Last week, the United States refused to participate in the UN’s review of the Global Compact on Migration.

The United States objects to the Global Compact on Migration and UN efforts to facilitate replacement migration to the United States and our Western allies.

— Department of State (@StateDept) May 11, 2026

I thought by the title this was going to be about the UFO files



What can I say I like the gif

bearister said:

---

---

So good

MinotStateBeav said:

---

Last week, the United States refused to participate in the UN’s review of the Global Compact on Migration.

The United States objects to the Global Compact on Migration and UN efforts to facilitate replacement migration to the United States and our Western allies.

— Department of State (@StateDept) May 11, 2026

---

Interesting post. 10 years ago this stuff was dismissed as racism and conspiracy. However, the things folks feared, whether or not it is morally right or wrong to resist forced massive cultural change or acceptance in the current population, ended up becoming true.

Europe and the USA have low birth rates. Third world countries have high birth rates with some foreign states purposely breeding with the goal of spreading their beliefs into European and US culture. Should we accept this?

I am sorry the folks responding continue to hijack threads with trolling and personal attacks. Thank you for having the courage to post an alternate viewpoint, even if they ridicule you for it.

oski003 said:

---

MinotStateBeav said:

---

Last week, the United States refused to participate in the UN’s review of the Global Compact on Migration.

The United States objects to the Global Compact on Migration and UN efforts to facilitate replacement migration to the United States and our Western allies.

— Department of State (@StateDept) May 11, 2026

---

Interesting post. 10 years ago this stuff was dismissed as racism and conspiracy. However, the things folks feared, whether or not it is morally right or wrong to resist forced massive cultural change or acceptance in the current population, ended up becoming true.

Europe and the USA have low birth rates. Third world countries have high birth rates with some foreign states purposely breeding with the goal of spreading their beliefs into European and US culture. Should we accept this?

I am sorry the folks responding continue to hijack threads with trolling and personal attacks. Thank you for having the courage to post an alternate viewpoint, even if they ridicule you for it.

---

"Third world countries have high birth rates with some foreign states purposely breeding with the goal of spreading their beliefs into European and US culture."

Where is that evidence re: the purpose? Seems to me like a racist dog whistle

CHOOSE KINDNESS

SBGold said:

---

oski003 said:

---

MinotStateBeav said:

---

Last week, the United States refused to participate in the UN’s review of the Global Compact on Migration.

The United States objects to the Global Compact on Migration and UN efforts to facilitate replacement migration to the United States and our Western allies.

— Department of State (@StateDept) May 11, 2026

---

Interesting post. 10 years ago this stuff was dismissed as racism and conspiracy. However, the things folks feared, whether or not it is morally right or wrong to resist forced massive cultural change or acceptance in the current population, ended up becoming true.

Europe and the USA have low birth rates. Third world countries have high birth rates with some foreign states purposely breeding with the goal of spreading their beliefs into European and US culture. Should we accept this?

I am sorry the folks responding continue to hijack threads with trolling and personal attacks. Thank you for having the courage to post an alternate viewpoint, even if they ridicule you for it.

---

"Third world countries have high birth rates with some foreign states purposely breeding with the goal of spreading their beliefs into European and US culture."

Where is that evidence re: the purpose? Seems to me like a racist dog whistle

CHOOSE KINDNESS

---

Chinese birth farms for starters. Might need to do your homework

oski003 said:

---

MinotStateBeav said:

---

Last week, the United States refused to participate in the UN’s review of the Global Compact on Migration.

The United States objects to the Global Compact on Migration and UN efforts to facilitate replacement migration to the United States and our Western allies.

— Department of State (@StateDept) May 11, 2026

---

Interesting post. 10 years ago this stuff was dismissed as racism and conspiracy. However, the things folks feared, whether or not it is morally right or wrong to resist forced massive cultural change or acceptance in the current population, ended up becoming true.

Europe and the USA have low birth rates. Third world countries have high birth rates with some foreign states purposely breeding with the goal of spreading their beliefs into European and US culture. Should we accept this?

