short pants

7,142 Views | 59 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by MSaviolives
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
" ...my defense, all you old white guys look alike."

I look like this:

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

" ...my defense, all you old white guys look alike."

I look like this:


reallly? huh, bold move. must say dapper-you has a passing resemblance to a Joe Kapp / Cary Grant crossing.

signed, a fan
muting more than 300 handles, turnaround is fair play
Growler91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
helltopay1 said:

Dear Blue Your feelings are duly noted. You are entitled to your feelings. I trust you are sitting down..I am entitled to my thoughts and feelings too. That's the thing about Democracy. Shocking, I know.
Bluesaxe didn't question your right to an opinion. He just said it was nostalgic and he disagreed. Why do thin-skinned people invoke "democracy" when they are criticized? Nobody said you should be censored for wanting to go back to Mayberry, USA. Free speech is about putting your stuff out there, exposing it to criticism and debating those points on the merits. At a time when so-called leaders are threatening the American people with the American military and we see an authoritarian show of force on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, this is just tone deaf. On the substance of short pants, since the time of the Fab 5, the fashion of the game been more influenced by the players and their tastes, not some throw-back to the 1950s, which is how it should be. Those are my thoughts. Fiat lux.
Civil Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Growler91 said:

helltopay1 said:

Dear Blue Your feelings are duly noted. You are entitled to your feelings. I trust you are sitting down..I am entitled to my thoughts and feelings too. That's the thing about Democracy. Shocking, I know.
Bluesaxe didn't question your right to an opinion. He just said it was nostalgic and he disagreed. Why do thin-skinned people invoke "democracy" when they are criticized? Nobody said you should be censored for wanting to go back to Mayberry, USA. Free speech is about putting your stuff out there, exposing it to criticism and debating those points on the merits. At a time when so-called leaders are threatening the American people with the American military and we see an authoritarian show of force on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, this is just tone deaf. On the substance of short pants, since the time of the Fab 5, the fashion of the game been more influenced by the players and their tastes, not some throw-back to the 1950s, which is how it should be. Those are my thoughts. Fiat lux.
Damn, I was all set to bust out the star until I got to the military/show of force crap. Had not so many of the protests gone south and turned into riots with vandalism, looting, violence, and in some cases homicides, there would be no need for the show of force.
joe amos yaks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

" ...my defense, all you old white guys look alike."

I look like this:


Cary Grant +5# @ 60.
Growler91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civil Bear said:

Growler91 said:

helltopay1 said:

Dear Blue Your feelings are duly noted. You are entitled to your feelings. I trust you are sitting down..I am entitled to my thoughts and feelings too. That's the thing about Democracy. Shocking, I know.
Bluesaxe didn't question your right to an opinion. He just said it was nostalgic and he disagreed. Why do thin-skinned people invoke "democracy" when they are criticized? Nobody said you should be censored for wanting to go back to Mayberry, USA. Free speech is about putting your stuff out there, exposing it to criticism and debating those points on the merits. At a time when so-called leaders are threatening the American people with the American military and we see an authoritarian show of force on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, this is just tone deaf. On the substance of short pants, since the time of the Fab 5, the fashion of the game been more influenced by the players and their tastes, not some throw-back to the 1950s, which is how it should be. Those are my thoughts. Fiat lux.
Damn, I was all set to bust out the star until I got to the military/show of force crap. Had not so many of the protests gone south and turned into riots with vandalism, looting, violence, and in some cases homicides, there would be no need for the show of force.
Don't want the approval of any conservative snowflakes. Old white guys who pine for the all-white days of short pants and, especially in this historic and cultural context, throw around the word "democracy" when democracy has never been more threatened, are tone deaf at best. Luckily we still do have some conservative patriots like Maddog Mattis who put country over party. I will leave the politics there. Fiat Lux.
joe amos yaks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
>" ... Bloomers??Why stop there? How about nylons and high heels?... One more thing---If you are home, wear white uniforms ... when away, wear the darkest of your school colors for proper contrast on the court ..."<

You might want to try your nylons + heels in an unofficial game (ie Cal v Waylon Baptist), and why not go skins v. shirts.
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
confidential to J.A.Y, all others please ignore.

