What Cal needs

1,257 Views | 8 Replies | Last: 2 mo ago by Strykur
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In my opinion, what Cal needs most is better defensive coaching. Here are some 2024 Cal defense stats, per game:

Points allowed........ 314th in NCAA Division One

Field Goals allowed .......296th

Field Goal Attempts allowed........290th

Field Goal Percentage allowed.......244th

2Pt Percentage allowed..........193rd

3Pt Percentage allowed.........314th

Shot Blocks..............234th


Defense is not rocket science. Players don't need great individual skills to play good defense. What players need most is aggressiveness, and a dogged determination not to let their man score, and not let him do anything else he wants to do. They need to gave great stamina to play long minutes hounding their opponent, with little reward, other than looking at a W on the scoreboard at the end of games. They need anticipation, but that comes with experience and studying his opponent. Footwork, slide steps, are all simple things to learn.

What Cal could most use, in my opinion, would be a good defensive assistant coach, to focus on teaching defensive techniques, and teaching different defensive strategies. Right now, Cal does not seem to have that, and they should think about hiring one.
SFCityBear
3Cats4CAL
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So what are each of the current assistant coaches' responsibilities- none of them are assigned teaching defense?
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
3Cats4CAL said:

So what are each of the current assistant coaches' responsibilities- none of them are assigned teaching defense?
Maybe 4thGen can answer that. To be fair, this coaching staff was assembled quickly, and had to deal with teaching and coaching a bunch of players who were new to them. Madsen had Aimaq before, but I don't know about the others. I'm not advocating firing anyone from this staff. They had a successful season, in my mind, digging Cal out of a deep hole. But after another year or two, if we don't start seeing improvement in Cal's defense, Madsen might want to think about making changes in his staff to bring us better defense. The defense we have now is not acceptable, if we want to improve our chances to make the NCAA Tourney. Giving up 77 ppg is not acceptable. We need to cut that by 15-20 points. And cut it by 10-12 points right away. That would do it for me, anyway.
SFCityBear
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Our defense was atrocious in the first half of the season but seemed to get better by February. Cone, notably, was a guy who improved on that end of the court.

Agree, obviously, that we need to get better defensively (especially since it seemed as though we tailed off in March).
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

... The defense we have now is not acceptable, if we want to improve our chances to make the NCAA Tourney. Giving up 77 ppg is not acceptable. We need to cut that by 15-20 points. And cut it by 10-12 points right away. That would do it for me, anyway.
I agree our defense was poor but points per game depends on pace. I couldn't find points per possession but in conference games we ranked:

7th in opponent FG% (.453)

8th in opponent 3-pt% (.359)

9th in opponent TO (10.4)

T-5th in rebound margin (-0.8)

https://stats.pac-12.com/sports/mbkb/2023-24/teams?sort=&r=1&pos=def
BeachedBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What I saw this season wrt defense.

Not horrible fundamentals, but lets call it sloppy
Some players (Aimaq) have physical limitations (extending to the perimeter, foot speed) that the scheme ignored
Team defense (spacing, switching, etc) improved dramatically during the season
SFCity's comment about aggressiveness is spot on. I call it defensive culture. It was only there in spurts.

Not sure a coaching change is needed, but my sense is that it is more a matter of emphasis. And that the staff was balancing a lot of issues with a major roster change. My guess is that defense was coached, the emphasis may have been there, but it may not have stuck as much as the staff would like.
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BeachedBear said:

What I saw this season wrt defense.

Not horrible fundamentals, but lets call it sloppy
Some players (Aimaq) have physical limitations (extending to the perimeter, foot speed) that the scheme ignored
Team defense (spacing, switching, etc) improved dramatically during the season
SFCity's comment about aggressiveness is spot on. I call it defensive culture. It was only there in spurts.

Not sure a coaching change is needed, but my sense is that it is more a matter of emphasis. And that the staff was balancing a lot of issues with a major roster change. My guess is that defense was coached, the emphasis may have been there, but it may not have stuck as much as the staff would like.
Celestine is a pretty good defender, but I think his mobility might be affected his leg injury and knee brace.
SFCityBear
calumnus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In Ken Pom we were #121 in offense and #146 in defense.

Not horrible in either, relatively better offense, but plenty of room for improvement in both.
https://kenpom.com/

We will have almost a completely new starting 5 next year.
Strykur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This season we showed we can play competent ball, which had been lacking for a half-decade.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.