I am sorry the folks responding continue to hijack threads with trolling and personal attacks. Thank you for having the courage to post an alternate viewpoint, even if they ridicule you for it.

---

Well said. No we shouldn't accept it, it's why birth right citizenship needs to be looked at.

It's some of the same few who call out others about post hijacking too.

SBGold said:

---

oski003 said:

---

MinotStateBeav said:

---

Last week, the United States refused to participate in the UN’s review of the Global Compact on Migration.

The United States objects to the Global Compact on Migration and UN efforts to facilitate replacement migration to the United States and our Western allies.

— Department of State (@StateDept) May 11, 2026

---

Interesting post. 10 years ago this stuff was dismissed as racism and conspiracy. However, the things folks feared, whether or not it is morally right or wrong to resist forced massive cultural change or acceptance in the current population, ended up becoming true.

Europe and the USA have low birth rates. Third world countries have high birth rates with some foreign states purposely breeding with the goal of spreading their beliefs into European and US culture. Should we accept this?

I am sorry the folks responding continue to hijack threads with trolling and personal attacks. Thank you for having the courage to post an alternate viewpoint, even if they ridicule you for it.

---

"Third world countries have high birth rates with some foreign states purposely breeding with the goal of spreading their beliefs into European and US culture."

Where is that evidence re: the purpose? Seems to me like a racist dog whistle

CHOOSE KINDNESS

---

That statement there is complete BS, straight out of the Tommy Robinson Trust Me Mate School of International Relations.

SBGold said:

---

oski003 said:

---

MinotStateBeav said:

---

Last week, the United States refused to participate in the UN’s review of the Global Compact on Migration.

The United States objects to the Global Compact on Migration and UN efforts to facilitate replacement migration to the United States and our Western allies.

— Department of State (@StateDept) May 11, 2026

---

Interesting post. 10 years ago this stuff was dismissed as racism and conspiracy. However, the things folks feared, whether or not it is morally right or wrong to resist forced massive cultural change or acceptance in the current population, ended up becoming true.

Europe and the USA have low birth rates. Third world countries have high birth rates with some foreign states purposely breeding with the goal of spreading their beliefs into European and US culture. Should we accept this?

I am sorry the folks responding continue to hijack threads with trolling and personal attacks. Thank you for having the courage to post an alternate viewpoint, even if they ridicule you for it.

---

"Third world countries have high birth rates with some foreign states purposely breeding with the goal of spreading their beliefs into European and US culture."

Where is that evidence re: the purpose? Seems to me like a racist dog whistle

CHOOSE KINDNESS

---

Speaking at a multi-faith event, NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani referenced Islamic teachings including the Hijrah, the Prophet Muhammad's migration from Mecca to Medina to frame migration as a shared moral responsibility. He called on government to protect and support those facing persecution, while announcing an executive order reinforcing the city's protections against abusive immigration enforcement for immigrants and other New York residents.

Yet, Muslim immigration to the West is not just about war.
It's not just about "seeking a better life." And it's definitely not some spontaneous act of cultural blending.
It's Hijrah. And it's commanded.
Hijrah is not just a word for "migration."
In Islam, it is a religious obligation to migrate to non-Muslim lands with the purpose of spreading Islam and establishing it as the dominant system.
This idea goes straight back to Muhammad himself, who fled Mecca to Medina in 622 AD, not to escape war, but to strategically build power.
That migration, known as the original Hijrah, marks the official beginning of the Islamic calendar, that's how central and celebrated it is in Islam.
From that moment on, Hijrah became a model for Islamic conquest:
Move into non-Muslim lands Form insular Muslim communities Build mosques and religious institutions Gain legal and political footholds Slowly implement Islamic norms and law (Sharia) Ultimately, replace host culture with Islamic supremacy
Don't take my word for it. Take Muhammad's:
"I have been commanded to fight the people until they say 'There is no god but Allah.'" Sahih al-Bukhari 385
This isn't just religious language. It's a battle plan.
The Quran itself praises those who leave their homes for the cause of Allah:
"Those who migrated for the cause of Allah after being wronged, We will surely settle them in this world in a good place." - Quran 16:41
"And whoever emigrates for the cause of Allah will find many locations and abundance." Quran 4:100
Muslim Brotherhood ideologue Yusuf al-Qaradawi was blunt about it:
"We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America, not through the sword, but through Da'wah (proselytizing) and Hijrah."

