst in P4 to average/slightly above average.

Huge credit to MM.
Really good observations. Also Madsen met with Daws outside of practice(mid pre season) and challenged him to give much better/consistent effort on the defensive end. Certainly not gifted with even average lateral movement, but is giving much better effort overall defensively. Team also would give spurts of defensive effort, but only after a team/coaches mtg after the ASU home loss, did the team bring consistent defensive effort over the entire game. The lack of depth is a factor as 5 guys are forced to play 32-36 minutes/game. Really just 2 subs available for minimum of 8-12 minutes/game. Losing Askew and ND though not starter level guys - still hurt as one has the savvy and the other could bring physicality in spurts. Staff and players have really improved the results and execution on the court from the early to mid stages of the season.

I think this team finally came together once Askew was shut down for the season. It was at that point that the team found its core identity, especially on offense. It's not a knock on Askew, personally, but while he was available there was uncertainty and confusion about roles, especially among the guards. And that confusion was made worse by the uncertainty of when/whether Askew would be available for any given game.

Since that time (after the first ucla game), the offensive approach has coalesced around, and the team seems to have fully bought into, Tyson being the primary focus, lots of P&R with Aimaq, and perhaps most importantly, Cone isn't trying to prove himself and earn/preserve minutes by trying to do too much (which caused a lot of poor shot selection earlier in the season).

Askew did not provide enough individual positives (even simply in the form of a needed body for depth) to overcome these more broad effects on the team.

It's neat to see the team really discover and utilize their roles so effectively now. It's too bad (but understandable for a team so heavy on new transfers) it took 2 months for that to happen.

I do think it would be very helpful for NDO to return, if possible. Aimaq will need lots more rest and help when we try to win on four consecutive days.
Definitely w/o Askew the roles were clearly laid out simply because there became very few alternative line ups (especially at point/ball handling versus the various presses). However to be accurate - Askew was shut down in early December(2nd planter fasciitis injury) and the team didn't come together fully until early January after a open team mtg that motivated everyone to take ownership to be better. Cone is a "win first" guy and realized his forced shots were hurting the team (and teams know that to shut down his open looks, greatly hinders Cal's offense). But the coaches are adamant that having Askew available would be a net positive - there simply is a big drop off at handling the ball when Cone(Brown just not ready for major minutes) is out versus the press and or creating penetration in the paint/creating a shot etc. For now - Tyson is doing fantastic at handling the ball and or creating when He is needed to take over, But that is a very tough pattern to depend on consistently.
Cone and most of the first 5 are in excellent shape and can handle easily 32-34 minutes/game - however on a short rest (games less than 48 hours apart or in a conf tournament of 3 potential games back to back - it will pay its toll and make it likely too tough to overcome. The staff is on Tyson to make sure that He is continually hydrating himself through out the day, but the commitment to do so, for whatever reason has not been consistent - though much better lately. NDO is taking his redshirt year and will not be back this season. That hurts (when Daws needs a blow) since Larson is very smart and is nearly always in the correct position - rotations etc, but is physically dominated due to needing another 15+lbs, Curtis is long but extremely inexperienced and not ready for major minutes and Newell while skilled and experienced, is not big/long enough to guard the better bigs down low. Tyson is so good that He can literally carry a team when a key bucket is needed. Hopefully He can continue his high level of play.

4thGen, I love your insights, but you're incorrect about when Askew went down. He played several games in late December including the Arizona games at the end of December. Moraga posted an article on Jan 9 saying Madsen made the announcement at the presser following those early-January LA games that Askew was being officially shut down at that time. And that was when, as you note, the team really came together.

I don't doubt you that the real reason they came together at that time was a team meeting, and that the coaches contend Askew is a value-added asset to the team. You have that insider access. But as a regular fan, I wasn't aware of the meeting. I just noticed that they were suddenly/finally playing better together, with much more evident purpose, organization, and execution on offense. As an outsider I saw that Askew (whose play, i have to say, I've never been particularly impressed with, including under Madsen) was not only no longer playing but, more importantly, after a month of sporadic and uncertain availability into early January, was announced that he was out for good. It was at that very moment, as you note, the team started playing organized basketball. The defense was still yet to come, but the offense started to take off at that time.

So that's why I made that connection to the timing of Askew being shut down for good. I was unaware of the behind-the-scenes things that were happening at the same time.

