TikTok ban - rant

5,596 Views | 72 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by going4roses
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Border Czar Kamala Harris said:

DiabloWags said:


At the risk of MAXIMUM PRIVACY INVASION.

https://www.uottawa.ca/about-us/information-technology/services/security/tiktok-use-privacy-risks#:~:text=Information%20TikTok%20collects&text=You%20could%20also%20unwittingly%20provide,app%20has%20access%20to%20it.

Even with items on your phone that you do not consciencously post on the App.


He might have a point if Biden was running for President.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm sure Musk won't end up owning it, right?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
“98 yards with my boys” Yeah, sure.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
3-5 million have signed up for the all Chinese app Redot ... Some say 10 million more by Sunday

Some 1-1.5 million content creators will be without employment
"Capitalism cannot reform itself; it is doomed to self-destruction"
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Americans are a addicted to sm. I don't think 100m+ addicted going cold turkey is going to be wild. Has anyone thought of unintended consequences ?
"Capitalism cannot reform itself; it is doomed to self-destruction"
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cant make this ish up
"Capitalism cannot reform itself; it is doomed to self-destruction"
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DE8J0_0x3MR/?igsh=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==

Sen Rand Paul take
"Capitalism cannot reform itself; it is doomed to self-destruction"
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2-3 million people out of work … not a good look . Will trump be the savior ?
"Capitalism cannot reform itself; it is doomed to self-destruction"
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
9 justices vs 150-170 million… who holds more weight? Doesn't seem like a free country to me I'm just saying
"Capitalism cannot reform itself; it is doomed to self-destruction"
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DE8J0_0x3MR/?igsh=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ==

Sen Rand Paul take


….I get so few chances to roll out this Greatest Hit these days that I had to go for it:



Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside
“98 yards with my boys” Yeah, sure.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Paul actually created a TikTok account last night …

Booker is catching all types of hell on his TikTok page lol

America is a trip
"Capitalism cannot reform itself; it is doomed to self-destruction"
concordtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cbbass1 said:



When you use your mobile phone, you have your location & sensor data as well. And many apps have access to your Photos & Files, your Contacts, and even your text messages.



99.9% have no idea what/how is collected.
I don't.
Basic consumer protection should do better.
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

9 justices vs 150-170 million… who holds more weight? Doesn't see like a free country to me I'm just saying


9 justices who don't know what social media is.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?


going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Of all of the most important and pressing issues ….

When was the last time the Sc voted 9-0

We cant agree to feed school lunches to hungry children nor any kind of policy to protect children from gun or SA violence but that TikTok yikes … this went from a shhhhit show to shhhhty clown show … while 5 million signed up for Red dot a real home based in mainland China
"Capitalism cannot reform itself; it is doomed to self-destruction"
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

Oh all if the most important and pressing issues ….

When was the last time the Sc vote 9-0

We cant agree to feed school lunches to hungry children nor any kind of policy to protect children from gun or SA violence but that TikTok yikes … this went from a shhhhit show to shhhhty clown show … while 5 million signed up for Red dot a real home based in mainland China


9-0 rulings are the most common types of Supreme Court rulings, year after year.
Chapman_is_Gone
How long do you want to ignore this user?

If TikTok is banned, going4roses will have to head to the local mall to spend his free time with tween girls. It'll be like the 1980s all over again.

Try H&M or Zara, I'm guessing. Lots of tweens there. But, dial back on the racism talk. The parents will likely frown upon it.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?


going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cold part I follow a young black couple that moved to mainland China and they have been exploring ,working and sharing their experiences there…and honestly America is cooked. No credit checks to get a decent clean place to live. Wisdom tooth problems extracted 60 usd.
The mental illness called Capitalism is now worldly know as a farce for evil aka steal everything from the poor and give it to the wealthy.

TikTok is back online …except we can't go live
"Capitalism cannot reform itself; it is doomed to self-destruction"
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe you can move to China.
Sounds like a good "place" for you.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Side note : IG live is fricking atrocious dial up video and audio quality. Like come on now.

Was This was all pych ops for trump imo ???
"Capitalism cannot reform itself; it is doomed to self-destruction"
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?


TikTok working to restore service after Trump assurance.
Congratulations going4roses.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This all looks to me like the TikTok parent company (ByteDance) is pulling a stunt with its service to essentially threaten American consumers and businesses ("Nice apps you have there, be a shame if something happened to 'em!") . . . which ironically pretty much makes the argument for why they should be banned.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Maybe you can move to China.
Sounds like a good "place" for you.
X is banned in China.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

9 justices vs 150-170 million… who holds more weight? Doesn't seem like a free country to me I'm just saying
chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?

chazzed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

This all looks to me like the TikTok parent company (ByteDance) is pulling a stunt with its service to essentially threaten American consumers and businesses ("Nice apps you have there, be a shame if something happened to 'em!") . . . which ironically pretty much makes the argument for why they should be banned.
Trump also appears to be in on the stunt. He should be banned too (but we already know that).
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chazzed said:

sycasey said:

This all looks to me like the TikTok parent company (ByteDance) is pulling a stunt with its service to essentially threaten American consumers and businesses ("Nice apps you have there, be a shame if something happened to 'em!") . . . which ironically pretty much makes the argument for why they should be banned.
Trump also appears to be in on the stunt. He need to be banned too.

