Official Trump Attacks Fed Chairman Powell Thread

2,615 Views | 55 Replies | Last: 19 hrs ago by PAC-10-BEAR
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?


The stable genius sent a handwritten note to Federal Reserve Bank Chairman Jerome Powell yesterday not only calling him out for not reducing interest rates - - - but also calling out the entire Federal Reserve Board.

The Wharton Business School alum seems to think that America can save a ton of money on the debt it issues and refinances if Powell lowers short-term rates.

lol

How dumb is this Clown???

The Orange Man also thinks that the U.S. "should be paying 1% interest or better"
Says Powell is a "stupid, low-IQ person."

Meanwhile, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that Trump was mulling options for sidelining Powell, who insists the president has no right to fire him.

Jerome Powell's term is not up until next MAY.

Stay tuned.
This thread is going to have a lot of "legs" between now and next MAY.






DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Two Kevins Battle to Be Next Fed Chair
in Trump's 'Apprentice' - style Contest



Free link:

https://www.wsj.com/economy/central-banking/trump-fed-chair-hassett-warsh-3373fe8e?st=HUk6ZR&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Interest rates should be 3 points lower. Jerome Powell is costing us a lot of money" - - - Trump 7-11-25

He's so stupid.
He doesn't even understand WHO prices long-term rates.

Lmfao.

DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
White House targets Fed chair Jerome Powell over $2.5B DC HQ renovation: 'We're going to hold him accountable'

President Trump on Tuesday called on Powell to "resign immediately" if he lied to Congress about a luxurious office upgrade.

"Cost overruns aside (about $700 million and counting), the plans for this project called for rooftop terrace gardens, VIP private dining rooms and elevators, water features, premium marble, and much more. You stated that 'there's no VIP dining room. There's no new marble … There are no special elevators… There are no new water features. There's no beehives and there's no roof terrace gardens.'"

Vought wrote that Powell's denial "raises serious questions about the project's compliance with the National Capital Planning Act [NCPA], which requires that projects like the Fed headquarters renovation be approved by the National Capital Planning Commission [NCPC].

"Your testimony appears to reveal that the project is out of compliance with the approved plan with regard to major design elements," the budget chief wrote, asking for clarification on the status of the details.

Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget, gave Powell a week to explain which law he violated.

PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Yikes!
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:


Yikes!

Yeah, it's pretty bad when Rep, Luna admits upfront that she will be committing a crime by referring Powell to the DOJ for perjury.

Freudian slip? Oh, just a little bit.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yup.

Is Luna gonna file charges against the National Capital Planning Commission who approved the Fed's design for its new headquarters at a total cost of $2.5 Billion?

Another MAGA moron.



DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
People like Luna are HYPOCRITES.

They whine and cry about "lawfare" being waged against them whenever any time a GOPer is held accountable.




DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-07-19/trump-s-attacking-powell-over-fed-renovation-here-s-why-it-costs-2-5-billion?accessToken=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJzb3VyY2UiOiJTdWJzY3JpYmVyR2lmdGVkQXJ0aWNsZSIsImlhdCI6MTc1Mjk0NTcxNSwiZXhwIjoxNzUzNTUwNTE1LCJhcnRpY2xlSWQiOiJTWk5KMDdHUTdMMkMwMCIsImJjb25uZWN0SWQiOiI0QTE0NjgyRTVEQjI0RDgyOEVGOTIxMzA1M0U4NzhDMiJ9.BVGYyunA6rJW_Y9ACyDPNQQUfQZGV4tNgiWmYX7TYUI

Why the Fed's remodel is costing $2.5 Billion.

Free link.

DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can any of the Trumpanzees tell me how the U.S. would save a TON of money on the interest expense of our National Debt if the Fed lowered rates by 3% points like Trump wants?

oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Can any of the Trumpanzees tell me how the U.S. would save a TON of money on the interest expense of our National Debt if the Fed lowered rates by 3% points like Trump wants?




This is the DUMBEST question of the ENTIRE YEAR! However, I will entertain it.

I am not a Trumpanzee, but, if the government financed or borrowed at lower interest rates, they'd pay less interest. Interest rates do generally base themselves on the Fed rate. Happy to help l, even if this is one of the DUMBEST questions EVER.

Here is AI Overview, which most people under 90 know how to use.

AI Overview

Yes, lending rates generally base themselves off of the federal funds rate, though it's not a direct, one-to-one relationship for all types of loans.

