Coordinated. Is Maria Bartiroma the only notable TV host covering these historic illegal acts?
DNI's Gabbard identifies Obama IC crimes
19,046 Views |
413 Replies |
Last: 1 day ago by movielover
They investigated Trump to cover up Hillary’s and Obama’s crimes then they impeached Trump for wanting to look into the crimes Joe pardoned Hunter for.
— C3 (@C_3C_3) August 4, 2025
DC is a crime scene.
bear2034 said:They investigated Trump to cover up Hillary’s and Obama’s crimes then they impeached Trump for wanting to look into the crimes Joe pardoned Hunter for.
— C3 (@C_3C_3) August 4, 2025
DC is a crime scene.
That is some bizarre conspiracy stuff but you go with that.
Most of this is covered in the recently released documents in black and white. (Not Hunter Biden portion.)
bear2034 said:BearNIt said:
Good luck, people are watching and will not forget the cruelty they have witnessed.
Well, they're being very quiet about it. Too quiet. And the way the corporate media is using Epstein to avoid covering Obama's complicity in the Russiagate hoax is very suspicious.
You mean the way the Big Cheeto is trying anything he can to not answer questions about why his name is all over the Epstein files is predictable.
Progressives refuse to admit basic facts.
Trump kicked Epstein out of his club 26 years ago? When the FBI was later investigating Epstein, they asked to interview DJT. He obliged them, and had a lengthy interview without an attorney present. The FBI said he was very helpful.
Trump kicked Epstein out of his club 26 years ago? When the FBI was later investigating Epstein, they asked to interview DJT. He obliged them, and had a lengthy interview without an attorney present. The FBI said he was very helpful.
Hans Mahncke@HansMahncke
"One thing that offers a bit of hope is the timing. Brennan sat for a full day of questioning with Durham on August 21, 2020. We've never seen a transcript, but it has always seemed likely that this was when he told his most actionable lies, spinning tales, advancing conspiracy narratives, and covering his tracks. There are now 16 days left to bring charges tied to anything he said that day. That's a far more promising angle than anything else publicly known. So if prosecutors are moving quickly, and if August 20, 2025 is the deadline they have in mind, there may still be reason to hope."
"One thing that offers a bit of hope is the timing. Brennan sat for a full day of questioning with Durham on August 21, 2020. We've never seen a transcript, but it has always seemed likely that this was when he told his most actionable lies, spinning tales, advancing conspiracy narratives, and covering his tracks. There are now 16 days left to bring charges tied to anything he said that day. That's a far more promising angle than anything else publicly known. So if prosecutors are moving quickly, and if August 20, 2025 is the deadline they have in mind, there may still be reason to hope."
movielover said:
Progressives refuse to admit basic facts.
Trump kicked Epstein out of his club 26 years ago? When the FBI was later investigating Epstein, they asked to interview DJT. He obliged them, and had a lengthy interview without an attorney present. The FBI said he was very helpful.
Then why was Epstein still on the Membership list in 2007 after the big Cheeto said he kicked him out in 2004 and after the big Cheeto gives an interview saying he was a terrific guy and a lot of fun to be with. He is quoted saying Epstein liked beautiful women many on the younger side. I think they call them basic facts.
movielover said:
Hans Mahncke@HansMahncke
"One thing that offers a bit of hope is the timing. Brennan sat for a full day of questioning with Durham on August 21, 2020. We've never seen a transcript, but it has always seemed likely that this was when he told his most actionable lies, spinning tales, advancing conspiracy narratives, and covering his tracks. There are now 16 days left to bring charges tied to anything he said that day. That's a far more promising angle than anything else publicly known. So if prosecutors are moving quickly, and if August 20, 2025 is the deadline they have in mind, there may still be reason to hope."
Didn't Durham do an extensive investigation and find that a low level attorney had lied on a document. Wasn't't that the only thing he found.
Using Epstein to "avoid covering Obama's complicity" before the accusation of Obama's complicity had been resurrected is real 5-D chess.bear2034 said:BearNIt said:
Good luck, people are watching and will not forget the cruelty they have witnessed.
