US Government Sponsorship of Censorship

15,471 Views | 122 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by bear2034
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Big Tech said 'we will not let a populist uprising take over and put a candidate in office... and that's when the censorship industrial complex began."
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

"Big Tech said 'we will not let a populist uprising take over and put a candidate in office... and that's when the censorship industrial complex began."
I can't think of anyone who deserved censorship more than Alex Jones. Interesting that you decided to hide who said that quote.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

bear2034 said:

"Big Tech said 'we will not let a populist uprising take over and put a candidate in office... and that's when the censorship industrial complex began."
I can't think of anyone who deserved censorship more than Alex Jones. Interesting that you decided to hide who said that quote.


That wasn't Alex Jones who said that but he is back on Twitter.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

bear2034 said:

"Big Tech said 'we will not let a populist uprising take over and put a candidate in office... and that's when the censorship industrial complex began."
I can't think of anyone who deserved censorship more than Alex Jones. Interesting that you decided to hide who said that quote.


That wasn't Alex Jones who said that but he is back on Twitter.
Technically, you're right, but Alex Jones believed in it enough to make it one of his very first tweets when he returned to Twitter.



AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So it wasn't Tin Foil Hat who said it, it was white nationalist Trump humper Poso? That's a better source?

Both are goose stepping morons.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Alex Jones was the first person to make you aware of Epstein's Island. You should be thankful.
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here's my Holiday Gift to you.

"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AunBear89 said:

Here's my Holiday Gift to you.
I only accept bitcoin.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Unit2Sucks said:

Forgot to mention that according to BG, domestic terrorism is part of the conservative political platform so any law enforcement investigation of domestic terrorism must be political.

This is just how crazy the GOP has become. They start the day complaining about politically driven censorship of core conservatives speech and it turns out they are referring to Hunter Biden's dick pics, anti public health misinformation and domestic terrorism. Great movement you have there, it's no wonder you are getting your azzes kicked in elections.

Bingo.
I dont even know who the GOP is anymore.

Seems like it's filled with "stupid sycophants and sickos.
Boepert, Gaetz, Cawthorn, Gosar, and Marjorie Taylor Greene.
Ronald Reagan would be turning over in his grave.





Reagan IS turning over in his graves.
He has picked up the phone to call Baby Doc to ask for some help operating those gifted and once-thought useless voodoo dolls.
AunBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

AunBear89 said:

Here's my Holiday Gift to you.
I only accept bitcoin.

That's between you and your clients.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." -- (maybe) Benjamin Disraeli, popularized by Mark Twain
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

AunBear89 said:

Here's my Holiday Gift to you.
I only accept bitcoin.


I dunno who you are but you're the kind of meat that is good for verbal target practice. We need to make sure that our insults of your judgment doesn't violate the boards decency policies.

Hard to do because you seem to lining yourself up for it.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

bear2034 said:

"Big Tech said 'we will not let a populist uprising take over and put a candidate in office... and that's when the censorship industrial complex began."
I can't think of anyone who deserved censorship more than Alex Jones. Interesting that you decided to hide who said that quote.


That wasn't Alex Jones who said that but he is back on Twitter.


Elon Musk has way too much spare time on his hands if he sat with Jones for two hours.

I like technical visionary Elon better than social commentator Elon.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:



Elon Musk has way too much spare time on his hands if he sat with Jones for two hours.

I like technical visionary Elon better than social commentator Elon.

It probably beats spending two hours on the Bearinsider.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
concordtom said:



I dunno who you are but you're the kind of meat that is good for verbal target practice.
I am your meat.
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

concordtom said:



Elon Musk has way too much spare time on his hands if he sat with Jones for two hours.

I like technical visionary Elon better than social commentator Elon.

It probably beats spending two hours on the Bearinsider.


Uh, no.
On BearInsider I am anonymous, so my filthy associations aren't seen by millions.
Lets Go Brandon 4
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Lets Go Brandon 5
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Lets Go Brandon 5
How long do you want to ignore this user?

bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lets Go Brandon 4 said:


From the Vigilant Fox:

MUST WATCH: Mike Benz makes damning case that the RIG was in for the 2020 election SEVEN MONTHS ahead of time.

TUCKER CARLSON: "So what you're saying is ... they knew the outcome of the election seven months before it was held?"

MIKE BENZ: "It looks very bad."

How did they do it?

According to censorship expert Mike Benz, a concerted effort, starting in April 2020, was made by a coalition involving the DHS, NATO, the DNC, and other entities to launch a mass censorship campaign across all social media platforms.

This campaign aimed to pre-emptively censor any disputes over the legitimacy of mail-in ballots.

Four key institutions were part of this effort:

Stanford University
The University of Washington
Graphika
The Atlantic Council (7 former CIA directors)

Benz described these entities as "Pentagon cutouts," suggesting they were operating under the influence or direction of the Pentagon to carry out the censorship campaign.

