Forward Sammie Yeanay

4,935 Views | 56 Replies | Last: 2 mo ago by RedlessWardrobe
WC Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Evidently, Cal has now landed a forward from GCU, Sammie Yeanay. Looks like he had a lot of interest from high majors while he was in high school.


BearlyCareAnymore
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WC Bear said:

Evidently, Cal has now landed a forward from GCU, Sammie Yeanay. Looks like he had a lot of interest from high majors while he was in high school.






So, what's the verdict on this commitment? Yea or Nay?
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlyCareAnymore said:

So, what's the verdict on this commitment? Yea or Nay?
In my uninformed opinion he looks like he has high upside. He has several years of eligibility so we'll find out unless he's poached.
WC Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
stu said:

BearlyCareAnymore said:

So, what's the verdict on this commitment? Yea or Nay?
In my uninformed opinion he looks like he has high upside. He has several years of eligibility so we'll find out unless he's poached.
According to Rivals, Yeanay had offers from Alabama, ASU, Florida, TT, Houston, Wake, Auburn, Florida State and Kansas, among others, and eventually committed to ASU. He then decommitted in March 2024. He hardly played at GCU. But he could be a diamond in the rough. We'll see.
Oakbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Certainly an area of need , seems to have potential
RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
According to ESPN, he is 6-8, 240. I've been waiting for us to get a forward with these height/weight numbers. Now, can he play?……..
eastcoastcal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looks great in terms of size / position! A little concerned about the numbers (2ppg in 5 games at GCU). Was he injured? I couldn't find too much info.
79 Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I believe he ended up redshirting.
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WC Bear said:

stu said:

BearlyCareAnymore said:

So, what's the verdict on this commitment? Yea or Nay?
In my uninformed opinion he looks like he has high upside. He has several years of eligibility so we'll find out unless he's poached.
According to Rivals, Yeanay had offers from Alabama, ASU, Florida, TT, Houston, Wake, Auburn, Florida State and Kansas, among others, and eventually committed to ASU. He then decommitted in March 2024. He hardly played at GCU. But he could be a diamond in the rough. We'll see.
That is an impressive list of schools who made him an offer (according to Rivals).

So why did he end up attending and playing for GCU? Did all those other schools back out? Was he injured? Or what?
bearsandgiants
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

WC Bear said:

stu said:

BearlyCareAnymore said:

So, what's the verdict on this commitment? Yea or Nay?
In my uninformed opinion he looks like he has high upside. He has several years of eligibility so we'll find out unless he's poached.
According to Rivals, Yeanay had offers from Alabama, ASU, Florida, TT, Houston, Wake, Auburn, Florida State and Kansas, among others, and eventually committed to ASU. He then decommitted in March 2024. He hardly played at GCU. But he could be a diamond in the rough. We'll see.
That is an impressive list of schools who made him an offer (according to Rivals).

So why did he end up attending and playing for GCU? Did all those other schools back out? Was he injured? Or what?


For folks wondering about gcu, they are an online school whose top marketing tactic appears to be the basketball team which they pump a lot of money into. They always have good teams now and pay well, for nil, so no surprise someone might pick them over a blue blood school. We have a penchant for landing formerly injured players with mixed results at best. If that's the case here, I hope we get lucky. Seems like a great player if healthy.
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlyCareAnymore said:

WC Bear said:

Evidently, Cal has now landed a forward from GCU, Sammie Yeanay. Looks like he had a lot of interest from high majors while he was in high school.






So, what's the verdict on this commitment? Yea or Nay?


Twitter post has been deleted
Bring back It’s It’s to Haas Pavillion!
KoreAmBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RedlessWardrobe said:

According to ESPN, he is 6-8, 240. I've been waiting for us to get a forward with these height/weight numbers. Now, can he play?……..
I saw a few comments during the season that our defensive rebounding weakness was because we were easily pushed around under the basket. So maybe Mad Dog is trying to address that. We were a good offensive rebounding team, but that was probably Rytis just willing it to happen.
HearstMining
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

WC Bear said:

stu said:

BearlyCareAnymore said:

So, what's the verdict on this commitment? Yea or Nay?
In my uninformed opinion he looks like he has high upside. He has several years of eligibility so we'll find out unless he's poached.
According to Rivals, Yeanay had offers from Alabama, ASU, Florida, TT, Houston, Wake, Auburn, Florida State and Kansas, among others, and eventually committed to ASU. He then decommitted in March 2024. He hardly played at GCU. But he could be a diamond in the rough. We'll see.
That is an impressive list of schools who made him an offer (according to Rivals).

