Quote:

---

Since 2010, the sea level at the Fort Pulaski gauge has risen by more than 7 inches, one of the fastest rates in the country, according to a Washington Post analysis of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration data for 127 tide gauges.

Similar spikes are affecting the entire U.S. Southeast showing a glimpse of our climate future.. .. ..

Overall, sea levels here rose 7.3 inches between 2010 and 2023; in the previous 30 years, the ocean rose about 3.7 inches.

---

smh said:

---

How High is a trick question, sorry, since slow motion rising sea levels are literally out of control, and nobody cares enough to do anything about it.

reliable long term forecast reads "curse god and die hard"

(freebie?) link..
https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/interactive/2024/us-south-sea-level-rise-climate-change

Quote:

---

Since 2010, the sea level at the Fort Pulaski gauge has risen by more than 7 inches, one of the fastest rates in the country, according to a Washington Post analysis of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration data for 127 tide gauges.

Similar spikes are affecting the entire U.S. Southeast showing a glimpse of our climate future.. .. ..

Overall, sea levels here rose 7.3 inches between 2010 and 2023; in the previous 30 years, the ocean rose about 3.7 inches.

---

---

Quote:

---

> Hey, it's all the natural cycles of nature. Besides, what's 7 inches when our rights of unlimited driving and electrical power might get limited?

---

smh said:

---

Quote:

---

> Hey, it's all the natural cycles of nature. Besides, what's 7 inches when our rights of unlimited driving and electrical power might get limited?

---

riight, though the many dozen foot follow-on, some years later, may be more inconvenient to locals.

---

smh said:

---

How High is a trick question…

---

Cal88 said:

---

smh said:

---

How High is a trick question, sorry, since slow motion rising sea levels are literally out of control, and nobody cares enough to do anything about it.

reliable long term forecast reads "curse god and die hard"

(freebie?) link..
https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/interactive/2024/us-south-sea-level-rise-climate-change

Quote:

---

Since 2010, the sea level at the Fort Pulaski gauge has risen by more than 7 inches, one of the fastest rates in the country, according to a Washington Post analysis of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration data for 127 tide gauges.

Similar spikes are affecting the entire U.S. Southeast showing a glimpse of our climate future.. .. ..

Overall, sea levels here rose 7.3 inches between 2010 and 2023; in the previous 30 years, the ocean rose about 3.7 inches.

---

---

This is a good example of the manipulative nature of MSM global warming reporting.

I looked up the data this whole article is based on, the tidal gauge measurements of a station located in a Georgia shore, Fort Pulaski, here it is:



https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?id=8670870

The graph shows that the increase in sea level rise rate from 2010-2024 is well within the historical range of variation. For instance 1988-96 was an even larger rise.

The graph also shows that sea level at that site actually declined between 1996 and 2010, and of course CO2 rise has noting to do with that, it is mainly due to statistical noise that comes with the territory of trying to record tidal gauges in millimeters in areas where the daily tidal differential is around 4 feet (1,300mm roughly).

Tidal gages that are older than the one featured in the WP indicate even more clearly that the current rise is well within historical norms of constant, linear increase in sea levels:



You can go even older using tidal gauges that have recorded measurements that are over 200 years old and see further evidence of the linear and unchanging nature of the rise in sea level, here they are:


NYC


Brest, France (oldest tidal gauge measurements)

Those measurements, once again, confirm that the rate of rise in sea levels is:

1- nearly constant, unchanging since the early 1800s.

2- very low, about an inch per decade.

---

dimitrig said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

smh said:

---

How High is a trick question, sorry, since slow motion rising sea levels are literally out of control, and nobody cares enough to do anything about it.

reliable long term forecast reads "curse god and die hard"

(freebie?) link..
https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/interactive/2024/us-south-sea-level-rise-climate-change

Quote:

---

Since 2010, the sea level at the Fort Pulaski gauge has risen by more than 7 inches, one of the fastest rates in the country, according to a Washington Post analysis of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration data for 127 tide gauges.

Similar spikes are affecting the entire U.S. Southeast showing a glimpse of our climate future.. .. ..

Overall, sea levels here rose 7.3 inches between 2010 and 2023; in the previous 30 years, the ocean rose about 3.7 inches.

