Official Trump / Vance Administration Thread #2

3,346 Views | 85 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by cal83dls79
dajo9
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 6:29a, 7/17/26
PAC-10-BEAR said:



I believe this is a violation of rule 2
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/135285/replies/2715288
Reply Quote
7
1 edit
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dajo9 • 6:32a, 7/17/26
dajo9 said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:

I believe this is a violation of rule 2
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/135285/replies/2715288

The Democrats violated rule 1, if you're going to cheat, don't get caught.
Reply Quote
7
cal83dls79
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 6:42a, 7/17/26
PAC-10-BEAR said:
dajo9 said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:

I believe this is a violation of rule 2
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/135285/replies/2715288

The Democrats violated rule 1, if you're going to cheat, don't get caught.
yeah, like the teleprompter guy.
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
Reply Quote
4
cal83dls79
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 6:52a, 7/17/26
PAC-10-BEAR said:
thanks for speaking for Pollly Market. I forget, who exactly is she?
Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
Reply Quote
5
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:34a, 7/17/26
Imagine if China had a lobby that paid Trump a quarter billion dollars...

Reply Quote
4
Cal88
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 8:28a, 7/17/26
Soros hates China just as much as you do.

The billionaire philanthropist George Soros has used his annual speech at the World Economic Forum, in Davos, to launch a scathing attack on China and its president Xi Jinping.
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-46996116

Miriam Adelson is Israeli, has served in the IDF, both her and her late husband expressed that their loyalty to Israel comes first.
Reply Quote
2
2 edits
ProBonoBear415
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dajo9 • 8:49a, 7/17/26
dajo9 said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:



I believe this is a violation of rule 2
https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/135285/replies/2715288


You are correct.

(2) Any post that is simply a cut and paste of a social media or URL post without commentary is disallowed with the same moderation/banning policy as above.
Reply Quote
6
2 edits
ProBonoBear415
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 8:50a, 7/17/26
PAC-10-BEAR said:



This is also a violation of the forum rules.
Twice now on the same page

(2) Any post that is simply a cut and paste of a social media or URL post without commentary is disallowed with the same moderation/banning policy as above.
Reply Quote
6
6 edits
GrinandBearit
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to ProBonoBear415 • 8:52a, 7/17/26
ProBonoBear415 said:


This is also a violation of the forum rules.

"It's not your job to "police" threads.
The forum has mods for this."

DiabloWags 7/16/26
Reply Quote
7
Muckieeye
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to GrinandBearit • 9:06a, 7/17/26
Yeah! What Grinandghostridethebearlybro said!
Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives...
I never meant to say that the Conservatives are generally stupid. I meant to say that stupid people are generally Conservative.
-John Stewart Mill
Reply Quote
5
GrinandBearit
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Muckieeye • 9:11a, 7/17/26
Muckieeye said:
Yeah! What Grinandghostridethebearlybro said!

You already posted something almost identical to this today and it was removed.
Reply Quote
3
Big C
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:22a, 7/17/26

I forgot what's exactly codified in the new set of rules (and I don't feel like reading them again), but I can tell you that one thing the mods really got sick of (I think) is posters calling other posters out for minor rules infractions and basically non-stop-whining about others in this "community" (such as it is).

It's really tedious, especially when it goes back and forth for several posts. Maybe we try and just share our thoughts on a topic?
Reply Quote
5
1 edit
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Cal88 • 9:31a, 7/17/26
Cal88 said:
Imagine if China had a lobby that paid Trump a quarter billion dollars...


Is that Roger Staubach in the background?
Reply Quote
3
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Big C • 9:34a, 7/17/26
Big C said:

I forgot what's exactly codified in the new set of rules (and I don't feel like reading them again), but I can tell you that one thing the mods really got sick of (I think) is posters calling other posters out for minor rules infractions and basically non-stop-whining about others in this "community" (such as it is).

It's really tedious, especially when it goes back and forth for several posts. Maybe we try and just share our thoughts on a topic?

Fair point, but I don't think what Ten is doing is minor when it is one of the more clear rules.

I don't usually do this, but Bono is right to note that:


"(2) Any post that is simply a cut and paste of a social media or URL post without commentary is disallowed with the same moderation/banning policy as above."

95% of 10's post historically are disallowed under this User Agreement provision. It's not minor and is done repeatedly.

VOTE BLUE AND FREE WAGS
Reply Quote
7
Big C
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SBGold • 12:48p, 7/17/26
SBGold said:
Big C said:

I forgot what's exactly codified in the new set of rules (and I don't feel like reading them again), but I can tell you that one thing the mods really got sick of (I think) is posters calling other posters out for minor rules infractions and basically non-stop-whining about others in this "community" (such as it is).