AI did the homework teach:

Baby Factories" and Child HarvestingTrue "farms" or "factories"where women are held against their will or coerced into pregnancy to sell infantsare a documented crime, particularly in parts of Africa.Locations: High incidences have been reported in Southern Nigeria, where facilities disguised as orphanages or maternity homes were raided.Purpose: These operations typically supply illegal adoptions or commercial surrogacy markets, rather than providing babies for migrants to facilitate border crossings.

Game Set Match

SBGold said:

---

AI did the homework teach:

Baby Factories" and Child HarvestingTrue "farms" or "factories"where women are held against their will or coerced into pregnancy to sell infantsare a documented crime, particularly in parts of Africa.Locations: High incidences have been reported in Southern Nigeria, where facilities disguised as orphanages or maternity homes were raided.Purpose: These operations typically supply illegal adoptions or commercial surrogacy markets, rather than providing babies for migrants to facilitate border crossings.

Game Set Match

---

You're not even looking in the right place but I'm glad you can use AI.

https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/chinese-national-pleads-guilty-running-birth-tourism-scheme-helped-aliens-give-birth

Conservative estimates suggest 20,000 to 26,000 "birth tourist" babies are born annually in the U.S., though some political figures claim the number of U.S. citizens currently living in China who were born this way could be as high as 1.5 million.

Wealthy Chinese couples frequently hire American women as surrogates. In these cases, the biological parents (using their own sperm and eggs) pay upwards of $70,000 to $100,000 to "rent a womb" in states like California where surrogacy laws are more favorable.

SBGold said:

---

Self restraint lasted about a day

---

Again, I'm going to refrain from the back and forth with you.

oski003 said:

---

SBGold said:

---

oski003 said:

---

MinotStateBeav said:

---

Last week, the United States refused to participate in the UN’s review of the Global Compact on Migration.

The United States objects to the Global Compact on Migration and UN efforts to facilitate replacement migration to the United States and our Western allies.

— Department of State (@StateDept) May 11, 2026

---

Interesting post. 10 years ago this stuff was dismissed as racism and conspiracy. However, the things folks feared, whether or not it is morally right or wrong to resist forced massive cultural change or acceptance in the current population, ended up becoming true.

Europe and the USA have low birth rates. Third world countries have high birth rates with some foreign states purposely breeding with the goal of spreading their beliefs into European and US culture. Should we accept this?

I am sorry the folks responding continue to hijack threads with trolling and personal attacks. Thank you for having the courage to post an alternate viewpoint, even if they ridicule you for it.

---

"Third world countries have high birth rates with some foreign states purposely breeding with the goal of spreading their beliefs into European and US culture."

Where is that evidence re: the purpose? Seems to me like a racist dog whistle

CHOOSE KINDNESS

---

Speaking at a multi-faith event, NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani referenced Islamic teachings including the Hijrah, the Prophet Muhammad's migration from Mecca to Medina to frame migration as a shared moral responsibility. He called on government to protect and support those facing persecution, while announcing an executive order reinforcing the city's protections against abusive immigration enforcement for immigrants and other New York residents.

