DNI's Gabbard identifies Obama IC crimes

7,140 Views | 180 Replies | Last: 4 hrs ago by movielover
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Can you guys go into a casino and bet your life savings on the proposition that Hilary will be convicted of these charges?

Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Odds are same as Trump being convicted when this whole fiasco began
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anything is possible.

bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Aren't there finger prints on the FBI burn bag documents?
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"If I'm indicted…I'll take half of D.C. with me…"

- Hillary Clinton
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A lot of the crimes she knows about have expired / SOL.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The walls are closing in
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

The walls are closing in

It's just starting.
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

On top of this, the DNC never allowed the FBI - defacto experts in espionage and technology - to look at their servers.



It always seemed crazy weird the DNC servers went uninspected.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anarchistbear said:

Odds are same as Trump being convicted when this whole fiasco began

Even if every word of this new "revelation" is true, someone is going to have to explain to me how it's a criminal offense.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Anarchistbear said:

Odds are same as Trump being convicted when this whole fiasco began

Even if every word of this new "revelation" is true, someone is going to have to explain to me how it's a criminal offense.


Conspiracy to commit sedition?

Nunes filed dozens of criminal referrals. Crowdstrike conducted illegal surveillance on hundreds of Americans, likely directed by the DNC.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

sycasey said:

Anarchistbear said:

Odds are same as Trump being convicted when this whole fiasco began

Even if every word of this new "revelation" is true, someone is going to have to explain to me how it's a criminal offense.


Conspiracy to commit sedition?

Nunes filed dozens of criminal referrals. Crowdstrike conducted illegal surveillance on hundreds of Americans, likely directed by the DNC.

I'm not sure you know what "sedition" means.
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

Anarchistbear said:

Odds are same as Trump being convicted when this whole fiasco began

Even if every word of this new "revelation" is true, someone is going to have to explain to me how it's a criminal offense.

Your question reads as if you are untroubled by their actions.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

sycasey said:

Anarchistbear said:

Odds are same as Trump being convicted when this whole fiasco began

Even if every word of this new "revelation" is true, someone is going to have to explain to me how it's a criminal offense.

Your question reads as if you are untroubled by their actions.

I need to know more, because there is a lot of room between "regular campaign mudslinging" and "criminal offense" and (assuming it's true) this would seem to fall somewhere in that range. But I don't know where
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is Federal employees ignoring hard, repeated Intell data, fabricating 'evidence', concocting bogus 'evidence' with foreign actors, lying to the FBI, producing fraudulent FISA warrants, lying to the FISA court, illegally spying on Americans, smearing Americans, and flipping the Intell 'analysis' 180 degrees to smear a presidential candidate. Prominent officials in the FBI and DOJ facilitated much of this. In addition, hundreds of thousands of illegal searches by third party's of the NSA databases.

As part of this con, Russia was falsely smeared and Russian officials expelled to help further their false narrative.

Then running a coordinated coverup for five years, via impeachment, sham investigations, special counsels, etc., to hide or bury evidence and hobble a sitting president. Twenty seven DOJ Federal smartphones purposefully erased in coordination, officials falsely smeared and buried (General Flynn), etc.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

This is Federal employees ignoring hard, repeated Intell data, fabricating 'evidence', concocting bogus 'evidence' with foreign actors, lying to the FBI, producing fraudulent FISA warrants, lying to the FISA court, illegally spying on Americans, smearing Americans, and flipping the Intell 'analysis' 180 degrees to smear a presidential candidate. Prominent officials in the FBI and DOJ facilitated much of this. In addition, hundreds of thousands of illegal searches by third party's of the NSA databases.

As part of this con, Russia was falsely smeared and Russian officials expelled to help further their false narrative.

Then running a coordinated coverup for five years, via impeachment, sham investigations, special counsels, etc., to hide or bury evidence and hobble a sitting president. Twenty seven DOJ Federal smartphones purposefully erased in coordination, officials falsely smeared and buried (General Flynn), etc.

You have extrapolated a lot from one leaked email from a Hillary campaign person.
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

tequila4kapp said:

sycasey said:

Anarchistbear said:

Odds are same as Trump being convicted when this whole fiasco began

Even if every word of this new "revelation" is true, someone is going to have to explain to me how it's a criminal offense.

Your question reads as if you are untroubled by their actions.

I need to know more, because there is a lot of room between "regular campaign mudslinging" and "criminal offense" and (assuming it's true) this would seem to fall somewhere in that range. But I don't know where

Campaign mudslinging should only apply to those who are members of the campaign. Not Obama, not Comey, not Brennan, not Clapper. But let's say Obama is part of team HRC and it is okay for a sitting president to influence an election on behalf of his political party. Fine. There is still no way the FBI, DNI and CIA are supposed to be working to help one candidate. But that's what they did.

Campaign mudslinging can only apply to actions taken before the election. This continued well after the election, then continued into Trump's presidency. For example, the worst of the Obama / IC actions appear to start on 12/8/2016 - a full month after Trump is President elect - in order to get a false IC report published on 1/6/2017, two weeks before Trump is inaugurated.
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sycasey said:

movielover said:

This is Federal employees ignoring hard, repeated Intell data, fabricating 'evidence', concocting bogus 'evidence' with foreign actors, lying to the FBI, producing fraudulent FISA warrants, lying to the FISA court, illegally spying on Americans, smearing Americans, and flipping the Intell 'analysis' 180 degrees to smear a presidential candidate. Prominent officials in the FBI and DOJ facilitated much of this. In addition, hundreds of thousands of illegal searches by third party's of the NSA databases.

