2018 Women's NCAA Championships (Swimming & Diving)

32,882 Views | 142 Replies | Last: 7 yr ago by tedbear
UrsusArctosCalifornicus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tedbear said:

Game time baby! Let's do this! GO FRICKEN BEARS!!!!!!
Running out, going to have to catch the 800 FR from my mobile whilst on the train...hopefully there will be some updates posted here!

With everyone seemingly already anointing the Furdettes the hot favourite to take this relay on Day 1 (and even for the Wolverines to get by Cal for the runner-up spot), still reckon our plucky Bears will have more than a fighting chance - esp if Manuel foregoes this one for the 400 MR on Friday!

We have all been jubilant witnesses to the upset back @ Pac-12s recently, I don't see why it can't happen on this relay again if our Bears show their grit and deliver PBs all around.

LSJU's amazing 6:45.91 NCAA record from 2017 should remain intact, but if Robin, Thleen, Katie & Amy can drop half a sec or more each from their stellar Pac-12s splits, a low 6:50 would be in a good place to challenge for the title, may even threaten the school record of 6:50.18 from a Missy-led squad accomplished back @ 2015 Pac-12s!

Yup, GO FRICKEN BEARS!!!!!!


HBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1:43.78 for Robin, fifth after the first leg.

6:50.83 for Cal, third for the night.
tedbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dang, as expected Furd, Michigan, Cal.
tedbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Katie made up ground on leg three, but we were so far behind by that point already. There was no way Amy was going to catch Ledecky, but I was hoping she could catch the Michigan anchor. Unfortunately, she ran out of gas.
HBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waiting for live results to post splits, but Thleen looked to have dropped off on that last 50 (from my view of the live stream).

Copied from SwimSwam comment section:
Neumann 1:43.78
Baker 1:42.78
McLaughlin 1:41.64
Bilquist 1:42.63

Haughey for Michigan with blazing 1:40.49 and and Ledecky's 1:39.87 to cap off Furd relay.
For reference:
Stanford
Drabot 1:42.99
Eastin 1:41.13
Forde 1:42.94
Ledecky 1:39.87

Michigan
Deloof C 1:43.35
Haughey 1:40.49
Bi 1:43.88
Deloof G 1:42.31

Go, Bears and esp. nice split from Katie!!
tedbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Agree HBear, and it looked worse because Comerford had an insane split. Ledecky might take down Missy's 200 Free record.
tedbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Siobhan Haughey, sigh, what could have been.
HBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Again, depending on SwimSwam comments here, but apparently 27.55 split for Kathleen's last 50 of her 200 (26.18 for Katie McL's last 50), just to make that comparison. But all-around, still third in the country with a faster time than the Bears marked last year... I'm sure great races for our Bears in coming days!
UrsusArctosCalifornicus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It was a really valiant effort by our Bears!!!

I think that 6:50.83 actually is the #2 fastest time ever done in school history!

Katie had a fantastic split (a massive PB as far as her flying splits are concerned), bodes well for her 200 free individual.

Thleen & Amy not too far off their lifetime best splits either, dropping time from their Pac-12s. Baker may have gone out a bit too fast trying to make up for the deficit. It's just that a bunch of other swimmers also laid down some eye-popping swims...
tedbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oh yeah UAC, and your girl Erika Brown looked really good in the leading off for Tennessee.
HBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Very true, I think my perception of the race definitely getting colored by the monster Ledecky and Comerford splits, as well as Brown, Haughey's performances that are getting so much press. All in all, great swims by our quartet of Bears tonight, really quite happy for Katie with that 1:41, and roll on you Bears! Georgia all the way back in tenth tonight.
UrsusArctosCalifornicus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HBear said:

Georgia all the way back in tenth tonight.

'SC & TAMU also underperformed by quite a bit on this relay...not that I'm complaining too loudly, mind you!