So why did he end up attending and playing for GCU? Did all those other schools back out? Was he injured? Or what?
It was the academics. Yeanay went to GCU for the academics . . .
kc1121
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oskidunker said:

BearlyCareAnymore said:

WC Bear said:

Evidently, Cal has now landed a forward from GCU, Sammie Yeanay. Looks like he had a lot of interest from high majors while he was in high school.






So, what's the verdict on this commitment? Yea or Nay?


Twitter post has been deleted
Deleted? Does that mean he's reconsidering?
PenBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We have a positive rebounding differential of +1.6. We may not get a high relative number of defensive rebounds because the opponents shoot a high percentage against us. But we are one of the better offensive rebounding teams.

With Mady and Dort I think we are often the one pushing other teams around. JoJ can hold his own and Rytis is full of activity. Stoj and Campbell and JW are good rebounding guards
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PenBear said:

We have a positive rebounding differential of +1.6. We may not get a high relative number of defensive rebounds because the opponents shoot a high percentage against us. But we are one of the better offensive rebounding teams.

With Mady and Dort I think we are often the one pushing other teams around. JoJ can hold his own and Rytis is full of activity. Stoj and Campbell and JW are good rebounding guards
Good observation but we no longer have Sissoko, Ola-Joseph, or Wilkinson. Hard to predict what the new guys can do.
KoreAmBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PenBear said:

We have a positive rebounding differential of +1.6. We may not get a high relative number of defensive rebounds because the opponents shoot a high percentage against us. But we are one of the better offensive rebounding teams.

With Mady and Dort I think we are often the one pushing other teams around. JoJ can hold his own and Rytis is full of activity. Stoj and Campbell and JW are good rebounding guards

The offensive rebounding likely made it positive, and on the flip side we got them because we missed so many shots.

To be a good defensive you need to get defensive boards. Possessions need to be one and done. You saw how many games we couldn't get that one rebound on a successful defensive stop that could have helped us win.
PenBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KoreAmBear said:

PenBear said:

We have a positive rebounding differential of +1.6. We may not get a high relative number of defensive rebounds because the opponents shoot a high percentage against us. But we are one of the better offensive rebounding teams.

With Mady and Dort I think we are often the one pushing other teams around. JoJ can hold his own and Rytis is full of activity. Stoj and Campbell and JW are good rebounding guards

The offensive rebounding likely made it positive, and on the flip side we got them because we missed so many shots.

To be a good defensive you need to get defensive boards. Possessions need to be one and done. You saw how many games we couldn't get that one rebound on a successful defensive stop that could have helped us win.

We are not a good defense and often allow penetration which pulls our bigs out of position to rebound. If we do a better job cutting off drives we would allow our bigs to block out better. But there are always instances where someone/team makes great rebounding plays against us, and we do it against them too. But overall I don't recall we are consistently "physically being pushed around".

I remember when Leonard Taylor went down and Dave Butler moved to center, and a skinny 6'7" 205 lb Jon Wheeler played power forward. That was a team that got pushed around.

And of course we welcome big strong centers and power forwards for next year.
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearsandgiants said:

SFCityBear said:

WC Bear said:

stu said:

BearlyCareAnymore said:

So, what's the verdict on this commitment? Yea or Nay?
In my uninformed opinion he looks like he has high upside. He has several years of eligibility so we'll find out unless he's poached.
According to Rivals, Yeanay had offers from Alabama, ASU, Florida, TT, Houston, Wake, Auburn, Florida State and Kansas, among others, and eventually committed to ASU. He then decommitted in March 2024. He hardly played at GCU. But he could be a diamond in the rough. We'll see.
That is an impressive list of schools who made him an offer (according to Rivals).

So why did he end up attending and playing for GCU? Did all those other schools back out? Was he injured? Or what?


For folks wondering about gcu, they are an online school whose top marketing tactic appears to be the basketball team which they pump a lot of money into. They always have good teams now and pay well, for nil, so no surprise someone might pick them over a blue blood school. We have a penchant for landing formerly injured players with mixed results at best. If that's the case here, I hope we get lucky. Seems like a great player if healthy.
Thanks for the explanation.