Yet, Muslim immigration to the West is not just about war.
It's not just about "seeking a better life." And it's definitely not some spontaneous act of cultural blending.
It's Hijrah. And it's commanded.
Hijrah is not just a word for "migration."
In Islam, it is a religious obligation to migrate to non-Muslim lands with the purpose of spreading Islam and establishing it as the dominant system.
This idea goes straight back to Muhammad himself, who fled Mecca to Medina in 622 AD, not to escape war, but to strategically build power.
That migration, known as the original Hijrah, marks the official beginning of the Islamic calendar, that's how central and celebrated it is in Islam.
From that moment on, Hijrah became a model for Islamic conquest:
Move into non-Muslim lands Form insular Muslim communities Build mosques and religious institutions Gain legal and political footholds Slowly implement Islamic norms and law (Sharia) Ultimately, replace host culture with Islamic supremacy
Don't take my word for it. Take Muhammad's:
"I have been commanded to fight the people until they say 'There is no god but Allah.'" Sahih al-Bukhari 385
This isn't just religious language. It's a battle plan.
The Quran itself praises those who leave their homes for the cause of Allah:
"Those who migrated for the cause of Allah after being wronged, We will surely settle them in this world in a good place." - Quran 16:41
"And whoever emigrates for the cause of Allah will find many locations and abundance." Quran 4:100
Muslim Brotherhood ideologue Yusuf al-Qaradawi was blunt about it:
"We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America, not through the sword, but through Da'wah (proselytizing) and Hijrah."

---

Hirsi Ali is a total fraud, a liar and an opportunist.

The irony about her is that her whole schtick is about muslim immigration fraud while she herself is a muslim who has committed fraud to immigrate to Holland and then the US, lying about her background, and using a Somali immigrant and his funds for her green card in a marriage she never intended to follow through.

She has lied about her past, posing as a persecuted woman, got married with a US Somali for her green card who financed her move to the US and quickly dumped him, and was sponsored by right wing groups both here and in Holland, who delivered for her a mid 6 figure income for propagating fear porn about muslims to a gullible western audience.

Her story and background narrative were thoroughly debunked by a Dutch TV program equivalent to 60 Minutes, Zembla, produced by the Dutch public TV network (equivalent of PBS) :

SBGold said:

---

oski003 said:

---

MinotStateBeav said:

---

Last week, the United States refused to participate in the UN’s review of the Global Compact on Migration.

The United States objects to the Global Compact on Migration and UN efforts to facilitate replacement migration to the United States and our Western allies.

— Department of State (@StateDept) May 11, 2026

---

Interesting post. 10 years ago this stuff was dismissed as racism and conspiracy. However, the things folks feared, whether or not it is morally right or wrong to resist forced massive cultural change or acceptance in the current population, ended up becoming true.

Europe and the USA have low birth rates. Third world countries have high birth rates with some foreign states purposely breeding with the goal of spreading their beliefs into European and US culture. Should we accept this?

I am sorry the folks responding continue to hijack threads with trolling and personal attacks. Thank you for having the courage to post an alternate viewpoint, even if they ridicule you for it.

---

"Third world countries have high birth rates with some foreign states purposely breeding with the goal of spreading their beliefs into European and US culture."

Where is that evidence re: the purpose? Seems to me like a racist dog whistle

CHOOSE KINDNESS

---

There are times when I read the comments here and think that I am subscribing to the NY Post.

DiabloWags said:

---

SBGold said:

---

oski003 said:

---

MinotStateBeav said:

---

Last week, the United States refused to participate in the UN’s review of the Global Compact on Migration.

The United States objects to the Global Compact on Migration and UN efforts to facilitate replacement migration to the United States and our Western allies.

— Department of State (@StateDept) May 11, 2026

---

Interesting post. 10 years ago this stuff was dismissed as racism and conspiracy. However, the things folks feared, whether or not it is morally right or wrong to resist forced massive cultural change or acceptance in the current population, ended up becoming true.

Europe and the USA have low birth rates. Third world countries have high birth rates with some foreign states purposely breeding with the goal of spreading their beliefs into European and US culture. Should we accept this?

I am sorry the folks responding continue to hijack threads with trolling and personal attacks. Thank you for having the courage to post an alternate viewpoint, even if they ridicule you for it.

