Off Topic
Sponsored by

The ECONOMY Part Deux

40,141 Views | 547 Replies | Last: 16 hrs ago by DiabloWags
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

I'll answer both your posts here. Thank you for providing a specific, substantial cut. That is more than I usually get from MAGA. Unfortunately it is inadequate. The entire defense budget is about $1 trillion and our annual deficit is about $2 trillion. If you cut defense in half (which is politically impossible) 75% of the problem still exists.

1. American's aren't taxed twice on their assets. They are taxed on income. An Estate Tax doesn't tax somebody twice as the previous holder is dead.



Perhaps I used the wrong word when I said assets.
They are first taxed on their income and then taxed again on their assets when they die.

I will simply say the following . . .

The fact of the matter is that the person who is dead is having his money taxed AGAIN by the Govt even though it is now technically part of an Estate.

I've made a lot of money in the last 15 years with two highly speculative and risky investments that no one was "backstopping" me on. I took that risk. Not the government.

Period.

I am paying my fair share of long-term capital gains taxes on (one) of those investments.
The other is still open and outstanding.

If I pass away tomorrow, two-thirds of my "wealth" would be subject to taxes under the proposals of people like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren to be redistributed.

Currently, anything under $15 million is exempt from a 40% federal tax.

Bernie Sanders wants to take us back to 2009.
Never mind that $3.5 million back then is roughly $5.5 million today.

I'm sure that there are a number of families here in the East Bay within a short dirve of the Cal campus that don't believe they are in the typical Sanders/Warren "wealth" category given that the home they live in happens to cost half of that $3.5 million.








Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And to think that Democrats wanted their own Joe Rogan when they could have just had Joe Rogan if it weren't for the fact that they can't tolerate even one iota of criticism of their party

But no, we can't tax people on their excessive wealth. That would be un-American.

Quote:

What if there's no more poverty? We could've already done that. But you would have to get all those rich people that are in charge of industry and running corporations and in government to agree to make the world a better place for everybody"



LOL at the guy at the end. "That ain't ever gonna happen."
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thought I would post something about the ECONOMY since this is the ECONOMY thread.

The Bond Market is the ultimate barometer.

Anyone want to pay nearly 7% for a 30 year mortgage?

dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

I'll answer both your posts here. Thank you for providing a specific, substantial cut. That is more than I usually get from MAGA. Unfortunately it is inadequate. The entire defense budget is about $1 trillion and our annual deficit is about $2 trillion. If you cut defense in half (which is politically impossible) 75% of the problem still exists.

1. American's aren't taxed twice on their assets. They are taxed on income. An Estate Tax doesn't tax somebody twice as the previous holder is dead.



Perhaps I used the wrong word when I said assets.
They are first taxed on their income and then taxed again on their assets when they die.

I will simply say the following . . .

The fact of the matter is that the person who is dead is having his money taxed AGAIN by the Govt even though it is now technically part of an Estate.

I've made a lot of money in the last 15 years with two highly speculative and risky investments that no one was "backstopping" me on. I took that risk. Not the government.

Period.

I am paying my fair share of long-term capital gains taxes on (one) of those investments.
The other is still open and outstanding.

If I pass away tomorrow, two-thirds of my "wealth" would be subject to taxes under the proposals of people like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren to be redistributed.

Currently, anything under $15 million is exempt from a 40% federal tax.

Bernie Sanders wants to take us back to 2009.
Never mind that $3.5 million back then is roughly $5.5 million today.

I'm sure that there are a number of families here in the East Bay within a short dirve of the Cal campus that don't believe they are in the typical Sanders/Warren "wealth" category given that the home they live in happens to cost half of that $3.5 million.











So if a married couple dies with $10M their heirs get about $8.5M. A single person's heirs get about $6.25M.

That seems ballpark good.
Censorship has always been a tool of the fascist
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

I'll answer both your posts here. Thank you for providing a specific, substantial cut. That is more than I usually get from MAGA. Unfortunately it is inadequate. The entire defense budget is about $1 trillion and our annual deficit is about $2 trillion. If you cut defense in half (which is politically impossible) 75% of the problem still exists.

1. American's aren't taxed twice on their assets. They are taxed on income. An Estate Tax doesn't tax somebody twice as the previous holder is dead.



Perhaps I used the wrong word when I said assets.
They are first taxed on their income and then taxed again on their assets when they die.

I will simply say the following . . .

The fact of the matter is that the person who is dead is having his money taxed AGAIN by the Govt even though it is now technically part of an Estate.

I've made a lot of money in the last 15 years with two highly speculative and risky investments that no one was "backstopping" me on. I took that risk. Not the government.

Period.

I am paying my fair share of long-term capital gains taxes on (one) of those investments.
The other is still open and outstanding.

If I pass away tomorrow, two-thirds of my "wealth" would be subject to taxes under the proposals of people like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren to be redistributed.

Currently, anything under $15 million is exempt from a 40% federal tax.

