Massie stepping up a bit

25,977 Views | 369 Replies | Last: 2 days ago by movielover
wifeisafurd
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jeez the Gold curse strikes again.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wifeisafurd said:

Jeez the Gold curse strikes again.


Might be batting 1.000 there
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Anarchistbear said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

movielover said:

"You come at the king [President], you best not miss."

Democrats should also have stayed silent. The endorsements backfired.

The stupid egotism of this never ceases to amaze. The idea that an endorsement will demonstrate "principles " and "above politics" in a MAGA district. Same as Liz Cheney for Harris

Liz Cheney/ Thomas Massie for the Democratic nomination in 2028.

But for now, the cable TV news circuit.


Ironically enough, Liz Cheney is no different from Lindsay Graham or other former never Trumper neocons, she supports Operation AIPAC Fury and the Epstein coverup.

Massie might well run as an independent in 2028 and spoil whoever GOP tool the Fox Boomers and Miriam Adelson will back, 5% of the votes could do it.


He knows the democrats will fund and support his run


Establishment Democrats hate Massie almost as much as re1arded Fox Boomers and Trump cultists.

Come to think of it though, you might be onto something here, Ross Perot did help Clinton beat GHWB. It would be fun to see Massie do that to the Trump GOP candidate.


Good luck, Massie couldn't even carry his own district

He got 45% of that vote going against the Trump-AIPAC machine, he would be good for 5% in GA, OH, PA, WI, AZ etc. Probably a whole lot more than 5% with gas near $6 and mortgage rates near 8% in November...


He was a lot more popular with democrats and his twitter bots than he was with his actual constituents


There are no new elements in this argument, you just like going in circles and keep pressing the same half-baked points, pushing a square peg into a round hole, over and over.

That's why you were banned for a week. Most people here will notice that the board was not clogged with useless back and forth when you were in the can.

I'm going to avoid being dragged into your type of useless/endless nitpicking.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why are you so interested in Maddie, the Israel issue?

You've also connected Tommy Robinson to Israel, and drug use, but I've seen long form interviews with TR where he is as sharp as a tack. He speaks in many different forums, impromptu, and appears normal. Zelensky, in contrast, is sometimes a basket case. If some Israeli is happy that he is highlighting the Muslim Brotherhood and supports him, who cares?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Anarchistbear said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

movielover said:

"You come at the king [President], you best not miss."

Democrats should also have stayed silent. The endorsements backfired.

The stupid egotism of this never ceases to amaze. The idea that an endorsement will demonstrate "principles " and "above politics" in a MAGA district. Same as Liz Cheney for Harris

Liz Cheney/ Thomas Massie for the Democratic nomination in 2028.

But for now, the cable TV news circuit.


Ironically enough, Liz Cheney is no different from Lindsay Graham or other former never Trumper neocons, she supports Operation AIPAC Fury and the Epstein coverup.

Massie might well run as an independent in 2028 and spoil whoever GOP tool the Fox Boomers and Miriam Adelson will back, 5% of the votes could do it.

A Cheney/Massie ticket would be both interesting and confusing for Democrats.

Pro-Israe/anti-AIPAC, pro-establishment/pro-libertarian, anti-Trump, anti-MAGA
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Anarchistbear said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

movielover said:

"You come at the king [President], you best not miss."

Democrats should also have stayed silent. The endorsements backfired.

The stupid egotism of this never ceases to amaze. The idea that an endorsement will demonstrate "principles " and "above politics" in a MAGA district. Same as Liz Cheney for Harris

Liz Cheney/ Thomas Massie for the Democratic nomination in 2028.

But for now, the cable TV news circuit.


Ironically enough, Liz Cheney is no different from Lindsay Graham or other former never Trumper neocons, she supports Operation AIPAC Fury and the Epstein coverup.

Massie might well run as an independent in 2028 and spoil whoever GOP tool the Fox Boomers and Miriam Adelson will back, 5% of the votes could do it.


He knows the democrats will fund and support his run


Establishment Democrats hate Massie almost as much as re1arded Fox Boomers and Trump cultists.