Well, they're being very quiet about it. Too quiet. And the way the corporate media is using Epstein to avoid covering Obama's complicity in the Russiagate hoax is very suspicious.
I have to say I'm surprised and amused that Staff chose to delete one word from my post. I'm at a loss to see why it was more offensive than dozens of similar terms used here everyday, but it was unimportant to the content of my post, so, very well. Next time I'll leave out the Ron White reference.Eastern Oregon Bear said:Using Epstein to "avoid covering Obama's complicity" before the accusation of Obama's complicity had been resurrected is real 5-D chess.bear2034 said:BearNIt said:
Good luck, people are watching and will not forget the cruelty they have witnessed.
Well, they're being very quiet about it. Too quiet. And the way the corporate media is using Epstein to avoid covering Obama's complicity in the Russiagate hoax is very suspicious.
Eastern Oregon Bear said:Using Epstein to "avoid covering Obama's complicity" before the accusation of Obama's complicity had been resurrected is real 5-D chess.bear2034 said:BearNIt said:
Good luck, people are watching and will not forget the cruelty they have witnessed.
Well, they're being very quiet about it. Too quiet. And the way the corporate media is using Epstein to avoid covering Obama's complicity in the Russiagate hoax is very suspicious.
The way that Trump got out ahead of this to be Epstein's best friend 30 years ago so that the media could use it now to deflect is even more impressive.
🚨BREAKING🚨
— Rep. James Comer (@RepJamesComer) August 5, 2025
The House Oversight Committee is compelling the following individuals to appear for depositions through issued subpoenas:
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton: October 9
Former President Bill Clinton: October 14
Former U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland:…
Former U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland: October 2
Former FBI Director James Comey: October 7
Former U.S. Attorney General William Barr: August 18
Former U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales: August 26
Former U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions: August 28
Former FBI Director Robert Mueller: September 2
Former U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch: September 9
Former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder: September 30
movielover said:
Coordinated. Is Maria Bartiroma the only notable TV host covering these historic illegal acts?
Don't know but NBC operatives are now having to report about the Grand Jury.
Names of attorneys in the on deck circle to prosecute these "chasing windmills" cases? Asking for a friend.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
bearister said:
Names of attorneys in the on deck circle to prosecute these "chasing windmills" cases? Asking for a friend.
Republicans have Panicans. What's the Democrat equivalent?
It took the Democrats more than 2 and a half years to plan the raid on Melania's underwear dresser.
bear2034 said:🚨BREAKING🚨
— Rep. James Comer (@RepJamesComer) August 5, 2025
The House Oversight Committee is compelling the following individuals to appear for depositions through issued subpoenas:
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton: October 9
Former President Bill Clinton: October 14
Former U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland:…
Former U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland: October 2
Former FBI Director James Comey: October 7
Former U.S. Attorney General William Barr: August 18
Former U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales: August 26
Former U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions: August 28
Former FBI Director Robert Mueller: September 2
Former U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch: September 9
Former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder: September 30
This is what is called a smoke screen so when Republicans return from the recess, they won't have to answer questions about Epstein. The administration is throwing everything they can at the wall to see what sticks. The administration and Republicans will never be able to sweep Epstein and Maxwell under the rug, the MAGA base won't let them. They created the monster and now the monster wants answers.
Haven't most of these people testified before? Can't they say, "I have nothing to add to my testimony please refer to the transcript"?
BearNIt said:
The administration is throwing everything they can at the wall to see what sticks.
You should read your Project 2025 manual more carefully. lol.
bear2034 said:BearNIt said:
The administration is throwing everything they can at the wall to see what sticks.
You should read your Project 2025 manual more carefully. lol.
Nah I'm good. The MAGA base is on it and like a tick on a dog's ass they will be on it for the foreseeable future.
