Republicans gonna Republican

349,225 Views | 3666 Replies | Last: 7 days ago by oski003
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch McConnells boy
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

Mitch McConnells boy


Why are you using a racist term? Are you doing this purposely because you hate black people who don't align with your views?
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
okaydo said:




"Start suing now". He does play to his strength, doesn't he.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you are right /just and for the people wouldn't you want everyone to vote ?

And if not why ???? What are you scared of ?
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

If you are right /just and for the people wouldn't you want everyone to vote ?

And if not why ???? What are you scared of ?


I would never argue that we should put conditions on voting other than age and citizenship but man someone skilled could make an argument that there are many Americans on every side of the political spectrum that should have limited 'powers'. I know that sounds totally contradictory and I really don't want to get in an internet pissing match about 'which people I would exclude' but my God, the longer I live the more and more I see stupid. I know, stupid people are people too. I just cringe thinking about them having a say in our leadership. We might as well spin a wheel.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Point made but who chooses is the even slippery slope
82gradDLSdad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

Point made but who chooses is the even slippery slope


Well, I'd be on the choosing panel for sure.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lol
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?

chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

I don't know this for sure but people have been saying that tRump died and tRump Lite is running for POTUS.
Donald Trump Jr's X account is 'hacked' & shares string of wild posts claiming dad is dead & he's running for president | The US Sun


https://www.the-sun.com/news/9135731/donald-trump-jr-social-media-hacked-strange-post/




going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They don't give bleep
GoOskie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chazzed said:

bearister said:

I don't know this for sure but people have been saying that tRump died and tRump Lite is running for POTUS.
Donald Trump Jr's X account is 'hacked' & shares string of wild posts claiming dad is dead & he's running for president | The US Sun


https://www.the-sun.com/news/9135731/donald-trump-jr-social-media-hacked-strange-post/





Can only imagine what Kirk and Bump Jr were doing "all night".
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bump Jr is all time
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
okaydo said:


If Menendez isn't convicted, it will be due to some technicality.

Unlike the GOP, the democratic party should hold its members to a higher standard. Menendez should resign and if he doesn't, he should immediately be stripped of all committee assignments.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Senator Bob "I'm going out sliding into home plate head first" Menendez

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
“98 yards with my boys” Yeah, sure.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

okaydo said:


If Menendez isn't convicted, it will be due to some technicality.

Unlike the GOP, the democratic party should hold its members to a higher standard. Menendez should resign and if he doesn't, he should immediately be stripped of all committee assignments.


I'm not sure about that, unless you consider our Supreme Court to be a technicality (personally, I consider it a farce). A few years back the Supreme Court rewrote our legislation (McDonnell) to make corruption much more narrow. This self serving act made Supreme Court corruption far less likely to be considered illegal.

I bet Menendez walks. I'm still voting for Andy Kim.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

okaydo said:


If Menendez isn't convicted, it will be due to some technicality.

Unlike the GOP, the democratic party should hold its members to a higher standard. Menendez should resign and if he doesn't, he should immediately be stripped of all committee assignments.


I'm not sure about that, unless you consider our Supreme Court to be a technicality (personally, I consider it a farce). A few years back the Supreme Court rewrote our legislation (McDonnell) to make corruption much more narrow. This self serving act made Supreme Court corruption far less likely to be considered illegal.

I bet Menendez walks. I'm still voting for Andy Kim.
At this point I would hope our standards for corruption are higher than the corrupt radical clerics appointed by Leonard Leo and his billionaires.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks said:

dajo9 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

okaydo said:


If Menendez isn't convicted, it will be due to some technicality.

Unlike the GOP, the democratic party should hold its members to a higher standard. Menendez should resign and if he doesn't, he should immediately be stripped of all committee assignments.


I'm not sure about that, unless you consider our Supreme Court to be a technicality (personally, I consider it a farce). A few years back the Supreme Court rewrote our legislation (McDonnell) to make corruption much more narrow. This self serving act made Supreme Court corruption far less likely to be considered illegal.

I bet Menendez walks. I'm still voting for Andy Kim.
At this point I would hope our standards for corruption are higher than the corrupt radical clerics appointed by Leonard Leo and his billionaires.