These entities pressured and compelled social media companies to adopt a new category of speech violation termed "delegitimization." This policy was broad in scope, encompassing any form of content that could be interpreted as challenging the legitimacy of mail-in voting, early voting dropboxes, or the tabulation of ballots on election day.

This pressure was not merely advisory but was backed by the implication of potential governmental force or repercussions for non-compliance. This included direct communication channels with tech company executives to facilitate rapid takedown requests.

As a consequence, this concerted censorship effort led to the removal or throttling of potentially hundreds of millions of posts, particularly those questioning the security of mail-in ballots.

The following excerpt from Benz highlights the most important aspect:

"Now, they did this seven months before the election because, at the time, they were worried about the perceived legitimacy of a Biden victory in the case of a so-called 'red mirage, blue shift event.'

"They knew the only way that Biden would be able to win, mathematically, was through the disproportionate Democrat use of mail-in ballots. They knew there would be a crisis because it was going to look extremely weird if Trump looked like he won by seven states and then, three days later, it came out actually the election switched.

"I mean, that would put the election crisis of the Bush-Gore election on a level of steroids that the national security state said, well, the public will not be prepared for. So what we need to do is we need to, in advance, we need to pre-censor the ability to even question legitimacy. This took out hundreds of key influencers."


dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

Lets Go Brandon 4 said:


From the Vigilant Fox:

MUST WATCH: Mike Benz makes damning case that the RIG was in for the 2020 election SEVEN MONTHS ahead of time.

TUCKER CARLSON: "So what you're saying is ... they knew the outcome of the election seven months before it was held?"

MIKE BENZ: "It looks very bad."

How did they do it?

According to censorship expert Mike Benz, a concerted effort, starting in April 2020, was made by a coalition involving the DHS, NATO, the DNC, and other entities to launch a mass censorship campaign across all social media platforms.

This campaign aimed to pre-emptively censor any disputes over the legitimacy of mail-in ballots.

Four key institutions were part of this effort:

Stanford University
The University of Washington
Graphika
The Atlantic Council (7 former CIA directors)

Benz described these entities as "Pentagon cutouts," suggesting they were operating under the influence or direction of the Pentagon to carry out the censorship campaign.

These entities pressured and compelled social media companies to adopt a new category of speech violation termed "delegitimization." This policy was broad in scope, encompassing any form of content that could be interpreted as challenging the legitimacy of mail-in voting, early voting dropboxes, or the tabulation of ballots on election day.

This pressure was not merely advisory but was backed by the implication of potential governmental force or repercussions for non-compliance. This included direct communication channels with tech company executives to facilitate rapid takedown requests.

As a consequence, this concerted censorship effort led to the removal or throttling of potentially hundreds of millions of posts, particularly those questioning the security of mail-in ballots.

The following excerpt from Benz highlights the most important aspect:

"Now, they did this seven months before the election because, at the time, they were worried about the perceived legitimacy of a Biden victory in the case of a so-called 'red mirage, blue shift event.'

"They knew the only way that Biden would be able to win, mathematically, was through the disproportionate Democrat use of mail-in ballots. They knew there would be a crisis because it was going to look extremely weird if Trump looked like he won by seven states and then, three days later, it came out actually the election switched.

"I mean, that would put the election crisis of the Bush-Gore election on a level of steroids that the national security state said, well, the public will not be prepared for. So what we need to do is we need to, in advance, we need to pre-censor the ability to even question legitimacy. This took out hundreds of key influencers."





Damn, we're good
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CBS reportedly seized files from Catherine Herridge, the network's recently laid-off senior investigative correspondent. She's the one who predicted a black swan event affecting national security earlier this year.

Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

CBS reportedly seized files from Catherine Herridge, the network's recently laid-off senior investigative correspondent. She's the one who predicted a black swan event affecting national security earlier this year.


Most companies take away your corporate computer access when you no longer work for the company. Nothing odd about that.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

bear2034 said:

CBS reportedly seized files from Catherine Herridge, the network's recently laid-off senior investigative correspondent. She's the one who predicted a black swan event affecting national security earlier this year.


Most companies take away your corporate computer access when you no longer work for the company. Nothing odd about that.


Than why is CBS denying this happened?

https://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/cbs-news-refutes-claim-it-seized-catherine-herridges-personal-files/

Your knee jerk reaction appears incorrect here. This seems suspicious.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

bear2034 said:

CBS reportedly seized files from Catherine Herridge, the network's recently laid-off senior investigative correspondent. She's the one who predicted a black swan event affecting national security earlier this year.


Most companies take away your corporate computer access when you no longer work for the company. Nothing odd about that.