Deep State banned Trump on Twitter but he's back.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The other thing is that calling this law "censorship" is quite silly. Any of the ideas or kinds of content that were expressed on TikTok are still widely available on other platforms. They are banning a specific company, not speech.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
going4roses said:

Americans are a addicted to sm. I don't think 100m+ addicted going cold turkey is going to be wild. Has anyone thought of unintended consequences ?

Unintended consequences like the red pilling of Gen Z after TikTok is restored?

BearGoggles
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

The other thing is that calling this law "censorship" is quite silly. Any of the ideas or kinds of content that were expressed on TikTok are still widely available on other platforms. They are banning a specific company, not speech.
Exactly. And they didn't ban TikTok. They just required that it not be owned by a hostile foreign country. TikTok chose to close shop (or is threatening to do so) precisely because China doesn't want to lose it intelligence spyware.

The is a ton of precedent for this. The US regulates ownership of newspapers, tv and radio stations, and key industries. We have CFIUS. If TikTok were owned by US nationals and China wanted to purchase it, there absolutely would be scrutiny.

If nothing else, China should not be allowed to own TikTok solely on the basis that a US company could not own/operate a company like TikTok in China. Why does the US agree to this?

And regarding Trump's post, if he's suggesting a governmental agency should own half of tiktok, that is a terrible idea. That would implicate the first amendment among many other concerns.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

The other thing is that calling this law "censorship" is quite silly. Any of the ideas or kinds of content that were expressed on TikTok are still widely available on other platforms. They are banning a specific company, not speech.

The main reason they are banning TikTok is that it is an organic platform that doesn't censor the coverage of the Israeli massacres in Gaza as heavily as the other platforms (Facebook, Instagram, and even X). That is why this censorship has garnered complete bipartisan support.


sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

The other thing is that calling this law "censorship" is quite silly. Any of the ideas or kinds of content that were expressed on TikTok are still widely available on other platforms. They are banning a specific company, not speech.

The main reason they are banning TikTok is that it is an organic platform that doesn't censor the coverage of the Israeli massacres in Gaza as heavily as the other platforms (Facebook, Instagram, and even X). That is why this censorship has garnered complete bipartisan support.

Again, this is entirely false, because I was able to find plenty of Israel-critical content on YouTube (for example) long before TikTok ever existed, and still can. TikTok is not essential here.

That said, I would not be surprised if TikTok was deliberately boosting Gaza content over the last year, because they know it is a wedge issue to divide the American left and they would prefer that Trump get back into power (because he'd be friendlier to them and/or more easily manipulated).
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Cal88 said:

sycasey said:

The other thing is that calling this law "censorship" is quite silly. Any of the ideas or kinds of content that were expressed on TikTok are still widely available on other platforms. They are banning a specific company, not speech.

The main reason they are banning TikTok is that it is an organic platform that doesn't censor the coverage of the Israeli massacres in Gaza as heavily as the other platforms (Facebook, Instagram, and even X). That is why this censorship has garnered complete bipartisan support.

Again, this is entirely false, because I was able to find plenty of Israel-critical content on YouTube (for example) long before TikTok ever existed, and still can. TikTok is not essential here.

That said, I would not be surprised if TikTok was deliberately boosting Gaza content over the last year, because they know it is a wedge issue to divide the American left and they would prefer that Trump get back into power (because he'd be friendlier to them and/or more easily manipulated).

Youtube did not censor or shadow ban that much a decade ago, but today they have been shadow-banning or outright removing many pro-Palestinian channels.

Gaza is not really a wedge issue on the left, it is however a wedge issue on the right, with Christian zionists and older BoomerCons being more prone to buying the Israeli narratives while younger conservatives amd anti-war conservatives are increasingly rejecting it.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

Youtube did not censor or shadow ban that much a decade ago, but today they have been shadow-banning or outright removing many pro-Palestinian channels.

Gaza is not really a wedge issue on the left, it is however a wedge issue on the right, with Christian zionists and older BoomerCons being more prone to buying the Israeli narratives while younger conservatives amd anti-war conservatives are increasingly rejecting it.
Show me the evidence that YouTube has been banning pro-Palestine channels.

Gaza is not a wedge issue on the left? Did you seriously make that argument? It's the #1 thing Biden and Harris got protested for.
going4roses
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Capitalism cannot reform itself; it is doomed to self-destruction"
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.