It's obvious the attacks on the chief justice are coordinated to produce media pop. It will disappear soon, just ignore it.

MinotStateBeav said:

---

It's obvious the attacks on the chief justice are coordinated to produce media pop. It will disappear soon, just ignore it.

---

This post checks out.

Great handle on facts, MSB!

The next thing you are going to tell me is that Harlon Crow pays Ginni's monthly alcohol bill….and that is a big f@ucking number.





"You know when your mouth a-getting dry You're plenty high."

*That bottle alone is $4000.

*On a more serious note, the song is Richie Furay's tribute to Gram Parsons

BearHunter said:

---

During today's hearing, @JohnCornyn played a clip from the Supreme Court confirmation hearing of Judge Clarence Thomas. The hearing was presided over by then-Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee Joe Biden.

32 years later, the "high tech lynching" resonates more than ever. pic.twitter.com/llWj67ZpXr

— The Article III Project (A3P) (@Article3Project) May 2, 2023

Democrats are still trying to get Thomas after all these years.

---

BearFarce, yawn

SBGold said:

---

BearHunter said:

---

During today's hearing, @JohnCornyn played a clip from the Supreme Court confirmation hearing of Judge Clarence Thomas. The hearing was presided over by then-Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee Joe Biden.

32 years later, the "high tech lynching" resonates more than ever. pic.twitter.com/llWj67ZpXr

— The Article III Project (A3P) (@Article3Project) May 2, 2023

Democrats are still trying to get Thomas after all these years.

---

BearFarce, yawn

---

Does the SB in your name stand for "substanceless bear" or "substance bare?" We already have an aunbear who attacks with no content. Are you AunFarce?

oski003 said:

---

SBGold said:

---

BearHunter said:

---

During today's hearing, @JohnCornyn played a clip from the Supreme Court confirmation hearing of Judge Clarence Thomas. The hearing was presided over by then-Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee Joe Biden.

32 years later, the "high tech lynching" resonates more than ever. pic.twitter.com/llWj67ZpXr

— The Article III Project (A3P) (@Article3Project) May 2, 2023

Democrats are still trying to get Thomas after all these years.

---

BearFarce, yawn

---

Does the SB in your name stand for "substanceless bear" or "substance bare?" We already have an aunbear who attacks with no content. Are you AunFarce?

---

Dude, just rise above it.

No point in wrestling in the mud with those who enjoy it far more than you do.

calbear93 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

SBGold said:

---

BearHunter said:

---

During today's hearing, @JohnCornyn played a clip from the Supreme Court confirmation hearing of Judge Clarence Thomas. The hearing was presided over by then-Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee Joe Biden.

32 years later, the "high tech lynching" resonates more than ever. pic.twitter.com/llWj67ZpXr

— The Article III Project (A3P) (@Article3Project) May 2, 2023

Democrats are still trying to get Thomas after all these years.

---

BearFarce, yawn

---

Does the SB in your name stand for "substanceless bear" or "substance bare?" We already have an aunbear who attacks with no content. Are you AunFarce?

---

Dude, just rise above it.

No point in wrestling in the mud with those who enjoy it far more than you do.

---

With his racist tendencies, he's right there in the googoo muck

SBGold said:

---

calbear93 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

SBGold said:

---

BearHunter said:

---

During today's hearing, @JohnCornyn played a clip from the Supreme Court confirmation hearing of Judge Clarence Thomas. The hearing was presided over by then-Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee Joe Biden.

32 years later, the "high tech lynching" resonates more than ever. pic.twitter.com/llWj67ZpXr

— The Article III Project (A3P) (@Article3Project) May 2, 2023

Democrats are still trying to get Thomas after all these years.

---

BearFarce, yawn

---

Does the SB in your name stand for "substanceless bear" or "substance bare?" We already have an aunbear who attacks with no content. Are you AunFarce?

---

Dude, just rise above it.

