DNI's Gabbard identifies Obama IC crimes

18,909 Views | 413 Replies | Last: 12 hrs ago by movielover
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Journalist Matt Taibbi breaks down the Russiagate fraud against the backdrop of the most recent declassified revelations.

bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
James Clapper's team at the DIA was responsible for manufacturing the intelligence for the Iraq WMD lie that led to the Iraq War.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearNIt said:

oski003 said:

BearNIt said:

tequila4kapp said:

BearNIt said:

movielover said:

DNI ecently released never-seen-before smoking gun evidence of HRC campaign's plan to smear President Trump, and the FBIs plan to amplify that smear. All supported by BHO.

Bull&@#$. You keep believing that while he puts up a smoke screen to prevent being asked about the fact that his name appears in the Epstein files multiple times.

Which part of the recent document release is bull*****
- Brennan briefing Obama, Comey, Clapper, Lynch that the Steele dossier was an HRC campaign ploy? (Briefing occurred before Crossfire Hurricane was opened)
- the part where the presidential daily briefing had the ICA concluding no Russia whatever with the election was suddenly canceled?
- the part where Obama ordered a new ICA and that it be delivered before inauguration
- the part where Brennan overruled case agents to insist the ICA conclude Russia interference even though it wasn't supported by evidence
- the part where a Brennan lackey threatened a case agent's career if he didn't get on board with the new ICA conclusion
- the part where we now know Comey knew the Steele dossier was HRC campaign material when he briefed Trump on the allegations without disclosing the part about HRC

The document release will end up meaning nothing, nobody will go to jail. The statute of limitations as well as immunity will take care of all that. If there was something there the big Cheeto would have done something about it in his first term.



Please use the exact same logic with Epstein while Biden was president. Thanks.

I won't have to the MAGAsphere will take care of the big Cheeto for misrepresenting the facts. They have already given signs that they want the truth and when the reveal comes and the big Cheeto's name is seen as all over the file they will have their say while Republicans will be left trying to defend their Pedo President going into the midterms. That's why he is trying to get 5 more seats out of Texas. Voters understand winning and even playing hard, what they don't understand nor like is blatant cheating and that is what is taking place in Texas.

You can bring Biden into it but if memory serves me correct Biden was viewed by the MAGAsphere as a doddering old man incapable of forming a complete sentence. I'm amazed that after 7 months the big Cheeto still hasn't. taken responsibility for this country and continues to blame Biden, Obama, Hillary, and Bill, for his screw ups.

My last point is Republicans want answers on a host of issues including the Epstein file and have subpoenaed a host of individuals to testify before Congress, but why haven't they subpoenaed the guy whose name is all over the file per reports, why haven't they subpoenaed, the big Cheeto. Shouldn't he have a wealth of information regarding the girls who were taken from Mar Lago, if he knew Epstein and Maxwell were molesting young girls, if those young girls were at gatherings where he , Epstein, and Maxwell socialized? Wouldn't the big Cheeto be a logical witness?




Is it your contention that Biden's dementia, a trait seemingly shared by many BI liberals, prevented him from doing something to Trump regarding Epstein?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Long interview, two classy ladies.

BearNIt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

BearNIt said:

oski003 said:

BearNIt said:

tequila4kapp said:

BearNIt said:

movielover said:

DNI ecently released never-seen-before smoking gun evidence of HRC campaign's plan to smear President Trump, and the FBIs plan to amplify that smear. All supported by BHO.

Bull&@#$. You keep believing that while he puts up a smoke screen to prevent being asked about the fact that his name appears in the Epstein files multiple times.

Which part of the recent document release is bull*****
- Brennan briefing Obama, Comey, Clapper, Lynch that the Steele dossier was an HRC campaign ploy? (Briefing occurred before Crossfire Hurricane was opened)
- the part where the presidential daily briefing had the ICA concluding no Russia whatever with the election was suddenly canceled?
- the part where Obama ordered a new ICA and that it be delivered before inauguration
- the part where Brennan overruled case agents to insist the ICA conclude Russia interference even though it wasn't supported by evidence
- the part where a Brennan lackey threatened a case agent's career if he didn't get on board with the new ICA conclusion
- the part where we now know Comey knew the Steele dossier was HRC campaign material when he briefed Trump on the allegations without disclosing the part about HRC

The document release will end up meaning nothing, nobody will go to jail. The statute of limitations as well as immunity will take care of all that. If there was something there the big Cheeto would have done something about it in his first term.