Come to think of it though, you might be onto something here, Ross Perot did help Clinton beat GHWB. It would be fun to see Massie do that to the Trump GOP candidate.


Good luck, Massie couldn't even carry his own district

He got 45% of that vote going against the Trump-AIPAC machine, he would be good for 5% in GA, OH, PA, WI, AZ etc. Probably a whole lot more than 5% with gas near $6 and mortgage rates near 8% in November...


He was a lot more popular with democrats and his twitter bots than he was with his actual constituents


There are no new elements in this argument, you just like going in circles and keep pressing the same half-baked points, pushing a square peg into a round hole, over and over.

That's why you were banned for a week. Most people here will notice that the board was not clogged with useless back and forth when you were in the can.

I'm going to avoid being dragged into your type of useless/endless nitpicking.



The point I stated remains true. The rest of your post isn't worth responding to
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

Why are you so interested in Maddie, the Israel issue?


Why do you hate Massie, just because Trump told you to hate him?

The stuff about his girlfriend, or about "his not being himself" after his second marriage is straight up bull, and incredibly ironic considering Trump doesn't even come close to measuring up with Massie on that scale.


Quote:

You've also connected Tommy Robinson to Israel, and drug use, but I've seen long form interviews with TR where he is as sharp as a tack. He speaks in many different forums, impromptu, and appears normal. Zelensky, in contrast, is sometimes a basket case. If some Israeli is happy that he is highlighting the Muslim Brotherhood and supports him, who cares?

T Robinson is funded by zionists for the specific mission of making right wingers hate Muslims in order to generate sympathy for Israel and manufacture consent for wars against Israeli targets in the mideast. I've followed him early on in his career when he wasn't well known in the US, same as Hirsi Ali.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What's your issue w Ms. Ali?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

T Robinson is funded by zionists for the specific mission of making right wingers hate Muslims in order to generate sympathy for Israel and manufacture consent for wars against Israeli targets in the mideast. I've followed him early on in his career when he wasn't well known in the US, same as Hirsi Ali.

What evidence do you have to support this?
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

Cal88 said:

T Robinson is funded by zionists for the specific mission of making right wingers hate Muslims in order to generate sympathy for Israel and manufacture consent for wars against Israeli targets in the mideast. I've followed him early on in his career when he wasn't well known in the US, same as Hirsi Ali.

What evidence do you have to support this?


Even if he gets some funding from them, so? Industrial-scale r*pe, torture, and trafficking of British children is well documented, even with widespread coverups and collaboration by some police, Labour, and school officials. Estimates are between 300,000 and one million victims. Victims, not r*pes. Some children have had over 150 attackers.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
movielover said:

What's your issue w Ms. Ali?

Did you see the Dutch TV documentary on her real life story that I have posted earlier this month? That would be a good place to start.

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/134570/replies/2694087
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

Cal88 said:

T Robinson is funded by zionists for the specific mission of making right wingers hate Muslims in order to generate sympathy for Israel and manufacture consent for wars against Israeli targets in the mideast. I've followed him early on in his career when he wasn't well known in the US, same as Hirsi Ali.

What evidence do you have to support this?


I have posted plenty already, not sure if reposting is going to change your mind.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:



That he should
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:




I brought up this point before and Cal88 didn't like it, I don't remember what his argument against it was
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Massie = all hat, no cattle?

Worried about the Epstein treatment?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

I brought up this point before and Cal88 didn't like it, I don't remember what his argument against it was

Maybe Massie saw what Jamie Crockett did and is having second thoughts after she publicly accused the wrong person with the same name?
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Several names that he did mention, like Black and Wexner, ended up going unscathed.
Big C
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Anarchistbear said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

movielover said:

"You come at the king [President], you best not miss."

Democrats should also have stayed silent. The endorsements backfired.

The stupid egotism of this never ceases to amaze. The idea that an endorsement will demonstrate "principles " and "above politics" in a MAGA district. Same as Liz Cheney for Harris

Liz Cheney/ Thomas Massie for the Democratic nomination in 2028.