---

---

This is a good example of the manipulative nature of MSM global warming reporting.

I looked up the data this whole article is based on, the tidal gauge measurements of a station located in a Georgia shore, Fort Pulaski, here it is:



https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?id=8670870

The graph shows that the increase in sea level rise rate from 2010-2024 is well within the historical range of variation. For instance 1988-96 was an even larger rise.

The graph also shows that sea level at that site actually declined between 1996 and 2010, and of course CO2 rise has noting to do with that, it is mainly due to statistical noise that comes with the territory of trying to record tidal gauges in millimeters in areas where the daily tidal differential is around 4 feet (1,300mm roughly).

Tidal gages that are older than the one featured in the WP indicate even more clearly that the current rise is well within historical norms of constant, linear increase in sea levels:



You can go even older using tidal gauges that have recorded measurements that are over 200 years old and see further evidence of the linear and unchanging nature of the rise in sea level, here they are:


NYC


Brest, France (oldest tidal gauge measurements)

Those measurements, once again, confirm that the rate of rise in sea levels is:

1- nearly constant, unchanging since the early 1800s.

2- very low, about an inch per decade.

---

" The annual rate of rise or how quickly sea level rise is happening has also increased from 0.08 inches/year (0.20 centimeters/year) in 1993 to the current yearly rate of 0.17 inches/year (0.44 centimeters/year)."


Link:
https://sealevel.nasa.gov/understanding-sea-level/key-indicators/global-mean-sea-level/

---

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

---

dimitrig said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

smh said:

---

How High is a trick question, sorry, since slow motion rising sea levels are literally out of control, and nobody cares enough to do anything about it.

reliable long term forecast reads "curse god and die hard"

(freebie?) link..
https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/interactive/2024/us-south-sea-level-rise-climate-change

Quote:

---

Since 2010, the sea level at the Fort Pulaski gauge has risen by more than 7 inches, one of the fastest rates in the country, according to a Washington Post analysis of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration data for 127 tide gauges.

Similar spikes are affecting the entire U.S. Southeast showing a glimpse of our climate future.. .. ..

Overall, sea levels here rose 7.3 inches between 2010 and 2023; in the previous 30 years, the ocean rose about 3.7 inches.

---

---

This is a good example of the manipulative nature of MSM global warming reporting.

I looked up the data this whole article is based on, the tidal gauge measurements of a station located in a Georgia shore, Fort Pulaski, here it is:



https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?id=8670870

The graph shows that the increase in sea level rise rate from 2010-2024 is well within the historical range of variation. For instance 1988-96 was an even larger rise.

The graph also shows that sea level at that site actually declined between 1996 and 2010, and of course CO2 rise has noting to do with that, it is mainly due to statistical noise that comes with the territory of trying to record tidal gauges in millimeters in areas where the daily tidal differential is around 4 feet (1,300mm roughly).

Tidal gages that are older than the one featured in the WP indicate even more clearly that the current rise is well within historical norms of constant, linear increase in sea levels:



You can go even older using tidal gauges that have recorded measurements that are over 200 years old and see further evidence of the linear and unchanging nature of the rise in sea level, here they are:


NYC


Brest, France (oldest tidal gauge measurements)

Those measurements, once again, confirm that the rate of rise in sea levels is:

1- nearly constant, unchanging since the early 1800s.

2- very low, about an inch per decade.

---

" The annual rate of rise or how quickly sea level rise is happening has also increased from 0.08 inches/year (0.20 centimeters/year) in 1993 to the current yearly rate of 0.17 inches/year (0.44 centimeters/year)."


Link:
https://sealevel.nasa.gov/understanding-sea-level/key-indicators/global-mean-sea-level/

---

It's comical how he cherry picks time periods to try and disprove what is obvious to the naked eye. 2010 was a relatively high outlier and comparing 2010 to now is misleading and intellectually dishonest. Also, 1988 was a relatively low point and 1996 was a relative high point, so claiming the slope was higher then than now is meaningless. With the possible exception of The Battery in NYC, the rate of rise has been increasing since 1990 or so on the plots he cherry picked. The fact that it's increasing at all is an indication that some coastal land areas are in the process of getting inundated. Quibbling about the rate of increase doesn't mean sea level rise isn't happening.

---