Please use the exact same logic with Epstein while Biden was president. Thanks.

I won't have to the MAGAsphere will take care of the big Cheeto for misrepresenting the facts. They have already given signs that they want the truth and when the reveal comes and the big Cheeto's name is seen as all over the file they will have their say while Republicans will be left trying to defend their Pedo President going into the midterms. That's why he is trying to get 5 more seats out of Texas. Voters understand winning and even playing hard, what they don't understand nor like is blatant cheating and that is what is taking place in Texas.

You can bring Biden into it but if memory serves me correct Biden was viewed by the MAGAsphere as a doddering old man incapable of forming a complete sentence. I'm amazed that after 7 months the big Cheeto still hasn't. taken responsibility for this country and continues to blame Biden, Obama, Hillary, and Bill, for his screw ups.

My last point is Republicans want answers on a host of issues including the Epstein file and have subpoenaed a host of individuals to testify before Congress, but why haven't they subpoenaed the guy whose name is all over the file per reports, why haven't they subpoenaed, the big Cheeto. Shouldn't he have a wealth of information regarding the girls who were taken from Mar Lago, if he knew Epstein and Maxwell were molesting young girls, if those young girls were at gatherings where he , Epstein, and Maxwell socialized? Wouldn't the big Cheeto be a logical witness?




Is it your contention that Biden's dementia, a straight seemingly shared by many BI liberals, prevented him from doing something to Trump regarding Epstein?

It's my contention that Republicans can't have it both ways. He was either a POTUS and had all his faculties and was able to govern or he was a doddering old man that needed his hand held and was propped up by others. Please pick one and stick with it.
BearNIt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Long interview, two classy ladies.



Even the people of Hawaii think she is an idiot.
Now we find out that she overrode CIA fears to release the Russia report revealing sources and collection techniques. She is dangerous to this country as evidenced by her actions with the full blessing of the big Cheeto. Things are so bad that there is this meeting with the principles at JD Vance's house to figure out what to do.
oski003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearNIt said:

oski003 said:

BearNIt said:

oski003 said:

BearNIt said:

tequila4kapp said:

BearNIt said:

movielover said:

DNI ecently released never-seen-before smoking gun evidence of HRC campaign's plan to smear President Trump, and the FBIs plan to amplify that smear. All supported by BHO.

Bull&@#$. You keep believing that while he puts up a smoke screen to prevent being asked about the fact that his name appears in the Epstein files multiple times.

Which part of the recent document release is bull*****
- Brennan briefing Obama, Comey, Clapper, Lynch that the Steele dossier was an HRC campaign ploy? (Briefing occurred before Crossfire Hurricane was opened)
- the part where the presidential daily briefing had the ICA concluding no Russia whatever with the election was suddenly canceled?
- the part where Obama ordered a new ICA and that it be delivered before inauguration
- the part where Brennan overruled case agents to insist the ICA conclude Russia interference even though it wasn't supported by evidence
- the part where a Brennan lackey threatened a case agent's career if he didn't get on board with the new ICA conclusion
- the part where we now know Comey knew the Steele dossier was HRC campaign material when he briefed Trump on the allegations without disclosing the part about HRC

The document release will end up meaning nothing, nobody will go to jail. The statute of limitations as well as immunity will take care of all that. If there was something there the big Cheeto would have done something about it in his first term.



Please use the exact same logic with Epstein while Biden was president. Thanks.

