I can't think of anyone who deserved censorship more than Alex Jones. Interesting that you decided to hide who said that quote.bear2034 said:
"Big Tech said 'we will not let a populist uprising take over and put a candidate in office... and that's when the censorship industrial complex began."
Eastern Oregon Bear said:I can't think of anyone who deserved censorship more than Alex Jones. Interesting that you decided to hide who said that quote.bear2034 said:
"Big Tech said 'we will not let a populist uprising take over and put a candidate in office... and that's when the censorship industrial complex began."
Alex Jones Interviews Elon Musk For 2 Hours! #AlexIsBack #1A pic.twitter.com/dilow5m9QH
— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) December 10, 2023
Technically, you're right, but Alex Jones believed in it enough to make it one of his very first tweets when he returned to Twitter.bear2034 said:Eastern Oregon Bear said:I can't think of anyone who deserved censorship more than Alex Jones. Interesting that you decided to hide who said that quote.bear2034 said:
"Big Tech said 'we will not let a populist uprising take over and put a candidate in office... and that's when the censorship industrial complex began."Alex Jones Interviews Elon Musk For 2 Hours! #AlexIsBack #1A pic.twitter.com/dilow5m9QH
— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) December 10, 2023
That wasn't Alex Jones who said that but he is back on Twitter.
"Big Tech said 'we will not let a populist uprising take over and put a candidate in office... and that's when the censorship industrial complex began,"
— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) December 11, 2023
- @JackPosobiec with @realalexjones & @elonmusk on X Spaces pic.twitter.com/uErkOdFdD5
I only accept bitcoin.AunBear89 said:
Here's my Holiday Gift to you.
DiabloWags said:Unit2Sucks said:
Forgot to mention that according to BG, domestic terrorism is part of the conservative political platform so any law enforcement investigation of domestic terrorism must be political.
This is just how crazy the GOP has become. They start the day complaining about politically driven censorship of core conservatives speech and it turns out they are referring to Hunter Biden's dick pics, anti public health misinformation and domestic terrorism. Great movement you have there, it's no wonder you are getting your azzes kicked in elections.
Bingo.
I dont even know who the GOP is anymore.
Seems like it's filled with "stupid sycophants and sickos.
Boepert, Gaetz, Cawthorn, Gosar, and Marjorie Taylor Greene.
Ronald Reagan would be turning over in his grave.
bear2034 said:I only accept bitcoin.AunBear89 said:
Here's my Holiday Gift to you.
bear2034 said:I only accept bitcoin.AunBear89 said:
Here's my Holiday Gift to you.
bear2034 said:Eastern Oregon Bear said:I can't think of anyone who deserved censorship more than Alex Jones. Interesting that you decided to hide who said that quote.bear2034 said:
"Big Tech said 'we will not let a populist uprising take over and put a candidate in office... and that's when the censorship industrial complex began."Alex Jones Interviews Elon Musk For 2 Hours! #AlexIsBack #1A pic.twitter.com/dilow5m9QH
— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) December 10, 2023
That wasn't Alex Jones who said that but he is back on Twitter.
concordtom said:
Elon Musk has way too much spare time on his hands if he sat with Jones for two hours.
I like technical visionary Elon better than social commentator Elon.
I am your meat.concordtom said:
I dunno who you are but you're the kind of meat that is good for verbal target practice.
bear2034 said:concordtom said:
Elon Musk has way too much spare time on his hands if he sat with Jones for two hours.
I like technical visionary Elon better than social commentator Elon.
It probably beats spending two hours on the Bearinsider.
Ep. 75 The national security state is the main driver of censorship and election interference in the United States. "What I’m describing is military rule," says Mike Benz. "It’s the inversion of democracy." pic.twitter.com/hDTEjAf89T
— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) February 16, 2024
State Department Threatens Congress Over Censorship Programs
— Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) February 17, 2024
A year after its censorship programs were exposed, the Global Engagement Center still insists the public has no right to know how it's spending taxpayer money @gekaminsky @ProfMJCleveland @Consortiumnews @dailywireplus… pic.twitter.com/OpLhudvHfV
I thank my lucky stars that I live in America, where I have freedom of speech and freedom from political prosecution. I also recognize that regime Democrats are working to undermine these rights every day.
