Other site reporting Pasternick finalist

16,208 Views | 131 Replies | Last: 12 yr ago by calumnus
OldBlue1999
How long do you want to ignore this user?
socaltownie;842302529 said:

sad part is that I am pretty much sure it will be Joe P and that it is going to be a donor-driven hire. Sad. We so need a new AD.


Hiring Pasternack would be such a WTF, 3 steps back move that I'm really starting to worry it's inevitable.
LocoOso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
barabbas;842302454 said:

There are a few large Jewish donors and from what I hear there is pressure from them to hire Pasternack.


Why would you need to specify that they're Jewish?
orindabear74
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oh snap!
mbBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dumbest post ever on BI and an embarrassment to the site that it hasn't been taken down.
Leaving it up when its based on no fact, if, for no other reason that its not logical, is insensitive at minimum, and complacent on its face.
You can say what you want here, as long as its not against the site moderators?
I don't honestly believe that, but it certainly sends that message.
Others have been banned from this site for certainly less. And for those of you who accuse SEC schools of having rednecks and other terms of prejudice lurking within their boards, well, guess you now live in a glass house...
concernedparent
How long do you want to ignore this user?
barabbas;842302516 said:

Oh lord!!! The utter absurdity and ridiculousness that my comments are anti-Semitic are sad. Folks have a reason to lobby for who they want to; there's nothing wrong with that, IMO. The fact that people are so sensitive and make people afraid to report what is happening is the problem. If the same report was made and the donors were Irish-Catholic and the prospective coach was Irish-Catholic nobody would say anything other than maybe some jokes about drinking. It's really unfortunate that you mention Jewish and many folks automatically play the anti-Semite card. The irony is when I speak to these donors individually it's very candid, but publicly, it's apparently taboo!


+1. The moral grandstanding here is seriously out of control. A rumor is passed (albeit unsubstantiated, but that's kind of the definition of a rumor) and suddenly everyone is outraged. Nobody is saying propping up a member of their own ethnic/ethnoreligious group is a "Jewish" thing or making whatever other blanket statements regarding Jewish people. Can someone please enlighten me on how this is anti-Semitic?

Furthermore, lets not pretend like this sort of thing doesn't happen in the real world. There are plenty of people out there who support others on the basis of religious affiliation, ethnicity, race, gender, etc...
BearInNeb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Came here to read about a potential candidate and I read this nonsense. Silly. From both sides.
concernedparent
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearInNeb;842302594 said:

Came here to read about a potential candidate and I read this nonsense. Silly. From both sides.


It's the internet.
philbert
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Let's not lose sight of the fact that Pasternack looks like he is actually in the running to be our next basketball coach! :confused:
mbBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
actually, he responded that "facts are facts." To believe that something like that is "factual" is not worth discussion among graduates (most) of the University of California, let alone the general population in the year 2014.
Probably not harsh enough actually...
OdontoBear66
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concernedparent;842302591 said:

+1. The moral grandstanding here is seriously out of control. A rumor is passed (albeit unsubstantiated, but that's kind of the definition of a rumor) and suddenly everyone is outraged. Nobody is saying propping up a member of their own ethnic/ethnoreligious group is a "Jewish" thing or making whatever other blanket statements regarding Jewish people. Can someone please enlighten me on how this is anti-Semitic?

Furthermore, lets not pretend like this sort of thing doesn't happen in the real world. There are plenty of people out there who support others on the basis of religious affiliation, ethnicity, race, gender, etc...


+2. I don't see it as bigoted either but agree with the comment just before yours concernedparent ,that "Why even mention Jewish?"
NYCGOBEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
joshbalt;842302573 said:

Because they killed Christ (and hired Joe Pasternack).

Holy crap that is funny. Sorry, but it is.
NYCGOBEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearInNeb;842302594 said:

Came here to read about a potential candidate and I read this nonsense. Silly. From both sides.

+1
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
socaltownie;842302529 said:

sad part is that I am pretty much sure it will be Joe P and that it is going to be a donor-driven hire. Sad. We so need a new AD.


