I totally "get" the No Kings idea but it just never really struck me as an effective protest that would resonate with the target audience.

dajo9 said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

bearister said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

---

Sounds like turnout was dreadfully small for all of the protests. No Kings fatigue has set in or people just realized how silly it was to have a protest called that when we don't have anything even resembling a king.

---

Protests are a way of putting your voice out there particularly when you feel it isn't being heard in other ways. Elections are another way of putting your voice out there. This is an election year.

---

Are you saying that the protests were poorly attended because people are voting this year?

---

Yes, partly. Protest energy doesn't last forever. It doesn't mean the thoughts and motivation for change are gone.

---

It means people realized they were showing to protests named after something that didn't exist anyways*

---

Donald Trump views himself with monarchical or unchecked power:

Challenging Birthright Citizenship: On his first day back in office, he issued an executive order attempting to end birthright citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment, a move critics and legal analysts argue bypasses constitutional text, federal statutes, and Supreme Court precedent.

Unilateral Tariffs and Economic Measures:
He has invoked emergency powers to impose sweeping global tariffs, sidestepping Congress's explicit constitutional authority to regulate commerce and levy taxes.

Targeting the Federal Reserve:
He publicly called for the termination of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell ("Powell's termination cannot come fast enough!") and attempted to fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook "for cause", prompting a temporary block by the Supreme Court as it reviews whether a president can dismiss central bank officials at will.

Impounding Congressional Funds: His administration has attempted to impound (refuse to spend) billions of dollars that Congress formally appropriated for specific programs, including public broadcasting, Voice of America, and international disease and aid initiatives.

Mass Firings and Dismantling Agencies:
He has pursued mass purges of civil servants and the dismantling or restructuring of independent federal agencies and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), facing dozens of lawsuits from judges who have rebuked the administration's view of Article II power.

Foreign Policy and Military Action:
He launched military strikes involving Iran without explicit congressional authorization for war, and floated or pursued aggressive foreign policy goals including proposed U.S. territorial takeovers (such as Greenland, Canada, or the Panama Canal) and treating Caribbean drug-trafficking boats as unilateral combat targets.

Monarchical Imagery and Rhetoric: He and his official or staff social media accounts have repeatedly shared and embraced royal imagery such as AI-generated and doctored images depicting him wearing crowns, royal cloaks, or mock "LONG LIVE THE KING!" magazine covers, alongside public statements where he has toyed with or brushed off comparisons to dictators or absolute rulers.

While Trump has occasionally disclaimed literal royal status (stating "I'm not a king"), critics argue that his active cultivation of the imagery combined with systematic efforts to strip away congressional, judicial, and agency oversight mirror the traits of an "imperial presidency".

*"Anyway" is the standard, correct choice for formal and written English, while "anyways" is an informal, nonstandard, or dialect variant.



The White House has released photos styling President Donald Trump as a king on social media.
https://www.newsweek.com/white-house-donald-trump-king-time-2033574

*Opinions not based on facts are little more than blather.

---

I kind of agree with BarelySane here, "no king" is kind of a fuzzy niche concept that was popular with the pink pus**cat hat crowd in the 2010s, it's kind of an insider, woke branding that doesn't resonate with the public at large. It actually turns off potential supporters.

The messaging should be more focused on the main issues, which have more universal appeal today as a result of Trump's disastrous policies :
-No wars of choice for Israel
-Inflation and cost of living
-healthcare

The Democrat establishment is pro-war, entirely complicit with Trump there, part of the reason they have been so mediocre at mobilizing popular support for what should be their platform. Dems who did do this, like El Sayed or Platner did do very well (Platner's personal issues notwithstanding).

---

As a Triple Trump supporter I would also say you are not a person to be influenced by on this topic.

---

You do a great job of showing why Dems have a tendency to faceplant by antagonizing independent voters, with your repeated lies, as you know damn well that I did not support Trump in 2024.

Big C said:

---

I totally "get" the No Kings idea but it just never really struck me as an effective protest that would resonate with the target audience.

---

I don't know about the target audience. Some things you do for yourself. Attendance was great.

dajo9 said:

---

Big C said:

---

I totally "get" the No Kings idea but it just never really struck me as an effective protest that would resonate with the target audience.

---

I don't know about the target audience. Some things you do for yourself. Attendance was great.

---

Attendance was great where?

dajo9 said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Cal88 said:

---

bearister said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

concordtom said:

---

---

Sounds like turnout was dreadfully small for all of the protests. No Kings fatigue has set in or people just realized how silly it was to have a protest called that when we don't have anything even resembling a king.

---

Protests are a way of putting your voice out there particularly when you feel it isn't being heard in other ways. Elections are another way of putting your voice out there. This is an election year.

---

Are you saying that the protests were poorly attended because people are voting this year?