As to your second point, a tragedy of modern college basketball is that we seldom will see that greatness in a player. If he signs with us, he may not show it until his second year, third year or beyond. Players naturally mature at different ages. Big men are slow maturing. Richard Solomon did not become a dominant player and rebounder until his final year at Cal. Jorge Guiterrez was a loose cannon, a bull in a china closet his first year, but matured quickly to become a force. Jerome Randle as a freshman was talented, but had some bad habits he needed to break, and he did not mature a good amount until his junior year. And with the Portal always beckoning the young players to try elsewhere, they too often are seduced to leave. No longer will we get many chances to watch our young recruits mature and improve year by year. We will pay the money to sign them, and then watch them leave after a season for maybe a better offer.
JimSox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
kc1121 said:

oskidunker said:

BearlyCareAnymore said:

WC Bear said:

Evidently, Cal has now landed a forward from GCU, Sammie Yeanay. Looks like he had a lot of interest from high majors while he was in high school.






So, what's the verdict on this commitment? Yea or Nay?


Twitter post has been deleted
Deleted? Does that mean he's reconsidering?
Yeah. How about some clarity about whether he's coming or not.
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JimSox said:

kc1121 said:

oskidunker said:

BearlyCareAnymore said:

WC Bear said:

Evidently, Cal has now landed a forward from GCU, Sammie Yeanay. Looks like he had a lot of interest from high majors while he was in high school.






So, what's the verdict on this commitment? Yea or Nay?


Twitter post has been deleted
Deleted? Does that mean he's reconsidering?
Yeah. How about some clarity about whether he's coming or not.
Bring back It’s It’s to Haas Pavillion!
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PenBear said:

KoreAmBear said:

PenBear said:

We have a positive rebounding differential of +1.6. We may not get a high relative number of defensive rebounds because the opponents shoot a high percentage against us. But we are one of the better offensive rebounding teams.

With Mady and Dort I think we are often the one pushing other teams around. JoJ can hold his own and Rytis is full of activity. Stoj and Campbell and JW are good rebounding guards

The offensive rebounding likely made it positive, and on the flip side we got them because we missed so many shots.

To be a good defensive you need to get defensive boards. Possessions need to be one and done. You saw how many games we couldn't get that one rebound on a successful defensive stop that could have helped us win.

We are not a good defense and often allow penetration which pulls our bigs out of position to rebound. If we do a better job cutting off drives we would allow our bigs to block out better. But there are always instances where someone/team makes great rebounding plays against us, and we do it against them too. But overall I don't recall we are consistently "physically being pushed around".

I remember when Leonard Taylor went down and Dave Butler moved to center, and a skinny 6'7" 205 lb Jon Wheeler played power forward. That was a team that got pushed around.

And of course we welcome big strong centers and power forwards for next year.

Always bonus points for a Kuchen Era reference! Jon Wheeler transferred here from Saint Mary's with a reputation as a shooter. Then, his final season as a Bear, he refashioned his game to fill in as our power forward... and wasn't half bad!
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

PenBear said:

KoreAmBear said:

PenBear said:

We have a positive rebounding differential of +1.6. We may not get a high relative number of defensive rebounds because the opponents shoot a high percentage against us. But we are one of the better offensive rebounding teams.

With Mady and Dort I think we are often the one pushing other teams around. JoJ can hold his own and Rytis is full of activity. Stoj and Campbell and JW are good rebounding guards

The offensive rebounding likely made it positive, and on the flip side we got them because we missed so many shots.

To be a good defensive you need to get defensive boards. Possessions need to be one and done. You saw how many games we couldn't get that one rebound on a successful defensive stop that could have helped us win.

We are not a good defense and often allow penetration which pulls our bigs out of position to rebound. If we do a better job cutting off drives we would allow our bigs to block out better. But there are always instances where someone/team makes great rebounding plays against us, and we do it against them too. But overall I don't recall we are consistently "physically being pushed around".

I remember when Leonard Taylor went down and Dave Butler moved to center, and a skinny 6'7" 205 lb Jon Wheeler played power forward. That was a team that got pushed around.