It's really tedious, especially when it goes back and forth for several posts. Maybe we try and just share our thoughts on a topic?

Fair point, but I don't think what Ten is doing is minor when it is one of the more clear rules.

I don't usually do this, but Bono is right to note that:


"(2) Any post that is simply a cut and paste of a social media or URL post without commentary is disallowed with the same moderation/banning policy as above."

95% of 10's post historically are disallowed under this User Agreement provision. It's not minor and is done repeatedly.

VOTE BLUE AND FREE WAGS

I get it, especially since the don't-post-just-a-link suggestion was mine (maybe others suggested this, as well).

Still, while I acknowledge that "if you see something, say something" is de rigueur these days, maybe, in a lot of cases, it might help threads flow better if we just let the mods do their job.

Our role can be to lead by example and model the rules. JMO
Reply Quote
4
1 edit
Eastern Oregon Bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Big C • 2:57p, 7/17/26
Big C said:
SBGold said:
Big C said:

I forgot what's exactly codified in the new set of rules (and I don't feel like reading them again), but I can tell you that one thing the mods really got sick of (I think) is posters calling other posters out for minor rules infractions and basically non-stop-whining about others in this "community" (such as it is).

It's really tedious, especially when it goes back and forth for several posts. Maybe we try and just share our thoughts on a topic?

Fair point, but I don't think what Ten is doing is minor when it is one of the more clear rules.

I don't usually do this, but Bono is right to note that:


"(2) Any post that is simply a cut and paste of a social media or URL post without commentary is disallowed with the same moderation/banning policy as above."

95% of 10's post historically are disallowed under this User Agreement provision. It's not minor and is done repeatedly.

VOTE BLUE AND FREE WAGS

I get it, especially since the don't-post-just-a-link suggestion was mine (maybe others suggested this, as well).

Still, while I acknowledge that "if you see something, say something" is de rigueur these days, maybe, in a lot of cases, it might help threads flow better if we just let the mods do their job.

Our role can be to lead by example and model the rules. JMO
Ah, If only rule 2 was being enforced by the mods even once or twice.
Reply Quote
4
dajo9
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Eastern Oregon Bear • 3:03p, 7/17/26
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
Big C said:
SBGold said:
Big C said:

I forgot what's exactly codified in the new set of rules (and I don't feel like reading them again), but I can tell you that one thing the mods really got sick of (I think) is posters calling other posters out for minor rules infractions and basically non-stop-whining about others in this "community" (such as it is).

It's really tedious, especially when it goes back and forth for several posts. Maybe we try and just share our thoughts on a topic?

Fair point, but I don't think what Ten is doing is minor when it is one of the more clear rules.

I don't usually do this, but Bono is right to note that:


"(2) Any post that is simply a cut and paste of a social media or URL post without commentary is disallowed with the same moderation/banning policy as above."

95% of 10's post historically are disallowed under this User Agreement provision. It's not minor and is done repeatedly.

VOTE BLUE AND FREE WAGS

I get it, especially since the don't-post-just-a-link suggestion was mine (maybe others suggested this, as well).

Still, while I acknowledge that "if you see something, say something" is de rigueur these days, maybe, in a lot of cases, it might help threads flow better if we just let the mods do their job.

Our role can be to lead by example and model the rules. JMO
Ah, If only rule 2 was being enforced by the mods even once or twice.


I do believe it has been enforced some

https://bearinsider.com/forums/6/topics/135310
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Big C • 4:45p, 7/17/26
Big C said:
SBGold said:
Big C said:

I forgot what's exactly codified in the new set of rules (and I don't feel like reading them again), but I can tell you that one thing the mods really got sick of (I think) is posters calling other posters out for minor rules infractions and basically non-stop-whining about others in this "community" (such as it is).

It's really tedious, especially when it goes back and forth for several posts. Maybe we try and just share our thoughts on a topic?

Fair point, but I don't think what Ten is doing is minor when it is one of the more clear rules.

I don't usually do this, but Bono is right to note that:


"(2) Any post that is simply a cut and paste of a social media or URL post without commentary is disallowed with the same moderation/banning policy as above."

95% of 10's post historically are disallowed under this User Agreement provision. It's not minor and is done repeatedly.

VOTE BLUE AND FREE WAGS

I get it, especially since the don't-post-just-a-link suggestion was mine (maybe others suggested this, as well).

I also suggested something like this, though for the record sometimes I think a single link is a legitimate response in a topic. One-offs aren't the issue. It's more when people just do it over and over and essentially spam a thread with them that it becomes a problem.
Reply Quote
2
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:45p, 7/17/26
Anyway, as far as I can tell the Trump speech was mostly a dud.