No DeSorbo Effect on Day 1 either? :p (alright, to be fair, UVA did set a new school record in coming 7th, higher than their original seed)

Does look like the Furdette Juggernaut's going to run away with it all this year ~sigh~.

Meehan seems to have smartly accounted for more than a few of his squad adding time from 2017 Pac-12s to 2017 NCAAs, by resting certain key players hardly at all @ conference this season...
UrsusArctosCalifornicus
How long do you want to ignore this user?

BEARS SWIM TO 3RD IN 800 FREE RELAY


Cal's time of 6:50.83 in the 800 free relay is the second fastest in school history.


COLUMBUS, Ohio California opened the NCAA Championships by racing to the second-fastest 800-yard free relay time in school history, touching in 6:50.83 to claim third place on the first day of the meet Wednesday.

The Golden Bears improved their time by more than 1.5 seconds from the Pac-12 Championships three weeks ago, and their result stands behind only the Cal-record 6:50.18 from the 2015 season.

Freshman Robin Neumann led off in 1:43.78 just off her personal best and she was followed by Kathleen Baker, Katie McLaughlin and Amy Bilquist. McLaughlin's split of 1:41.64 was the best of her career.

"I thought they did a nice job and it was a really good way to kick us off for the week," head coach Teri McKeever said. "It would have been nice to move up, but I don't think you can complain when you go the second-best time in history. We responded well to the racing situation and Katie, particularly, had one of the best swims she's had as a Golden Bear. We just have to keep it going."


RESULTS => http://calbears.com/documents/2018/3/14//2018_women_s_ncaa_wednesday_results_1_column.pdf

UrsusArctosCalifornicus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Off-topic haha, but just thought it was nice that the podium photo of our studly 800 FR quartet posted by CalBears above also includes Erika (had led off Tenn's squad with a 1:42.39) & Siobhan (busted out a 1:40.49 for Mich), who happen to be 2 of my originally-hoped-for picks from the recruits class of 2016 & 2015 respectively... :p

EDITS -> Oh, also featured in the photo is 2016 Cal recruit Meghan Small (1:42.45 split for the Vols), who had taken an official trip here...

Not to mentioned another fave recruit of ours from 2016, Claire Adams (Amy's clubmate from Carmel), contributed a 1:41.71 split for her Horns.
bearz012
How long do you want to ignore this user?



2018 WOMEN'S NCAA CHAMPIONSHIPS: DAY 1 FINALS LIVE RECAP

WOMEN'S 800 FREE RELAY:
1. GOLD: Stanford, 6:46.93
2. SILVER: Michigan, 6:50.03
3. BRONZE: Cal, 6:50.83

Michigan wound up 2nd with a speedy 1:40.49 from Siobhan Haughey on the 2nd leg and a 1:42.31 anchor from Gabby Deloof. Cal rounded out the top 3 with a 1:41.64 from Katie McLaughlin on the 3rd leg. The Bears also had sub-1:43 splits from Kathleen Baker (2nd leg- 1:42.78) and Amy Bilquist (anchor leg- 1:42.63).

TEAM SCORES THROUGH DAY 1:
1. Stanford - 40
2. Michigan - 34
3. Cal - 32
4. Tennessee - 30
5. Texas - 28

-----

Some notes:
- A&M seems to have missed their taper (Pickrem went 1:44.0 vs her 1:42.9 at SEC's), which is great because A&M was the biggest threat to our presumed runner-up finish
- Strong splits from Haughey (1:40.4), Brown (1:42.3 lead), Small (1:42.4), Adams (1:41.7), Marrkand (1:42.3), Raab (1:42.9), Seidt (1:42.9), and Nelson (1:42.5)
- McLaughlin's split was really promising, not only for NCAA's, but the summer as well!
- Yeah, Thleen's split was a bit worrying but she took it out a bit too fast for someone who doesn't often swim the 200 free.