BearNIt said:movielover said:
Hans Mahncke@HansMahncke
"One thing that offers a bit of hope is the timing. Brennan sat for a full day of questioning with Durham on August 21, 2020. We've never seen a transcript, but it has always seemed likely that this was when he told his most actionable lies, spinning tales, advancing conspiracy narratives, and covering his tracks. There are now 16 days left to bring charges tied to anything he said that day. That's a far more promising angle than anything else publicly known. So if prosecutors are moving quickly, and if August 20, 2025 is the deadline they have in mind, there may still be reason to hope."
Didn't Durham do an extensive investigation and find that a low level attorney had lied on a document. Wasn't't that the only thing he found.
Durham was highly limited in what he could look at, preventing him from reaching into other "silos". It's how the IC / DC / Swamp protects itself.
This is why those forces were going after former Democrat and non-Swamp (not-controlled) Tulsi Gabbard months ago, and then immediately after she published her first illuminating document dump, some crooked CONgressmen moved to limit her access.
bear2034 said:bearister said:
Names of attorneys in the on deck circle to prosecute these "chasing windmills" cases? Asking for a friend.
Republicans have Panicans. What's the Democrat equivalent?
It took the Democrats more than 2 and a half years to plan the raid on Melania's underwear dresser.
AKA another overt action in continuance of the Conspiracy. Also, committed in Florida. Thank you.
bearister said:
Names of attorneys in the on deck circle to prosecute these "chasing windmills" cases? Asking for a friend.
Me -- I see a connection:
— Shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) August 4, 2025
Saturday's Confirmation of Jason Reding Quinones as U.S. Attorney for Southern District of Florida
AND
Today's https://t.co/IMml7m9eQp
The Fox News items is quite explicit in saying that Bondi's Memo did not specify the District where she ordered… pic.twitter.com/J6rgRvI7nv
BREAKING: DOJ Requests DNI Documents Following Gabbard Criminal Referral On Russiagate Conspiracy https://t.co/kWtqAslONW
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) August 5, 2025
movielover said:BearNIt said:movielover said:
Hans Mahncke@HansMahncke
"One thing that offers a bit of hope is the timing. Brennan sat for a full day of questioning with Durham on August 21, 2020. We've never seen a transcript, but it has always seemed likely that this was when he told his most actionable lies, spinning tales, advancing conspiracy narratives, and covering his tracks. There are now 16 days left to bring charges tied to anything he said that day. That's a far more promising angle than anything else publicly known. So if prosecutors are moving quickly, and if August 20, 2025 is the deadline they have in mind, there may still be reason to hope."
Didn't Durham do an extensive investigation and find that a low level attorney had lied on a document. Wasn't't that the only thing he found.
Durham was highly limited in what he could look at, preventing him from reaching into other "silos". It's how the IC / DC / Swamp protects itself.
This is why those forces were going after former Democrat and non-Swamp (not-controlled) Tulsi Gabbard months ago, and then immediately after she published her first illuminating document dump, some crooked CONgressmen moved to limit her access.
The report of Durham and the Senate Intel Committee's report chaired by little Marco should be more than enough to counter any insane conspiracy that the administration comes up with. So I would tell Trump and his merry and of sycophants to have at it but the statute of limitation and immunity are issues they will have to overcome. You have the big Cheeto, Jeff Sessions, and William Barr to thank for that. Nobody and I mean nobody gives any credibility to the useful idiot, Gabbard, not even Republicans.
DNI ecently released never-seen-before smoking gun evidence of HRC campaign's plan to smear President Trump, and the FBIs plan to amplify that smear. All supported by BHO.
movielover said:
DNI ecently released never-seen-before smoking gun evidence of HRC campaign's plan to smear President Trump, and the FBIs plan to amplify that smear. All supported by BHO.
Bull&@#$. You keep believing that while he puts up a smoke screen to prevent being asked about the fact that his name appears in the Epstein files multiple times.
Which part of the recent document release is bull*****BearNIt said:movielover said:
DNI ecently released never-seen-before smoking gun evidence of HRC campaign's plan to smear President Trump, and the FBIs plan to amplify that smear. All supported by BHO.