Here's how it works:
Federal Funds Rate as a Benchmark: The Federal Reserve sets a target range for the federal funds rate, which is the interest rate at which banks lend to each other overnight to meet reserve requirements. This rate acts as a benchmark, or the base interest rate in the US financial market.
Prime Rate's Role: Financial institutions often base their prime rate (the interest rate they offer their most creditworthy customers) on the federal funds rate, usually with an additional spread of about 3%.
Consumer Lending and the Ripple Effect: This prime rate, in turn, serves as a benchmark for many other types of loans and credit products available to consumers, including:

Credit cards.
Auto loans.
Personal loans.
Adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs).
Home equity lines of credit (HELOCs).
Small business loans.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

Can any of the Trumpanzees tell me how the U.S. would save a TON of money on the interest expense of our National Debt if the Fed lowered rates by 3% points like Trump wants?




This is the DUMBEST question of the ENTIRE YEAR! However, I will entertain it.

I am not a Trumpanzee, but, if the government financed or borrowed at lower interest rates, they'd pay less interest. Interest rates do generally base themselves on the Fed rate. Happy to help l, even if this is one of the DUMBEST questions EVER.



Like Donald Chump, thank you for once again showing how terribly unsophisticated and ignorant you are when it comes to the financial markets and how our NATIONAL DEBT is impacted by market participants and the Fed.

Your answer is an EPIC FAIL for obvious reasons.

Perhaps someone else here like "WifeisaFurd" can help explain why you are so terribly WRONG again.
lol


oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

Can any of the Trumpanzees tell me how the U.S. would save a TON of money on the interest expense of our National Debt if the Fed lowered rates by 3% points like Trump wants?




This is the DUMBEST question of the ENTIRE YEAR! However, I will entertain it.

I am not a Trumpanzee, but, if the government financed or borrowed at lower interest rates, they'd pay less interest. Interest rates do generally base themselves on the Fed rate. Happy to help l, even if this is one of the DUMBEST questions EVER.



Like Donald Chump, thank you for once again showing how terribly unsophisticated and ignorant you are when it comes to the financial markets and how our NATIONAL DEBT is impacted by market participants and the Fed.

Your answer is an EPIC FAIL for obvious reasons.

Perhaps someone else here like "WifeisaFurd" can help explain why you are so terribly WRONG again.
lol





Again, here is AI Overview, which most people under 90 know how to use:

Yes, Federal Reserve interest rate changes can affect the amount of interest paid on the national debt, though it's not the sole determining factor. The Federal Reserve's federal funds rate influences short-term interest rates, which in turn affects the interest paid on some government debt. However, the national debt is comprised of a mix of short-term, medium, and long-term Treasury securities, and the interest rates on these are also influenced by market factors and investor demand.

Here's a more detailed explanation:
Federal Reserve's Role:
The Federal Reserve (the Fed) primarily influences short-term interest rates through its monetary policy tools, including setting the federal funds rate.
Impact on Short-Term Debt:
Changes in the federal funds rate directly impact the interest rates on newly issued short-term Treasury securities.
Influence on Longer-Term Debt:
While the Fed's actions can influence longer-term rates, these are also affected by other factors like market expectations about inflation, economic growth, and investor demand for government bonds.
National Debt Composition:
The national debt isn't solely composed of short-term debt; it includes a variety of Treasury securities with different maturities. The interest rates on these securities can vary based on their maturity and other market conditions.
Rising Interest Costs:
As interest rates rise, the cost of servicing the national debt increases, especially if a significant portion of the debt is tied to short-term instruments that need to be refinanced at higher rates.
Vicious Cycle:
Rising interest rates, coupled with a growing national debt, can lead to a situation where a larger portion of the federal budget is allocated to interest payments, potentially crowding out other government spending priorities.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

Can any of the Trumpanzees tell me how the U.S. would save a TON of money on the interest expense of our National Debt if the Fed lowered rates by 3% points like Trump wants?




This is the DUMBEST question of the ENTIRE YEAR! However, I will entertain it.

I am not a Trumpanzee, but, if the government financed or borrowed at lower interest rates, they'd pay less interest. Interest rates do generally base themselves on the Fed rate. Happy to help l, even if this is one of the DUMBEST questions EVER.



Like Donald Chump, thank you for once again showing how terribly unsophisticated and ignorant you are when it comes to the financial markets and how our NATIONAL DEBT is impacted by market participants and the Fed.

Your answer is an EPIC FAIL for obvious reasons.