More points from SwimSwam --> https://swimswam.com/erika-brown-appears-to-have-hit-her-taper-at-ncaas/

-----
https://instagr.am/p/BgUs1QegLOJ



Some pictures:


Kathleen Baker (left), Katie McLaughlin (right)



2018 W. NCAAS: DAY 1 PHOTO VAULT

puget sound cal fan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Teri' and the Bears have got the rest of the field right where Cal wants them! Go Bears!
BearDevil
How long do you want to ignore this user?
UrsusArctosCalifornicus said:

Katie had a fantastic split (a massive PB as far as her flying splits are concerned), bodes well for her 200 free individual.


Terrific to see McL bounce back strong this season.
UrsusArctosCalifornicus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Katie was showcasing her new-found sprint speed @ Pac-12s, but her endurance in the last lap of the 200 distance events wasn't quite there yet. A spot of extra rest seemed to have done the trick judging by her studly outing in the 800 FR last night!

The 200 Fly is Eastin's race to lose, but would be really great to have Katie in the A final there & in the 200 Free, esp if that would involve pushing down Drabot in the scoring although the furdette's having a really strong meet so far.

Seeing that McL is historically even better in long course than yards, do share your hopes re this summer!

May be a mite early (Tokyo 2020 is always the ultimate goal in mind), but would sooo luv to see Katie get back on Team USA in the 4x200m relay, and perhaps even qualify alongside 2018 Baby Bear Cassidy for Pan Pacs in the 200m Fly (of course they'll have to get past Flickinger, Worrell, Luther, Carter & even Regan Smith first).

Katie's fantastic swim in that relay @ Kazan 2015 not long after her 200m Fly final still brings back fond memories...
HBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good grief. 10 a.m., first heat of the morning, and Furd has broken Cal's newly-minted AR from Pac-12 already with 1:25.68. Hu, Manuel, Pitzer, Howe.

1:26.93 for Cal in heat 3, with Abbey leading off and Katie anchoring.
UrsusArctosCalifornicus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
  • Abbey 21.54 (leadoff), Madds 21.78, Val 21.94, Katie21.67 => 1:26.93

  • Hu 21.74, Manuel 21.42, Pitzer 21.45, Howe 21.07 => 1:25.68

Amy will come in to sub for Val in finals.

Bears have a solid chance of reclaiming the AR from LSJU this evening, but would it be enough to hold off a red hot furdette machine?

Sapling Pitzer had a strong outing...Manuel will surely be swifter in finals... Howe's anchor split absolutely Herculean - but can the senior dupe that feat tonight...
HBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
200 free relay live results for the morning:

#1 -- Stanford - new AR
Hu (21.74), Manuel (21.42), Pitzer (21.45), Howe (21.07)

#2 -- Tennessee

#2 -- Cal
Abbey (21.54), Maddie (21.78), Val (21.94), Katie (21.67). Assuming there will be a switch in the finals lineup tonight for Cal, while Furd will stay the same, but especially cheers to Katie for such a fast split, second in the quarter to just Abbey!
UrsusArctosCalifornicus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just for reference...

2017 NCAA - Abbey 21.59, Madds 21.83, Amy 21.26, Farida 20.91 => 1:25.59 ... (NCAA Record!)

2018 Pac-12 - Madds 21.96, Amy 21.24, Katie 21.67, Abbey 21.00 => 1:25.87 .... (Former American Record)
UrsusArctosCalifornicus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Robin takes Heat 5 of the 500 Free from Lane 1 in 4:40.98, just 0.06 sec from her 4:40.92 PB done @ Pac-12s (was 4:43.50 @ UGA Invite).

Was prob. tapered for Pac-12s, so a pretty decent swim considering. Did beats furdette Voss (4:41.19) in her heat.
BearDevil
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Props to Val for getting the job done. Bears just needed to get a middle lane and can sub in a fresh Amy and go for a title and/or records tonight.

