Can anyone tell me why they assign play-in games for 16 seeds and 11 or 12 seeds?
Like, shouldnt they all be 16 seeds?
Like, shouldnt they all be 16 seeds?
This was the agreement to expand the field to 68. The first time they expanded (to 66) only the 16 seeds had play-in games. When they added two more, the deal (probably insisted upon by the smaller conferences) was to make the lowest four conference champions (16 seeds) AND the lowest four at-large teams (usually 11 or 12 seeds) do play-in games.concordtom said:
Can anyone tell me why they assign play-in games for 16 seeds and 11 or 12 seeds?
oskidunker said:
I saw asu was in the play in game and had bad memories of South Florida.
concordtom said:
Anyone notice that Oregon and UC Irvine are 12 and 13 seeds, but get to play in San Jose vs teams from the other side of the country?
That's odd.
BearSD said:concordtom said:
Anyone notice that Oregon and UC Irvine are 12 and 13 seeds, but get to play in San Jose vs teams from the other side of the country?
That's odd.
Cal was placed in San Jose as a #12 seed several years ago, IIRC. Bears beat #5 seed UNLV in the first round and lost to #4 Syracuse in the second round.
That makes sense. Also, UNLV did not deserve anything close to a 5-seed that year. It was essentially an 8 vs 9 game rather than a 5 vs 12 game.sycasey said:BearSD said:concordtom said:
Anyone notice that Oregon and UC Irvine are 12 and 13 seeds, but get to play in San Jose vs teams from the other side of the country?
That's odd.
Cal was placed in San Jose as a #12 seed several years ago, IIRC. Bears beat #5 seed UNLV in the first round and lost to #4 Syracuse in the second round.
I believe the committee said they had to underseed us a little in that bracket. I suspect the favorable region was a way to make up for that.
BearSD said:That makes sense. Also, UNLV did not deserve anything close to a 5-seed that year. It was essentially an 8 vs 9 game rather than a 5 vs 12 game.sycasey said:BearSD said:concordtom said:
Anyone notice that Oregon and UC Irvine are 12 and 13 seeds, but get to play in San Jose vs teams from the other side of the country?
That's odd.
Cal was placed in San Jose as a #12 seed several years ago, IIRC. Bears beat #5 seed UNLV in the first round and lost to #4 Syracuse in the second round.
I believe the committee said they had to underseed us a little in that bracket. I suspect the favorable region was a way to make up for that.