Might be a good idea for the NIT:headbang
GOCAL73;842289836 said:
it's not the defense. We need somebody like Gary Colson under Campanelli to give us an offense. That air ball 3 by Wallace near the end of the game said it all.
GOCAL73;842289836 said:
it's not the defense. We need somebody like Gary Colson under Campanelli to give us an offense. That air ball 3 by Wallace near the end of the game said it all.
oskidunker;842289830 said:
Might be a good idea for the NIT:headbang

My best guess as to why Wallace missed the open 3 so badly is that he had stepped out of bounds before taking the shot. He's thinking, "Crap, I just stepped out bounds." His mind is listening for the whistle, which hasn't come, and he's so busy praying that the refs missed him stepping out of bounds that he is totally distracted from what he needs to do to come close to hitting that shot.Cal Geek;842289905 said:
My memory of Wallace's air ball 3 was that he had an open look. He just missed it by three feet.
Not sure why he missed, but not sure someone could come in and "give us an offense" will help us us with open three pointers that end up being air balls.
82gradDLSdad;842289919 said:
I thought you were going to say Campanelli was willing to help Montgomery get his coaching fire back.
We need more of this:
And less of this:
Big C_Cal;842289947 said:
I dunno, I think I've seen plenty of fire on the sideline this year. Obviously, though, something isn't working.
GOCAL73;842289836 said:
it's not the defense. We need somebody like Gary Colson under Campanelli to give us an offense. That air ball 3 by Wallace near the end of the game said it all.
Cal Geek;842289905 said:
My memory of Wallace's air ball 3 was that he had an open look. He just missed it by three feet.
Not sure why he missed, but not sure someone could come in and "give us an offense" will help us us with open three pointers that end up being air balls.
GOCAL73;842289836 said:
it's not the defense. We need somebody like Gary Colson under Campanelli to give us an offense. That air ball 3 by Wallace near the end of the game said it all.
CALiforniALUM;842289889 said:
That shot was bad I couldn't believe it wasn't him losing the handle on the shot.
CALiforniALUM;842289889 said:
That shot was bad I couldn't believe it wasn't him losing the handle on the shot.
HoopDreams;842290336 said:
I think it was just he miss handled the shot
When someone is rebuilding their shot it sometimes happens because your shooting form isn't instinctive yet, so your trying to get the right shooting form on your shot and you just misfire
Unfortunately I've done that more than once while rebuilding my shooting form
When he shot it I immediately knew why he missed so bad, but of course when others see this they can't understand how a shot can be so off
south bender;842290345 said:
What is both sobering and troubling is that the guy, with the shot that badly needs rebuilding, a shot not yet close to being adequately rebuilt, is taking a critical 3 with the game on the line. And that this same guy, who clearly is a warrior, but a most problematic long distance shooter, has taken more than 25% more 3's than the guy with the next highest 3 attempts, who shoots 3's substantially better.
I am not blaming anybody for this, but it does demonstrate the difficulty of winning games with guys who really are erratic, unreliable shooters.
Bearprof;842290351 said:
....Both Wallace and Solomon complained that team members were concerned about their own performance over the team's....
bearister;842290355 said:
My guess is Wallace doesn't think his teammates are feeding him the rock enough. Next year when he has even more seniority we are going to find out exactly where his head is at. The speculation will end. By the way, Cobbs is the most team oriented player on the team. I would happily reallocate 50% of Wallace's touches to Cobbs.
oskidunker;842289830 said:
Might be a good idea for the NIT:headbang
SFCityBear;842290944 said:
Interesting guess, but I sort of doubt it. I also don't think Cobbs is the most team-oriented player on the team, but he is still very team-oriented. I think Kreklow and Singer are the most team-oriented, if the definition is passing up open shots. Both would rather make a pass for an assist than take a shot.
Interesting speculation about Wallace next year. Many fans have him penciled in at the point guard spot for next season, which means he will get at least one touch in just about every possession after an opponent basket. I still worry about his out of control drives to the hoop, which often look spectacular, but at least just as often end up badly.
If he is not the point guard, which seems unlikely, and if he does not improve over the summer, you have the same situation as this year, a shooting guard who does not shoot well. It is puzzling that Montgomery has said in the past that you can't have your worst three point shooter taking most of your threes for you, and yet he still gives Wallace the green light, apparently, because he has shot many more threes than anyone else on this team. (I know Cobbs is shooting threes at a lower percentage than Wallace, but I'd prefer that Cobbs take more that Wallace. Wallace's misses are worse than Cobbs' misses, and usually result in long caroms off the rim, or airballs, leading to Cal losing the rebound.)
:beer:
south bender;842290954 said:
SFCB, at the start of your last paragraph, don't you intend to say it is unlikely Ty will be our point guard?
Go Bears!
SFCityBear;842290944 said:
Interesting guess, but I sort of doubt it. I also don't think Cobbs is the most team-oriented player on the team, but he is still very team-oriented. I think Kreklow and Singer are the most team-oriented, if the definition is passing up open shots. Both would rather make a pass for an assist than take a shot.
Interesting speculation about Wallace next year. Many fans have him penciled in at the point guard spot for next season, which means he will get at least one touch in just about every possession after an opponent basket. I still worry about his out of control drives to the hoop, which often look spectacular, but at least just as often end up badly.
Next year, if Ty Wallace moves to the off guard spot, which is not as likely, and he has not improved his shooting, then we have the same situation that we have now, a shooting guard who does not shoot very well. It is puzzling that Montgomery has said in the past that you can't have your worst three point shooter taking most of your threes for you, and yet he still gives Wallace the green light, apparently, because he has shot many more threes than anyone else on this team. (I know Cobbs is shooting threes at a lower percentage than Wallace, but I'd prefer that Cobbs take more that Wallace. Wallace's misses are worse than Cobbs' misses, and usually result in long caroms off the rim, or airballs, leading to Cal losing the rebound.)
:beer:
south bender;842289912 said:
I can see an ill-advised, off balance, or rushed 3 missing by that much, but when a guy has the time to line up the shot, with no defensive pressure and misses by 2'-3'???
Not even Ty can miss that bad, if he is playing with rhythm and confidence.
What is it about this group? Ty's shot is only symbolic of the collective malaise of this team.
I thought offensively we played the strangest, most uncomfortable game.
Just stunning...
Go Bears!
bearister;842291011 said:
It's funny, as exasperated as I get with Wallace, I rarely get mad at him when he fails to finish a drive. I think he is very talented close to the basket. He has the hops and a nice touch in close........and is aggressive.