Off Topic
Sponsored by

Are Democrats Out-of-Touch, Senile, Nuts or Something Worse?

15,997 Views | 236 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by BearlySane88
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

Aunburdened said:

This platform might win in blue states, but it's gonna be nip/tuck in purple states



You got #6 wrong dawg, we can fix

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN

The only thing Democrats support with more fervor than a person's capacity to decide which gender they want to be is the idea that the three letter agencies are doing good in the world.

Aun "unburdened by what has been" Bear is the OG legend
- DaddyLegend 9/6/2026
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

SBGold said:

Aunburdened said:

This platform might win in blue states, but it's gonna be nip/tuck in purple states



You got #6 wrong dawg, we can fix

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN

The only thing Democrats support with more fervor than a person's capacity to decide which gender they want to be is the idea that the three letter agencies are doing good in the world.



Hmm, that seems to be a sweeping, sensationalized sweep of the attitudes and the good work done by our proud Dems without any basis.

That's disgusting to me that you would do that. You get banned for a significant period of time and then come back with that pandering dreck for MAGAs?

Shameful display.

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

SBGold said:

Aunburdened said:

This platform might win in blue states, but it's gonna be nip/tuck in purple states



You got #6 wrong dawg, we can fix

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN

The only thing Democrats support with more fervor than a person's capacity to decide which gender they want to be is the idea that the three letter agencies are doing good in the world.




Keep it up big dog. Appreciate your takes on both sides, even when we don't agree.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Aunburdened said:

SBGold said:

Aunburdened said:

This platform might win in blue states, but it's gonna be nip/tuck in purple states



You got #6 wrong dawg, we can fix

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN

The only thing Democrats support with more fervor than a person's capacity to decide which gender they want to be is the idea that the three letter agencies are doing good in the world.




Keep it up big dog. Appreciate your takes on both sides, even when we don't agree.

You're welcome

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We keep getting told this never happens.

Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Democrats created an unnecessary language trap for themselves



Quote:

This has been a long-running problem for the Democrats. During the 2020 Democratic primaries, Elizabeth Warren a white septuagenarian woman from New England referred to Hispanic Americans as "Latinx" to avoid the masculine "Latino" during the first Democratic debate. Her campaign adopted the term formally as well. Surveys ultimately found Hispanics rejected "Latinx," with some even describing it as an offensive form of "linguistic imperialism".

By 2021, arch strategist James Carville was leading the charge against the Democrats' "faculty lounge politics". "You ever get the sense that people in faculty lounges in fancy colleges use a different language than ordinary people?" he asked Vox. "They come up with a word like 'Latinx' that no one else uses. Or they use a phrase like 'communities of color.' I don't know anyone who speaks like that." Interestingly, though, Carville framed his criticism by arguing, "There's nothing inherently wrong with these phrases. But this is not how people talk. This is not how voters talk."

Aun "unburdened by what has been" Bear is the OG legend
- DaddyLegend 9/6/2026
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Once you view the Democrats through this lens, all of their actions and rhetoric make sense.

Aun "unburdened by what has been" Bear is the OG legend
- DaddyLegend 9/6/2026
DaddyLegend
How long do you want to ignore this user?
After 10 years of Trump, the best Democrats will come up with is AOC and Newsom.
Go Bears Forever - Heisman Mendoza
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DaddyLegend said:

After 10 years of Trump, the best Democrats will come up with is AOC and Newsom.

There's more on the bench than that Tenner. Welcome back

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN
"I Abide by Old and New Rules, and I Never Personally Attack. Gambling is illegal at Bushwood, sir, and I never slice."
ChudBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

DaddyLegend said:

After 10 years of Trump, the best Democrats will come up with is AOC and Newsom.

There's more on the bench than that Tenner. Welcome back

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN

Who is on the bench?

You seem set on Newsom. You've presumably spent years complaining about how slimy Trump is and you choose the most slime covered Democrat to endorse?
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TrumpBear said:

SBGold said:

DaddyLegend said:

After 10 years of Trump, the best Democrats will come up with is AOC and Newsom.

There's more on the bench than that Tenner. Welcome back

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN

Who is on the bench?

You seem set on Newsom. You've presumably spent years complaining about how slimy Trump is and you choose the most slime covered Democrat to endorse?