randolph scott ?!
muting more than 300 handles, turnaround is fair play
joe amos yaks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I saw R.Scott at the Crosby circa 1956 and he was wearing a similar sweater ... a shade more gray ... with pleated slacks. Not shorts. Looks like he has better legs than Grant ... Judy, Judy, Judy ...
01Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LOL! He was a screen legend, but I much preferred him in his earlier comedies. I mean, he was great in Hitchcock films (and the almost-Hitchcock Charade), but his comedic talents and timing were fantastic. Unfortunately, they were less used as he aged. His performances in Father Goose and Operation Petticoat showed he still had the comedic talent, but Hollywood preferred to cast him as the charming leading man instead of the funny man.
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1956?? impressive # not dead yet
muting more than 300 handles, turnaround is fair play
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
01Bear said:

LOL! He was a screen legend, but I much preferred him in his earlier comedies. I mean, he was great in Hitchcock films (and the almost-Hitchcock Charade), but his comedic talents and timing were fantastic. Unfortunately, they were less used as he aged. His performances in Father Goose and Operation Petticoat showed he still had the comedic talent, but Hollywood preferred to cast him as the charming leading man instead of the funny man.


Well, your post triggered a story. When I used to play golf at Sequoyah CC in Oakland, I knew a guy named Don Spruance. He was an actor in his younger days. He had a bit part in Father Goose.

Don Spruance - IMDb


https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0819863/


Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
BeachedBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I really didn't think Short Pants would get close to 50 posts. I guess things aren't that bad, if we all time to focus on this.

Go Bears!
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
01Bear said:

LOL! He was a screen legend, but I much preferred him in his earlier comedies. I mean, he was great in Hitchcock films (and the almost-Hitchcock Charade), but his comedic talents and timing were fantastic. Unfortunately, they were less used as he aged. His performances in Father Goose and Operation Petticoat showed he still had the comedic talent, but Hollywood preferred to cast him as the charming leading man instead of the funny man.
hidden gem from 1952 (spoilers).. "A chemist finds his personal and professional life turned upside down when one of his chimpanzees finds the fountain of youth."

born in 1896 legen-dary director Howard Hawkes' MonkeyBusiness, with little miss monroe as the secretary:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0044916

pisstol poor-res copy on youtube..


muting more than 300 handles, turnaround is fair play
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BeachedBear said:

I really didn't think Short Pants would get close to 50 posts. I guess things aren't that bad, if we all time to focus on this.

Go Bears!
thread thieves R us, hey hey.
muting more than 300 handles, turnaround is fair play
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Well, your post triggered a story. When I used to play golf at Sequoyah CC in Oakland, I knew a guy named Don Spruance. He was an actor in his younger days. He had a bit part in Father Goose.
yeahbut,, what storry? sit.. [cautionary rating of BBC-AM's GrahamNorton // watch for Doctor Who'ses]

muting more than 300 handles, turnaround is fair play
helltopay1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dear Civil..Thank you...Allow me to buy you a beverage off your choice someday.
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HearstMining said:

bearister said:




*This is why John C. Holmes was discouraged from going out for basketball in high school.
When I first saw this photo, I thought "Gee, that's sure an old bunch of guys playing for UW", but then I checked the link and it's the Washington Generals, the long-time foils of the Globetrotters! This means that the guy holding the ball is the immortal Red Klotz, who was the founder and captain of the Generals. Those of us who grew up watching ABC's Wild World of Sports probably remember the little round guy who made a surprising number of set shots against the Globies, but the the end was always a forgone conclusion.

Checking Wikipedia, I learned the following:
  • In the 1940s, Red actually played in the ABL and the BAA (Baltimore Bullets) before the NBA even existed.
  • At 5'7", Red was tied for the fourth shortest player in pro basketball history.
  • Red coached and played point-guard for the Generals until he was 68 YEARS OLD.

