Southern Methodist preview

2,969 Views | 50 Replies | Last: 28 days ago by CalFanatic
polarbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nice to finally see some good bench minutes and production. We will need them going forward with tougher opponents on the schedule! Also just curious- when was the last time we were ahead of FURD in the standings? It's been a long time!
annarborbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
gljone said:

The NC State game will be fun to see.
This should be a breakthrough game for attendance. Spend money to advertise. Give away tickets. Look at it as a chance to build future fans.
mbBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
annarborbear said:

gljone said:

The NC State game will be fun to see.
This should be a breakthrough game for attendance. Spend money to advertise. Give away tickets. Look at it as a chance to build future fans.


Aren't the students still on break?
Shocky1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
it's a loser mentality to blame outcomes on refs, they may not always make the right call but they are not biased

michelle's chronic foul problems are 100% on her & nobody else...onyiah got wnba athleticism but her telling me before the season that her foul issues are because of the refs is mind boggling & gonna prevent her from ever getting PAID playing the game of basketball

great players/teams adapt, losers whine like candy azz soft crybabies with delusional paranoia

annarborbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Shocky1 said:

it's a loser mentality to blame outcomes on refs, they may not always make the right call but they are not biased

michelle's chronic foul problems are 100% on her & nobody else...onyiah got wnba athleticism but her telling me before the season that her foul issues are because of the refs is mind boggling & gonna prevent her from ever getting PAID playing the game of basketball

great players/teams adapt, losers whine like candy azz soft crybabies

this board's pathological blaming the refs is sociologically interesting to observe
With replays always shown, we can now easily see when there are "shockingly" bad calls.
Shocky1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
understood and those bad calls go both ways, marta crashed into opposing defenders multiple times and jayda pushed opposing offensive players without fouls being called & the bears probably lead the nation in uncalled moving screen fouls

there's no money in sports book betting for collegiate women's basketball, the refs are not biased for either team
gljone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
annarborbear said:

gljone said:

The NC State game will be fun to see.
This should be a breakthrough game for attendance. Spend money to advertise. Give away tickets. Look at it as a chance to build future fans.

While it 'should', history has shown that if anyone expects an attendance bump, we'll most likely be disappointed.

What I do not understand is why don't more students show up. Forgive my ignorance, but If attendance for students is not free, then it should be. That would be a place to start.

It would be nice if there was a bump in attendance because the team would get a boost from it.

SFCALBear72
How long do you want to ignore this user?
gljone said:

annarborbear said:

gljone said:

The NC State game will be fun to see.
This should be a breakthrough game for attendance. Spend money to advertise. Give away tickets. Look at it as a chance to build future fans.

While it 'should', history has shown that if anyone expects an attendance bump, we'll most likely be disappointed.

What I do not understand is why don't more students show up. Forgive my ignorance, but If attendance for students is not free, then it should be. That would be a place to start.

It would be nice if there was a bump in attendance because the team would get a boost from it.


Students do get in free to women's basketball games.
Shocky1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
^ probably 99% of the berkeley students are unaware of the free tixs and/or the wbb team due to poor campus outreach by markeisha everett & jennifer simon-o'neil who have never sold a tix to any sporting event in their lives

the trouble with worthless bureaucrats is that they will NEVER be hired away by any results based organizations which means this special team continues to play in a nearly empty haas

the greater bay area/nor cal is women's basketball starved but ZERO work has been done by the cal athletic department to market this team in the local marketsapce

HoopDreams
How long do you want to ignore this user?
in the first games of the season I thought Williams was a poor outside shooter, but she is a solid 3 point catch and shoot long range shooter. She has a few too many unforced turnovers, but I like her game overall
blungld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Shocky1 said:

understood and those bad calls go both ways, marta crashed into opposing defenders multiple times and jayda pushed opposing offensive players without fouls being called & the bears probably lead the nation in uncalled moving screen fouls

there's no money in sports book betting for collegiate women's basketball, the refs are not biased for either team
I don't think the ongoing claim is cheating or fixing, though some may have said this (mostly as a joke or to vent?). I think it is simple frustration and "discussing" amongst like-minded peers to identify obvious errors and their impact. What is the point of being a fan if you don't have the right and passion to complain and cheer for coaching decisions, player performance, and refs? There literally is no sport without spectators involvement--and we can't get on the court, we can only kvetch about what goes on on the court/field. It's not the enterprise of losers, it is the enterprise of being a non-participant.
The Bear will not quilt, the Bear will not dye!
BearBint
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well stated.
"Don't get distracted, myself. Don't get distracted." Self-talk from a young relative
mbBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
blungld said:

