BearForce2 said:

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearForce2 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Will any of our Trump loving friends here have the courage to condemn this?

---

We have receipts from the damage caused by violent protests and you have Ted Nugent concert videos?

---

That's a no. You will not condemn encouraging Trump supporters at a Trump rally to go berserk on the skulls of Democrats.

---

I'd like to see the receipts BF2 claims to have.

---

How far do you live from Portland? You have front row seats.

---

I'm over 200 miles from Portland, so I'm not even in the cheap seats. I don't get over to Portland very often. I did spend 10 days there last year, but I was in a hospital having surgery. I didn't see any damage or damage receipts at the hospital. Going home, the route to the Interstate looked like a perfectly fine neighborhood with no boarded up or burned out buildings. I couldn't smell any ashes or soot. We didn't think to stop and ask people about their damage receipts.

BearForce2 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearForce2 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearForce2 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearForce2 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearForce2 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Will any of our Trump loving friends here have the courage to condemn this?

---

We have receipts from the damage caused by violent protests and you have Ted Nugent concert videos?

---

That's a no. You will not condemn encouraging Trump supporters at a Trump rally to go berserk on the skulls of Democrats.

---

The only people who seem to be going berserk on the skulls of Democrats are other Democrats.

---

So you won't condemn the Trump rally message?

---

Only if you:

1. condemn previous BLM-Antfia riots that that took place
2. play the entire speech so we know what he means.

---

So, that's a no on condemning a call for violence of political opponents at a political rally of a candidate you support

---

So that's a no on condemning violence.

---

Two things. One, you'll lead me around on these games but you'll never condemn this call for political violence from a rally for your favorite politician, Trump.

Second, if you want to be more specific about a specific incident I'll be glad to give you my judgment. Then we'll revert back to #1.

---

You would have to ask Ted Nugent what he meant instead of being offended by inflammatory language that both sides use. You are playing games by asking me to do something I don't need to.

---

Go "berserk on the skulls" from the podium of a political rally is not a both sides issue. Your side is pushing political violence and you won't say anything against it.

dajo9 said:

---

BearForce2 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearForce2 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearForce2 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearForce2 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearForce2 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Will any of our Trump loving friends here have the courage to condemn this?

---

We have receipts from the damage caused by violent protests and you have Ted Nugent concert videos?

---

That's a no. You will not condemn encouraging Trump supporters at a Trump rally to go berserk on the skulls of Democrats.

---

The only people who seem to be going berserk on the skulls of Democrats are other Democrats.

---

So you won't condemn the Trump rally message?

---

Only if you:

1. condemn previous BLM-Antfia riots that that took place
2. play the entire speech so we know what he means.

---

So, that's a no on condemning a call for violence of political opponents at a political rally of a candidate you support

---

So that's a no on condemning violence.

---

Two things. One, you'll lead me around on these games but you'll never condemn this call for political violence from a rally for your favorite politician, Trump.

Second, if you want to be more specific about a specific incident I'll be glad to give you my judgment. Then we'll revert back to #1.

---

You would have to ask Ted Nugent what he meant instead of being offended by inflammatory language that both sides use. You are playing games by asking me to do something I don't need to.

---

Go "berserk on the skulls" from the podium of a political rally is not a both sides issue. Your side is pushing political violence and you won't say anything against it.

---

Democrat politicians do the same and your side engages in the majority of the political violence.

BearForce2 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearForce2 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearForce2 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearForce2 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearForce2 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearForce2 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Will any of our Trump loving friends here have the courage to condemn this?

---

We have receipts from the damage caused by violent protests and you have Ted Nugent concert videos?

---

That's a no. You will not condemn encouraging Trump supporters at a Trump rally to go berserk on the skulls of Democrats.

---

The only people who seem to be going berserk on the skulls of Democrats are other Democrats.

---

So you won't condemn the Trump rally message?

---

Only if you:

1. condemn previous BLM-Antfia riots that that took place
2. play the entire speech so we know what he means.

---

So, that's a no on condemning a call for violence of political opponents at a political rally of a candidate you support

---

So that's a no on condemning violence.

---

Two things. One, you'll lead me around on these games but you'll never condemn this call for political violence from a rally for your favorite politician, Trump.

Second, if you want to be more specific about a specific incident I'll be glad to give you my judgment. Then we'll revert back to #1.

---

You would have to ask Ted Nugent what he meant instead of being offended by inflammatory language that both sides use. You are playing games by asking me to do something I don't need to.

---

Go "berserk on the skulls" from the podium of a political rally is not a both sides issue. Your side is pushing political violence and you won't say anything against it.

---

Democrat politicians do the same and your side engages in the majority of the political violence.

---

Oh really? Please provide documentation of Democratic Party politicians or leaders calling for violence against The Right. I'll wait...

cbbass1 said:

---

BearForce2 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearForce2 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearForce2 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearForce2 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearForce2 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearForce2 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Will any of our Trump loving friends here have the courage to condemn this?