So, at your next socially distanced cocktail party, if the subject of Red Klotz comes up, you can contribute something - probably more useful than anything else on this thread.
Thanks for this. I saw a lot of the Generals-Trotters games as a kid, and I used to feel sorry for Klotz, an old man who spent his career losing a basketball games and being embarrassed. When I got older, I realize he was probably laughing all the way to the bank. I would love to have been a fly on the wall at the salary negotiations between Red Klotz and Abe Saperstein, both very likely a couple of con-artists, with an aptitude for putting on a great show for a pretty good gate.
joe amos yaks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Saw the Trotters v Generals @ Richmond Auditorium (the "deadspots" floor challenged the Meadowlark) in 195_? ... the Goose was playing. Generals got hot and nearly won. So the story goes.
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
01Bear said:

SFCityBear said:

01Bear said:

SFCityBear said:


And do us a favor: Leave racisim and agism at the door when you post

SFCityBear, brother I would encourage you to take the same advice. It's pretty damn racist and agist to expect everyone to cater to and adopt old white guy preferences as the norm. While I initially made my comment half-jokingly (though I admit, I should've added a smiley face emoticon), it appears your comment is entirely serious.

How many times have you come on this board to lament how basketball isn't played the way you prefer, any more? How many times have you lambasted younger Bears for not knowing the generations of Bears who played before they or even their parents were born? While sharing information about the past is welcome (and I truly do enjoy learning from you about Cal's basketball legacy, by the way), your criticism of young Bears for not knowing what you know is very much a reflection of the agism you claim to deplore.

Worse, your (and in this case, helltopay's) insistence that your sartorial choices are really what's acceptable has a ridiculously racist premise, namely that the standard body type to be used to determine what is appropriate is that of the skinny white athlete. I was never a skinny white athlete. Why should my uniform preferences be dictated by someone whose body dimensions drastically differed from mine?

Thanks to puberty, I gained about 25lbs, all of which settled below the belt, over the course of one summer. I was a short power forward/center on my high school frosh basketball team, but I could effectively box out taller opponents because of my stronger and thicker base. My thighs resembled those of a juiced Lance Armstrong. My glutes were proportional to my treetrunk-like thighs. My calves were the size of some grapefruits. I was entirely uncomfortable in those hot pants that passed for basketball shorts. Yet, I was forced to wear them because some old white guy determined that high school basketball players were all skinny, based on a history of predominantly white basketball players at my school. Never mind that for those of us (generally non-White) players with more mass in our hips, butts, and thighs, those "normal" shorts rode up and were little better than speedos.

Guess what, your (and helltopay's) pronouncements are pretty much indistinguishable from the decision (by whomever it was in my predominantly white school district who decided) to buy shorts that suited skinny white guys well but not so much the rest of us. They're rooted in the racism that uses the white body as the standard by which all things are measured. It may not be malicious or even intentional, but it marginalizes, minimizes, others, and even dehumanizes non-white bodies, nonetheless.

That said, I appreciate your link to an article showing that young athletes are starting to wear shorter shorts again. That's fine for them. I encourage them to find and wear shorts in which they're comfortable. Their choices, however, shouldn't be limited only to what some old dude (either you, me, helltopay, or anyone else) whose body type is/was entirely different from theirs determines is appropriate.
Well, I took your original post as serious and not jokingly or half-jokingly in any way. By the literal meaning of the words you used, it was no more than a racist and agist attack against one age group of one race. An emoticon might have helped me somehow understand how it was meant, but I can be pretty dense sometimes, especially when I get my hackles up, so I doubt it would have helped. My post was deadly serious, because except for the "LOL", I felt your post was intended to be taken seriously. As I read it, it sounded very serious, indeed, like you had some kind of axe to grind with old white men.

It is so easy to misunderstand something typed and sent electronically, and sometimes take offence at something not meant to offend. I suspect that most posts, messages, or e-mails intended to insult are ones that the poster would never say in person face-to-face. Now that you have told me of your well-developed muscular structure (and I am pretty sure you are much younger than me, and bigger than me), I will certainly have to tread lightly, and be careful not to insult you, for fear we might meet one day, and you would knock my block off.