Stay tuned Tenner
"I Abide by Old and New Rules, and I Never Personally Attack. Gambling is illegal at Bushwood, sir, and I never slice."
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who does the left decide to back in this?

SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Who does the left decide to back in this?



None of them. Easy call

Won't be sucked in to some nonsensical straw man.

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN
"I Abide by Old and New Rules, and I Never Personally Attack. Gambling is illegal at Bushwood, sir, and I never slice."
DaddyLegend
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Democrats supporting religious fundamentalists.

Muslims supporting new feminism and LGBTQ+++.

Can we all just get along?
Go Bears Forever - Heisman Mendoza
DaddyLegend
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Curious, does Gavin Newsom hate Israel really bad? Like, Hasan Piker bad?
Go Bears Forever - Heisman Mendoza
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You curious or just trolling dawg?
"I Abide by Old and New Rules, and I Never Personally Attack. Gambling is illegal at Bushwood, sir, and I never slice."
dajo9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

You curious or just trolling dawg?


Trolling. He doesn't care. He'll attack either way.
Censorship has always been a tool of the fascist
cbbass1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

Who does the left decide to back in this?



Anyone with a sense of humanity, "Right" or "Left", can see that the "Democratic" Party needs to drop Hakeem Jeffries and other pro-genocide Members of Congress like a hot rock.

Jeffries (a.k.a. "AIPAC Shakur") isn't representing his constituents at all. He's representing the interests of Israel (which is a foreign nation, lest we forget) -- and he's paid very well to do so.

So the [not-yet-killed] Palestinian journalist's critique of Rep Hakeem Jeffries is valid & warranted, despite her mistake in using the 'monkey' word.

Charlamagne tha God, a radio host and political commentator, referred to Hakeem Jeffries as "AIPAC Shakur."

Reason for the Nickname
  • Ties to Pro-Israel Groups: The nickname emphasizes Jeffries's close connections to pro-Israel lobbying organizations, particularly AIPAC.
  • Lack of Distinct Voice: Charlamagne suggested that Jeffries lacks a strong, independent political stance, implying he is heavily influenced by these organizations.
This nickname reflects Charlamagne's critique of Jeffries's political effectiveness and messaging.

Jeffries receives enough $$$ from AIPAC & other pro-Israel groups that he should be required to register as an Israeli foreign agent.

https://www.trackaipac.com/states/newyork?rq=Hakeem%20Jeffries



It's extremely important to keep things in perspective here. There is no divide among Democratic Voters, nor "The Left", on Israel's genocide in Gaza. A clear supermajority of Democratic Voters DO NOT support Israel's genocide, and when you include liberal / Left-leaning independents (many of whom left the "Democratic" Party because of their support for Israel & genocide), opposition to Israel's war crimes runs closer to 90%.

The Divide is between "Left" / "Democratic" VOTERS and their elected leaders -- who DO support Israel's genocide -- and are very well paid to do so.

https://theintercept.com/2026/06/04/democrats-israel-voters/

DiabloWags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IMO, Rula Jebreal wouldn't be wrong about Jeffries.

Anarchistbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She should have called him a trained chimp instead of a monkey, shows proper sensitivity
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Are the Dems nuts?

Nah man, seem to be doing just fine:

https://www.thedailybeast.com/donald-trumps-big-moment-hit-by-embarrassing-google-results/?via=newsletter&source=DDMorning&user_emailA=29130012af40393c4ef977aeca11781a&user_emailB=93967a408671cb74a3d8c590d633fc48cad9f915da8bdc017cd009940eb9bafa&lctg=680d7a129c9e0798ae060651&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=260905-AMDigest&utm_term=F%20List%20Daily%20Beast%20Newsletter%20AM

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN
"I Abide by Old and New Rules, and I Never Personally Attack. Gambling is illegal at Bushwood, sir, and I never slice."
DaddyLegend
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

Quote:

Curious, does Gavin Newsom hate Israel really bad? Like, Hasan Piker bad?

You curious or just trolling dawg?

You mean no one on the left has challenged Newsom about this?
Go Bears Forever - Heisman Mendoza
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DaddyLegend said:

SBGold said:

Quote:

Curious, does Gavin Newsom hate Israel really bad? Like, Hasan Piker bad?