No point in wrestling in the mud with those who enjoy it far more than you do.

---

With his racist tendencies, he's right there in the googoo muck

---

Racist tendencies. Lol. "He defends police officers. Sometimes. He kind of sort of defended Tucker Carlson. He defends white people against racist attacks. He must be racist!".

sycasey said:

---

calbear93 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

SBGold said:

---

BearHunter said:

---

During today's hearing, @JohnCornyn played a clip from the Supreme Court confirmation hearing of Judge Clarence Thomas. The hearing was presided over by then-Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee Joe Biden.

32 years later, the "high tech lynching" resonates more than ever. pic.twitter.com/llWj67ZpXr

— The Article III Project (A3P) (@Article3Project) May 2, 2023

Democrats are still trying to get Thomas after all these years.

---

BearFarce, yawn

---

Does the SB in your name stand for "substanceless bear" or "substance bare?" We already have an aunbear who attacks with no content. Are you AunFarce?

---

Dude, just rise above it.

No point in wrestling in the mud with those who enjoy it far more than you do.

---

My guess is that 003 enjoys it just as much.

---

My sense is that you don't get in the mud very often, if at all. But why does the behavior of some not called out by you but, instead, you call out a more limited mudslinging by oski? Does seem to indicate this is more bullying for having the wrong political beliefs than a stand against boorish behavior.

I cannot understand why any of you would talk mess about Chief Justice Clarence Thomas. This very good man is worthy of all of our support. His compassionate public service has spanned decades and he does not let political leanings obscure an even handed and non-objective driven approach to justice.

He. Is. A. Very. Good. And. Honorable. Man.

Anybody defending him should feel very good about doing so.

Shame on any of you who engage in speaking ill of this pillar of integrity.

calbear93 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

calbear93 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

SBGold said:

---

BearHunter said:

---

During today's hearing, @JohnCornyn played a clip from the Supreme Court confirmation hearing of Judge Clarence Thomas. The hearing was presided over by then-Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee Joe Biden.

32 years later, the "high tech lynching" resonates more than ever. pic.twitter.com/llWj67ZpXr

— The Article III Project (A3P) (@Article3Project) May 2, 2023

Democrats are still trying to get Thomas after all these years.

---

BearFarce, yawn

---

Does the SB in your name stand for "substanceless bear" or "substance bare?" We already have an aunbear who attacks with no content. Are you AunFarce?

---

Dude, just rise above it.

No point in wrestling in the mud with those who enjoy it far more than you do.

---

My guess is that 003 enjoys it just as much.

---

My sense is that you don't get in the mud very often, if at all. But why does the behavior of some not called out by you but, instead, you call out a more limited mudslinging by oski? Does seem to indicate this is more bullying for having the wrong political beliefs than a stand against boorish behavior.

---

Honestly, I generally just stay out of all the boring d***-measuring contests that go on here. All of that doesn't interest me much. But from what I have observed, I think oski003 gives as good as he gets. He just has a different, indirect style, but he clearly wanders in expecting a fight.

Haloski said:

---

I cannot understand why any of you would talk mess about Chief Justice Clarence Thomas. This very good man is worthy of all of our support. His compassionate public service has spanned decades and he does not let political leanings obscure an even handed and non-objective driven approach to justice.

He. Is. A. Very. Good. And. Honorable. Man.

Anybody defending him should feel very good about doing so.

Shame on any of you who engage in speaking ill of this pillar of integrity.

---

That is a bit simplistic, is it not?

Let's assume a former rapist has served his sentence but is now accused of a new crime that he did not commit. Should no lawyer represent him? If a lawyer does represent him, is he doing so because he believes the former rapist Is. A. Very. Good. And. Honorable. Man?

He is doing so because he should be judged and sentenced based on what he actually did and not whether someone thinks he is a good person and feels good about defending him.

I already stated that Justice Thomas is an embarrassment. And Ginni is an even bigger embarrassment.