I won't have to the MAGAsphere will take care of the big Cheeto for misrepresenting the facts. They have already given signs that they want the truth and when the reveal comes and the big Cheeto's name is seen as all over the file they will have their say while Republicans will be left trying to defend their Pedo President going into the midterms. That's why he is trying to get 5 more seats out of Texas. Voters understand winning and even playing hard, what they don't understand nor like is blatant cheating and that is what is taking place in Texas.

You can bring Biden into it but if memory serves me correct Biden was viewed by the MAGAsphere as a doddering old man incapable of forming a complete sentence. I'm amazed that after 7 months the big Cheeto still hasn't. taken responsibility for this country and continues to blame Biden, Obama, Hillary, and Bill, for his screw ups.

My last point is Republicans want answers on a host of issues including the Epstein file and have subpoenaed a host of individuals to testify before Congress, but why haven't they subpoenaed the guy whose name is all over the file per reports, why haven't they subpoenaed, the big Cheeto. Shouldn't he have a wealth of information regarding the girls who were taken from Mar Lago, if he knew Epstein and Maxwell were molesting young girls, if those young girls were at gatherings where he , Epstein, and Maxwell socialized? Wouldn't the big Cheeto be a logical witness?




Is it your contention that Biden's dementia, a straight seemingly shared by many BI liberals, prevented him from doing something to Trump regarding Epstein?

It's my contention that Republicans can't have it both ways. He was either a POTUS and had all his faculties and was able to govern or he was a doddering old man that needed his hand held and was propped up by others. Please pick one and stick with it.


He was a doddering old man that needed his hand held and was propped up by others. Those others certainly could have skewered Trump but were unable to do so because they didn't have the goods.
BearNIt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oski003 said:

BearNIt said:

oski003 said:

BearNIt said:

oski003 said:

BearNIt said:

tequila4kapp said:

BearNIt said:

movielover said:

DNI ecently released never-seen-before smoking gun evidence of HRC campaign's plan to smear President Trump, and the FBIs plan to amplify that smear. All supported by BHO.

Bull&@#$. You keep believing that while he puts up a smoke screen to prevent being asked about the fact that his name appears in the Epstein files multiple times.

Which part of the recent document release is bull*****
- Brennan briefing Obama, Comey, Clapper, Lynch that the Steele dossier was an HRC campaign ploy? (Briefing occurred before Crossfire Hurricane was opened)
- the part where the presidential daily briefing had the ICA concluding no Russia whatever with the election was suddenly canceled?
- the part where Obama ordered a new ICA and that it be delivered before inauguration
- the part where Brennan overruled case agents to insist the ICA conclude Russia interference even though it wasn't supported by evidence
- the part where a Brennan lackey threatened a case agent's career if he didn't get on board with the new ICA conclusion
- the part where we now know Comey knew the Steele dossier was HRC campaign material when he briefed Trump on the allegations without disclosing the part about HRC

The document release will end up meaning nothing, nobody will go to jail. The statute of limitations as well as immunity will take care of all that. If there was something there the big Cheeto would have done something about it in his first term.



Please use the exact same logic with Epstein while Biden was president. Thanks.

I won't have to the MAGAsphere will take care of the big Cheeto for misrepresenting the facts. They have already given signs that they want the truth and when the reveal comes and the big Cheeto's name is seen as all over the file they will have their say while Republicans will be left trying to defend their Pedo President going into the midterms. That's why he is trying to get 5 more seats out of Texas. Voters understand winning and even playing hard, what they don't understand nor like is blatant cheating and that is what is taking place in Texas.

You can bring Biden into it but if memory serves me correct Biden was viewed by the MAGAsphere as a doddering old man incapable of forming a complete sentence. I'm amazed that after 7 months the big Cheeto still hasn't. taken responsibility for this country and continues to blame Biden, Obama, Hillary, and Bill, for his screw ups.

My last point is Republicans want answers on a host of issues including the Epstein file and have subpoenaed a host of individuals to testify before Congress, but why haven't they subpoenaed the guy whose name is all over the file per reports, why haven't they subpoenaed, the big Cheeto. Shouldn't he have a wealth of information regarding the girls who were taken from Mar Lago, if he knew Epstein and Maxwell were molesting young girls, if those young girls were at gatherings where he , Epstein, and Maxwell socialized? Wouldn't the big Cheeto be a logical witness?