As part of this con, Russia was falsely smeared and Russian officials expelled to help further their false narrative.

Then running a coordinated coverup for five years, via impeachment, sham investigations, special counsels, etc., to hide or bury evidence and hobble a sitting president. Twenty seven DOJ Federal smartphones purposefully erased in coordination, officials falsely smeared and buried (General Flynn), etc.

You have extrapolated a lot from one leaked email from a Hillary campaign person.

If that's all you think there is you either are not paying attention or are too partisan to objectively assess this.
sycasey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tequila4kapp said:

sycasey said:

movielover said:

This is Federal employees ignoring hard, repeated Intell data, fabricating 'evidence', concocting bogus 'evidence' with foreign actors, lying to the FBI, producing fraudulent FISA warrants, lying to the FISA court, illegally spying on Americans, smearing Americans, and flipping the Intell 'analysis' 180 degrees to smear a presidential candidate. Prominent officials in the FBI and DOJ facilitated much of this. In addition, hundreds of thousands of illegal searches by third party's of the NSA databases.

As part of this con, Russia was falsely smeared and Russian officials expelled to help further their false narrative.

Then running a coordinated coverup for five years, via impeachment, sham investigations, special counsels, etc., to hide or bury evidence and hobble a sitting president. Twenty seven DOJ Federal smartphones purposefully erased in coordination, officials falsely smeared and buried (General Flynn), etc.

You have extrapolated a lot from one leaked email from a Hillary campaign person.

If that's all you think there is you either are not paying attention or are too partisan to objectively assess this.

Lay it out for me. Or point me somewhere that I can read about all of this.

Somewhere that actually lays out the evidence for it with solid sourcing, not random Twitter influencers.

EDIT: Should be clear that I am looking for criminal activity, not things that seem shady or inappropriate. If that's the standard then a lot of Presidents should have gone to jail.
cal83dls79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

This drop today, this classified annex to the Durham Report from 2016 we are only just now seeing in 2025, is INSANE!
the fact that those emails are obviously fake is insane as well!
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The idea that the CIA and FBI are non political is insane. This whole operation is political as was the Russia nonsense
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?


movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
When the FBI used the Steele dossier to seek surveillance warrants on Trump campaign volunteer Carter Page, the bureau made 17 "factual misstatements and omissions" to the FISA court, Inspector General Horowitz found in his December 2019 report.

These abuses included omitting information that undermined the credibility of Steele's main source, Igor Danchenko, and the fanciful claims he told Steele about prostitutes and billion dollar bribes; omitting that both Page and Papadopoulos had made exonerating statements to FBI informants; and, most notably, omitting that the Clinton campaign was paying for Steele's services.

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2022/01/20/the_tension_over_truth_and_consequences_gripping_the_fbis_trump-russia_reckoning_812321.html
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard breaks down how the recently declassified documents outlines the story of the Trump-Russia collusion hoax.

The declassified annex to the John Durham report reveals intelligence intercepts where hackers infiltrated the George Soros network and subsequently located a discussion of the Clinton campaign working with the FBI in 2016 to manufacture the Trump-Russia narrative.

bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cal83dls79 said:

bear2034 said:

This drop today, this classified annex to the Durham Report from 2016 we are only just now seeing in 2025, is INSANE!

the fact that those emails are obviously fake is insane as well!


We're past emails at this point, people are waking up to the fact that Hilary has been linked to murders.
cal83dls79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:

cal83dls79 said:

bear2034 said:

This drop today, this classified annex to the Durham Report from 2016 we are only just now seeing in 2025, is INSANE!

the fact that those emails are obviously fake is insane as well!


We're past emails at this point, people are waking up to the fact that Hilary has been linked to murders.
still channeling dead people I see. Have you spoken to those that were murdered? More Helltopay intel? So do share!
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2034 said:


We're past emails at this point, people are waking up to the fact that Hilary has been linked to murders.


Says the guy who quotes Alex Jones as a factual source.

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
tequila4kapp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cal83dls79 said:

bear2034 said:

This drop today, this classified annex to the Durham Report from 2016 we are only just now seeing in 2025, is INSANE!

the fact that those emails are obviously fake is insane as well!

https://thefederalist.com/2025/08/01/dont-believe-the-lies-from-nyt-russia-hoaxers-about-the-durham-annex/
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
American Thinker: Anatomy of a Coup: The Obama-Era Big Lie That Launched a National Delusion

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/08/anatomy_of_a_coup_the_obama_era_big_lie_that_launched_a_national_delusion.html
cal83dls79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

American Thinker: Anatomy of a Coup: The Obama-Era Big Lie That Launched a National Delusion

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/08/anatomy_of_a_coup_the_obama_era_big_lie_that_launched_a_national_delusion.html
Part 1 was great, fast paced with some twists. Part 2 was a letdown.
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.