Reply Quote
5
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 4:50p, 7/17/26
sycasey said:
Anyway, as far as I can tell the Trump speech was mostly a dud.


Yup, it was another DJT failure, like Trump Airlines and Trump steaks and Trump Atlantic City.

I just wish more networks showed it, we are in fraudulent times and IMO democracy dies in the darkness.
Reply Quote
9
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 5:01p, 7/17/26
sycasey said:
Anyway, as far as I can tell the Trump speech was mostly a dud.

That's why network media is criticizing the contents of the speech they refused to air.
Reply Quote
1
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 5:16p, 7/17/26
PAC-10-BEAR said:
sycasey said:
Anyway, as far as I can tell the Trump speech was mostly a dud.

That's why network media is criticizing the contents of the speech they refused to air.

I'm very disappointed in Fox News, the others I could understand but disappointed in them as well.

That failure of reason and logic should have been available to the masses to see.

Did Truth Social air it?
Reply Quote
4
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 10:04p, 7/17/26
PAC-10-BEAR said:
sycasey said:
Anyway, as far as I can tell the Trump speech was mostly a dud.

That's why network media is criticizing the contents of the speech they refused to air.

You guys whine about the media too much.
Reply Quote
4
Aunburdened
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 11:27p, 7/17/26
sycasey said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:
sycasey said:
Anyway, as far as I can tell the Trump speech was mostly a dud.

That's why network media is criticizing the contents of the speech they refused to air.

You guys whine about the media too much.

Speaking of the media, there's some misunderstanding about why the Ellisons want to control legacy media. It's not for Trump.

Reply Quote
1
dajo9
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aunburdened • 3:31a, 7/18/26
Aunburdened said:
sycasey said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:
sycasey said:
Anyway, as far as I can tell the Trump speech was mostly a dud.

That's why network media is criticizing the contents of the speech they refused to air.

You guys whine about the media too much.

Speaking of the media, there's some misunderstanding about why the Ellisons want to control legacy media. It's not for Trump.



It's this kind of dishonest framing that makes people hate Twitter randos. Larry Ellison gave Trump $45 million. He just did it indirectly through a PAC.

https://fortune.com/2026/06/25/larry-ellison-donald-trump-45-million-donation-stargate-tiktok-paramount/
Reply Quote
6
cal83dls79
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dajo9 • 3:40a, 7/18/26
dajo9 said:
Aunburdened said:
sycasey said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:
sycasey said:
Anyway, as far as I can tell the Trump speech was mostly a dud.

That's why network media is criticizing the contents of the speech they refused to air.

You guys whine about the media too much.

Speaking of the media, there's some misunderstanding about why the Ellisons want to control legacy media. It's not for Trump.



It's this kind of dishonest framing that makes people hate Twitter randos. Larry Ellison gave Trump $45 million. He just did it indirectly through a PAC.

https://fortune.com/2026/06/25/larry-ellison-donald-trump-45-million-donation-stargate-tiktok-paramount/
his relationship with Trump is more private, to the tune of $45m.

https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/how-a-45-million-donation-brought-larry-ellison-deeper-into-trumps-circle-b3e26c03?st=Dh23P6




Priest of the Patty Hearst Shrine
Reply Quote
5
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 4:39a, 7/18/26
sycasey said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:
sycasey said:
Anyway, as far as I can tell the Trump speech was mostly a dud.

That's why network media is criticizing the contents of the speech they refused to air.

You guys whine about the media too much.

Because the media is the enemy of the people.
Reply Quote
2
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 9:30a, 7/18/26
PAC-10-BEAR said:
sycasey said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:
sycasey said:
Anyway, as far as I can tell the Trump speech was mostly a dud.

That's why network media is criticizing the contents of the speech they refused to air.

You guys whine about the media too much.

Because the media is the enemy of the people.

A very Stalinist framing coming from the right wing. Didn't know you Trumpers were such fans of communism.
Reply Quote
9
Aunburdened
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dajo9 • 10:45a, 7/18/26
dajo9 said:
Aunburdened said:
sycasey said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:
sycasey said:
Anyway, as far as I can tell the Trump speech was mostly a dud.

That's why network media is criticizing the contents of the speech they refused to air.

You guys whine about the media too much.

Speaking of the media, there's some misunderstanding about why the Ellisons want to control legacy media. It's not for Trump.



It's this kind of dishonest framing that makes people hate Twitter randos. Larry Ellison gave Trump $45 million. He just did it indirectly through a PAC.

https://fortune.com/2026/06/25/larry-ellison-donald-trump-45-million-donation-stargate-tiktok-paramount/

Now THAT'S a dishonest framing. If we can call donations to a non-profit support for Trump and then post-election bribery, then you can certainly start calling out all the USAID/NGO BS that the Democrats use to influence events.