Seems inefficient that Teri rarely uses relay only swimmers given her traditional depth in sprint, back, and fly. She never butts up against the 18 squad limit. Also important to get promising froskies into the pipeline early to build experience and confoidence for larger roles later in their careers.
swimmer19
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wow, USC only managed 13th on the 2FR, Georgia 10th, and Texas A&M not even finaling (not that I'm complaining).

Indiana didn't make finals, either.
swimmer19
How long do you want to ignore this user?
500 results:

Robin 24th

2 furds in A final

Possibly 3 in B (swim-off for 16th btwn Courtney Harnish/Megan Byrnes)
HBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In all honesty, slightly relieved that "only" 2 Furds are in the A-final, considering the damage that they could have wreaked otherwise. (Hoping I'm not jinxing anything though.)
UrsusArctosCalifornicus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Robin did well relative to the field ending up as the 24th fastest in the 500 Free, as her original seeding was #39. Now if only there was a scoring C final @ NCAAs, like we had @ Pac-12s hehe...

LSJU will start piling on the points as the Card qualified 2 ups (Drabot improving from her #14 seed to #6), and at least 2 downs in the form of Forde & Pitzer, with Byrnes in the unenviable position of drawing w/UGA's Harnish @ #16 thus involving a swim-off (Megan's an experienced distance swimmer, so this may not be quite as bad as it sounds for her lol).

Do like the amiable furdette sophomore whose parents are both Bears, but will be rooting for the dawg freshman in the swimoff haha.
UrsusArctosCalifornicus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Going to be offline for a wee bit, pls keep the (hopefully) good news flowing in as we cheer on our Bears in these morning heats.

Day 2 is projected to be Cal's biggest scoring day, at least from the psych sheets...so we'll need to get some decent momentum really going this morning, as the Furd will start to run away from the rest of the field on Day 3 (if not much earlier judging by their red hot performances thus far, guess Greg has his Furdette Juggernaut really fired up to dominate the competition)

#fullsend #grit #gobears
HBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looks like Keaton added nearly 3 seconds to her seed, going a 1:58 in prelims.
BearDevil
How long do you want to ignore this user?
swimmer19 said:

Wow, USC only managed 13th on the 2FR, Georgia 10th, and Texas A&M not even finaling (not that I'm complaining).

Indiana didn't make finals, either.


'SC, the Great Satan of the PAC, is having a crappy meet and they've regressed in recent years #sSAD! 'SC and A&M will cannibalize each other in breast scoring, making it harder for them to make up mediocre performances in two relays.
swimmer19
How long do you want to ignore this user?
200 IM/50 Free/400 MR recap:

200 IM: Thleen into A final at 6th, Sarah into B at 14th, and Keeks all the way down at 35th... the Furd have Ella Eastin in A, and Ally Howe in B

50 Free: Abbey into A in 2nd, Maddie/Amy into B at 9th/10th, Noemie scratched, not to mention Madds tied her entry time of 21.96 in prelims, with Amy right behind at 21.97... the Furd only have Simone Manuel in A

400 MR: We're in with an outside lane (lane 1, seed 7th) with Keeks, Ali, Noemie, and Katie McL headlining our lineup... think the finals lineup should be somewhat Thleen, Ali, Noemie, Abbey, while the Furd are seeded 1st with Janet Hu, Grace Zhao (former Cal recruit), Lindsey Engel, and Simone. Don't really expect that lineup to change...

500 Free swimoff: Winner was former Cal target Courtney Harnish, thus leaving the trees with 2A, 2B in the 500
bearz012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
swimmer19 said:

400 MR: We're in with an outside lane (lane 1, seed 7th) with Keeks, Ali, Noemie, and Katie McL headlining our lineup... think the finals lineup should be somewhat Thleen, Ali, Noemie, Abbey, while the Furd are seeded 1st with Janet Hu, Grace Zhao (former Cal recruit), Lindsey Engel, and Simone. Don't really expect that lineup to change...
Stanford's lineup will definitely change. They've always had Hu (who could probably put down a 50-mid) on the fly leg, and Howe on the back leg. Zhao/Williams will be a tossup. Williams split a 58.61 at Pac-12's, but looked sort of off on her 200 IM. We'll see. Maybe they'll throw Williams on there because of her experience.