This is getting overlooked.
GoBears58
How long do you want to ignore this user?
socaltownie;842302529 said:

sad part is that I am pretty much sure it will be Joe P and that it is going to be a donor-driven hire. Sad. We so need a new AD.


If you are correct then we need some new donors as well.
NYCGOBEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OdontoBear66;842302613 said:

+2. I don't see it as bigoted either but agree with the comment just before yours concerned parent ,that "Why even mention Jewish?"

It was indelicately worded, certainly dumb and rude but I wouldn't characterize it as anti Semitic.
atoms
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pasternack is out per Twitter
beelzebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
atoms;842302647 said:

Pasternack is out per Twitter


Yay! :cheer:bravo
AbominableSnowman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
atoms;842302647 said:

Pasternack is out per Twitter


Amen
mikecohen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concernedparent;842302591 said:

+1. The moral grandstanding here is seriously out of control. A rumor is passed (albeit unsubstantiated, but that's kind of the definition of a rumor) and suddenly everyone is outraged. Nobody is saying propping up a member of their own ethnic/ethnoreligious group is a "Jewish" thing or making whatever other blanket statements regarding Jewish people. Can someone please enlighten me on how this is anti-Semitic?

Furthermore, lets not pretend like this sort of thing doesn't happen in the real world. There are plenty of people out there who support others on the basis of religious affiliation, ethnicity, race, gender, etc...


Without rancor: It's anti-Semitic because it suggests one of the negative stereotypes about Jews, that, as a small minority, they unduly control (to the detriment of the folk) solely because of the power of their money (expressed in a backroom, conspiratorial way - remember the Protocols of the Elders of Zion); and it doesn't take much to blow it out from there.
tsubamoto2001
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This whole coaching search has been odd. That's all I can say. Tsuba Out.
socaliganbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is this search more dramatic than the FB search? I think so.
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
socaliganbear;842302655 said:

Is this search more dramatic than the FB search? I think so.


More dramatic than the search for the missing airline. Seriously. I hear a PING! I really do!!!!
bearball
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tsubamoto2001;842302654 said:

This whole coaching search has been odd. That's all I can say. Tsuba Out.


Tsuba,
Out of curiosity, what about this search makes it odder than ones you've seen in the past? The late shooting star trajectory of Pasternack's candidacy?
EchoOfSilence
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pasternack out. /thread
NYCGOBEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AbominableSnowman;842302651 said:

Amen

+1
tsubamoto2001
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearball;842302659 said:

Tsuba,
Out of curiosity, what about this search makes it odder than ones you've seen in the past? The late shooting star trajectory of Pasternack's candidacy?


Somewhat. The drama surrounding this thing makes it unusual, also.

Actually, you're right, I guess. This is just par for the course if you think about it. I remember being shocked that Monty was hired 6 years ago.
DrDanger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
atoms;842302647 said:

Pasternack is out per Twitter


twitted by who? what did it say?
NYCGOBEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DrDanger;842302666 said:

twitted by who? what did it say?

Tweeted by Cal Rivals.

Polodad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Could be another feint. Definitely high drama here.
NYCGOBEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Polodad;842302669 said:

Definitely high drama here.

Should we expect anything else?
OdontoBear66
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NYCGOBEARS;842302625 said:

It was indelicately worded, certainly dumb and rude but I wouldn't characterize it as anti Semitic.


Agreed. Such accusations should be saved for serious encroachments on propriety, not minor infractions or possible misstatements
blungld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AbominableSnowman;842302651 said:

Amen


L'chaim!






Sorry, I couldn't resist.
Bobodeluxe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DrDanger;842302465 said:

....until Cal figures out how to make it less intimidating for kids to actually get through Cal. It is the elephant in the room when it comes to 4-5 star players.


Wwwwwhhhhhaaaatttttttttttt?

:facepalm

Change our name to Arizona? Oregon? USC?
DrDanger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bobodeluxe;842302676 said:

Wwwwwhhhhhaaaatttttttttttt?

:facepalm

Change our name to Arizona? Oregon? USC?


It s the truth in Football and Basketball.
Sometimes, the truth hurts.
LocoOso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
atoms;842302647 said:

Pasternack is out per Twitter


Because he's a Jew?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.