Official Matt Bradley Fan Club Thread

7,824 Views | 40 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by bearister
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Line vs Pepperdine:

FG: 8 for 11

3PT: 5 for 7

REB: 5

AST: 3

PTS: 25*

*PB
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
FloriDreaming
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Loved watching him play tonight. Hope he can keep that level up all season!
socaltownie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Only a Soph. He is going to be SO good and one of the great all time Bears.
Take care of your Chicken
calgo430
How long do you want to ignore this user?
very aggressive. big upside.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He appears to be somewhat better than last year (expected, freshman-to-sophomore). And he was good last year! His "flagrant" foul tonight did not seem flagrant, just seeing it live. This guy has been a fan fav since day one.
MoragaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
After a season, an exhibition and the opener, Bradley's shown himself to be elite from the perimeter.

Funny that some (one in particular) said he had no perimeter game and could only drive, despite video evidence to the contrary.

They'll need every bit of his perimeter skills this season, too, though it was a really pleasant surprise to see the overall. 3 PT efficiency tonight. That would be huge if they could keep it up.
89Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
To my untrained eye, he does not seem like a player to leave early to join the NBA. He could end up having a monster career. Excited!
BeachedBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bradley has a quiet 'cockiness' that I love. It comes across in this sort of smirk that exudes confidence and swagger. But it is backed up with consistently strong play. There were a couple scorers on the team last season that displayed very poor body language that seemed to drag down their teammates. Bradley is the opposite.
Civil Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Mrs. said he looked like Joe Shipp. A junior or senior Shipp maybe. Joe didn't have the chiseled body or the drive game as an underclassman.
Go!Bears
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sign me up! He is the one guy I thought would really hurt us if he left. The departures we experienced were, ho-hum, wish you luck... That he stayed was something of a miracle. I am thrilled that we will get to watch him become a force in the conference.
CALiforniALUM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BeachedBear said:

Bradley has a quiet 'cockiness' that I love. It comes across in this sort of smirk that exudes confidence and swagger. But it is backed up with consistently strong play. There were a couple scorers on the team last season that displayed very poor body language that seemed to drag down their teammates. Bradley is the opposite.
As I recall from some of his high school footage that he was more 'cockiness' and less quite. But I'll take it. Sometimes that can be a big tool in tight games as long as the tool owner knows how to manage and use it.
calfanz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cockiness? Ivan Weaver? I'm a buyer
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
89Bear said:

To my untrained eye, he does not seem like a player to leave early to join the NBA. He could end up having a monster career. Excited!


That would probably require 6'7 with his game...but an Elite Pac 12 player he is. I loved Joe Shipp, but Joe was no Matt.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
R90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This year Bradley is an undersized 3 because we have Brown, Austin and South among our best players. Next year South and Austin are gone, while our bigs will all have more experience, so Bradley will be an overpowering 2 (against some competition).

He should do best against 3-guard teams. He may have trouble when guarded by athletic 6'7" wings in conference.
It's all just entertainment, so find a way to enjoy it.
The refs are there to feed your hatred addiction and keep the games close.
oskidunker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who is House?..
Go Bears!
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Go!Bears said:

Sign me up! He is the one guy I thought would really hurt us if he left. The departures we experienced were, ho-hum, wish you luck... That he stayed was something of a miracle. I am thrilled that we will get to watch him become a force in the conference.
I would've HATED it if Bradley left. But then, I hated it when Vanover left.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

89Bear said:

To my untrained eye, he does not seem like a player to leave early to join the NBA. He could end up having a monster career. Excited!


That would probably require 6'7 with his game...but an Elite Pac 12 player he is. I loved Joe Shipp, but Joe was no Matt.
Joe was no Matt and Matt is no Joe. Shipp was probably first or second runner-up for conference POY, when he was a senior.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

bearister said:

89Bear said:

To my untrained eye, he does not seem like a player to leave early to join the NBA. He could end up having a monster career. Excited!