---

Yes, partly. Protest energy doesn't last forever. It doesn't mean the thoughts and motivation for change are gone.

---

It means people realized they were showing to protests named after something that didn't exist anyways*

---

Donald Trump views himself with monarchical or unchecked power:

Challenging Birthright Citizenship: On his first day back in office, he issued an executive order attempting to end birthright citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment, a move critics and legal analysts argue bypasses constitutional text, federal statutes, and Supreme Court precedent.

Unilateral Tariffs and Economic Measures:
He has invoked emergency powers to impose sweeping global tariffs, sidestepping Congress's explicit constitutional authority to regulate commerce and levy taxes.

Targeting the Federal Reserve:
He publicly called for the termination of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell ("Powell's termination cannot come fast enough!") and attempted to fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook "for cause", prompting a temporary block by the Supreme Court as it reviews whether a president can dismiss central bank officials at will.

Impounding Congressional Funds: His administration has attempted to impound (refuse to spend) billions of dollars that Congress formally appropriated for specific programs, including public broadcasting, Voice of America, and international disease and aid initiatives.

Mass Firings and Dismantling Agencies:
He has pursued mass purges of civil servants and the dismantling or restructuring of independent federal agencies and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), facing dozens of lawsuits from judges who have rebuked the administration's view of Article II power.

Foreign Policy and Military Action:
He launched military strikes involving Iran without explicit congressional authorization for war, and floated or pursued aggressive foreign policy goals including proposed U.S. territorial takeovers (such as Greenland, Canada, or the Panama Canal) and treating Caribbean drug-trafficking boats as unilateral combat targets.

Monarchical Imagery and Rhetoric: He and his official or staff social media accounts have repeatedly shared and embraced royal imagery such as AI-generated and doctored images depicting him wearing crowns, royal cloaks, or mock "LONG LIVE THE KING!" magazine covers, alongside public statements where he has toyed with or brushed off comparisons to dictators or absolute rulers.

While Trump has occasionally disclaimed literal royal status (stating "I'm not a king"), critics argue that his active cultivation of the imagery combined with systematic efforts to strip away congressional, judicial, and agency oversight mirror the traits of an "imperial presidency".

*"Anyway" is the standard, correct choice for formal and written English, while "anyways" is an informal, nonstandard, or dialect variant.



The White House has released photos styling President Donald Trump as a king on social media.
https://www.newsweek.com/white-house-donald-trump-king-time-2033574

*Opinions not based on facts are little more than blather.

---

I kind of agree with BarelySane here, "no king" is kind of a fuzzy niche concept that was popular with the pink pus**cat hat crowd in the 2010s, it's kind of an insider, woke branding that doesn't resonate with the public at large. It actually turns off potential supporters.

The messaging should be more focused on the main issues, which have more universal appeal today as a result of Trump's disastrous policies :
-No wars of choice for Israel
-Inflation and cost of living
-healthcare

The Democrat establishment is pro-war, entirely complicit with Trump there, part of the reason they have been so mediocre at mobilizing popular support for what should be their platform. Dems who did do this, like El Sayed or Platner did do very well (Platner's personal issues notwithstanding).

---

As a Triple Trump supporter I would also say you are not a person to be influenced by on this topic.

---

You do a great job of showing why Dems have a tendency to faceplant by antagonizing independent voters, with your repeated lies, as you know damn well that I did not support Trump in 2024.

---

If you are an independent voter than you are breaking the law unless your citizenship status has changed.

---

Because voting for Jill Stein is against the law in your book, OK.

Big C said:

---

I totally "get" the No Kings idea but it just never really struck me as an effective protest that would resonate with the target audience.

---

Boomers eat this **** up.

James Carville says he'd rather have Republicans keep control of the House than Democrats winning the chamber by 5 seats.

"I would rather the Republicans keep the House by five than the Democrats win by five, because if that happens, they’re hostage to the DSA. Like, Hakeem… pic.twitter.com/Uina8uBWQ2

— Politics & Poll Tracker 📡 (@PollTracker2024) October 18, 2026

Senile old man waves fist at traffic

This is on mark, the policies run by Jeffries, Ossof, Schumer, Pelosi and co are not going to be much different from Trump's on many issues.

I see many wondering why the No Kings rallies are not as confrontational or angry as protests in France, Albania etc, and have no concrete demands

It’s because No Kings participants are certain the Democrats will sweep the midterms, and their only demand is that we vote Democrat… https://t.co/g5lct8plFd

— Max Blumenthal (@MaxBlumenthal) October 19, 2026

"I see many wondering why the No Kings rallies are not as confrontational or angry as protests in France, Albania etc, and have no concrete demands

It's because No Kings participants are certain the Democrats will sweep the midterms, and their only demand is that we vote Democrat

These are purely get out the vote rallies for a Democrat Party that is still generally pro-war, pro-Israel, and corporate friendly

They are filled with boomerlibs hypnotized by MSNOW and first term Trump era Russiagate propaganda. Once the Dems take power, they go back to brunch.