But of course, you won't do that.
Happy Roevember!
Reply Quote
2
Muckieeye
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aunburdened • 1:34p, 7/18/26
Aunburdened said:
dajo9 said:
Aunburdened said:
sycasey said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:
sycasey said:
Anyway, as far as I can tell the Trump speech was mostly a dud.

That's why network media is criticizing the contents of the speech they refused to air.

You guys whine about the media too much.

Speaking of the media, there's some misunderstanding about why the Ellisons want to control legacy media. It's not for Trump.



It's this kind of dishonest framing that makes people hate Twitter randos. Larry Ellison gave Trump $45 million. He just did it indirectly through a PAC.

https://fortune.com/2026/06/25/larry-ellison-donald-trump-45-million-donation-stargate-tiktok-paramount/

Now THAT'S a dishonest framing. If we can call donations to a non-profit support for Trump and then post-election bribery, then you can certainly start calling out all the USAID/NGO BS that the Democrats use to influence events.

But of course, you won't do that.

Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are conservatives...
I never meant to say that the Conservatives are generally stupid. I meant to say that stupid people are generally Conservative.
-John Stewart Mill
Reply Quote
6
sycasey
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aunburdened • 2:32p, 7/18/26
Aunburdened said:
dajo9 said:
Aunburdened said:
sycasey said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:
sycasey said:
Anyway, as far as I can tell the Trump speech was mostly a dud.

That's why network media is criticizing the contents of the speech they refused to air.

You guys whine about the media too much.

Speaking of the media, there's some misunderstanding about why the Ellisons want to control legacy media. It's not for Trump.



It's this kind of dishonest framing that makes people hate Twitter randos. Larry Ellison gave Trump $45 million. He just did it indirectly through a PAC.

https://fortune.com/2026/06/25/larry-ellison-donald-trump-45-million-donation-stargate-tiktok-paramount/

Now THAT'S a dishonest framing. If we can call donations to a non-profit support for Trump and then post-election bribery, then you can certainly start calling out all the USAID/NGO BS that the Democrats use to influence events.

But of course, you won't do that.

The question at hand was whether or not Ellison supported Trump. Other groups supporting other things is a different answer to a different question.
Reply Quote
7
SBGold
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:26p, 7/18/26
We should all be disgusted with this, golfing while our forces perish:

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-goes-golfing-as-iran-kills-american-troops/

Commander in Thief, not Commander in Chief!

VOTE BLUE AND FREE WAGS
Reply Quote
5
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to sycasey • 4:51p, 7/18/26
sycasey said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:
sycasey said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:
sycasey said:
Anyway, as far as I can tell the Trump speech was mostly a dud.

That's why network media is criticizing the contents of the speech they refused to air.

You guys whine about the media too much.

Because the media is the enemy of the people.

A very Stalinist framing coming from the right wing. Didn't know you Trumpers were such fans of communism.

"Mainstream" media trust is at all-time lows. This isn't just a right-wing thing.

You are delusional. I'm here to help.
Reply Quote
1
2 edits
Eastern Oregon Bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to PAC-10-BEAR • 5:47p, 7/18/26
PAC-10-BEAR said:
sycasey said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:
sycasey said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:
sycasey said:
Anyway, as far as I can tell the Trump speech was mostly a dud.

That's why network media is criticizing the contents of the speech they refused to air.

You guys whine about the media too much.

Because the media is the enemy of the people.

A very Stalinist framing coming from the right wing. Didn't know you Trumpers were such fans of communism.

"Mainstream" media trust is at all-time lows. This isn't just a right-wing thing.

You are delusional. I'm here to help.

Just because mainstream media is distrusted, it doesn't mean they are the enemy of the people.
Reply Quote
4
PAC-10-BEAR
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Eastern Oregon Bear • 6:51p, 7/18/26
Eastern Oregon Bear said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:
sycasey said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:
sycasey said:
PAC-10-BEAR said:
sycasey said:
Anyway, as far as I can tell the Trump speech was mostly a dud.

That's why network media is criticizing the contents of the speech they refused to air.

You guys whine about the media too much.

Because the media is the enemy of the people.

A very Stalinist framing coming from the right wing. Didn't know you Trumpers were such fans of communism.

"Mainstream" media trust is at all-time lows. This isn't just a right-wing thing.

You are delusional. I'm here to help.

Just because mainstream media is distrusted, it doesn't mean they are the enemy of the people.

If engineers build bridges like today's media report news, we would be in big trouble.
Reply Quote
1
Page 2 of 3 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.