Like I said, I'm voting for Kim. But our corruption laws are whatever the corrupt Supreme Court says they are.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

dajo9 said:

Unit2Sucks said:

okaydo said:


If Menendez isn't convicted, it will be due to some technicality.

Unlike the GOP, the democratic party should hold its members to a higher standard. Menendez should resign and if he doesn't, he should immediately be stripped of all committee assignments.


I'm not sure about that, unless you consider our Supreme Court to be a technicality (personally, I consider it a farce). A few years back the Supreme Court rewrote our legislation (McDonnell) to make corruption much more narrow. This self serving act made Supreme Court corruption far less likely to be considered illegal.

I bet Menendez walks. I'm still voting for Andy Kim.
At this point I would hope our standards for corruption are higher than the corrupt radical clerics appointed by Leonard Leo and his billionaires.


Like I said, I'm voting for Kim. But our corruption laws are whatever the corrupt Supreme Court says they are.
I can't wait to hear Bob's defense.

"ladies and gentleman of the jury, if I'm guilty of anything it's trying too hard to win a friendly wager. My friends bet me several gold bars, a mercedes and half a mil in cash that I couldn't use my government influence to help them and the country of Egypt. I won the bet fair and square. Offbooks gambling is a time-honored tradition in New Jersey and I'm confident the Supreme Court will back me up on this. I was planning on filing taxes any day now."
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't want this to be confused with me defending Menendez. I'm not. I will be voting for Kim.

I am castigating the self-serving law that the Supreme Court wrote for us.

Do they have Menendez on record with a quid pro quo? If not, I think he walks on corruption charges.
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
okaydo said:


Republican politicians are not serious people.
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
okaydo said:


Great example of the difference in media treatment of GOP and democrats. If the parties were reversed, all of the right wing news outlets (which have no pretense of being unbiased) would call this a witch hunt 24/7 and mock it relentlessly.

The GOP controls the house and instead of passing a budget to keep our government running they are focused on these ridiculous witch hunts which Trump has demanded they do.

The mainstream media treats these clowns as if they are serious professionals while their conservative media treats everyone who doesn't tow their line as a clown.

What we are seeing from the congressional GOP is pathetic and the most we get from the popular press is long-form articles dryly pointing out factual errors and avoiding calling out the obviously ridiculousness of what's going on in in order to appear unbiased.

A lot of people think the mainstream press is trying to keep things competitive in order to increase the demand for their coverage but I suspect it's more about a misguided attempt to appear to be unbiased which is resulting in a de facto bias in favor of the GOP.
BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?


If Biden doesn't have to step down, I won't either, mofos. - Bob Menendez
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?

BearHunter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What a fine list of MAGA Republican donors, not.
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
House approves amendment from Marjorie Taylor Greene to cut Lloyd Austin's salary to $1:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/house-approves-amendment-marjorie-taylor-192539636.html
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chazzed said:

House approves amendment from Marjorie Taylor Greene to cut Lloyd Austin's salary to $1:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/house-approves-amendment-marjorie-taylor-192539636.html
At least the House is dealing with the important stuff and not wasting time on silly matters like the government shut down next week.
okaydo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unit2Sucks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
okaydo said:




I mean he is the secretary of the interior right?

This is yet another reminder that the GOP likes to play the role of fiscally responsible politicians but in reality they are spendthrifts who increase our deficit.

They could be passing a fiscally responsible budget right now but they are focused on a sham impeachment "inquiry" they even their witnesses call into question.

They cut taxes to satisfy their donors and lie to the American public about the laffer curve. When they do have concrete ideas for budget cuts it's always in two categories: first, cuts to the IRS in order to protect their tax cheats which just further increases our deficits and second, cuts to any services which don't directly benefit their donors. So they attack healthcare, education funding and all social services aimed at helping the less fortunate.

And yes, redecorating seems like a pathetic bipartisan tradition for cabinet members. That plus government funded travel. Most cabinet members (democrat or GOP) are NPCs who provide no value to the administration but manage to spend like crazy and then use their connections to enrich themselves and their families. The GOP only takes notice of this sort of thing when it's a Biden.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
^^^ One can assume they were interior doors, right? Come back and complain f they were exterior doors... ^^^
First Page Last Page
Page 73 of 105
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.