But for now, the cable TV news circuit.


Ironically enough, Liz Cheney is no different from Lindsay Graham or other former never Trumper neocons, she supports Operation AIPAC Fury and the Epstein coverup.

Massie might well run as an independent in 2028 and spoil whoever GOP tool the Fox Boomers and Miriam Adelson will back, 5% of the votes could do it.


He knows the democrats will fund and support his run


Establishment Democrats hate Massie almost as much as re1arded Fox Boomers and Trump cultists.

Come to think of it though, you might be onto something here, Ross Perot did help Clinton beat GHWB. It would be fun to see Massie do that to the Trump GOP candidate.


Good luck, Massie couldn't even carry his own district

Sorry to bring up Cal sports but this vaguely reminds me of when we lose out on 4-star recruits from the Bay Area.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

Several names that he did mention, like Black and Wexner, ended up going unscathed.

Both Black and Wexner are involved in multiple lawsuits.

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/126220/replies/2687992
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

Cal88 said:

Several names that he did mention, like Black and Wexner, ended up going unscathed.

Both Black and Wexner are involved in multiple lawsuits.

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/126220/replies/2687992

They should be in jail, prosecuted by the FBI.
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big C said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Anarchistbear said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

movielover said:

"You come at the king [President], you best not miss."

Democrats should also have stayed silent. The endorsements backfired.

The stupid egotism of this never ceases to amaze. The idea that an endorsement will demonstrate "principles " and "above politics" in a MAGA district. Same as Liz Cheney for Harris

Liz Cheney/ Thomas Massie for the Democratic nomination in 2028.

But for now, the cable TV news circuit.


Ironically enough, Liz Cheney is no different from Lindsay Graham or other former never Trumper neocons, she supports Operation AIPAC Fury and the Epstein coverup.

Massie might well run as an independent in 2028 and spoil whoever GOP tool the Fox Boomers and Miriam Adelson will back, 5% of the votes could do it.


He knows the democrats will fund and support his run


Establishment Democrats hate Massie almost as much as re1arded Fox Boomers and Trump cultists.

Come to think of it though, you might be onto something here, Ross Perot did help Clinton beat GHWB. It would be fun to see Massie do that to the Trump GOP candidate.


Good luck, Massie couldn't even carry his own district

Sorry to bring up Cal sports but this vaguely reminds me of when we lose out on 4-star recruits from the Bay Area.

The worst. Hopefully that's changing
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Cal88 said:

Several names that he did mention, like Black and Wexner, ended up going unscathed.

Both Black and Wexner are involved in multiple lawsuits.

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/126220/replies/2687992

They should be in jail, prosecuted by the FBI.

I wonder why the Biden FBI didn't investigate them, even the Obama FBI? Black and Wexner, although not Trump supporters, both donated to Republicans, primarily.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

BearlySane88 said:

Cal88 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Anarchistbear said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

movielover said:

"You come at the king [President], you best not miss."

Democrats should also have stayed silent. The endorsements backfired.

The stupid egotism of this never ceases to amaze. The idea that an endorsement will demonstrate "principles " and "above politics" in a MAGA district. Same as Liz Cheney for Harris

Liz Cheney/ Thomas Massie for the Democratic nomination in 2028.

But for now, the cable TV news circuit.


Ironically enough, Liz Cheney is no different from Lindsay Graham or other former never Trumper neocons, she supports Operation AIPAC Fury and the Epstein coverup.

Massie might well run as an independent in 2028 and spoil whoever GOP tool the Fox Boomers and Miriam Adelson will back, 5% of the votes could do it.


He knows the democrats will fund and support his run


Establishment Democrats hate Massie almost as much as re1arded Fox Boomers and Trump cultists.

Come to think of it though, you might be onto something here, Ross Perot did help Clinton beat GHWB. It would be fun to see Massie do that to the Trump GOP candidate.