That would probably require 6'7 with his game...but an Elite Pac 12 player he is. I loved Joe Shipp, but Joe was no Matt.
Joe was no Matt and Matt is no Joe. Shipp was probably first or second runner-up for conference POY, when he was a senior.

3 bitcoin: Their respective 4 year stats will be in different zip codes. I'll take Bradley*...and Bradley was held back on the starting blocks by a sub CYO level coach.

*Does that correction work for you?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Pigskin Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MoragaBear said:

After a season, an exhibition and the opener, Bradley's shown himself to be elite from the perimeter.

Funny that some (one in particular) said he had no perimeter game and could only drive, despite video evidence to the contrary.

They'll need every bit of his perimeter skills this season, too, though it was a really pleasant surprise to see the overall. 3 PT efficiency tonight. That would be huge if they could keep it up.
If you're going to throw shade, why don't you just say who you are referring to?
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bump
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You Jorge fans need to sign up for this fan club now so that in two years when I resurrect this thread you will look like basketball sages.

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tickets go on sale Monday for The Matt Bradley Hologram Tour.



Line vs Colorado

FG: 8 for 14

3PT: 5 for 7

REB: 6

AST: 0

PTS: 26*

*PB
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
All Pac 12 player
NVBear78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

All Pac 12 player


Bingo HoopDreams!!!! I have been thinking this for quite a while and last night should have iced it!

1). with the victory Cal moves up to a middle of the pack team which makes us more worthy and likely to get an all PAC-12 player.

2). It was a 12 point scoring spurt by Bradley in the first half that put us in the lead for good.
3). We are the most overachieving team in the league relative to our talent but Bradley has been our one consistent scorer and player even though other teams can focus all their defensive attention on him (like Utah did the first time we played).

If Matt does not make All League it will be a complete travesty!!!
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Congratulations on a great game Matt and a Big Win for the Bears!



Matt's line vs Buffs 2/27/20

FG: 8 for 14

3PT: 5 for 7

REB: 6

AST: 0

PTS: 26*

*PB

Matt's line vs Buffs 2/13/21

FG: 9 for 17

3PT: 2 for 5

REB: 8

AST: 2

PTS: 28*

*PB


Some news outlets are reporting Bradley had 29 points, which I assume is an error.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
drizzlybear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'll admit that at the time I probably would've taken Vanover to stay over Bradley. But MB pretty quickly showed last season that he is an all-around special player. I expected him to contend for POY this season and I, too, wondered if he might not leave early. But i think he will stick with this team for at least one more season. Is he Cal's best offensive player since Ryan Anderson?

He's very fun to watch (did you see the fist to the chest he gave to Coach Fox near the end of the game last night?). Plus, he looks like Mike Tyson, which is a plus.
4thGenCal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
drizzlybear said:

I'll admit that at the time I probably would've taken Vanover to stay over Bradley. But MB pretty quickly showed last season that he is an all-around special player. I expected him to contend for POY this season and I, too, wondered if he might not leave early. But i think he will stick with this team for at least one more season. Is he Cal's best offensive player since Ryan Anderson?

He's very fun to watch (did you see the fist to the chest he gave to Coach Fox near the end of the game last night?). Plus, he looks like Mike Tyson, which is a plus.
Matt Bradley gives his all and represents the program very well on and off the court. Very respectful and appreciative young man - raised well by his Dad. Matt will return to complete his education/gain his degree for next season.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
drizzlybear said:

I'll admit that at the time I probably would've taken Vanover to stay over Bradley....



2020-21 season stats for Vanover

PTS. 7.7.
REB. 5.7.
AST. 0.6.



2020-21 season stats for Bradley

PTS. 19.1
REB. 4.6
AST. 1.7
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

drizzlybear said:

I'll admit that at the time I probably would've taken Vanover to stay over Bradley....