Bull&@#$. You keep believing that while he puts up a smoke screen to prevent being asked about the fact that his name appears in the Epstein files multiple times.
- Brennan briefing Obama, Comey, Clapper, Lynch that the Steele dossier was an HRC campaign ploy? (Briefing occurred before Crossfire Hurricane was opened)
- the part where the presidential daily briefing had the ICA concluding no Russia whatever with the election was suddenly canceled?
- the part where Obama ordered a new ICA and that it be delivered before inauguration
- the part where Brennan overruled case agents to insist the ICA conclude Russia interference even though it wasn't supported by evidence
- the part where a Brennan lackey threatened a case agent's career if he didn't get on board with the new ICA conclusion
- the part where we now know Comey knew the Steele dossier was HRC campaign material when he briefed Trump on the allegations without disclosing the part about HRC
And we gleaned this from Danish Intell, who snuck into Russian computer systems. This included:
- in their assessment, HRC was going to win
- HRC had fits of rage and psychological social problems, rage, or extreme happiness
- Russia held the damning information, waiting to release it until after HRC won
- Ergo, Russia didn't help Trump (though they could have); they helped HRC by not releasing the dirt
- P.S. No pee tape; more projection?
- in their assessment, HRC was going to win
- HRC had fits of rage and psychological social problems, rage, or extreme happiness
- Russia held the damning information, waiting to release it until after HRC won
- Ergo, Russia didn't help Trump (though they could have); they helped HRC by not releasing the dirt
- P.S. No pee tape; more projection?
tequila4kapp said:BearNIt said:movielover said:
DNI ecently released never-seen-before smoking gun evidence of HRC campaign's plan to smear President Trump, and the FBIs plan to amplify that smear. All supported by BHO.
Bull&@#$. You keep believing that while he puts up a smoke screen to prevent being asked about the fact that his name appears in the Epstein files multiple times.
Which part of the recent document release is bull*****
- Brennan briefing Obama, Comey, Clapper, Lynch that the Steele dossier was an HRC campaign ploy? (Briefing occurred before Crossfire Hurricane was opened)
- the part where the presidential daily briefing had the ICA concluding no Russia whatever with the election was suddenly canceled?
- the part where Obama ordered a new ICA and that it be delivered before inauguration
- the part where Brennan overruled case agents to insist the ICA conclude Russia interference even though it wasn't supported by evidence
- the part where a Brennan lackey threatened a case agent's career if he didn't get on board with the new ICA conclusion
- the part where we now know Comey knew the Steele dossier was HRC campaign material when he briefed Trump on the allegations without disclosing the part about HRC
The document release will end up meaning nothing, nobody will go to jail. The statute of limitations as well as immunity will take care of all that. If there was something there the big Cheeto would have done something about it in his first term. To believe that the useful idiot Gabbard is smart enough to come up with a real crime is laughable as much so as her half-assed press conference where she offered no evidence. This hole clust&$#@ of a smoke screen is to serve one purpose, and that is to give the MAGA base something to focus on instead of the Pedo President who was advised that his name is all over the Epstein files. Durham and little Marco have both issued reports where they found no wrong doing by anyone on that list of subpoenas. What is remarkable is that the Oversight Committee didn't subpoena the former Secretary of Labor who was the US Attorney who got a sweetheart deal for Epstein when he was looking at life involving 60 different charges and ended up getting 13 months in jail on work release. I might remind you that the victims, the girls he and Maxwell molested were never notified of the non prosecution deal which would come back to bite Acosta in the ass. A few years later Acosta ends up as Secretary of Labor for the big Cheeto. What did Acosta know? You focus on the smoke screen though, that's exactly where the big Cheeto wants your attention.
President Trump and his DOJ didn't have access to this evidence last term, the Deep State hid it.
Democrats: "No one is above the law."
In the least, BHO and HRC's names are tarnished forever.
Democrats: "No one is above the law."
In the least, BHO and HRC's names are tarnished forever.
movielover said:
President Trump and his DOJ didn't have access to this evidence last term, the Deep State hid it.
