We are like 10th in attendance in the ACC. Louisville leads with over 7,000 a game and Notre Dame is second at 7,000 a game. Stanford , even in the good years never averaged that high. I think it would be reasonable to maybe get to 3,000 if we had several good years in a row.
Who is going to the game on Thursday
3,244 Views |
89 Replies |
Last: 48 min ago by Shocky1
I tried to find WBB attendance statistics on the CalBears page - but even though it says you can view "season statistics", I kep getting a 404 code when I clicked on 08,09, 10, 11, 12 and 13.
ncbears said:
I tried to find WBB attendance statistics on the CalBears page - but even though it says you can view "season statistics", I kep getting a 404 code when I clicked on 08,09, 10, 11, 12 and 13.
I didn't find comprehensive attendance stats, but I looked at the attendance listed in each box score.
Last time I checked it was around 1800 a game.
cal wbb is 11th in the acc in attendance with an abysmal 1772 average a game at a time when the creatively marketed wnba valkyries averaged 18,064 in the wildly supportive of women's basketball bay area
https://theacc.com/stats.aspx?path=wbball&year=2025
FIRE JENNIFER SIMON-O"NEIL
https://theacc.com/stats.aspx?path=wbball&year=2025
FIRE JENNIFER SIMON-O"NEIL
SFCALBear72 said:GATC said:Finnish Oski said:
Last night was the most disappointed I've been with attendance all season. Hoping Sunday and the final weekend make up for it. I wish more people appreciated what a combative, spirited team we have and what excellent representatives they are of the university.
Thank you. My sentiments exactly
Mine too!
Cal WBB promotes the games on social media (Facebook, Instagram) plus at the games.
I don't understand why the attendance hasn't risen as this fun season has progressed.
72, it takes INNOVATION to sell tixs/build fanbases in today's 6 second attention economy, the current social media never reaches students & potential fans who have never attended a wbb game and just winning more games is not the solution
agreed this is a FUN team but nothing is gonna change until the evil as **** JENNIFER SIMON-O'NEIL is fired, she thinks her attending every game as a fan at the university's expense is her job, any fan who sees her at today's game should let jenny know that's she a total **** up
Shocky1 said:
cal wbb is 11th in the acc in attendance with an abysmal 1772 average a game at a time when the creatively marketed wnba valkyries averaged 18,064 in the wildly supportive of women's basketball bay area
https://theacc.com/stats.aspx?path=wbball&year=2025
FIRE JENNIFER SIMON-O"NEIL
Her contract is up on July 1 (I think)
Is anyone else exhausted by how every thread devolves into a mass psychosis episode about Jennifer Simon O'Neil?
I'd love to talk about the basketball game we actually played. Maybe we should create a dedicated thread for a certain individual (no need to name names) so he can rant into it daily when he forgets to take his medication
Good idea Cal fanatic.
CalFanatic said:
Is anyone else exhausted by how every thread devolves into a mass psychosis episode about Jennifer Simon O'Neil?
I'd love to talk about the basketball game we actually played. Maybe we should create a dedicated thread for a certain individual (no need to name names) so he can rant into it daily when he forgets to take his medication
blocking annoying posters is free & easy, works grreat.
< Im not sick, but im not well; sometimes it feels.. >
Ha. If you look at the Olympic sports board, I "ignored" this user this morning (I assume that's the block feature) after yet another unhinged rant directed at me on the softball thread. I still seem to be seeing responses to their posts, thoughso if there's a way to fully fix that, please please please , for the love of god, let me know.
Anyways, looking at the standings after our game- a Virginia Tech win Sunday and a Stanford win over Virginia would put all of us at six conference losses, with us obviously holding the tiebreaker. That would be massive.
Anyways, looking at the standings after our game- a Virginia Tech win Sunday and a Stanford win over Virginia would put all of us at six conference losses, with us obviously holding the tiebreaker. That would be massive.
CalFanatic said:
Ha. If you look at the Olympic sports board, I "ignored" this user this morning (I assume that's the block feature) after yet another unhinged rant directed at me on the softball thread. I still seem to be seeing responses to their posts, though if there's a way to fully fix that, please please please , for the love of god, let me know.
yeah, you're right, blocking doesn't filter out replies, but imo helps
# "love of god" not so much, ymmv
< Im not sick, but im not well; sometimes it feels.. >
Ah, oh well. Something's better than nothing my friend. Go Bears!