As always, I appreciate your insights very much.
Thank you for the correction - I should have been more detailed. Askew convinced the staff/coach to give him another try and it went from pain(in limited minutes) to another tear in the foot. Totally agree that Askew for all his previous accolades, and accumulated experience has not been able to meaningful contribute to the program. The end result is a very thin depth at the ball handling/point positions. Meadows leaving along with Askew, hurt impacts the flexibility the staff has and come tournament time, could be a tough obstacle to overcome.
yeah, Meadows situation was puzzling. He bounced around a lot including committing to another school for his 3rd college team, and then decommitting and then signing with Cal, only to transfer out again.

Seems like a good passer based on his assist to turnover ratio and would have helped with depth. Still you never know whether he would have helped or hurt team chemestry based on just a box score

https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/player/gamelog/_/id/4339478/michael-meadows-jr
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Bowser has another year of eligibility and I bet he could get. two. Imagine he gets a BA from Cal and then goes to a grad school that plays basketball on a level where he could excel. That would give him a heckuva great start on his adult life!
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oskidunker said:

Early in the season when asked who he would like to go to dinner with, Madsen replied, " Monty Bowser" My guess is Brown has played better in practice.
My guess is quality of conversation. Seriously. I'm not knocking his basketball skills, just saying they're not relevant at dinner.
RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
stu said:

oskidunker said:

Early in the season when asked who he would like to go to dinner with, Madsen replied, " Monty Bowser" My guess is Brown has played better in practice.
My guess is quality of conversation. Seriously. I'm not knocking his basketball skills, just saying they're not relevant at dinner.
Agreed. My first comment about Bowser was that if there was a need to use him in the remaining games MM would not hesitate to play him. And honestly, I'm a big Rodney Brown fan, but against a full court press Monty still might be a better option.
Basketball Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"yeah, Meadows situation was puzzling. He bounced around a lot including committing to another school for his 3rd college team, and then decommitting and then signing with Cal, only to transfer out again.

Seems like a good passer based on his assist to turnover ratio and would have helped with depth. Still you never know whether he would have helped or hurt team chemestry based on just a box score

https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/player/gamelog/_/id/4339478/michael-meadows-jr"


Looking at those stats through the end of December, he would have made a big difference on the team when we had all the injuries. 28 Assists 6 TO. We were having a real tough time not having a point guard/distributor. He also scored 58 pts. during that same time. I think he felt was not enough playing time when the kid from Serbia was announced was joining the team.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Basketball Bear said:

"yeah, Meadows situation was puzzling. He bounced around a lot including committing to another school for his 3rd college team, and then decommitting and then signing with Cal, only to transfer out again.

Seems like a good passer based on his assist to turnover ratio and would have helped with depth. Still you never know whether he would have helped or hurt team chemestry based on just a box score

https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/player/gamelog/_/id/4339478/michael-meadows-jr"


Looking at those stats through the end of December, he would have made a big difference on the team when we had all the injuries. 28 Assists 6 TO. We were having a real tough time not having a point guard/distributor. He also scored 58 pts. during that same time. I think he felt was not enough playing time when the kid from Serbia was announced was joining the team.
yeah, possible. Hard to say what the reason was. Maybe we win some of those early close games ... at least the Pacific game! (but who knows how he would have fit into the team over the season ... kinda a wild card)
4thGenCal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

Basketball Bear said:

"yeah, Meadows situation was puzzling. He bounced around a lot including committing to another school for his 3rd college team, and then decommitting and then signing with Cal, only to transfer out again.

Seems like a good passer based on his assist to turnover ratio and would have helped with depth. Still you never know whether he would have helped or hurt team chemestry based on just a box score

https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/player/gamelog/_/id/4339478/michael-meadows-jr"


Looking at those stats through the end of December, he would have made a big difference on the team when we had all the injuries. 28 Assists 6 TO. We were having a real tough time not having a point guard/distributor. He also scored 58 pts. during that same time. I think he felt was not enough playing time when the kid from Serbia was announced was joining the team.
yeah, possible. Hard to say what the reason was. Maybe we win some of those early close games ... at least the Pacific game! (but who knows how he would have fit into the team over the season ... kinda a wild card)
Total wild card as the feeling from the players was that He was decent, but not a first 5-7th player on the roster. He was not a NIL player(nor did He insist on that to come to Cal) and He told the coaches that due to a family situation - money became an issue for him to help out. So He made a quick decision to transfer late in off season, likely due to some financial incentive elsewhere. That combined with a realization that the team was deep at the time and PT for him, would be less than anticipated.
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4thGenCal said:

HoopDreams said:

Basketball Bear said:

"yeah, Meadows situation was puzzling. He bounced around a lot including committing to another school for his 3rd college team, and then decommitting and then signing with Cal, only to transfer out again.