But that does not mean we get to make crap up. Even if I don't like him, I can still insist that he be judged based on actual violation of standards that apply to all of the justices on the court.

And just because someone may think you are not honorable does not give that person license to make accusation against you based on arbitrary and subjective standards.

sycasey said:

---

calbear93 said:

---

sycasey said:

---

calbear93 said:

---

oski003 said:

---

SBGold said:

---

BearHunter said:

---

During today's hearing, @JohnCornyn played a clip from the Supreme Court confirmation hearing of Judge Clarence Thomas. The hearing was presided over by then-Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee Joe Biden.

32 years later, the "high tech lynching" resonates more than ever. pic.twitter.com/llWj67ZpXr

— The Article III Project (A3P) (@Article3Project) May 2, 2023

Democrats are still trying to get Thomas after all these years.

---

BearFarce, yawn

---

Does the SB in your name stand for "substanceless bear" or "substance bare?" We already have an aunbear who attacks with no content. Are you AunFarce?

---

Dude, just rise above it.

No point in wrestling in the mud with those who enjoy it far more than you do.

---

My guess is that 003 enjoys it just as much.

---

My sense is that you don't get in the mud very often, if at all. But why does the behavior of some not called out by you but, instead, you call out a more limited mudslinging by oski? Does seem to indicate this is more bullying for having the wrong political beliefs than a stand against boorish behavior.

---

Honestly, I generally just stay out of all the boring d***-measuring contests that go on here. All of that doesn't interest me much. But from what I have observed, I think oski003 gives as good as he gets. He just has a different, indirect style, but he clearly wanders in expecting a fight.

---

That's why even though I disagree almost 90% of the time on your political and economic positions, I enjoy our discussions.

Leo instructed the GOP pollster Kellyanne Conway to bill a nonprofit group and use that money to pay Virginia “Ginni” Thomas, documents show. The same year, the nonprofit group filed a brief to the Supreme Court in a landmark voting rights case. https://t.co/CKc8Kwb6yJ

— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) May 4, 2023

The Post is continuing reporting on the U.S. Supreme Court, including on potential conflicts of interest for its nine justices. Do you have information to share or questions The Post should explore? Tell us about it at this link. We appreciate your help: https://t.co/hJMyg1Tyzy

— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) May 4, 2023

AunBear89 said:

---

He's not the chief justice. You should have your facts straight before you try to have a grown up conversation.

---

At least he didn't make the RFK/JFK/RFK Jr/JFK Jr mistake he's been doing with regularity lately.

oski003 said:

---

Does the SB in your name stand for "substanceless bear" or "substance bare?" We already have an aunbear who attacks with no content. Are you AunFarce?

---

Are you saying SBGold and AunBear89 are the same person?

New Supreme Court ethics allegation surfaces



https://mol.im/a/12048999

"A conservative judicial activist arranged for the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to be paid tens of thousands of dollars a decade ago with instructions that her name be kept off paperwork, according to a new report."

Bearfarce can't stay away

MinotStateBeav said:

---

It's obvious the attacks on the chief justice are coordinated to produce media pop. It will disappear soon, just ignore it.

---

Here's some more click bait crimes for you.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/clarence-thomas-wife-ginni-paid-020838847.html?.tsrc=fp_deeplink

Clarence Thomas' wife Ginni was paid nearly $100,000 for 'consulting' by a nonprofit that ended up filing an amicus brief to the Supreme Court: report


A conservative activist helped Ginni Thomas rake in nearly $100,000 for consulting, The Washington Post reported.

Conservative lawyer Leonard Leo reportedly ensured Ginni Thomas' name was kept off the paperwork.

Leo's nonprofit filed an amicus brief before the Supreme Court that same year.