Shocky1 said:

understood and those bad calls go both ways, marta crashed into opposing defenders multiple times and jayda pushed opposing offensive players without fouls being called & the bears probably lead the nation in uncalled moving screen fouls

there's no money in sports book betting for collegiate women's basketball, the refs are not biased for either team
I don't think the ongoing claim is cheating or fixing, though some may have said this (mostly as a joke or to vent?). I think it is simple frustration and "discussing" amongst like-minded peers to identify obvious errors and their impact. What is the point of being a fan if you don't have the right and passion to complain and cheer for coaching decisions, player performance, and refs? There literally is no sport without spectators involvement--and we can't get on the court, we can only kvetch about what goes on on the court/field. It's not the enterprise of losers, it is the enterprise of being a non-participant.


Without a doubt, a good post. But I have always hated the complaining about refs stuff, so in a straightforward way, I agree with Shocky Play better, don't make it come down to calls.
But, no question, frustration is all part of it...
blungld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
mbBear said:

blungld said:

Shocky1 said:

understood and those bad calls go both ways, marta crashed into opposing defenders multiple times and jayda pushed opposing offensive players without fouls being called & the bears probably lead the nation in uncalled moving screen fouls

there's no money in sports book betting for collegiate women's basketball, the refs are not biased for either team
I don't think the ongoing claim is cheating or fixing, though some may have said this (mostly as a joke or to vent?). I think it is simple frustration and "discussing" amongst like-minded peers to identify obvious errors and their impact. What is the point of being a fan if you don't have the right and passion to complain and cheer for coaching decisions, player performance, and refs? There literally is no sport without spectators involvement--and we can't get on the court, we can only kvetch about what goes on on the court/field. It's not the enterprise of losers, it is the enterprise of being a non-participant.


Without a doubt, a good post. But I have always hated the complaining about refs stuff, so in a straightforward way, I agree with Shocky Play better, don't make it come down to calls.
But, no question, frustration is all part of it...
Of course play better should overcome bad calls (not always)...but the point is we are not the players. "We" can't play better. We are watching the game...and talking about the game. We are not telling the players not to play better, or telling them to complain about the refs, or providing them with excuses, or communicating with the refs...the only thing we are doing is talking amongst ourselves. Are we supposed not comment to one another when there is an obvious bad call? I think the weaksauce/loser criticism may come from people who forget that they are not playing and that being a spectator has zero effect on the outcome, that their ego, superstition, and vicarious experience has taken over their common sense.
The Bear will not quilt, the Bear will not dye!
mbBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
blungld said:

mbBear said:

blungld said:

Shocky1 said:

understood and those bad calls go both ways, marta crashed into opposing defenders multiple times and jayda pushed opposing offensive players without fouls being called & the bears probably lead the nation in uncalled moving screen fouls

there's no money in sports book betting for collegiate women's basketball, the refs are not biased for either team
I don't think the ongoing claim is cheating or fixing, though some may have said this (mostly as a joke or to vent?). I think it is simple frustration and "discussing" amongst like-minded peers to identify obvious errors and their impact. What is the point of being a fan if you don't have the right and passion to complain and cheer for coaching decisions, player performance, and refs? There literally is no sport without spectators involvement--and we can't get on the court, we can only kvetch about what goes on on the court/field. It's not the enterprise of losers, it is the enterprise of being a non-participant.


Without a doubt, a good post. But I have always hated the complaining about refs stuff, so in a straightforward way, I agree with Shocky Play better, don't make it come down to calls.
But, no question, frustration is all part of it...
Of course play better should overcome bad calls (not always)...but the point is we are not the players. "We" can't play better. We are watching the game...and talking about the game. We are not telling the players not to play better, or telling them to complain about the refs, or providing them with excuses, or communicating with the refs...the only thing we are doing is talking amongst ourselves. Are we supposed not comment to one another when there is an obvious bad call? I think the weaksauce/loser criticism may come from people who forget that they are not playing and that being a spectator has zero effect on the outcome, that their ego, superstition, and vicarious experience has taken over their common sense.


Fair.. really agree with your last point...
CalFanatic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I can't believe I even have to say this, but my comments about the refs being paid were done in humor. And in no way should've been taken in a literal way.

I lost brain cells having to explain this stupidity. Oh wait, that's humor too.
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.