Is it your contention that Biden's dementia, a straight seemingly shared by many BI liberals, prevented him from doing something to Trump regarding Epstein?

It's my contention that Republicans can't have it both ways. He was either a POTUS and had all his faculties and was able to govern or he was a doddering old man that needed his hand held and was propped up by others. Please pick one and stick with it.


He was a doddering old man that needed his hand held and was propped up by others. Those others certainly could have skewered Trump but were unable to do so because they didn't have the goods.

The number one rule for serving at the pleasure of the President is you don't get out in front of the President. Unless Biden was going to issue comments regarding the Epstein files the information would stay where it was. Now the Head of the FBI, and others have been convened to come up with a war room strategy to deceive the American people because they lied. Hard to put the toothpaste back in the tube once it is out, you usually end up making a bigger mess, and that is what we are witnessing right now.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Tulsi has assets….so I don't care if she is an asset. If she starts something that results in innocent people going to prison, I'm willing to look past that.

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
BearNIt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:


Tulsi has assets….so I don't care if she is an asset.



BearNIt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearNIt said:

bearister said:


Tulsi has assets….so I don't care if she is an asset.





A good friend of mine that I grew up with is a former state senator for Hawaii and has a political radio show. He is less than impressed with Gabbard, and I am being nice.
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tulsi Gabbard's history with Russia is even more concerning than you think | The Independent
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/tulsi-gabbard-russian-connection-dni-trump-syria-b2692244.html
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
BearNIt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Tulsi Gabbard's history with Russia is even more concerning than you think | The Independent
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/tulsi-gabbard-russian-connection-dni-trump-syria-b2692244.html

That is why I refer to her as a useful idiot. She is incompetent, way over her head, and most importantly a danger to this country.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Let me guess - Progressive.

Interesting as she comes off polished, charming, circumspect, well spoken, and authentic in an extended interview.

In short interviews Kamala repeatedly comes off as rambling and often tipsy. HRC comes off angry and entiled.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearNIt said:

bearister said:

Tulsi Gabbard's history with Russia is even more concerning than you think | The Independent
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/tulsi-gabbard-russian-connection-dni-trump-syria-b2692244.html

That is why I refer to her as a useful idiot. She is incompetent, way overhead, and most importantly a danger to this country.


That was the HRC smear, which the Deep State is now using in their coordinated message.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bearister said:

Tulsi Gabbard's history with Russia is even more concerning than you think | The Independent
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/tulsi-gabbard-russian-connection-dni-trump-syria-b2692244.html


This is so rich. Writer Andrew Feinberg wrote for Liberal publications like The Hill and Politico, is anti Trump, and worked for Sputnik news agency in Moscow!
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And a Boxster keychain.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yup. He was also caught trying to contact Christopher Steele on the DL.

movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whoo!!

BearNIt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Let me guess - Progressive.

Interesting as she comes off polished, charming, circumspect, well spoken, and authentic in an extended interview.

In short interviews Kamala repeatedly comes off as rambling and often tipsy. HRC comes off angry and entiled.

Not Progressive, but left of center. Hate cheaters, liars, hate people who use religion to justify their hate, and people who use their so called power to deny others, their rights. Can't stand people who wrapped themselves in the flag claiming to be patriots while their actions say different ie Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, and Nazi's. Enjoy my 2nd amendment rights.
BearNIt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:



This shows you how dangerous she is to this country by the divulging of sources and collection methods. If we have allies that were involved they must be pissed and wondering should they ever share intelligence with this administration again which further puts this country at risk.
MinotStateBeav
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Getting SPICEY!


bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearNIt said:

movielover said:



This shows you how dangerous she is to this country by the divulging of sources and collection methods. If we have allies that were involved they must be pissed and wondering should they ever share intelligence with this administration again which further puts this country at risk.