Than why is CBS denying this happened?

https://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/cbs-news-refutes-claim-it-seized-catherine-herridges-personal-files/

Your knee jerk reaction appears incorrect here. This seems suspicious.
We weren't discussing CBS's denial. It wasn't even mentioned. We were discussing whether CBS was acting properly in not letting her keep those files. Where I work, we recently fired an employee and it was handled just like Bear2034 claimed it was done in this case.

It's just like you to bash me for not anticipating and responding to your future goalpost shift.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

oski003 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

bear2034 said:

CBS reportedly seized files from Catherine Herridge, the network's recently laid-off senior investigative correspondent. She's the one who predicted a black swan event affecting national security earlier this year.


Most companies take away your corporate computer access when you no longer work for the company. Nothing odd about that.


Than why is CBS denying this happened?

https://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/cbs-news-refutes-claim-it-seized-catherine-herridges-personal-files/

Your knee jerk reaction appears incorrect here. This seems suspicious.
We weren't discussing CBS's denial. It wasn't even mentioned. We were discussing whether CBS was acting properly in not letting her keep those files. Where I work, we recently fired an employee and it was handled just like Bear2034 claimed it was done in this case.

It's just like you to bash me for not anticipating and responding to your future goalpost shift.


Not at all EOB. CBS wouldn't be denying this happened if there was nothing odd about grabbing the reporter's files.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

bear2034 said:

CBS reportedly seized files from Catherine Herridge, the network's recently laid-off senior investigative correspondent. She's the one who predicted a black swan event affecting national security earlier this year.


Most companies take away your corporate computer access when you no longer work for the company. Nothing odd about that.


Did she say something she wasn't supposed to?
Lets Go Brandon 7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

bear2034 said:

CBS reportedly seized files from Catherine Herridge, the network's recently laid-off senior investigative correspondent. She's the one who predicted a black swan event affecting national security earlier this year.
Most companies take away your corporate computer access when you no longer work for the company. Nothing odd about that.
Pro-tip - when looking for accurate information about proper procedure when laying off a reporter, don't take the word of some low-level government employee in Oregon who doesn't know what he's talking about.


Lets Go Brandon 8
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

oski003 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

bear2034 said:

CBS reportedly seized files from Catherine Herridge, the network's recently laid-off senior investigative correspondent. She's the one who predicted a black swan event affecting national security earlier this year.
Most companies take away your corporate computer access when you no longer work for the company. Nothing odd about that.
Than why is CBS denying this happened?

https://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/cbs-news-refutes-claim-it-seized-catherine-herridges-personal-files/

Your knee jerk reaction appears incorrect here. This seems suspicious.
We weren't discussing CBS's denial. It wasn't even mentioned. We were discussing whether CBS was acting properly in not letting her keep those files. Where I work, we recently fired an employee and it was handled just like Bear2034 claimed it was done in this case.

It's just like you to bash me for not anticipating and responding to your future goalpost shift.
SAG-AFTRA is pleased to confirm that yet again, Eastern Oregon Bear exposed his ignorance by stating that everything was done properly when he had no idea what he was talking about.



https://media.giphy.com/media/5tojx1LzP3mMA1J1CE/giphy.gif
Genocide Joe
How long do you want to ignore this user?

bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:


Damn, we're good
Democrats are ballers and RINOs in battleground states help them.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Government's censorship industry kicked off in 2016 with the term, 'Russian disinformation'.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tRumpists/Right Wingers are dirty rotten liars. Gym Jordan squirmed like a cat on a hot tin roof when he sheepishly admitted most people don't believe the 2020 Election was stolen.

I would have asked Gym to give some examples of truthful information that was removed from platforms.

Supreme Court grapples with online First Amendment rights as social media teems with misinformation - CBS News


https://www.cbsnews.com/news/scotus-grapples-with-online-first-amendment-rights-as-social-media-teems-with-misinformation-60-minutes-transcript/

*They confirmed that the videos I posted where tRump says he wants to be a prison wife and confesses that he has ED are legit and not deepfake AI
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

tRumpists/Right Wingers are dirty rotten liars. Gym Jordan squirmed like a cat on a hot tin roof when he sheepishly admitted most people don't believe the 2020 Election was stolen.

I would have asked Gym to give some examples of truthful information that was removed from platforms.

Supreme Court grapples with online First Amendment rights as social media teems with misinformation - CBS News


https://www.cbsnews.com/news/scotus-grapples-with-online-first-amendment-rights-as-social-media-teems-with-misinformation-60-minutes-transcript/

*They confirmed that the videos I posted where tRump says he wants to be a prison wife and confesses that he has ED are legit and not deepfake AI


Just saw that tonight and it's true! I'm afraid Mr. Jordan is going to be in deep doodoo with his "boss", after he couldn't help but chuckle at the "prison wife" thing...
Lets Go Brandon 11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/scotus-grapples-with-online-first-amendment-rights-as-social-media-teems-with-misinformation-60-minutes-transcript/


 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.