---

We have receipts from the damage caused by violent protests and you have Ted Nugent concert videos?

---

That's a no. You will not condemn encouraging Trump supporters at a Trump rally to go berserk on the skulls of Democrats.

---

The only people who seem to be going berserk on the skulls of Democrats are other Democrats.

---

So you won't condemn the Trump rally message?

---

Only if you:

1. condemn previous BLM-Antfia riots that that took place
2. play the entire speech so we know what he means.

---

So, that's a no on condemning a call for violence of political opponents at a political rally of a candidate you support

---

So that's a no on condemning violence.

---

Two things. One, you'll lead me around on these games but you'll never condemn this call for political violence from a rally for your favorite politician, Trump.

Second, if you want to be more specific about a specific incident I'll be glad to give you my judgment. Then we'll revert back to #1.

---

You would have to ask Ted Nugent what he meant instead of being offended by inflammatory language that both sides use. You are playing games by asking me to do something I don't need to.

---

Go "berserk on the skulls" from the podium of a political rally is not a both sides issue. Your side is pushing political violence and you won't say anything against it.

---

Democrat politicians do the same and your side engages in the majority of the political violence.

---

Oh really? Please provide documentation of Democratic Party politicians or leaders calling for violence against The Right. I'll wait...

---

Maxine Waters says hi.

BearForce2 said:

---

cbbass1 said:

---

BearForce2 said:

---

cbbass1 said:

---

You won't see this on Faux News.

Note that it's become commonplace for law enforcement to declare #BLM or anti-war/#Occupy/anti-WTO, or other "liberal" protests "illegal", and then use force and violent tactics to disperse the protesters.

These violent dispersal tactics seem to be spared, though, for right-wing/anti-mask/anti-shutdown/white supremacist/pro-Fascist gatherings, because nationwide, most law enforcement officers agree with them.

---

I didn't see any murder of innocent civilians by police, just a video from a comedy show and an edited video without any context.

---

This was about the murder of George Floyd. This is your context.
The death of George Floyd: What video shows about his final minutes

Quote:

---

Strange that the response of law enforcement to demonstrations against the murder of innocent civilians by police was to assault the peaceful protesters.

---

---

The death of a single person as tragic as that was doesn't justify the destruction, looting, and violence.

---

Nothing justifies the destruction, looting, and violence. All those are crimes, and the laws against them need to be enforced.

You're equating the #BLM protests, which were Constitutionally-protected peaceful assemblies for the redress of grievances, with destruction, looting, and violence. The two are not the same.

The murder of George Floyd DID justify large-scale protests, because Floyd was just one of scores of innocent citizens murdered by cops. Finally, one murdering cop was held accountable.

cbbass1 said:

---

BearForce2 said:

---

cbbass1 said:

---

BearForce2 said:

---

cbbass1 said:

---

You won't see this on Faux News.

Note that it's become commonplace for law enforcement to declare #BLM or anti-war/#Occupy/anti-WTO, or other "liberal" protests "illegal", and then use force and violent tactics to disperse the protesters.

These violent dispersal tactics seem to be spared, though, for right-wing/anti-mask/anti-shutdown/white supremacist/pro-Fascist gatherings, because nationwide, most law enforcement officers agree with them.

---

I didn't see any murder of innocent civilians by police, just a video from a comedy show and an edited video without any context.

---

This was about the murder of George Floyd. This is your context.
The death of George Floyd: What video shows about his final minutes

Quote:

---

Strange that the response of law enforcement to demonstrations against the murder of innocent civilians by police was to assault the peaceful protesters.

---

---

The death of a single person as tragic as that was doesn't justify the destruction, looting, and violence.

---

Nothing justifies the destruction, looting, and violence. All those are crimes, and the laws against them need to be enforced.

You're equating the #BLM protests, which were Constitutionally-protected peaceful assemblies for the redress of grievances, with destruction, looting, and violence. The two are not the same.

The murder of George Floyd DID justify large-scale protests, because Floyd was just one of scores of innocent citizens murdered by cops. Finally, one murdering cop was held accountable.

---

Not all BLM protests were violent and destructive. All Antifa protests were violent and destructive. And many BLM protestors were mixed in together with Antifa along with looters and other trouble makers. Membership cards aren't required to join these protests. Also....

10% of ballot mules identified by True the Vote also participated in violent riots of 2020

That’s not a coincidence. pic.twitter.com/zeAltMu0mA

— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) May 17, 2022

This is a lie. The White House never encouraged that. https://t.co/kxwdsIlS25

— Andrew Bates (@AndrewJBates46) June 8, 2022

A man was arrested in the assassination attempt of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh and told authorities he planned to break into Kavanaugh's home in Maryland and kill the justice. Remember this?

FLASHBACK: Democrat Senator Chuck Schumer threatened U.S. Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh.

"You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price! You won't know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions!"pic.twitter.com/e1qKzocJDj

— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) June 8, 2022