AI Overview of why countries are reluctant to share intelligence with the Trump Administration:

"International relations, especially in areas like intelligence sharing, are built on trust and a shared understanding of common threats and strategic interests. Concerns arose amongst some of the United States' allies regarding former President Trump's approach to these issues, leading to hesitations about fully sharing sensitive intelligence.
Specifically, the following factors contributed to the perceived hesitancy:

Trump's alleged cavalier attitude towards classified information:
Reports suggest that Trump's handling of classified material in the past, including instances of sharing sensitive intelligence with unauthorized individuals or in unsecured locations, raised concerns about potential compromises of intelligence sources and methods.

Skepticism towards intelligence agencies and politicization of intelligence:
Trump's rhetoric and actions, including his distrust of intelligence leaders and claims of manipulated intelligence, potentially damaged trust within the intelligence community and among allies.

Transactional approach to foreign policy: Trump's inclination towards a transactional and sometimes isolationist approach to foreign policy left some allies unsure of the US commitment to long-standing alliances and agreements, potentially affecting their willingness to share intelligence freely.

Concerns about specific appointments to intelligence leadership roles: Appointments of individuals with limited intelligence experience or perceived partisan bias could raise doubts among allies about the impartiality and professionalism of intelligence operations under the Trump administration."


*Question: How long will it take the Trump Administration to get AI to comply with its narratives?
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
["International relations, especially in areas like intelligence sharing, are built on trust and a shared understanding of common threats and strategic interests.]

You mean like Alexander Downer, former Minister for Foreign Affairs of Australia, who helped falsely frame candidate Trump? And MI5 and bumbling lackey Christopher Steele?

How about honeypot 'Azra Turk' who set up George Papadopolous - CIA or Five Eyes?

[Concerns arose amongst some of the United States' allies regarding former President Trump's approach ...]

Like NATO allies paying their fair share?

[Trump's alleged cavalier attitude towards classified information]

They weren't worried about Crackhead Biden, or Biden Sr. storing documents in four locations, including his garage, when he was VP.

[Skepticism towards intelligence agencies and politicization of intelligence:]

You mean 51 crooked intell officials, or 17 politicized agencies?

[Trump's rhetoric and actions, including his distrust of intelligence leaders and [PROVEN]claims of manipulated intelligence,]

You mean illegal FISA warrants and hundreds of thousands of illegal NSA database searches by third party [Democrat] firms?

[Transactional approach to foreign policy]

Like reciprocal tariffs and MAGA?

[Concerns about specific appointments to intelligence leadership roles:]

Specifically DNI head Tulsi Gabbard, who just released proof of criminal conduct by Democrat IC leaders and former POTUZ targeting incoming PresidentTrump with fabricated intelligence?
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No, it doesn't mean any of that, and nothing you wrote changes the fact that countries are reluctant to share intelligence with the Trump Administration as opposed to past administrations.

You need to lobby your Republican leaders to insist that AI tow the line and respond with "alternate facts" consistent with the false narratives.
Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention

“I love Cal deeply. What are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rigged elections, newspapers, intell and media. We know the score.
BearNIt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Rigged elections, newspapers, intell and media. We know the score.

If you actually knew the score you would stop this conspiratorial bullshyte.
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I see from this thread the magats have successfully moved the discussion away from Epstein. What a bunch of lemmings.
bear2034
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

I see from this thread the magats have successfully moved the discussion away from Epstein. What a bunch of lemmings.

Epstein and Russiagate are two separate active threads tied together by Bill and Hillary Clinton.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FBI cans three senior problem employees.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rasmussen Poll: shocking 69% demand accountability

"In the wake of revelations about the so-called "RussiaGate" scandal, more than two-thirds of voters agree with Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard that there must be "accountability" for any crimes committed.

"The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 54% of Likely U.S. Voters believe it's likely that members of President Barack Obama's national security team committed crimes when they manipulated and manufactured intelligence to promote a false narrative about Russia and Donald Trump, including 37% who consider it Very Likely.

This, with the MSM mostly silent, though a few try to dampen the revelations from evidence.

https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/trump_administration_second_term/69_agree_russiagate_requires_accountability
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.