Bernie Sanders wants to take us back to 2009.
Never mind that $3.5 million back then is roughly $5.5 million today.

I'm sure that there are a number of families here in the East Bay within a short dirve of the Cal campus that don't believe they are in the typical Sanders/Warren "wealth" category given that the home they live in happens to cost half of that $3.5 million.











So if a married couple dies with $10M their heirs get about $8.5M. A single person's heirs get about $6.25M.

That seems ballpark good.


I'm not following your math.

dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

I'll answer both your posts here. Thank you for providing a specific, substantial cut. That is more than I usually get from MAGA. Unfortunately it is inadequate. The entire defense budget is about $1 trillion and our annual deficit is about $2 trillion. If you cut defense in half (which is politically impossible) 75% of the problem still exists.

1. American's aren't taxed twice on their assets. They are taxed on income. An Estate Tax doesn't tax somebody twice as the previous holder is dead.



Perhaps I used the wrong word when I said assets.
They are first taxed on their income and then taxed again on their assets when they die.

I will simply say the following . . .

The fact of the matter is that the person who is dead is having his money taxed AGAIN by the Govt even though it is now technically part of an Estate.

I've made a lot of money in the last 15 years with two highly speculative and risky investments that no one was "backstopping" me on. I took that risk. Not the government.

Period.

I am paying my fair share of long-term capital gains taxes on (one) of those investments.
The other is still open and outstanding.

If I pass away tomorrow, two-thirds of my "wealth" would be subject to taxes under the proposals of people like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren to be redistributed.

Currently, anything under $15 million is exempt from a 40% federal tax.

Bernie Sanders wants to take us back to 2009.
Never mind that $3.5 million back then is roughly $5.5 million today.

I'm sure that there are a number of families here in the East Bay within a short dirve of the Cal campus that don't believe they are in the typical Sanders/Warren "wealth" category given that the home they live in happens to cost half of that $3.5 million.











So if a married couple dies with $10M their heirs get about $8.5M. A single person's heirs get about $6.25M.

That seems ballpark good.


I'm not following your math.




The $3.5m you cite is for singles. Married couples is double to $7M. For the remaining $3M (of the total $10M estate) I estimated 50% tax = $1.5M tax and $8.5M inheritance.

For singles the remaining $6.5M I also estimated 50% tax = $3.25M tax and $6.75M inheritance.
Censorship has always been a tool of the fascist
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:


The $3.5m you cite is for singles. Married couples is double to $7M. For the remaining $3M (of the total $10M estate) I estimated 50% tax = $1.5M tax and $8.5M inheritance.

For singles the remaining $6.5M I also estimated 50% tax = $3.25M tax and $6.75M inheritance.


Why do you feel that the Govt is deserving of 33% of my wealth when I die?
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
10 YEAR TREASURY YIELD AS HIGH AS 4.814% THIS MORNING.

THIS IS HOW YOU MAGA!

GO TRUMP GO!

WE ARE CLEARLY THE HOTTEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD RIGHT NOW.

LMAO.

10-year U.S. Treasury yield hits highest level since November 2023
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:


The $3.5m you cite is for singles. Married couples is double to $7M. For the remaining $3M (of the total $10M estate) I estimated 50% tax = $1.5M tax and $8.5M inheritance.

For singles the remaining $6.5M I also estimated 50% tax = $3.25M tax and $6.75M inheritance.


Why do you feel that the Govt is deserving of 33% of my wealth when I die?


Because it's good for the country. $6.75M for your heirs is plenty.
Censorship has always been a tool of the fascist
smh
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:


The $3.5m you cite is for singles. Married couples is double to $7M. For the remaining $3M (of the total $10M estate) I estimated 50% tax = $1.5M tax and $8.5M inheritance.

For singles the remaining $6.5M I also estimated 50% tax = $3.25M tax and $6.75M inheritance.





thanks. alzheimers bear doesn't get stuff, alot, but given that us married folks hardly ever croak at the same time, won't the harsher Single inheritance rules apply practically all the time??
signed, in our 70s and haven't done inheritance planning, umm, quite yet.
# childless by choice # uh-oh, there's a hole in our donut
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dajo9 said:

DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:


The $3.5m you cite is for singles. Married couples is double to $7M. For the remaining $3M (of the total $10M estate) I estimated 50% tax = $1.5M tax and $8.5M inheritance.

For singles the remaining $6.5M I also estimated 50% tax = $3.25M tax and $6.75M inheritance.


Why do you feel that the Govt is deserving of 33% of my wealth when I die?


Because it's good for the country. $6.75M for your heirs is plenty.


You're assuming that the Govt will spend my money wisely.
That's not a good bet. In fact, it's a horrible bet.

I'd rather have the money directed to non-profits that I support.

Thanks.
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:


The $3.5m you cite is for singles. Married couples is double to $7M. For the remaining $3M (of the total $10M estate) I estimated 50% tax = $1.5M tax and $8.5M inheritance.