Perhaps someone else here like "WifeisaFurd" can help explain why you are so terribly WRONG again.
lol





Again, here is AI Overview, which most people under 90 know how to use:

Yes, Federal Reserve interest rate changes can affect the amount of interest paid on the national debt, though it's not the sole determining factor. The Federal Reserve's federal funds rate influences short-term interest rates, which in turn affects the interest paid on some government debt. However, the national debt is comprised of a mix of short-term, medium, and long-term Treasury securities, and the interest rates on these are also influenced by market factors and investor demand.



Again, it doesn't appear that you are informed or know what you're talking about.
That must be why you are relying on Artificial Intelligence.

Or, perhaps there is a READING COMPREHENSION problem at work here which I have found you to fall prey to on many occasions. - - - Here, let me help you.

I'm talking about the interest expense on our NATIONAL DEBT.
Not short-term rates that impact credit cards, auto loans, etc.

How would lowering the Fed Funds rate by 3 percentage points wind up impacting our NATIONAL DEBT?
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

Can any of the Trumpanzees tell me how the U.S. would save a TON of money on the interest expense of our National Debt if the Fed lowered rates by 3% points like Trump wants?




This is the DUMBEST question of the ENTIRE YEAR! However, I will entertain it.

I am not a Trumpanzee, but, if the government financed or borrowed at lower interest rates, they'd pay less interest. Interest rates do generally base themselves on the Fed rate. Happy to help l, even if this is one of the DUMBEST questions EVER.



Like Donald Chump, thank you for once again showing how terribly unsophisticated and ignorant you are when it comes to the financial markets and how our NATIONAL DEBT is impacted by market participants and the Fed.

Your answer is an EPIC FAIL for obvious reasons.

Perhaps someone else here like "WifeisaFurd" can help explain why you are so terribly WRONG again.
lol





Again, here is AI Overview, which most people under 90 know how to use:

Yes, Federal Reserve interest rate changes can affect the amount of interest paid on the national debt, though it's not the sole determining factor. The Federal Reserve's federal funds rate influences short-term interest rates, which in turn affects the interest paid on some government debt. However, the national debt is comprised of a mix of short-term, medium, and long-term Treasury securities, and the interest rates on these are also influenced by market factors and investor demand.



Again, it doesn't appear that you are informed or know what you're talking about.
That must be why you are relying on Artificial Intelligence.

Or, perhaps there is a READING COMPREHENSION problem at work here which I have found you to fall prey to on many occasions. - - - Here, let me help you.

I'm talking about the interest expense on our NATIONAL DEBT.
Not short-term rates that impact credit cards, auto loans, etc.

How would lowering the Fed Funds rate by 3 percentage points wind up impacting our NATIONAL DEBT?




Perrhaps there is a READING COMPREHENSION problem at work here which I have found you to fall prey to on many occasions. - - - Again, let me help you.

Here is AI Overview, which most people under 90 know how to use:

Yes, Federal Reserve interest rate changes can affect the amount of interest paid on the national debt, though it's not the sole determining factor. The Federal Reserve's federal funds rate influences short-term interest rates, which in turn affects the interest paid on some government debt. However, the national debt is comprised of a mix of short-term, medium, and long-term Treasury securities, and the interest rates on these are also influenced by market factors and investor demand.

Here's a more detailed explanation:
Federal Reserve's Role:
The Federal Reserve (the Fed) primarily influences short-term interest rates through its monetary policy tools, including setting the federal funds rate.
Impact on Short-Term Debt:
Changes in the federal funds rate directly impact the interest rates on newly issued short-term Treasury securities.
Influence on Longer-Term Debt:
While the Fed's actions can influence longer-term rates, these are also affected by other factors like market expectations about inflation, economic growth, and investor demand for government bonds.
National Debt Composition:
The national debt isn't solely composed of short-term debt; it includes a variety of Treasury securities with different maturities. The interest rates on these securities can vary based on their maturity and other market conditions.
Rising Interest Costs:
As interest rates rise, the cost of servicing the national debt increases, especially if a significant portion of the debt is tied to short-term instruments that need to be refinanced at higher rates.
Vicious Cycle:
Rising interest rates, coupled with a growing national debt, can lead to a situation where a larger portion of the federal budget is allocated to interest payments, potentially crowding out other government spending priorities.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Since you obviously have no idea what you are talking about, let me help you:

HINT: Ask Artificial Intelligence what the average DURATION of our National Debt is.

HINT: Then ask Artificial Intelligence what the average DURATION of our National Debt is sans T-Bills.