Aside from that, it is apparent you either have not read, or have read a lot into my posts which were not there. My posts are interminably long much of the time, and I can understand in this fast-moving age, why someone might not read such posts carefully. First, I admit to lamenting that basketball is not played the way it was in the 1950s and 1960s, but what I continually try to point out is that some of the fundamentals of that era haven't changed and players of today would be better players if they had mastered some of those fundamentals. The pro players who attended Pete Newell's Big Man Camps for fifty years after he retired from coaching are a testament to this. They respected what he could teach them about how to play the game better. My biggest problem is with the rule changes that favor the offense, and make it near impossible for one player to stop another player from scoring. And it isn't old white guys who lament this. Old black guys like Oscar Roberston, Wilt Chamberlain, Bill Russell, and Julius Erving have lamented it also. Publicly. Allowing today's players to do many things that the older player were not allowed to do, and then to try and say today's players are better, is just wrong.

I have learned much about modern basketball from posters on this board. I try hard not to insult. I don't believe I have ever "lambasted younger Bears for not knowing players who played before" I know I have not "criticized young Bears for not knowing what I know" because I try very hard not to criticize persons, only their ideas, and usually only in a debate. Since I got to the Bear Insider, I have been ridiculed for even mentioning how basketball was played from say 1958 to first the three point shot attempt, and some of those playing methods ought to still be relevant. So I vehemently disagree with you that "I criticize young Bears for not knowing what I know". I try to tell interesting stories from the past, maybe to inform folks of what they may not know, and often get ridiculed for doing so, but I never intend to criticize a person, only to defend my position against insult and attack, by letting them know there are other ways to play this game.

How would you know what uniforms I prefer? I never voiced an opinion. I could care less. The long loose uniforms appear a little comical to me, and I said so. It doesn't mean I wouldn't wear one. I have never played in them, so I don't know if they would interfere with my running or dribbling. In fact, I had a sever case of eczema on my legs, and wore sweat pants at practice, so no one would see the sores on my legs. So I guess the long bloomers of the last 30 years or so would have been perfect for me, like they were for you, for a different reason. I really have no opinion of what is a good uniform. I remember my mother telling me she was upset when she went to some of my father's games. His team was the Demons, and sometimes in their games, one team would be wearing shirts and the other team was naked from the waist up, and mom did not like that one bit, shirts and skins. Fortunately she never saw any of my high school practices, where we always split into teams of shirts and skins.

Finally, I'm not understanding this basketball body type you talk about, "skinny white men". Compared to whom exactly? I'm sure there is an '-ism" for bias against body size or weight, but I haven't learned that one yet. I understand that some white men are skinny. I was white and skinny when I tried out for the Cal frosh, 5-10, 135 lbs. I was cut, told I was too skinny, and told I had to get up to 180 to make the Cal team. A year later, a teammate of mine from high school days, Denny Lewis, white and 5-11, 185 lbs, and he made the team. In fact all the guards on Cal teams of those days were short, and weighed just under 200 lbs. Bill McClintock in Cal's glory days was a forward who was 6-4 and 215 lbs. Harper Kamp is 6-8, 245. David Kravish, who always looked skinny, was 6-10 and 245. Lars is 7-0 and 250 lbs. Richard Solomon was 6-10, 235, and Robert Thurman was 6-10, 265. Who, exactly, are these skinny white men that you played against or that you see playing basket ball. Best rebounders in Cal history were Bob Presley and Ansley Truitt, both black men. Truitt weighed 215, and Presley even less. Skinny black men. Ryan Anderson, 240. People come in all sizes and weights. It is rare that skinny players make it into Cal rotations. Some have, but most of them, black or white are not skinny. You have to have plenty of weight to keep from getting pushed around. It is a physical game. Maybe you played on teams with some undersized undernourished white men, I don't know. The admin guys who make uniform decisions may have been skinny white men, for sure.


SFCityBear, I may have confused you with some other old Bears, then. Please forgive me if I unfairly accused you of lambasting younger Bears over their lack of knowledge. In my defense, all you old white guys look alike. (In case it's not coming across over the text, I'm entirely kidding with that last line. For starters, I've never seen pictures of any of you.)

As for the Cal players, the last Bear I can remember who wasn't built like a bean pole was likely Markhuri Sanders-Frison. While he was likely extremely cut/ripped/shredded, even Leon Powe looked a bit skinny in college. The same applies to Jaylen Brown, who was undoubtedly strong (especially for a freshman basketball player). Even Rob Thurman (he of the "Dunk! Dunk! Dunk" game in the NCAS Tournament) wasn't exactly really thicker than average (for his height, anyway). It's unsurprising then, that these young men would prefer tight short shorts over longer and baggier ones.