You curious or just trolling dawg?

You mean no one on the left has challenged Newsom about this?

Google is probably your friend on that one, hope your weekend is good
"I Abide by Old and New Rules, and I Never Personally Attack. Gambling is illegal at Bushwood, sir, and I never slice."
cbbass1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DiabloWags said:

IMO, Rula Jebreal wouldn't be wrong about Jeffries.




Agreed!

And yes, the "Democratic" Party leaders are most definitely out-of-step with Democratic Voters!

Here's the original interview: When Will America Finally Quit Israel & AIPAC? | Rula Jebreal

She's correct on everything else, too.

Aside from her use of the word "monkey" -- which the host confronted, and for which Jebreal apologized and explained -- she's 100% correct on all counts.

What's troubling is the number of Israel-funded black influencers who are jumping on Jebreal to condemn her as a "racist". They're claiming that she called Jeffries a "boy" as evidence of her "racism".

But she clearly referred to Jeffries as an "errand boy" for AIPAC and Israel -- which he absolutely IS. She NEVER used the term "boy" -- which could be considered racist IF it was used alone, without being preceded by "errand".


Case in point: Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner called Hakeem Jeffries, asking for a meeting. Jeffries lied about their meeting, saying that it was about "affordability". It wasn't. It was all about Kushner (& Trump & Netanyahu) making sure that even if the Dems win & control the House & Senate, the U.S. Congress will STILL be controlled by Israel.

After the meeting, the House Dems leaders appointed 3 hard-core pro-Israel / pro-genocide / pro-war hawks to prominent roles on House foreign policy committees:
  • Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) was appointed to join the House Foreign Affairs Committee (HFAC);
  • Wesley Bell (D-MO) was also appointed to join HFAC;
  • Jared Moscowitz (D-FL) was appointed as the new ranking member of the Middle East & N Africa subcommittee.
Quote:

The HFAC's ranking member and likely next chair Greg Meeks (D-NY) similarly a hardline supporter of Israel and of autocratic U.S. allies unsurprisingly praised the new likeminded appointees and expressed positivity about how they will soon "guide the committee as it addresses urgent challenges in national security and diplomacy."

Moskowitz's appointment in particular should be of concern to supporters of human rights and international law: It puts him in the position to chair the subcommittee in the likely event that Democrats gain a majority in the House of Representatives after the November elections.

-- Stephen Zunes, Truthout

These moves put the House Democrats solidly in support of the Trump / GOP foreign policy, and their disastrous & unpopular Iran War.


For anyone who disagrees with Rula Jebreal's assessment of Hakeem Jeffries as an errand boy for Israel & AIPAC, please share with us some evidence. Provide evidence of the times when Jeffries made a principled stand AGAINST AIPAC, or Israel, or any major "Democratic" Party Donor.

I'll wait...


As I've said countless times before -- "Democratic" Party leaders would rather lose to Trump than WIN with Progressive / independent / non-corrupt / anti-genocide candidates.

So much for "Vote Blue no matter who."

cbbass1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DaddyLegend said:

SBGold said:

Quote:

Curious, does Gavin Newsom hate Israel really bad? Like, Hasan Piker bad?

You curious or just trolling dawg?

You mean no one on the left has challenged Newsom about this?

First, Hasan Piker -- the Zionists' favorite whipping boy -- doesn't hate Israel. He hates Israel's apartheid, genocide, and ethnic cleansing in Gaza, the West Bank, and now S Lebanon. There's a difference.

And 80% of Democratic Voters agree with him.


When Gavin Newsom was being interviewed by Van Lathan, Lathan said "I will not vote for a candidate that takes $1 from AIPAC."

Newsom then panicked, and bobbed & weaved.

The AIPAC question that broke the brain of Gavin Newsom

Newsom fumbles AIPAC question - video

Fast-fwd to March 3, 2026 (obviously "reading the room" of Democratic Voters):
Newsom Compares Israel to 'Apartheid State', Questions Military Support

...then to March 24, 2026 (after being threatened by The Israel Lobby):
Newsom says he regrets likening Israel to an 'apartheid state'

So...

Newsom, unlike Joe Biden, refused to identify as a Zionist -- which seems very reasonable to me. I mean, IF you are, or want to be, President OF THE UNITED STATES, why would you declare yourself to be a nationalist for a nation other than your own???