I believe former President Obama would call this a "teachable" moment.
You're Welcome.



oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Since you obviously have no idea what you are talking about, let me help you:

HINT: Ask Artificial Intelligence what the average DURATION of our National Debt is.

HINT: Then ask Artificial Intelligence what the average DURATION of our National Debt is sans T-Bills.

I believe former President Obama would call this a "teachable" moment.
You're Welcome.





I am so happy to help! I walked an old lady across the street the other day!


AI Overview

As of March 2025, the average maturity of the U.S. national debt is 71 months. This is approximately 5.9 years.

DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So if the average duration of our outstanding Treasury Debt is roughly 6 years, how does lowering the Fed Funds rate impact the yields of that bond debt?

Please feel free to illustrate the impact over the entire yield curve.

And since you have no idea what you're talking about, feel free to keep using AI.




oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

So if the average duration of our outstanding Treasury Debt is roughly 6 years, how does lowering the Fed Funds rate impact the yields of that bond debt?

Please feel free to illustrate the impact over the entire yield curve.

And since you have no idea what you're talking about, feel free to keep using AI.







Actually, I am now so informed by you, that I am going to get a job advising the government. I will advise that Jpow raise the rates to 75%. Because, according to you, government borrowing rates have little or nothing to do with the fed rates, the fed can then borrow at low interest and provide short term loans at much higher interest!

THE NATIONAL DEBT CRISIS IS NOW SOLVED!!!

THANK YOU LORD WAGS!!!
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looks like our "mascot" just tapped-out.
Sad really.

DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Journal on Sunday published a report claiming that Bessent had recently made his case to Trump against Powell's removal, citing potential effects on the economy, the legal challenges such a decision would face, and the fact that the U.S. central bank is probably already likely to cut interest rates this year.

In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump claimed the Journal story was "untruthful," noting there was no reason for Bessent to lay out the economic impact of the move.

"Nobody had to explain that to me," Trump wrote. "I know better than anybody what's good for the Market, and what's good for the U.S.A. If it weren't for me, the Market wouldn't be at Record Highs right now, it probably would have CRASHED! So, get your information CORRECT."

"People don't explain to me, I explain to them!" he added.

LMFAO!

I think someone actually had to EXPLAIN it to this idiot that firing Powell would cause a nearly $60 Billion INCREASE in interest cost. - - - And it happened to be our Treasury Secretary.

Ousting of Fed Chair Jerome Powell could raise U.S. borrowing costs by nearly $60 billion a year
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The average yield on the Treasury's debt has turned up with the end of near 0 interest rates.

Here's an idea.

Selling more short-term Tbills as opposed to longer dated bonds and notes could help lower interest expense on our debt.

Former Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen was criticized for tilting the govts securities sales towards shorter term securities starting in late 2022.

One of those critics was Scott Bessent.
He might want to change his position on that.

Tbills have been roughly 15-20% of the Treasury's total issuance. That could easily increase to 20-25% given demand.

Of course, a change like this would act as a "stealth" QE given the reduction in supply of long term govt paper.

Note: This post was made without Ai.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chump....just too f-ing dumb.

Lmfao!


DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?

DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hahhahahahaaaaaa!
President Chump not Happy with Fed Governors leaving rates unchanged as the PCE index comes in at 2.6%






Donald Trump Tears Into 'Too Angry, Too Stupid' Jerome Powell - Newsweek
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Trump on CNBC "Squawk Box" with more lies.

Lmfao.

https://www.cnbc.com/video/2025/08/05/president-trump-treasury-sec-scott-bessent-does-not-want-to-be-fed-chair-but-4-others-in-running.html
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
On CNBC this morning . . .

Trump tells everyone WHY he appointed Jerome Powell:

"Jay Powell is highly political," Trump told Squawk Box while asserting that he hired Powell initially because a former employee liked him.

"Somebody that worked for me was a big fan of his not a fan of his, he hardly knew him, but he wanted him so badly I did somebody a favor I put him in there. No, he's too late. He's too late. That name will stick to him forever," Trump claimed.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAAAAA!



'Give me a break': Trump says he hired Fed chair Powell as a 'favor' after CNBC host presses him on labor bureau firing
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

On CNBC this morning . . .

Trump tells everyone WHY he appointed Jerome Powell:

"Jay Powell is highly political," Trump told Squawk Box while asserting that he hired Powell initially because a former employee liked him.

"Somebody that worked for me was a big fan of his not a fan of his, he hardly knew him, but he wanted him so badly I did somebody a favor I put him in there. No, he's too late. He's too late. That name will stick to him forever," Trump claimed.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAAAAA!