A little more than a decade ago, a conservative judicial activist helped Ginni Thomas, the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, secure consulting work that yielded her nearly $100,000 all the while asking that her name was left off the financial paperwork, according to a new Washington Post report.

dajo9 said:

---

All I have ever really wanted is to submit to my Terminator overlords and be able to stop thinking

---

Drugs and alcohol.
But it's not advisable.

concordtom said:

---

MinotStateBeav said:

---

It's obvious the attacks on the chief justice are coordinated to produce media pop. It will disappear soon, just ignore it.

---

Here's some more click bait crimes for you.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/clarence-thomas-wife-ginni-paid-020838847.html?.tsrc=fp_deeplink

Clarence Thomas' wife Ginni was paid nearly $100,000 for 'consulting' by a nonprofit that ended up filing an amicus brief to the Supreme Court: report


A conservative activist helped Ginni Thomas rake in nearly $100,000 for consulting, The Washington Post reported.

Conservative lawyer Leonard Leo reportedly ensured Ginni Thomas' name was kept off the paperwork.

Leo's nonprofit filed an amicus brief before the Supreme Court that same year.

A little more than a decade ago, a conservative judicial activist helped Ginni Thomas, the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, secure consulting work that yielded her nearly $100,000 all the while asking that her name was left off the financial paperwork, according to a new Washington Post report.

---

Maybe the DOJ can look into that after they look into the Biden's being paid millions by Ukraine and China and the Moscow Mayor's wife.

MinotStateBeav said:

---

concordtom said:

---

MinotStateBeav said:

---

It's obvious the attacks on the chief justice are coordinated to produce media pop. It will disappear soon, just ignore it.

---

Here's some more click bait crimes for you.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/clarence-thomas-wife-ginni-paid-020838847.html?.tsrc=fp_deeplink

Clarence Thomas' wife Ginni was paid nearly $100,000 for 'consulting' by a nonprofit that ended up filing an amicus brief to the Supreme Court: report


A conservative activist helped Ginni Thomas rake in nearly $100,000 for consulting, The Washington Post reported.

Conservative lawyer Leonard Leo reportedly ensured Ginni Thomas' name was kept off the paperwork.

Leo's nonprofit filed an amicus brief before the Supreme Court that same year.

A little more than a decade ago, a conservative judicial activist helped Ginni Thomas, the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, secure consulting work that yielded her nearly $100,000 all the while asking that her name was left off the financial paperwork, according to a new Washington Post report.

---

Maybe the DOJ can look into that after they look into the Biden's being paid millions by Ukraine and China and the Moscow Mayor's wife.

---

Where's the smoking gun?
I want facts, not rumors and accusations

bearister said:

---

New Supreme Court ethics allegation surfaces



https://mol.im/a/12048999

"A conservative judicial activist arranged for the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to be paid tens of thousands of dollars a decade ago with instructions that her name be kept off paperwork, according to a new report."

---

While I defended the position that the change in form of legal entity does not represent a sale, this is getting shady. Of course, not surprising Ginni is in the middle of all this.

calbear93 said:

---

bearister said:

---

New Supreme Court ethics allegation surfaces



https://mol.im/a/12048999

"A conservative judicial activist arranged for the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to be paid tens of thousands of dollars a decade ago with instructions that her name be kept off paperwork, according to a new report."

---

While I defended the change in form of legal entity does not represent a sale, this is getting shady. Of course, not surprising Ginni is in the middle of all this.

---

That's funny you say that, because "ginni " means "piece of sh*t" in Estonian.

calbear93 said:

---

bearister said:

---

New Supreme Court ethics allegation surfaces



https://mol.im/a/12048999

"A conservative judicial activist arranged for the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas to be paid tens of thousands of dollars a decade ago with instructions that her name be kept off paperwork, according to a new report."

---

While I defended the position that the change in form of legal entity does not represent a sale, this is getting shady. Of course, not surprising Ginni is in the middle of all this.

---

These Justices need to be paid more so they can't be bought so easily. Same elsewhere at high levels of govt.

OR we need to nominate and vet the character of individuals better.