I, on the other hand, was built like a fire hydrant. I was short, stout, and I had a bolt on the top of my head. Okay, maybe not quite. It was more of a rivet. Seriously, though, by the time I started high school, I was built as solid as a tank from the hips down. This meant that unlike you, I had no difficulty putting on weight.

Reaching 150lbs was only difficult for me in college because I was approaching it from the other direction. Over a break during my first year at Cal, a high school friend of mine saw me with my shirt off and thought I was sick/dying because he could see my ribs. I weighed about 150-155lbs (after losing about 25-30lbs thanks in part to the horrible dorm food and regular cardio-intensive workouts). I had massive (albeit short) legs and an underdeveloped upper body. This was similar to how I was built in my freshman year of high school, when I wore those darn short shorts.

Back then, I was new to the post game. Growing up, I played point guard with my friends. Yet, on my high school frosh team I was moved to 4/5. I learned to bang in the post and even developed some low post footwork (I loved the Mikan drill) and a hook shot. If anything, I wish I got to learn under Pete Newell, back then. I have no illusions that I could've been a college big man (for starters, I was about a foot too short!), but I would've loved to have learn enough so that I could help teach and develop big men.

Like you, I believe knowing how to play in the post is a lost art, thanks in great part to the rule changes over the last decades. Honestly, I would love to see the rules changed to bring back the dominant low post juggernauts. Along those lines I also would love to see rule changes favoring defenders and defense. Ultimately, I guess I'm just an old Asian guy.
01Bear,

This is a great read. Five stars. Now I understand what you were saying, and I split my sides with laughter as well. Sorry for going off on your post.

I had wrongly assumed that the long pants were just a fashion thing, like Stu and others had said. I never did think it was racial in any way, because black players in short pants had more or less dominated the NBA since the 1970s, and achieved great success, maybe in spite of the confining short pants of the standard uniforms. I did some reading up on it, and it seems some, probably many players did prefer the longer pants as it gave them more freedom of movement. Your post was the first I ever heard of this, and my eyes are now opened. For the rest of the players, the skinny ones, I think it may be more of a style thing, and conforming to fashion. Most of us like to look cool. Back when I went to Cal, no guy wanting to look cool would ever carry a briefcase or have a slide rule clipped to his belt. Carrying one book was the max allowed. Today, first graders' backs are bowed with heavy backpacks full of who knows what? A kid like me, carrying one book would be ridiculed. I remember one night I was sitting in the fraternity dining room booking for finals. I was alone, and had several books and notes with me. In the door comes Andy Segale, who I think was captain of the Cal football team. His major was one of the hardest at Cal, engineering physics. He was carrying 2 books, one for each of 2 finals the next day. He spent half an hour thumbing through the first book, and half an hour with the 2nd book, and then got up to leave. I asked him where he was going. "La Vals," he said. "Can't miss Happy Hour." I thought he was the coolest guy I ever saw. Later, I asked him how he did in the exams. He got C in both courses. Not as cool as I thought. Next semester, he switched to Business Administration. Anyway, white kids have fully adapted to the long pants over the years, and all players who are driven by looking cool will probably change to shorter pants if the schools and NBA start shortening the pants.

I can remember a few guys maybe built like you. Ray Murray, maybe Carl Boyd. How about Gene Ransom? Nobody could push that guy around.

I did have trouble putting on weight. I used to eat 5,000-6,000 calories a day and gain nothing. When the Cal frosh coaches told me to gain 40 pounds to make the varsity, they said to eat bananas and milkshakes and work out lifting weights. So I ate about a dozen bananas and drank 3 milkshakes every day, and went to the gym every day where they did their best to bulk me up. 6 months later, I had gained only 12 pounds, but it was all muscle. I hadn't played basketball for months. At the first varsity tryout, I took a jumper from the top of the key, and it sailed over the backboard into the seats, I was so musclebound. I went from being the best shot on the floor, to the worst, and I had to learn to shoot all over again. I slinked off the floor into oblivion.