'Give me a break': Trump says he hired Fed chair Powell as a 'favor' after CNBC host presses him on labor bureau firing

If you're appointing someone to a critically important position like the Fed Chairman because you're doing a friend a favor, that's total dereliction of your Presidential duties.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

If you're appointing someone to a critically important position like the Fed Chairman because you're doing a friend a favor, that's total dereliction of your Presidential duties.


Agreed 100%

The Chairman of the Fed is the single most powerful and important person when it comes to employment and price stability of our economy. He can literally move markets given that he sets the "value" of money.

The fact that this BOZO barely even gave this appointment any "thought" at all pretty much says it all.

And now he's repeatedly whining and crying about the guy he appointed.

On this alone, he should be impeached and removed.


oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

If you're appointing someone to a critically important position like the Fed Chairman because you're doing a friend a favor, that's total dereliction of your Presidential duties.


Agreed 100%

The Chairman of the Fed is the single most powerful and important person when it comes to employment and price stability of our economy. He can literally move markets given that he sets the "value" of money.

The fact that this BOZO barely even gave this appointment any "thought" at all pretty much says it all.

And now he's repeatedly whining and crying about the guy he appointed.

On this alone, he should be impeached and removed.





You'd have a point if Trump appointed him to his current term, but your dementia buddy Joe did.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

If you're appointing someone to a critically important position like the Fed Chairman because you're doing a friend a favor, that's total dereliction of your Presidential duties.


Agreed 100%

The Chairman of the Fed is the single most powerful and important person when it comes to employment and price stability of our economy. He can literally move markets given that he sets the "value" of money.

The fact that this BOZO barely even gave this appointment any "thought" at all pretty much says it all.

And now he's repeatedly whining and crying about the guy he appointed.

On this alone, he should be impeached and removed.





You'd have a point if Trump appointed him to his current term, but your dementia buddy Joe did.


Sadly, you're conflating things again.

Powell heading the Fed in Trump's current term has nothing to do with the fact that Trump appointed him during his first term because of a "favor" to someone that once worked for Trump and liked Powell.

That was clearly the point that I made in my original post about Trump on CNBC this morning and its the same point that Eastern Oregon Bear made as well in his reply.

I'm sorry that this point flew over your head.
But that seems to be your MO when you're always found to be defending the Orange Man.

You jump to conclusions . . . not being made.
Just like you did last weekend regarding Los Vaqueros Reservoir.

Have a nice day!




oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

If you're appointing someone to a critically important position like the Fed Chairman because you're doing a friend a favor, that's total dereliction of your Presidential duties.


Agreed 100%

The Chairman of the Fed is the single most powerful and important person when it comes to employment and price stability of our economy. He can literally move markets given that he sets the "value" of money.

The fact that this BOZO barely even gave this appointment any "thought" at all pretty much says it all.

And now he's repeatedly whining and crying about the guy he appointed.

On this alone, he should be impeached and removed.





You'd have a point if Trump appointed him to his current term, but your dementia buddy Joe did.


Sadly, you're conflating things again.

Powell heading the Fed in Trump's current term has nothing to do with the fact that Trump appointed him during his first term because of a "favor" to someone that once worked for Trump and liked Powell.

That was clearly the point that I made in my original post about Trump on CNBC this morning and its the same point that Eastern Oregon Bear made as well in his reply.

I'm sorry that this point flew over your head.
But that seems to be your MO when you're always found to be defending the Orange Man.

You jump to conclusions . . . not being made.
Just like you did last weekend regarding Los Vaqueros Reservoir.

Have a nice day!




Sure. Powell generally did a good job during Trump's term, and the economy recovered well from covid shutdowns. After Biden appointed him, rates kept being lowered and massive QE was done much longer than needed, resulting in the opposite during Trump's second term.
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

If you're appointing someone to a critically important position like the Fed Chairman because you're doing a friend a favor, that's total dereliction of your Presidential duties.


Agreed 100%

The Chairman of the Fed is the single most powerful and important person when it comes to employment and price stability of our economy. He can literally move markets given that he sets the "value" of money.

The fact that this BOZO barely even gave this appointment any "thought" at all pretty much says it all.

And now he's repeatedly whining and crying about the guy he appointed.

On this alone, he should be impeached and removed.





You'd have a point if Trump appointed him to his current term, but your dementia buddy Joe did.


Sadly, you're conflating things again.