Democrats: "No one is above the law."
In the least, BHO and HRC's names are tarnished forever.
He was the PRESIDENT who controlled both the House and the Senate, he had the AG, had Special Counsel Durham look into Russian interference, and had little Marco his current Secretary of Defense and National Security Advisor issue a bipartisan Senate Intel Report. You mean to tell me with all that and with all the hearings conducted, his own people hid information from him, lied to him and prevented him from accessing the information. Why would they do this to their fearless leader. I thought he only hired the best and the brightest. You also mean to tell me that the useful idiot they call Tulsi Gabbard is sharp enough to develop information that the other super geniuses in the administration couldn't. Nobody believes that, and I mean nobody. Obama's legacy will never be tarnished due to the fact that he saved this country and some of its most vital industries from economic collapse. Was he perfect no and I can live with that but at least nobody had to worry about him hurting the country, or using the U.S. Presidency for various money making schemes. As far has Hillary the Republicans have vilified the Clintons for 40 years and if not for Comey being an absolute jackass with his disclosures so close to the election, she would have been POTUS.
BearNIt said:tequila4kapp said:BearNIt said:movielover said:
DNI ecently released never-seen-before smoking gun evidence of HRC campaign's plan to smear President Trump, and the FBIs plan to amplify that smear. All supported by BHO.
Bull&@#$. You keep believing that while he puts up a smoke screen to prevent being asked about the fact that his name appears in the Epstein files multiple times.
Which part of the recent document release is bull*****
- Brennan briefing Obama, Comey, Clapper, Lynch that the Steele dossier was an HRC campaign ploy? (Briefing occurred before Crossfire Hurricane was opened)
- the part where the presidential daily briefing had the ICA concluding no Russia whatever with the election was suddenly canceled?
- the part where Obama ordered a new ICA and that it be delivered before inauguration
- the part where Brennan overruled case agents to insist the ICA conclude Russia interference even though it wasn't supported by evidence
- the part where a Brennan lackey threatened a case agent's career if he didn't get on board with the new ICA conclusion
- the part where we now know Comey knew the Steele dossier was HRC campaign material when he briefed Trump on the allegations without disclosing the part about HRC
The document release will end up meaning nothing, nobody will go to jail. The statute of limitations as well as immunity will take care of all that. If there was something there the big Cheeto would have done something about it in his first term.
Please use the exact same logic with Epstein while Biden was president. Thanks.
BearNIt said:movielover said:
President Trump and his DOJ didn't have access to this evidence last term, the Deep State hid it.
Democrats: "No one is above the law."
In the least, BHO and HRC's names are tarnished forever.
He was the PRESIDENT who controlled both the House and the Senate, he had the AG, had Special Counsel Durham look into Russian interference, and had little Marco his current Secretary of Defense and National Security Advisor issue a bipartisan Senate Intel Report. You mean to tell me with all that and with all the hearings conducted, his own people hid information from him, lied to him and prevented him from accessing the information. Why would they do this to their fearless leader. I thought he only hired the best and the brightest. You also mean to tell me that the useful idiot they call Tulsi Gabbard is sharp enough to developer information that the other super geniuses in the administration couldn't. Nobody believes that, and I mean nobody. Obama's legacy will never be tarnished due to the fact that he saved this country and some of its most vital industries from economic collapse. Was he perfect no and I can live with that but at least nobody had to worry about him hurting the country, using the U.S. Presidency for various money making schemes. As far has Hillary the Republicans have vilified the Clintons for 40 years and if not for Comey being an absolute jackass with his disclosures so close to the election, she would have been POTUS.
You're not understanding the logic here.
Trump cannot fail. He can only be failed.
oski003 said:BearNIt said:tequila4kapp said:BearNIt said:movielover said:
DNI ecently released never-seen-before smoking gun evidence of HRC campaign's plan to smear President Trump, and the FBIs plan to amplify that smear. All supported by BHO.
Bull&@#$. You keep believing that while he puts up a smoke screen to prevent being asked about the fact that his name appears in the Epstein files multiple times.