2020-21 season stats for Vanover

PTS. 7.7.
REB. 5.7.
AST. 0.6.



2020-21 season stats for Bradley

PTS. 19.1
REB. 4.6
AST. 1.7


I'm a HUGE Bradley fan. Now that that's out of the way, note that Vanover is putting up his numbers on a 16-5 team (8-4 in the SEC), whereas Bradley is getting in his numbers on a team that's right near the Pac 12 cellar.

I'd love to have Vanover on our team, this year and next, but that ship has sailed, so what I'd REALLY LOVE is for Bradley to have a great senior season for a Cal team that wins a lot of games!
HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4thGenCal said:

drizzlybear said:

I'll admit that at the time I probably would've taken Vanover to stay over Bradley. But MB pretty quickly showed last season that he is an all-around special player. I expected him to contend for POY this season and I, too, wondered if he might not leave early. But i think he will stick with this team for at least one more season. Is he Cal's best offensive player since Ryan Anderson?

He's very fun to watch (did you see the fist to the chest he gave to Coach Fox near the end of the game last night?). Plus, he looks like Mike Tyson, which is a plus.
Matt Bradley gives his all and represents the program very well on and off the court. Very respectful and appreciative young man - raised well by his Dad. Matt will return to complete his education/gain his degree for next season.
Matt is the ultimate hooper

Love his intensity, confidence, heart and swagger

Earlier in the thread someone mentioned Jorge. The two are in the same class and for me, that is very rare air

If we keep this team together and add a couple good pieces, next year can be a very successful season

drizzlybear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

drizzlybear said:

I'll admit that at the time I probably would've taken Vanover to stay over Bradley....



2020-21 season stats for Vanover

PTS. 7.7.
REB. 5.7.
AST. 0.6.



2020-21 season stats for Bradley

PTS. 19.1
REB. 4.6
AST. 1.7


That is way too simplistic as to almost be completely irrelevant. In any case, I'm not saying I was right to have preferred Vanover; hence, my starting with "I'll admit ..." Of course, quality bigs are a more precious commodity than are quality wing scorers. But it didn't take long into last season for me to be happy we still had Bradley.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HoopDreams said:

4thGenCal said:

drizzlybear said:

I'll admit that at the time I probably would've taken Vanover to stay over Bradley. But MB pretty quickly showed last season that he is an all-around special player. I expected him to contend for POY this season and I, too, wondered if he might not leave early. But i think he will stick with this team for at least one more season. Is he Cal's best offensive player since Ryan Anderson?

He's very fun to watch (did you see the fist to the chest he gave to Coach Fox near the end of the game last night?). Plus, he looks like Mike Tyson, which is a plus.
Matt Bradley gives his all and represents the program very well on and off the court. Very respectful and appreciative young man - raised well by his Dad. Matt will return to complete his education/gain his degree for next season.
Matt is the ultimate hooper

Love his intensity, confidence, heart and swagger

Earlier in the thread someone mentioned Jorge. The two are in the same class and for me, that is very rare air

If we keep this team together and add a couple good pieces, next year can be a very successful season



Next fall, when assessing our team's prospects, it's going to read like those old college football pre-season mags, which would say something like... "The good news is that Oregon State has more returning starters than any other team. The bad news is that they will be starting the same players that finished 2-10."

We'll need a couple of guys to take it up TWO NOTCHES next year, instead of the more typical one notch. It'd be nice to find somebody decent with a little length, too, in case Thiemann only takes it up a half notch.
drizzlybear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

HoopDreams said:

4thGenCal said:

drizzlybear said:

I'll admit that at the time I probably would've taken Vanover to stay over Bradley. But MB pretty quickly showed last season that he is an all-around special player. I expected him to contend for POY this season and I, too, wondered if he might not leave early. But i think he will stick with this team for at least one more season. Is he Cal's best offensive player since Ryan Anderson?