Gavin is waffling. Count on AIPAC and the Epstein Class to come up with some critical information that would destroy his political career if released. Then Gavin will be Israel's Biggest FanBoi.
cbbass1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlySane88 said:

We keep getting told this never happens.




What was the actual alleged fraud?

What evidence has been gathered to support the charges?

What evidence was provided to the judge to support Probable Cause for any search warrants?


IF this is another case of paying street people to sign petitions, or to register to vote, I hope that justice is served.

IF the accusation is actual Election Fraud, I strongly suspect that there is none, and that the accusation is false.

Please remember that Voting While Ineligible (non-citizen) is a FELONY, punishable by a fine of up to $50,000 per count, and up to 5 years in prison.

Nationwide, with hundreds of millions of potential votes each year, only a handful are stupid enough to try this. And illegal voting has never had an influence on any election in the U.S.


After reading the article, I have to add that Paul Sperry, the article's author, is far more bothered by the occasional Hamas celebration of the death of IDF soldiers than he is by the thousands of celebrations of Palestinian civilian deaths posted on social media by IDF soldiers.

He's also bought the Israeli hasbara (propaganda) regarding the October 7th attack.

The article has a photo with the following caption: "Muslims led campus protests many considered antisemitic during Israel's war with Hamas."

While it's true that "Muslims led campus protests many considered antisemitic...", most reasonable people saw that these were protests against Israel's genocide.

Being against genocide is the norm for humans. It's NOT "anti-Semitic".


Obvious shill. Easy to dismiss.
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cbbass1 said:

BearlySane88 said:

We keep getting told this never happens.




What was the actual alleged fraud?

What evidence has been gathered to support the charges?

What evidence was provided to the judge to support Probable Cause for any search warrants?


IF this is another case of paying street people to sign petitions, or to register to vote, I hope that justice is served.

IF the accusation is actual Election Fraud, I strongly suspect that there is none, and that the accusation is false.

Please remember that Voting While Ineligible (non-citizen) is a FELONY, punishable by a fine of up to $50,000 per count, and up to 5 years in prison.

Nationwide, with hundreds of millions of potential votes each year, only a handful are stupid enough to try this. And illegal voting has never had an influence on any election in the U.S.


After reading the article, I have to add that Paul Sperry, the article's author, is far more bothered by the occasional Hamas celebration of the death of IDF soldiers than he is by the thousands of celebrations of Palestinian civilian deaths posted on social media by IDF soldiers.

He's also bought the Israeli hasbara (propaganda) regarding the October 7th attack.

The article has a photo with the following caption: "Muslims led campus protests many considered antisemitic during Israel's war with Hamas."

While it's true that "Muslims led campus protests many considered antisemitic...", most reasonable people saw that these were protests against Israel's genocide.

Being against genocide is the norm for humans. It's NOT "anti-Semitic".


Obvious shill. Easy to dismiss.


Exactly, to the scrap heap with shills.

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN
ChudBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"He's also bought the Israeli hasbara (propaganda) regarding the October 7th attack."

Please tell us more about how you are defending the October 7th attack
Katow-Jo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I love katow
"I Abide by Old and New Rules, and I Never Personally Attack. Gambling is illegal at Bushwood, sir, and I never slice."
Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Democrat women blaming men for their own problems?

Aun "unburdened by what has been" Bear is the OG legend
- DaddyLegend 9/6/2026
SBGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aunburdened said:

Democrat women blaming men for their own problems?



Interesting. Are conservative women more subservient?

No idea

VOTE BLUE AND VOTE GAVIN
"I Abide by Old and New Rules, and I Never Personally Attack. Gambling is illegal at Bushwood, sir, and I never slice."
BearlySane88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's not happening, it only happens a little, yeah it's happening butโ€ฆ

Aunburdened
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Always remember that this is the healthcare system that the Democrats consider the crowning achievement of both Obama's presidency and Mama Bear's speakership.

This was the best they could do for their voters.

Aun "unburdened by what has been" Bear is the OG legend
- DaddyLegend 9/6/2026
Eastern Oregon Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SBGold said:

I love katow
What ever happened to katow kaelin anyway?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.