And of course we welcome big strong centers and power forwards for next year.

Always bonus points for a Kuchen Era reference! Jon Wheeler transferred here from Saint Mary's with a reputation as a shooter. Then, his final season as a Bear, he refashioned his game to fill in as our power forward... and wasn't half bad!
Wheeler became a good, high energy defender.
Civil Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JimSox said:

kc1121 said:

oskidunker said:

BearlyCareAnymore said:

WC Bear said:

Evidently, Cal has now landed a forward from GCU, Sammie Yeanay. Looks like he had a lot of interest from high majors while he was in high school.






So, what's the verdict on this commitment? Yea or Nay?


Twitter post has been deleted
Deleted? Does that mean he's reconsidering?
Yeah. How about some clarity about whether he's coming or not.

That's what the premium board is for.
Alkiadt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civil Bear said:

JimSox said:

kc1121 said:

oskidunker said:

BearlyCareAnymore said:

WC Bear said:

Evidently, Cal has now landed a forward from GCU, Sammie Yeanay. Looks like he had a lot of interest from high majors while he was in high school.






So, what's the verdict on this commitment? Yea or Nay?


Twitter post has been deleted
Deleted? Does that mean he's reconsidering?
Yeah. How about some clarity about whether he's coming or not.

That's what the premium board is for.


Correct. You want the complete best info, it's not on the free boards.
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civil Bear said:

JimSox said:

kc1121 said:

oskidunker said:

BearlyCareAnymore said:

WC Bear said:

Evidently, Cal has now landed a forward from GCU, Sammie Yeanay. Looks like he had a lot of interest from high majors while he was in high school.






So, what's the verdict on this commitment? Yea or Nay?


Twitter post has been deleted
Deleted? Does that mean he's reconsidering?
Yeah. How about some clarity about whether he's coming or not.

That's what the premium board is for.
That's what November is for.
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
stu said:

Civil Bear said:

JimSox said:

kc1121 said:

oskidunker said:

BearlyCareAnymore said:

WC Bear said:

Evidently, Cal has now landed a forward from GCU, Sammie Yeanay. Looks like he had a lot of interest from high majors while he was in high school.






So, what's the verdict on this commitment? Yea or Nay?


Twitter post has been deleted
Deleted? Does that mean he's reconsidering?
Yeah. How about some clarity about whether he's coming or not.

That's what the premium board is for.
That's what November is for.


Agreed. Until you see him in Hass, don't count on it.
Bring back It’s It’s to Haas Pavillion!
parentswerebears
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Didn't we have some hotshot JC guy commit two years ago?
stu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
parentswerebears said:

Didn't we have some hotshot JC guy commit two years ago?
Last year, then he went elsewhere and got injured.
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
stu said:

parentswerebears said:

Didn't we have some hotshot JC guy commit two years ago?
Last year, then he went elsewhere and got injured.


Need someone better than Dort.
Bring back It’s It’s to Haas Pavillion!
Basketball Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I have high hopes for Dort, he showed me a lot in his sophomore season. As many have stated before me it takes time for big men to mature on the court. He worked very hard when he was in games and I feel he will only get better. He is our center for the next two years. Remember Maddy was a role player before this year.
HearstMining
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dort
  • Better athlete than basketball player
  • 6'-9", but not a long 6-9
  • Needs a post game so that he's a threat from 3-6 ft out. Should be shooting 100 shots/day all summer long to improve here. A 10-ft jumper would be great, but clearly beyond his grasp at this point.
  • Needs to improve defending the pick-and-roll. He's inherently quick enough but needs to improve footwork and decision-making (like virtually everyone else on the team).
barsad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Much needed size in Yeanay, I really hope he's starting. There's one more roster spot by my count. Can we get another guy over 6-8?
RedlessWardrobe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm guilty of being a traditionalist. As it stands now I'm thinking Dort at center and Yeanay at the 4 with Illic as the backup maybe to both. And to barsad's point, let's use the last roster spot to get another big guy so that we have a backup at both the 4 and 5. No more guards or wings.
Muckieeye
How long do you want to ignore this user?
barsad said:

Much needed size in Yeanay, I really hope he's starting. There's one more roster spot by my count. Can we get another guy over 6-8?
Let's get him on the team first. Still no confirmation that has happened.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.