— David Sacks (@DavidSacks) February 16, 2024
From the Vigilant Fox:Lets Go Brandon 4 said:Ep. 75 The national security state is the main driver of censorship and election interference in the United States. "What I’m describing is military rule," says Mike Benz. "It’s the inversion of democracy." pic.twitter.com/hDTEjAf89T
— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) February 16, 2024
bear2034 said:From the Vigilant Fox:Lets Go Brandon 4 said:Ep. 75 The national security state is the main driver of censorship and election interference in the United States. "What I’m describing is military rule," says Mike Benz. "It’s the inversion of democracy." pic.twitter.com/hDTEjAf89T
— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) February 16, 2024
MUST WATCH: Mike Benz makes damning case that the RIG was in for the 2020 election SEVEN MONTHS ahead of time.
TUCKER CARLSON: "So what you're saying is ... they knew the outcome of the election seven months before it was held?"
MIKE BENZ: "It looks very bad."
How did they do it?
According to censorship expert Mike Benz, a concerted effort, starting in April 2020, was made by a coalition involving the DHS, NATO, the DNC, and other entities to launch a mass censorship campaign across all social media platforms.
This campaign aimed to pre-emptively censor any disputes over the legitimacy of mail-in ballots.
Four key institutions were part of this effort:
Stanford University
The University of Washington
Graphika
The Atlantic Council (7 former CIA directors)
Benz described these entities as "Pentagon cutouts," suggesting they were operating under the influence or direction of the Pentagon to carry out the censorship campaign.
These entities pressured and compelled social media companies to adopt a new category of speech violation termed "delegitimization." This policy was broad in scope, encompassing any form of content that could be interpreted as challenging the legitimacy of mail-in voting, early voting dropboxes, or the tabulation of ballots on election day.
This pressure was not merely advisory but was backed by the implication of potential governmental force or repercussions for non-compliance. This included direct communication channels with tech company executives to facilitate rapid takedown requests.
As a consequence, this concerted censorship effort led to the removal or throttling of potentially hundreds of millions of posts, particularly those questioning the security of mail-in ballots.
The following excerpt from Benz highlights the most important aspect:
"Now, they did this seven months before the election because, at the time, they were worried about the perceived legitimacy of a Biden victory in the case of a so-called 'red mirage, blue shift event.'
"They knew the only way that Biden would be able to win, mathematically, was through the disproportionate Democrat use of mail-in ballots. They knew there would be a crisis because it was going to look extremely weird if Trump looked like he won by seven states and then, three days later, it came out actually the election switched.
"I mean, that would put the election crisis of the Bush-Gore election on a level of steroids that the national security state said, well, the public will not be prepared for. So what we need to do is we need to, in advance, we need to pre-censor the ability to even question legitimacy. This took out hundreds of key influencers."
Most companies take away your corporate computer access when you no longer work for the company. Nothing odd about that.bear2034 said:
CBS reportedly seized files from Catherine Herridge, the network's recently laid-off senior investigative correspondent. She's the one who predicted a black swan event affecting national security earlier this year.
Eastern Oregon Bear said:Most companies take away your corporate computer access when you no longer work for the company. Nothing odd about that.bear2034 said:
CBS reportedly seized files from Catherine Herridge, the network's recently laid-off senior investigative correspondent. She's the one who predicted a black swan event affecting national security earlier this year.
We weren't discussing CBS's denial. It wasn't even mentioned. We were discussing whether CBS was acting properly in not letting her keep those files. Where I work, we recently fired an employee and it was handled just like Bear2034 claimed it was done in this case.oski003 said:Eastern Oregon Bear said:Most companies take away your corporate computer access when you no longer work for the company. Nothing odd about that.bear2034 said:
CBS reportedly seized files from Catherine Herridge, the network's recently laid-off senior investigative correspondent. She's the one who predicted a black swan event affecting national security earlier this year.
Than why is CBS denying this happened?
https://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/cbs-news-refutes-claim-it-seized-catherine-herridges-personal-files/
Your knee jerk reaction appears incorrect here. This seems suspicious.
Eastern Oregon Bear said:We weren't discussing CBS's denial. It wasn't even mentioned. We were discussing whether CBS was acting properly in not letting her keep those files. Where I work, we recently fired an employee and it was handled just like Bear2034 claimed it was done in this case.oski003 said:Eastern Oregon Bear said:Most companies take away your corporate computer access when you no longer work for the company. Nothing odd about that.bear2034 said:
CBS reportedly seized files from Catherine Herridge, the network's recently laid-off senior investigative correspondent. She's the one who predicted a black swan event affecting national security earlier this year.