Any more radical demands are sure to be diluted within the partisan No Kings morass, or shut down by a lady wearing a shirt that says "Resist."

Ain't no kings bombing people, the resistance will do that.

How did we get to a place where humans think we can overcome oppression with shit like this? https://t.co/jmAP1Kjdba

— Just.A.Thought 💭 (@e_galv) October 19, 2026

There is a very strong cultural difference between the Anglo ethics America inherited from Britain vs. the French ethic. In America, trashing your neighborhood because you are unhappy is generally frowned upon. Not saying it doesn't happen but it almost always results in public revulsion in America.

Don't listen to the people who want authoritarianism and division to succeed in America.

Under the Dems

Trump tax cuts remain
Israel budget, no cuts
Ukraine war, no cuts
ICE funded with vague promises for accountability
Healthcare, No Medicare for all- subsidies fo insurance companies
Tariffs remain
Lots of BS about democracy returning

Anarchistbear said:

---

Under the Dems

Trump tax cuts remain
Israel budget, no cuts
Ukraine war, no cuts
ICE funded with vague promises for accountability
Healthcare, No Medicare for all- subsidies fo insurance companies
Tariffs remain
Lots of BS about democracy returning

---

Under the Dems, we'll still be under Trump

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

Under the Dems

Trump tax cuts remain
Israel budget, no cuts
Ukraine war, no cuts
ICE funded with vague promises for accountability
Healthcare, No Medicare for all- subsidies fo insurance companies
Tariffs remain
Lots of BS about democracy returning

---

Under the Dems, we'll still be under Trump

---

I think you're missing his point

BearlySane88 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

Under the Dems

Trump tax cuts remain
Israel budget, no cuts
Ukraine war, no cuts
ICE funded with vague promises for accountability
Healthcare, No Medicare for all- subsidies fo insurance companies
Tariffs remain
Lots of BS about democracy returning

---

Under the Dems, we'll still be under Trump

---

I think you're missing his point

---

Is his point that our system is designed to create gridlock?

dajo9 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

Under the Dems

Trump tax cuts remain
Israel budget, no cuts
Ukraine war, no cuts
ICE funded with vague promises for accountability
Healthcare, No Medicare for all- subsidies fo insurance companies
Tariffs remain
Lots of BS about democracy returning

---

Under the Dems, we'll still be under Trump

---

I think you're missing his point

---

Is his point that our system is designed to create gridlock?

---

I think his point is that democrat politicians are republican politicians in a different color.

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

Under the Dems

Trump tax cuts remain
Israel budget, no cuts
Ukraine war, no cuts
ICE funded with vague promises for accountability
Healthcare, No Medicare for all- subsidies fo insurance companies
Tariffs remain
Lots of BS about democracy returning

---

Under the Dems, we'll still be under Trump

---

Of no consequence

Anarchistbear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

Under the Dems

Trump tax cuts remain
Israel budget, no cuts
Ukraine war, no cuts
ICE funded with vague promises for accountability
Healthcare, No Medicare for all- subsidies fo insurance companies
Tariffs remain
Lots of BS about democracy returning

---

Under the Dems, we'll still be under Trump

---

Of no consequence

---

Still consequence because if nothing happens then we slow the descent to bad things happening. Thats how the system is designed.

dajo9 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

BearlySane88 said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

Under the Dems

Trump tax cuts remain
Israel budget, no cuts
Ukraine war, no cuts
ICE funded with vague promises for accountability
Healthcare, No Medicare for all- subsidies fo insurance companies
Tariffs remain
Lots of BS about democracy returning

---

Under the Dems, we'll still be under Trump

---

I think you're missing his point

---

Is his point that our system is designed to create gridlock?

---

I think his point is that democrat politicians are republican politicians in a different color.

---

If you believe that you should vote for Democrats

---

I said his point, not mine

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

Under the Dems

Trump tax cuts remain
Israel budget, no cuts
Ukraine war, no cuts
ICE funded with vague promises for accountability
Healthcare, No Medicare for all- subsidies fo insurance companies
Tariffs remain
Lots of BS about democracy returning

---

Under the Dems, we'll still be under Trump

---

Of no consequence

---

Still consequence because if nothing happens then we slow the descent to bad things happening. Thats how the system is designed.

---

Under the Dems bad things happen independent of Trump. He's been around for ten years. Things are the same no matter who is in charge because there is general agreement between the parties.

Anarchistbear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

Under the Dems

Trump tax cuts remain
Israel budget, no cuts
Ukraine war, no cuts
ICE funded with vague promises for accountability
Healthcare, No Medicare for all- subsidies fo insurance companies
Tariffs remain
Lots of BS about democracy returning

---

Under the Dems, we'll still be under Trump

---

Of no consequence

---

Still consequence because if nothing happens then we slow the descent to bad things happening. Thats how the system is designed.