He's very fun to watch (did you see the fist to the chest he gave to Coach Fox near the end of the game last night?). Plus, he looks like Mike Tyson, which is a plus.
Matt Bradley gives his all and represents the program very well on and off the court. Very respectful and appreciative young man - raised well by his Dad. Matt will return to complete his education/gain his degree for next season.
Matt is the ultimate hooper

Love his intensity, confidence, heart and swagger

Earlier in the thread someone mentioned Jorge. The two are in the same class and for me, that is very rare air

If we keep this team together and add a couple good pieces, next year can be a very successful season



Next fall, when assessing our team's prospects, it's going to read like those old college football pre-season mags, which would say something like... "The good news is that Oregon State has more returning starters than any other team. The bad news is that they will be starting the same players that finished 2-10."

We'll need a couple of guys to take it up TWO NOTCHES next year, instead of the more typical one notch. It'd be nice to find somebody decent with a little length, too, in case Thiemann only takes it up a half notch.

But there are those of us who believe this team's record does not reflect its abilities. In my view, the season started in earnest for this team with the UCLA game. Granted, we're 1-7 since that time. BUT, if you accept that we truly have been competitive with the conference's stronger teams over that stretch, and if Cal is able to start winning a few games over these last couple weeks, then maybe we're already one notch above a typical 2-10 team?

As others have said, we already know, largely, what next year's team will look like. I think it will be a middle of the PAC team. That's not enough, but it's significantly better than where we've been the past four years. The question then will be what the next step looks like after that (post-Bradley and GA). That will all be about the development of Brown, Celestine, Thiemann, Bowser, and the guys coming in this year and next. Time will tell.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
drizzlybear said:

Big C said:

HoopDreams said:

4thGenCal said:

drizzlybear said:

I'll admit that at the time I probably would've taken Vanover to stay over Bradley. But MB pretty quickly showed last season that he is an all-around special player. I expected him to contend for POY this season and I, too, wondered if he might not leave early. But i think he will stick with this team for at least one more season. Is he Cal's best offensive player since Ryan Anderson?

He's very fun to watch (did you see the fist to the chest he gave to Coach Fox near the end of the game last night?). Plus, he looks like Mike Tyson, which is a plus.
Matt Bradley gives his all and represents the program very well on and off the court. Very respectful and appreciative young man - raised well by his Dad. Matt will return to complete his education/gain his degree for next season.
Matt is the ultimate hooper

Love his intensity, confidence, heart and swagger

Earlier in the thread someone mentioned Jorge. The two are in the same class and for me, that is very rare air

If we keep this team together and add a couple good pieces, next year can be a very successful season



Next fall, when assessing our team's prospects, it's going to read like those old college football pre-season mags, which would say something like... "The good news is that Oregon State has more returning starters than any other team. The bad news is that they will be starting the same players that finished 2-10."

We'll need a couple of guys to take it up TWO NOTCHES next year, instead of the more typical one notch. It'd be nice to find somebody decent with a little length, too, in case Thiemann only takes it up a half notch.

But there are those of us who believe this team's record does not reflect its abilities. In my view, the season started in earnest for this team with the UCLA game. Granted, we're 1-7 since that time. BUT, if you accept that we truly have been competitive with the conference's stronger teams over that stretch, and if Cal is able to start winning a few games over these last couple weeks, then maybe we're already one notch above a typical 2-10 team?

As others have said, we already know, largely, what next year's team will look like. I think it will be a middle of the PAC team. That's not enough, but it's significantly better than where we've been the past four years. The question then will be what the next step looks like after that (post-Bradley and GA). That will all be about the development of Brown, Celestine, Thiemann, Bowser, and the guys coming in this year and next. Time will tell.

OaktownBear takes a couple of days off from posting and some people rapidly become emboldened (I mean, we actually won one basketball game, too, I'm not discounting that.).

Reminds me of, only a couple of weeks into the lockdown last spring, suddenly there was wildlife roaming through the suburbs.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.