Clemson has a tough road. we could finish as high as 6th. what would that mean?
wvitbear said:
Clemson has a tough road. we could finish as high as 6th. what would that mean?
Could woulda shoulda but looking at the standings right now…that overtime loss to 10-4 Syracuse hurts more than ever.
It would mean a first round bye in the ACC tournament, probably playing the winner of 11 vs 14.
The Vanderbilt game also is a coulda woulda, and man if Lulu hadn't turned it over at the end of the Missouri game, that's another one. 
Still I feel like we are playing really well right now, and I'm happy about that, particularly if we can get Taylor back.
Still I feel like we are playing really well right now, and I'm happy about that, particularly if we can get Taylor back.
Our record last year was 12 and 6. but does anyone remember where we finished in the ACC?
While I agree, I look back to the beginning of the season where I didn't know the majority of this roster and how they would gel.
I had concerns about replacing the shooting lost from last season. And while there isn't the level of accuracy, this team makes up for it by playing better defense and being a team that is tough to play against.
It's been highly enjoyable. Getting to see Mjracle and Sakima grow into their large roles...to see the development of Gisella's game and seeing what Puff and Taylor can do? Plus Lulu's mettle at the end of games...
Yes, enjoyable. And they still have a chance at a special season.
I had concerns about replacing the shooting lost from last season. And while there isn't the level of accuracy, this team makes up for it by playing better defense and being a team that is tough to play against.
It's been highly enjoyable. Getting to see Mjracle and Sakima grow into their large roles...to see the development of Gisella's game and seeing what Puff and Taylor can do? Plus Lulu's mettle at the end of games...
Yes, enjoyable. And they still have a chance at a special season.
ncbears said:Shocky1 said:
cal wbb is 11th in the acc in attendance with an abysmal 1772 average a game at a time when the creatively marketed wnba valkyries averaged 18,064 in the wildly supportive of women's basketball bay area
https://theacc.com/stats.aspx?path=wbball&year=2025
FIRE JENNIFER SIMON-O"NEIL
Her contract is up on July 1 (I think)
Numerous Cal Swimmers Accuse Coach Teri McKeever of Verbal Abuse “For Decades” https://t.co/Rzavmnz0iQ
— SwimSwam (@swimswamnews) May 24, 2022
FACT: Shocky is in communication with multiple former Cal women's swimmers and their families re: the years of abuse that was enabled by JENNIFER SIMON-O'NEIL & ignored by the then Director of Compliance JAY LARSON (who looked the other way re: egregious Title IX violations). These young women's lives have been forever damaged by their Berkeley experiences.
FACT: Shocky is in possession of multiple legal documents pertaining to the abuse inflicted including the confidential Munger report that was not released to me via a public information request. This is a shocking report that makes the reader want to throw up and disassociate with Cal Athletics.
FACT: Shocky is in possession of an email directory listing for the University's largest donors, The Builders of Berkeley.
If Chancellor Lyons still employs JENNIFER SIMON-O'NEIL and JAY LARSON in any capacity including but not limited to serving as Co Athletic Directors after their current contracts expire on July 1, 2026 it's possible that unredcated highlighted portions documenting the racism and other abuses that resulted in multiple swimmers having suicidal iterations will be sent by an untraceable 3rd party to The Builders of Berkeley, the UC Board of Regents and selective national media outlets including the New York Times.
Fundraising for Berkeley at that point will be very challenging in addition to national scrutiny upon the University.
FAFO#
Featured Stories
See All
Cal Earns Pair Of Walk-Off Wins Over Santa Clara
by Cal Athletics
Cal Beats Boston College 86-75 Behind 22 Points From Chris Bell
by Cal Athletics
Post Transfer Portal - Additions and Subtractions (Kicking)
by Bear Insider
Cal Drops Season Opener To Santa Clara
by Cal Athletics
Bears Open Up 2026 Season Tonight at Home vs Santa Clara
by Jim McGill