Our careers were reversed. You started playing point guard, and grew into a bigger player and moved to the post. I was taller than most kids and started out playing center. I played center my first two years in high school. One of my Filipino teammates recruited me to play for his CYO team, because they needed rebounds. They were 4 Filipinos and me, and they never passed me the ball. That was how I learned to dribble, because the only way I could get a shot was to get a rebound and dribble the length of the floor and shoot it. We almost won the city championship, 5 ball hogs we were.

Another teammate on my high school team said that he and I were both only 5-10, and our parents were all short, 5-7 or less, so he said we would probably stop growing at 6-6, so we had better practice a forward's moves for the future. Neither of us grew another inch. So when I got to Cal and the tryouts, I had to play guard, which I had never played in my life. I loved it. I had the ball and I could shoot, start a play, or find an open teammate for a shot. I was asthmatic, and playing guard, I didn't have to run the length of the floor as much as I did in high school, every time one of my teammates lost the ball, or the ball changed hands, so I didn't get as tired. Now I am even shorter. A couple years ago, I went into a doctor's office, and the nurse asked me, "How tall are you?" I told her, "5-10". She said, "No, you're not. You are 5-9" We argued, she measured, and she was right. The doctor asked me if I was a golfer. I said I was, and he said. "I knew it. You have arthritis in all the right places." The arthritis is a little painful sometimes, but getting shorter really hurts. Don't get old, 01Bear.

I loved playing in the post in grade school, and early high school. The hook shot was a favorite of mine, especially with a fade away. Unstoppable. I never was very good with my left hand, though. But playing with your back to the basket is so much fun. Like Shareef. I really miss the great hook shots. Bob McKeen was the best Cal ever had at that. Washington had Doug Smart and Bruno Boin, two tall guys who could knock down 20 points each with 20 foot hook shots from the corners. Joe Roberts killed Cal in the NCAA final with with 20-25 foot hook shots. Jerry Lucas use to catch the ball under the edge of the backboard, and dribble away from the basket and take a fadeaway hook at the free throw line. Deadly.

Larno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I played high school basketball in the late 60's and we wore short, tight, satin pants. They weren't particularly comfortable and they chafed and I got jock rash one year, although I can't completely blame that on the shorts. We also wore black low top Chuck Taylors, which I thought was great as they were in style then for general wear and I wore them to class anyway. I find it interesting that they are still very popular today although in colors that were not available then (you got white or black, why would you need more)? Then as now they were not great to play ball in but they were the standard for decades.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think we should go back to peach baskets. Who needs those iron hoops with dainty little frilly nets hanging off of them?
SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

I think we should go back to peach baskets. Who needs those iron hoops with dainty little frilly nets hanging off of them?
Or the glass backboards. Too distracting when you are trying to aim a shot.

While you're at it, let's paint over all those artificial semi-circles on the floor, along with the logo at center court, and bring back the half-court line to Haas. And that entire floor up in Eugene is an atrocity. I can't stand watching games played on that floor, even when we win.
MSaviolives
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If only they would bring back the cages around the court

SFCityBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MSaviolives said:

If only they would bring back the cages around the court


I remember when basketball players used to be called "Cagers" in the press and elsewhere. Were the cages to keep the players separated from the fans, or vice versa?
MSaviolives
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SFCityBear said:

MSaviolives said:

If only they would bring back the cages around the court


I remember when basketball players used to be called "Cagers" in the press and elsewhere. Were the cages to keep the players separated from the fans, or vice versa?
Here's a blurb about the origin of "cagers" suggesting that the cage was to protect the fans:
Quote:

In the first decade of the game of basketball, the rule was that when the ball went out of bounds, it belonged to the first team to gain possession. I'll repeat that: the ball went to the first guy who could get his hands on it. Naturally, this led to lots of elbowing and wrestling, which was disastrous given the spectators sitting right alongside the court!
Cages were installed around basketball courts to protect the fans from the players and vice-versa (those player-fan brawls got intense!). Despite the out of bounds rule being changed in 1902, cages stuck around because players loved bouncing the ball (and each other) off the walls.
Wire-mesh cages were soon replaced by the cheaper and safer rope netting, but they still called them cages and they stuck around as late as the 1930s.
Cagers
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.