For singles the remaining $6.5M I also estimated 50% tax = $3.25M tax and $6.75M inheritance.


Why do you feel that the Govt is deserving of 33% of my wealth when I die?


Because it's good for the country. $6.75M for your heirs is plenty.


You're assuming that the Govt will spend my money wisely.
That's not a good bet. In fact, it's a horrible bet.

I'd rather have the money directed to non-profits that I support.

Thanks.

Like Porsche?
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:


The $3.5m you cite is for singles. Married couples is double to $7M. For the remaining $3M (of the total $10M estate) I estimated 50% tax = $1.5M tax and $8.5M inheritance.

For singles the remaining $6.5M I also estimated 50% tax = $3.25M tax and $6.75M inheritance.


Why do you feel that the Govt is deserving of 33% of my wealth when I die?


Because it's good for the country. $6.75M for your heirs is plenty.


You're assuming that the Govt will spend my money wisely.
That's not a good bet. In fact, it's a horrible bet.

I'd rather have the money directed to non-profits that I support.

Thanks.



As I've already said it's about redistribution for things like healthcare and senior care.
Censorship has always been a tool of the fascist
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
smh said:

dajo9 said:

DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:


The $3.5m you cite is for singles. Married couples is double to $7M. For the remaining $3M (of the total $10M estate) I estimated 50% tax = $1.5M tax and $8.5M inheritance.

For singles the remaining $6.5M I also estimated 50% tax = $3.25M tax and $6.75M inheritance.





thanks. alzheimers bear doesn't get stuff, alot, but given that us married folks hardly ever croak at the same time, won't the harsher Single inheritance rules apply practically all the time??
signed, in our 70s and haven't done inheritance planning, umm, quite yet.
# childless by choice # uh-oh, there's a hole in our donut


I think they use Trusts or something. Not sure the details.
Censorship has always been a tool of the fascist
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:

DiabloWags said:

Why do you feel that the Govt is deserving of 33% of my wealth when I die?

Because it's good for the country. $6.75M for your heirs is plenty.

You're assuming that the Govt will spend my money wisely.
That's not a good bet. In fact, it's a horrible bet.

I'd rather have the money directed to non-profits that I support.

Thanks.

Reality more like this:

DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
smh said:

dajo9 said:

DiabloWags said:

dajo9 said:


The $3.5m you cite is for singles. Married couples is double to $7M. For the remaining $3M (of the total $10M estate) I estimated 50% tax = $1.5M tax and $8.5M inheritance.

For singles the remaining $6.5M I also estimated 50% tax = $3.25M tax and $6.75M inheritance.





thanks. alzheimers bear doesn't get stuff, alot, but given that us married folks hardly ever croak at the same time, won't the harsher Single inheritance rules apply practically all the time??
signed, in our 70s and haven't done inheritance planning, umm, quite yet.
# childless by choice # uh-oh, there's a hole in our donut


You need to set up a family trust with either both you and your wife listed as the Trustees or one of you.

This way you can hand assets down to your kids and avoid probate.

In a family trust, once one of you passes away, everything that you own gets marked to a price.
Your home gets valued at comps in your neighborhood, your stocks and bonds, any asset that you own.
It all gets "priced" for the day of the death of one of the Trustees.

This, then becomes your new cost basis for all of your assets.
This is called a "step-up" in a family trust.

For example, if you have owned your home for 30 years that you bought for $200,000 and at the time of death comparable homes in your neighborhood are going for $1.5 million, then $1.5 million becomes your NEW COST BASIS.

In other words, if you were to sell it a week after one of the Trustees passes away for $1.5 million, you will pay no taxes.
Your tax liability is zero.

The current exemption is $15,000,000 for an individual. $30 million for a couple.

Anything under $15 million in your Trust is exempt from being taxed.
Anything above $15 million is taxed at 40%.

There are lots of "Trusts for Dummies" out there that you can read up on.

Amazon.com : trusts for dummies 2026






LudwigsFountain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I just discovered a new inflation hedge. In the past ten years inflation has been around 40% but first class stamps have gone up by 75%. So buy now and then sell at a slight discount in a few years.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I paid $4,200 for my burial plot.
It will be my last hedge.
DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Global bond markets getting SHREDDED.

Japan's 10 year yield touched 3% for the first time since 1996.

The UK's 30 year yield hit the highest level since 1998.

Bond yields in Germany and France hit their highest levels in more than a decade.

The U.S. 10 year yield hit 4.81% today.
The highest level since November 2023.

Trimp and Bessent are so out of touch with what's going on its SCARY.


DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is how you MAGA!



DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HOW ARE THOSE TRUMP TARIFFS WORKING OUT?


Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

This is how you MAGA!





By posting unavailable images?

DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They were available earlier this morning before a virus impacted the platform.

For your information, Bearinsider has been terribly "buggy" this week for anyone using a desktop.

Thank You for your interest.

 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.