Good luck, Massie couldn't even carry his own district

Massie carried California Democrats.
movielover
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How many Rand Paul's can the GOP produce?
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Massie's largest donor, Jeffrey Yass, is a Jewish billionaire investor who donates to pro-Israel causes.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

Massie's largest donor, Jeffrey Yass, is a Jewish billionaire investor who donates to pro-Israel causes.

Yass is also a libertarian who donates to libertarian causes and politicians, and his donation to Massie is a small fraction of Massie's total donation.

The astroturfed opponent received 90%+ of his money from 3 Israel first bigwig donors to punish Massie for two things mainly, being America first not Israel first, and pushing hard to expose Israel's role in the Epstein pedo honeytrap blackmail operation.
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Massie's opponent's donors tend to be wealthier while Massie's donors tend to be Muslim, Californian, and Democrat.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

Massie's opponent's donors tend to be wealthier while Massie's donors tend to be Muslim, Californian, and Democrat.

Massie's opponents donors don't "tend", there are 3 of them and all three are zionist oligarch making sure that any politician who dares oppose AIPAC and Trump's Israel First foreign policies gets crushed.

Are you deliberately lying about Massie's donors, or just very poorly informed.



PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Massie's opponent's donors tend to be wealthier while Massie's donors tend to be Muslim, Californian, and Democrat.

Massie's opponents donors don't "tend", there are 3 of them and all three are zionist oligarch making sure that any politician who dares oppose AIPAC and Trump's Israel First foreign policies gets crushed.

Are you deliberately lying about Massie's donors, or just very poorly informed.

The majority of Massie's campaign donations came from large individual contributions, primarily from out-of-state donors, with California as the top contributing state. The map with red dots doesn't show dollar amounts.
Cal88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PAC-10-BEAR said:

Cal88 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Massie's opponent's donors tend to be wealthier while Massie's donors tend to be Muslim, Californian, and Democrat.

Massie's opponents donors don't "tend", there are 3 of them and all three are zionist oligarch making sure that any politician who dares oppose AIPAC and Trump's Israel First foreign policies gets crushed.

Are you deliberately lying about Massie's donors, or just very poorly informed.

The majority of Massie's campaign donations came from large individual contributions, primarily from out-of-state donors, with California as the top contributing state. The map with red dots doesn't show dollar amounts.


Source, Sideboob Gina?
bearister
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Cal88 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Massie's opponent's donors tend to be wealthier while Massie's donors tend to be Muslim, Californian, and Democrat.

Massie's opponents donors don't "tend", there are 3 of them and all three are zionist oligarch making sure that any politician who dares oppose AIPAC and Trump's Israel First foreign policies gets crushed.

Are you deliberately lying about Massie's donors, or just very poorly informed.

The majority of Massie's campaign donations came from large individual contributions, primarily from out-of-state donors, with California as the top contributing state. The map with red dots doesn't show dollar amounts.


Source, Sideboob Gina?

That is a copyrighted term owned by the Daily Mail along with these companion terms:

Busty display
Under boob
Spilling
Ample assets
Busty cleavage
Flash the flesh
Flashing enviable curves
Jaw dropping
Eye popping curves

Cancel my subscription to the Resurrection
Send my credentials to the House of Detention
I got some friends inside

“I love Cal deeply, by the way, what are the directions to The Portal from Sproul Plaza?”
PAC-10-BEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cal88 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Cal88 said:

PAC-10-BEAR said:

Massie's opponent's donors tend to be wealthier while Massie's donors tend to be Muslim, Californian, and Democrat.

Massie's opponents donors don't "tend", there are 3 of them and all three are zionist oligarch making sure that any politician who dares oppose AIPAC and Trump's Israel First foreign policies gets crushed.

Are you deliberately lying about Massie's donors, or just very poorly informed.

The majority of Massie's campaign donations came from large individual contributions, primarily from out-of-state donors, with California as the top contributing state. The map with red dots doesn't show dollar amounts.


Source, Sideboob Gina?

https://www.opensecrets.org/profiles/thomas-massie/us_congress/summary?mpid=1091614

All your Israel/Gaza propaganda come from Hamas and Sideboob Gina.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.