UrsaMajor said:

---

BeachedBear said:

---

I think he should be considered (we need to cast a wide net and look hard). My points one and three are irrelevant, but if the issue of being dirty is unresolved, then that can be handled withing the contract if he is deemed the best candidate, leaving Cal an out if something arises in further investigations.

---

This is rational, BB, but not practical. The investigation is going to grind slowly. What if he's found to be "dirty" along about December? We have to fire another coach and start another search. We can't afford to have that much ongoing uncertainty.

---

Good point, timing doesn't work during the timeframe of coaching search,

We are still the worst team in any of the major conferences according to ESPN (BPI #292 even after beating both UW and WSU).

That is how deep a hole we had dug for ourselves and and we are still in.

The second worst team is WSU with BPI of #231.

Go Bears!

And That's the way it was. And so ends this thread. Thanks CB80.

Stadium Basketball Insider just named hiring this guy

One of the Worst Hires Of This Decade.

Go Bears!

calbear80 said:

---

Stadium Basketball Insider just named hiring this guy

One of the Worst Hires Of This Decade.

Go Bears!

---

You are very busy today. I think I liked it better when you were snorkeling in the Maldives, with less free time on your hands to post the same thing over and over and over.

I wonder if the author of the OP was right with the 5-33 (13% winning percentage)?