Powell heading the Fed in Trump's current term has nothing to do with the fact that Trump appointed him during his first term because of a "favor" to someone that once worked for Trump and liked Powell.

That was clearly the point that I made in my original post about Trump on CNBC this morning and its the same point that Eastern Oregon Bear made as well in his reply.

I'm sorry that this point flew over your head.
But that seems to be your MO when you're always found to be defending the Orange Man.

You jump to conclusions . . . not being made.
Just like you did last weekend regarding Los Vaqueros Reservoir.

Have a nice day!




Sure. Powell generally did a good job during Trump's term, and the economy recovered well from covid shutdowns. After Biden appointed him, rates kept being lowered and massive QE was done much longer than needed, resulting in the opposite during Trump's second term.

Powell did a good job because Trump then Powell did a bad job because Biden. Does it hurt when you twist yourself into a pretzel?
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eastern Oregon Bear said:

oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

If you're appointing someone to a critically important position like the Fed Chairman because you're doing a friend a favor, that's total dereliction of your Presidential duties.


Agreed 100%

The Chairman of the Fed is the single most powerful and important person when it comes to employment and price stability of our economy. He can literally move markets given that he sets the "value" of money.

The fact that this BOZO barely even gave this appointment any "thought" at all pretty much says it all.

And now he's repeatedly whining and crying about the guy he appointed.

On this alone, he should be impeached and removed.





You'd have a point if Trump appointed him to his current term, but your dementia buddy Joe did.


Sadly, you're conflating things again.

Powell heading the Fed in Trump's current term has nothing to do with the fact that Trump appointed him during his first term because of a "favor" to someone that once worked for Trump and liked Powell.

That was clearly the point that I made in my original post about Trump on CNBC this morning and its the same point that Eastern Oregon Bear made as well in his reply.

I'm sorry that this point flew over your head.
But that seems to be your MO when you're always found to be defending the Orange Man.

You jump to conclusions . . . not being made.
Just like you did last weekend regarding Los Vaqueros Reservoir.

Have a nice day!




Sure. Powell generally did a good job during Trump's term, and the economy recovered well from covid shutdowns. After Biden appointed him, rates kept being lowered and massive QE was done much longer than needed, resulting in the opposite during Trump's second term.

Powell did a good job because Trump then Powell did a bad job because Biden. Does it hurt when you twist yourself into a pretzel?


Does it hurt yourself to be so partisan you can't see the reasons I posted? Jpow's rate reduction and QE lasted way longer than it should have. Thanks.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

oski003 said:

DiabloWags said:

Eastern Oregon Bear said:

If you're appointing someone to a critically important position like the Fed Chairman because you're doing a friend a favor, that's total dereliction of your Presidential duties.


Agreed 100%

The Chairman of the Fed is the single most powerful and important person when it comes to employment and price stability of our economy. He can literally move markets given that he sets the "value" of money.

The fact that this BOZO barely even gave this appointment any "thought" at all pretty much says it all.

And now he's repeatedly whining and crying about the guy he appointed.

On this alone, he should be impeached and removed.





You'd have a point if Trump appointed him to his current term, but your dementia buddy Joe did.


Sadly, you're conflating things again.

Powell heading the Fed in Trump's current term has nothing to do with the fact that Trump appointed him during his first term because of a "favor" to someone that once worked for Trump and liked Powell.

That was clearly the point that I made in my original post about Trump on CNBC this morning and its the same point that Eastern Oregon Bear made as well in his reply.

I'm sorry that this point flew over your head.
But that seems to be your MO when you're always found to be defending the Orange Man.

You jump to conclusions . . . not being made.
Just like you did last weekend regarding Los Vaqueros Reservoir.

Have a nice day!




Sure. Powell generally did a good job during Trump's term, and the economy recovered well from covid shutdowns. After Biden appointed him, rates kept being lowered and massive QE was done much longer than needed, resulting in the opposite during Trump's second term.

Powell did a good job because Trump then Powell did a bad job because Biden. Does it hurt when you twist yourself into a pretzel?


Does it hurt yourself to be so partisan you can't see the reasons I posted? Jpow's rate reduction and QE lasted way longer than it should have. Thanks.


Again, your repeated partisanship blinds you from the point that I was making.
Your poor reading comprehension continues to fail you.

Trump hired Powell due to a "favor" to a former employee of his.
This is the point that I have been consistently posting, yet it totally goes over your head.

It's not like Powell and his credentials were robustly vetted by Trump for one of the most important appointments that a President can make.

I REPEAT: Trump hired Powell as a "favor" to someone.

Period.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.