Than why is CBS denying this happened?
https://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/cbs-news-refutes-claim-it-seized-catherine-herridges-personal-files/
Your knee jerk reaction appears incorrect here. This seems suspicious.
It's just like you to bash me for not anticipating and responding to your future goalpost shift.
Eastern Oregon Bear said:Most companies take away your corporate computer access when you no longer work for the company. Nothing odd about that.bear2034 said:
CBS reportedly seized files from Catherine Herridge, the network's recently laid-off senior investigative correspondent. She's the one who predicted a black swan event affecting national security earlier this year.
NEW - CBS's Catherine Herridge highlights that Hunter Biden's federal charges revolve around income earned from China, Ukraine, and Romania, but Hunter never registered as a foreign lobbyist, in violation of the Foreign Agent Registration Act.pic.twitter.com/DjaPpy5hHZ
— KanekoaTheGreat (@KanekoaTheGreat) December 8, 2023
Pro-tip - when looking for accurate information about proper procedure when laying off a reporter, don't take the word of some low-level government employee in Oregon who doesn't know what he's talking about.Eastern Oregon Bear said:Most companies take away your corporate computer access when you no longer work for the company. Nothing odd about that.bear2034 said:
CBS reportedly seized files from Catherine Herridge, the network's recently laid-off senior investigative correspondent. She's the one who predicted a black swan event affecting national security earlier this year.
“This action is deeply concerning to the union because it sets a dangerous precedent for all media professionals and threatens the very foundation of the First Amendment...” https://t.co/YEFdbDl4d1
— Labor Week (@LaborWeek) February 23, 2024
SAG-AFTRA is pleased to confirm that yet again, Eastern Oregon Bear exposed his ignorance by stating that everything was done properly when he had no idea what he was talking about.Eastern Oregon Bear said:We weren't discussing CBS's denial. It wasn't even mentioned. We were discussing whether CBS was acting properly in not letting her keep those files. Where I work, we recently fired an employee and it was handled just like Bear2034 claimed it was done in this case.oski003 said:Than why is CBS denying this happened?Eastern Oregon Bear said:Most companies take away your corporate computer access when you no longer work for the company. Nothing odd about that.bear2034 said:
CBS reportedly seized files from Catherine Herridge, the network's recently laid-off senior investigative correspondent. She's the one who predicted a black swan event affecting national security earlier this year.
https://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/cbs-news-refutes-claim-it-seized-catherine-herridges-personal-files/
Your knee jerk reaction appears incorrect here. This seems suspicious.
It's just like you to bash me for not anticipating and responding to your future goalpost shift.
— Catherine Herridge (@CBS_Herridge) February 26, 2024
If you care about the First Amendment, please stop everything and read this @WIRED article. Tl;dr: House intelligence committee (HPSCI) members are blocking reforms to FISA Section 702 *because they want the FBI to spy on American protesters.* 1/20 https://t.co/7hhNSPMPZc
— Elizabeth Goitein (@LizaGoitein) March 12, 2024
Democrats are ballers and RINOs in battleground states help them.dajo9 said:
Damn, we're good
The most under-reported and under-discussed story of 2023: a federal district court judge, upheld by a unanimous appellate panel, found the Biden WH and FBI committed one of the gravest attacks on the 1st Am in decades by coercing Big Tech to censor dissent online. pic.twitter.com/00MamRBUdw
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) March 17, 2024
bearister said:
tRumpists/Right Wingers are dirty rotten liars. Gym Jordan squirmed like a cat on a hot tin roof when he sheepishly admitted most people don't believe the 2020 Election was stolen.
I would have asked Gym to give some examples of truthful information that was removed from platforms.
Supreme Court grapples with online First Amendment rights as social media teems with misinformation - CBS News
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/scotus-grapples-with-online-first-amendment-rights-as-social-media-teems-with-misinformation-60-minutes-transcript/
*They confirmed that the videos I posted where tRump says he wants to be a prison wife and confesses that he has ED are legit and not deepfake AI
bearister said:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/scotus-grapples-with-online-first-amendment-rights-as-social-media-teems-with-misinformation-60-minutes-transcript/
These folks would lock up Lenny Bruce all over again https://t.co/MUo1XXiuwX
— Walter Kirn (@walterkirn) March 25, 2024
These ex-EIP monsters can’t make up their minds - do they not participate in censorship at all, as they claim when convenient, or is the problem that platforms like Twitter cut “just a third” of their flags? https://t.co/KeXmdoRssy
— Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) March 25, 2024