Bears will need to swap out Keeks for Thleen, and Katie for Abbey, though in order to challenge LSJU for the title, Ali should get down to the 59.0 she was at Pac-12's. I think Ali & Robin were tapered at Pac-12's in order to make NCAA's, since Teri believes in the pipeline and giving the freshies as much experience so when they're faster and stronger, they will have more confidence going into NCAA's in coming years.

------

2018 WOMEN'S NCAA CHAMPIONSHIPS: DAY 2 PRELIMS LIVE RECAP
2018 WOMEN'S NCAA CHAMPIONSHIPS: DAY 2 UP/DOWNS

-----

Some pictures from prelims via SwimmingWorld:


Abbey Weitzeil



Abbey Weitzeil


Kathleen Baker



-----


-----



The Strategic Sprint: How Baker, Eastin and Pickrem Will Attack NCAA 200 IM

Kathleen Baker is one of the world's best backstrokers. Ella Eastin is best known for her IM abilities, particularly in the 400 IM, and her 200 fly. Different swimmers from very different backgrounds Baker from North Carolina, Eastin from Southern California but there's one event where they have developed an intense rivalry: The 200 IM.

The last time the duo raced in that event, they actually could not be separated at the touch. At the USA College Challenge in October, Baker and Eastin tied for the win in the 200 IM at 1:53.24. Baker's Cal Bears and Eastin's Stanford Cardinal met twice last month, but Baker opted out of the 200 IM at the dual meet, and Eastin passed on the event at the Pac-12 championships.

When the two were freshmen in 2016, Eastin won the 200 IM at the NCAA championships and set a new American record. She trailed Baker after 50 yards of butterfly, made up ground on the backstroke, took the lead on the breaststroke and pulled away on the free. Baker settled for second, a full 1.3 seconds behind.

One year later, Baker turned the tables. She took the lead after butterfly, maintained the lead on backstroke and then, in a surprising development, pulled away on the breaststroke. On the free, there was nothing Eastin could to do keep up. Baker finished in 1:51.69, four hundredths off Eastin's record.

In this year's 200 IM final, it's worth expecting just about the same thing: Baker jumping out to be a big lead and Eastin chasing her home. But there's a third swimmer who could jump into this mix, and that's Sydney Pickrem, the Canadian Olympian and Texas A&M Aggie who won bronze in the 400 IM at the World Championships.

Pickrem doesn't have much pure speed and is not much of a butterflier. She will lose more ground on backstroke. But she will the best breaststroker in the final and one of the best at the entire meet.
At the SEC championships last month, Pickrem split 32.09 for her breaststroke split of the 200 IM, faster than Baker or Eastin have ever gone. Her 26.84 free split was also excellent. Her time from that meet was 1:52.69, a lifetime best but still a second behind the career bests of both Eastin and Baker. But for whatever it's worth, Pickrem does enter the NCAA championships as the top seed in the event.

Baker is seeded second and Eastin fifth, but it's tough to see anyone but this trio finishing in the top three spots in the final.

Unlike most 200s, the 200-yard IM is very much a sprint, with two quick bursts of energy for each stroke. But it's still long enough for the lead to change multiple times as swimmers switch between strokes where they excel and strokes where they struggle. That's what makes it such a compelling race for fans.

No two of Baker, Eastin and Pickrem swim the 200 IM the same way. Baker will inevitably out have the lead after both the butterfly and backstroke legs, but that won't matter. This race will be decided by execution who pulls off her own race plan and has enough left in the tank for the final 50 yards.