Which part of the recent document release is bull*****
- Brennan briefing Obama, Comey, Clapper, Lynch that the Steele dossier was an HRC campaign ploy? (Briefing occurred before Crossfire Hurricane was opened)
- the part where the presidential daily briefing had the ICA concluding no Russia whatever with the election was suddenly canceled?
- the part where Obama ordered a new ICA and that it be delivered before inauguration
- the part where Brennan overruled case agents to insist the ICA conclude Russia interference even though it wasn't supported by evidence
- the part where a Brennan lackey threatened a case agent's career if he didn't get on board with the new ICA conclusion
- the part where we now know Comey knew the Steele dossier was HRC campaign material when he briefed Trump on the allegations without disclosing the part about HRC
The document release will end up meaning nothing, nobody will go to jail. The statute of limitations as well as immunity will take care of all that. If there was something there the big Cheeto would have done something about it in his first term.
Please use the exact same logic with Epstein while Biden was president. Thanks.
I won't have to the MAGAsphere will take care of the big Cheeto for misrepresenting the facts. They have already given signs that they want the truth and when the reveal comes and the big Cheeto's name is seen as all over the file they will have their say while Republicans will be left trying to defend their Pedo President going into the midterms. That's why he is trying to get 5 more seats out of Texas. Voters understand winning and even playing hard, what they don't understand nor like is blatant cheating and that is what is taking place in Texas.
You can bring Biden into it but if memory serves me correct Biden was viewed by the MAGAsphere as a doddering old man incapable of forming a complete sentence. I'm amazed that after 7 months the big Cheeto still hasn't. taken responsibility for this country and continues to blame Biden, Obama, Hillary, and Bill, for his screw ups.
My last point is Republicans want answers on a host of issues including the Epstein file and have subpoenaed a host of individuals to testify before Congress, but why haven't they subpoenaed the guy whose name is all over the file per reports, why haven't they subpoenaed, the big Cheeto. Shouldn't he have a wealth of information regarding the girls who were taken from Mar Lago, if he knew Epstein and Maxwell were molesting young girls, if those young girls were at gatherings where he , Epstein, and Maxwell socialized? Wouldn't the big Cheeto be a logical witness?
oski003 said:BearNIt said:tequila4kapp said:BearNIt said:movielover said:
DNI ecently released never-seen-before smoking gun evidence of HRC campaign's plan to smear President Trump, and the FBIs plan to amplify that smear. All supported by BHO.
Bull&@#$. You keep believing that while he puts up a smoke screen to prevent being asked about the fact that his name appears in the Epstein files multiple times.
Which part of the recent document release is bull*****
- Brennan briefing Obama, Comey, Clapper, Lynch that the Steele dossier was an HRC campaign ploy? (Briefing occurred before Crossfire Hurricane was opened)
- the part where the presidential daily briefing had the ICA concluding no Russia whatever with the election was suddenly canceled?
- the part where Obama ordered a new ICA and that it be delivered before inauguration
- the part where Brennan overruled case agents to insist the ICA conclude Russia interference even though it wasn't supported by evidence
- the part where a Brennan lackey threatened a case agent's career if he didn't get on board with the new ICA conclusion
- the part where we now know Comey knew the Steele dossier was HRC campaign material when he briefed Trump on the allegations without disclosing the part about HRC
The document release will end up meaning nothing, nobody will go to jail. The statute of limitations as well as immunity will take care of all that. If there was something there the big Cheeto would have done something about it in his first term.
Please use the exact same logic with Epstein while Biden was president. Thanks.
Yikes, Senor Bootlicker with a pathetic response. Cheeto owns the Epstein mess, no getting around that (thx MAGA, lol)
UNITY OVER DIVISION
VOTE BLUE
Go Bears Forever
Featured Stories
See All
Wilcox Names Starting QB, Talks Developing Depth Chart
by Bear Insider
Cal Football To Host 2025 Fan Day
by Cal Athletics
So'oto, Brown and Griffin Post Practice Interviews
by Jim McGill