---

"Third world countries have high birth rates with some foreign states purposely breeding with the goal of spreading their beliefs into European and US culture."

Where is that evidence re: the purpose? Seems to me like a racist dog whistle

CHOOSE KINDNESS

---

There are times when I read the comments here and think that I am subscribing to the NY Post.

---

There are times when I read the comments here and think that I am subscribing to The New Yorker

UN agencies – working with the NGOs they fund – established a migration corridor through Central America and to the U.S. border.

As the American people suffered under an unprecedented wave of mass migration, the UN was on the ground pipelining migrants to our southern border.

— Department of State (@StateDept) May 11, 2026

As Europe endured sustained migratory pressure, UN officials staffed all ends of the Mediterranean migration route – from the coast of Libya to the shores of the Aegean to the islands of Greece.

Then UN agencies condemned frontline states who refused to open their borders.

— Department of State (@StateDept) May 11, 2026

After facilitating mass migration to the United States and Europe, UN agencies condemned the deportation of illegal immigrants.

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

UN agencies – working with the NGOs they fund – established a migration corridor through Central America and to the U.S. border.

As the American people suffered under an unprecedented wave of mass migration, the UN was on the ground pipelining migrants to our southern border.

— Department of State (@StateDept) May 11, 2026

As Europe endured sustained migratory pressure, UN officials staffed all ends of the Mediterranean migration route – from the coast of Libya to the shores of the Aegean to the islands of Greece.

Then UN agencies condemned frontline states who refused to open their borders.

— Department of State (@StateDept) May 11, 2026

After facilitating mass migration to the United States and Europe, UN agencies condemned the deportation of illegal immigrants.

---

From Trump's State Dept? Yeah, I believe all of that



Love the gif

SBGold said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

After facilitating mass migration to the United States and Europe, UN agencies condemned the deportation of illegal immigrants.

---

From Trump's State Dept? Yeah, I believe all of that

---

This one?https://t.co/L6cg0jnRkJ

— Snow Then (@stradainsalita) May 12, 2026

Feel free to read the entire document created in 2000 by the UN, entitled, "Replacement Migration: is it a solution to declining and ageing populations?".

The United States will not legitimize global compacts that enable mass migration into America or Western nations.

Under President Trump, the State Department will facilitate remigration – not replacement migration.

— Department of State (@StateDept) May 11, 2026

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

SBGold said:

---

PAC-10-BEAR said:

---

After facilitating mass migration to the United States and Europe, UN agencies condemned the deportation of illegal immigrants.

---

From Trump's State Dept? Yeah, I believe all of that

---

This one?https://t.co/L6cg0jnRkJ

— Snow Then (@stradainsalita) May 12, 2026

Feel free to read the entire document created in 2000 by the UN, entitled, "Replacement Migration: is it a solution to declining and ageing populations?".

---

I read it and focused on the U.S. actions and opinions, which are summarized here:

"In the very first days of the Administration, through a series of migration and protection focused executive orders, President Biden established the framework for the United States to recommit to work collaboratively with governments, civil society, international organizations, and other partners to support humane migration, address the root causes of irregular migration, collaboratively manage migration in the region, rebuild the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program and other legal pathways for protection and migration, restore faith in the U.S. immigration system, include and integrate new U.S. citizens into civic life, protect child migrants, and support family unity.

It is in this spirit that the United States is pleased to announce our endorsement of the vision contained in the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration (GCM or Compact.) We commit to working with other countries to enhance cooperation to manage migration in ways that are grounded in human rights, transparency, nondiscrimination, responsibility sharing, and State sovereignty. The GCM reaffirms the sovereign right of States to determine their national migration policy and their prerogative to govern migration within their jurisdiction, in conformity with international law, while also critically recognizing that international migration is an inherently transnational phenomenon that no State can or should address alone."


That was truly great work by the Biden administration and respected foreign sovereignty. I miss the days when we had intelligent work being done by our administration.

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN

Sorry, here's the UN document link:

https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/412547?ln=en&v=pdf