Seems like a good passer based on his assist to turnover ratio and would have helped with depth. Still you never know whether he would have helped or hurt team chemestry based on just a box score

https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/player/gamelog/_/id/4339478/michael-meadows-jr"


Looking at those stats through the end of December, he would have made a big difference on the team when we had all the injuries. 28 Assists 6 TO. We were having a real tough time not having a point guard/distributor. He also scored 58 pts. during that same time. I think he felt was not enough playing time when the kid from Serbia was announced was joining the team.
yeah, possible. Hard to say what the reason was. Maybe we win some of those early close games ... at least the Pacific game! (but who knows how he would have fit into the team over the season ... kinda a wild card)
Total wild card as the feeling from the players was that He was decent, but not a first 5-7th player on the roster. He was not a NIL player(nor did He insist on that to come to Cal) and He told the coaches that due to a family situation - money became an issue for him to help out. So He made a quick decision to transfer late in off season, likely due to some financial incentive elsewhere. That combined with a realization that the team was deep at the time and PT for him, would be less than anticipated.
thanks for the insight

his numbers are also against a much weaker conference

he might have helped prior to Kennedy getting healthy, but probably wouldn't have helped once Kennedy started playing



sonofabear51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TY
Start Slowly and taper off
drizzlybear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4thGenCal said:

HoopDreams said:

Basketball Bear said:

"yeah, Meadows situation was puzzling. He bounced around a lot including committing to another school for his 3rd college team, and then decommitting and then signing with Cal, only to transfer out again.

Seems like a good passer based on his assist to turnover ratio and would have helped with depth. Still you never know whether he would have helped or hurt team chemestry based on just a box score

https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/player/gamelog/_/id/4339478/michael-meadows-jr"


Looking at those stats through the end of December, he would have made a big difference on the team when we had all the injuries. 28 Assists 6 TO. We were having a real tough time not having a point guard/distributor. He also scored 58 pts. during that same time. I think he felt was not enough playing time when the kid from Serbia was announced was joining the team.
yeah, possible. Hard to say what the reason was. Maybe we win some of those early close games ... at least the Pacific game! (but who knows how he would have fit into the team over the season ... kinda a wild card)
Total wild card as the feeling from the players was that He was decent, but not a first 5-7th player on the roster. He was not a NIL player(nor did He insist on that to come to Cal) and He told the coaches that due to a family situation - money became an issue for him to help out. So He made a quick decision to transfer late in off season, likely due to some financial incentive elsewhere. That combined with a realization that the team was deep at the time and PT for him, would be less than anticipated.

The way you refer to this player makes me think He would be the greatest player we have ever seen.

(Ha, sorry, I couldn't resist.)
barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4thGenCal can you say more about your opinion on Larson filling the Aimaq hole next year. You said a while back that he knows what he's doing defensively but needs 15 lbs more to stick with ACC big men. It's not unheard of for a freshman to gain that in the gym (sometimes we forget that these kids aren't fully grown), but do you think he has the commitment to make that happen? And does he have the skills to start scoring and rebounding, contributing to the offense? I've said elsewhere in the Forums that depending only on the portal for a good 5 seems too risky, we need a backup plan.
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FWIW Larson has accumulated 48 fouls in just 180 minutes, which is 4 fouls every 15 minutes. Half of that would still be terrible.
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tonight Colorado shot 50% and took 29 free throws, which indicates a regression on defense. Some of that might be explained by their 22 fast break points, 18 off turnovers.
barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not really fair to extrapolate, stu, his job the whole season is to spell Daws and not let the big men take advantage of him, fouling is part of that role. If he's allowed to be part of the lineup in a substantive way his minutes will not look the same next year.
Anyway I was asking 4thGenCal, who seems to speak with some level of objectivity.
Shocky1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th gen introduced me to gus at a football game this fall, larson tole me he got shooting range to 18 feet & that he knows he needs to gain good weight coming from the ivy league in order to compete in the pac 12 & acc...we both joked that he needs to eat more mystic pizza in connecticut

unlike some of the guys on this year's roster, larson actually plays d with enthusiasm...the grant newell avoiding the charge again (kinda like his constant backing off on loose balls) is kinda embarazzing

gus also tole me he's been promised a scholly by coach for 2024...very likable high energy young man with an extremely bright future both on & off the court
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.