-----



2018 W. NCAAS FINALS PREVIEW: STAGE SET FOR CAL-STANFORD SHOWDOWN IN 200 FREE RELAY

200 Free Relay- This could get interesting between Cal and Stanford. At Pac-12s, Cal took down the American Record. This morning, Stanford broke that record. The 2 teams will go head-to-head tonight with their best lineups. We'll likely see the NCAA Record go down, as Stanford was hundredths shy this morning and Simone Manuel looks like she has plenty left in the tank to go faster on her split tonight. Ally Howe impressed this morning for the Cardinal with a 21.07 anchor. Cal's Abbey Weitzeil looks to help the Bears defend their title. Teammate Amy Bilquist is a key player for them as well, as she's split 21-lows before.

200 IM- American Record holder Ella Eastin (Stanford) and defending NCAA champion Kathleen Baker (Cal) will have a rematch tonight. Texas A&M's Sydney Pickrem will challenge them as the top seed for finals. Wisconsin's Beata Nelson is in the hunt for a top 3 spot after a lifetime best this morning.

50 Free- None of the top swimmers seemed to show all of their cards in prelims. Cal's Abbey Weitzeil, the American Record holder, and Stanford's Simone Manuel, the NCAA Record holder and defending champion, headline this race. There are a couple of swimmers who could pull off an upset though. Tennessee's Erika Brown has been on the rise this year, and Ohio State's Liz Li has the home pool advantage.

400 Medley Relay- This could end up being a close race with the lead potentially changing hands a few times. Stanford and Cal have two of the fastest 100 backstrokers ever in Ally Howe (the American Record holder) and Kathleen Baker respectively, but Indiana should have far and away the fastest breaststroke split by Lilly King. Tennessee has the potential to be up there with them if they swap Erika Brown in on the fly leg.
UrsusArctosCalifornicus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thanks for the updates. Catching up on the results now...

Crikey, that was too blinding close for comfort on the 400 MR!!!!

General rule of thumb is that if you aren't in the top seeded heat @ prelims, strive to finish in the top 2 of your heat. 3rd may get in the A final, but 4th makes things more than a wee dodgy.

Props to Teri for having faith in Keeks to lead off the relay, in spite of her 200 IM earlier falling 2+ sec short of her 1:55.72 PB @ Pac-12s (3/4 of a sec slower on that 100 back leg here than her individual @ Pac12).

But I personally wouldn't have risked using Keaton here, as clearly her taper meet was at conference where she had dropped PBs in all her events...

OTOH, this was the 1 relay that Amy would have to forego (well maybe the 200 MR too, but Billy already scheduled to contest the 200 FR + 50 Free B final tonight), and Kathleen needed to save her legs in order to be at her best when challenging an on-fire Ella & several other dangerous contenders in the 200 IM, capping the evening by leading off Bears in the 400 MR - so not much of a backup option there for Teri!

Basically Katie saved the day with that dazzling lifetime best 47.15 anchor split of hers. Just more than half a sec slower, and Bears would have been relegated to the B final!!!


For reference:

2018 Pac-12 Finals: Thleen 50.24, Ali 59.06, Nono 50.20, Abbey 46.00 => 3:25.50
2018 NCAA Prelims: Keeks 52.58, Ali 59.71, Nono 50.81, Katie 47.15 => 3:30.25

2018 Pac-12 Finals: Howe 50.21, Williams 58.61, Hu 50.38, Manuel 45.95 => 3:25.15 (NCAA record)
2018 NCAA Prelims: Hu 51.21, Zhao 58.69, Engel 50.98, Manuel 46.70 => 3:27.58 (Pool record)
UrsusArctosCalifornicus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Glancing @ results from Meet Mobile, looks like neither Cal or LSJU will benefit from diving points on Day 2.

In the 1 metre springboard prelims, our Phoebe placed #42 with 251.10 points .... whilst Furd Olympian Kassidy Cook was 18th. Horns & Vols did qualify 1 diver each for finals, as did the 2 Arizona schools.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.