---

Under the Dems bad things happen independent of Trump. He's been around for ten years. Things are the same no matter who is in charge because there is general agreement between the parties.

---

If I were single I would be uninsurable without Dems. That difference by itself is life or death.

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

Under the Dems

Trump tax cuts remain
Israel budget, no cuts
Ukraine war, no cuts
ICE funded with vague promises for accountability
Healthcare, No Medicare for all- subsidies fo insurance companies
Tariffs remain
Lots of BS about democracy returning

---

Under the Dems, we'll still be under Trump

---

Of no consequence

---

Still consequence because if nothing happens then we slow the descent to bad things happening. Thats how the system is designed.

---

Under the Dems bad things happen independent of Trump. He's been around for ten years. Things are the same no matter who is in charge because there is general agreement between the parties.

---

If I were single I would be uninsurable without Dems. That difference by itself is life or death.

---

You're not single. Yes, one party supports insurance companies not health for all.

Anarchistbear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

Under the Dems

Trump tax cuts remain
Israel budget, no cuts
Ukraine war, no cuts
ICE funded with vague promises for accountability
Healthcare, No Medicare for all- subsidies fo insurance companies
Tariffs remain
Lots of BS about democracy returning

---

Under the Dems, we'll still be under Trump

---

Of no consequence

---

Still consequence because if nothing happens then we slow the descent to bad things happening. Thats how the system is designed.

---

Under the Dems bad things happen independent of Trump. He's been around for ten years. Things are the same no matter who is in charge because there is general agreement between the parties.

---

If I were single I would be uninsurable without Dems. That difference by itself is life or death.

---

You're not single. Yes, one party supports insurance companies not health for all.

---

But many are. Many would be uninsurable if it weren't for Dems. Life or death.

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

Under the Dems

Trump tax cuts remain
Israel budget, no cuts
Ukraine war, no cuts
ICE funded with vague promises for accountability
Healthcare, No Medicare for all- subsidies fo insurance companies
Tariffs remain
Lots of BS about democracy returning

---

Under the Dems, we'll still be under Trump

---

Of no consequence

---

Still consequence because if nothing happens then we slow the descent to bad things happening. Thats how the system is designed.

---

Under the Dems bad things happen independent of Trump. He's been around for ten years. Things are the same no matter who is in charge because there is general agreement between the parties.

---

If I were single I would be uninsurable without Dems. That difference by itself is life or death.

---

You're not single. Yes, one party supports insurance companies not health for all.

---

But many are. Many would be uninsurable if it weren't for Dems. Life or death.

---

I would suggest you focus on things that have happened more recently than 15 years. You pretty much prove my point. The Democrats currrently have nothing to do with. Improving the material lives of Americans.

Anarchistbear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

Under the Dems

Trump tax cuts remain
Israel budget, no cuts
Ukraine war, no cuts
ICE funded with vague promises for accountability
Healthcare, No Medicare for all- subsidies fo insurance companies
Tariffs remain
Lots of BS about democracy returning

---

Under the Dems, we'll still be under Trump

---

Of no consequence

---

Still consequence because if nothing happens then we slow the descent to bad things happening. Thats how the system is designed.

---

Under the Dems bad things happen independent of Trump. He's been around for ten years. Things are the same no matter who is in charge because there is general agreement between the parties.

---

If I were single I would be uninsurable without Dems. That difference by itself is life or death.

---

You're not single. Yes, one party supports insurance companies not health for all.

---

But many are. Many would be uninsurable if it weren't for Dems. Life or death.

---

I would suggest you focus on things that have happened more recently than 15 years. You pretty much prove my point. The Democrats currrently have nothing to do with. Improving the material lives of Americans.

---

The Dems have saved our healthcare numerous times from recent attempts to end the ACA. Politics involves offense and defense. Your brand of taking the ball and going home because you don't get what you want is exactly what the billionaires want from you.

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

Under the Dems

Trump tax cuts remain
Israel budget, no cuts
Ukraine war, no cuts
ICE funded with vague promises for accountability
Healthcare, No Medicare for all- subsidies fo insurance companies
Tariffs remain
Lots of BS about democracy returning

---

Under the Dems, we'll still be under Trump

---

Of no consequence

---

Still consequence because if nothing happens then we slow the descent to bad things happening. Thats how the system is designed.

---

Under the Dems bad things happen independent of Trump. He's been around for ten years. Things are the same no matter who is in charge because there is general agreement between the parties.

---

If I were single I would be uninsurable without Dems. That difference by itself is life or death.

---

You're not single. Yes, one party supports insurance companies not health for all.

---

But many are. Many would be uninsurable if it weren't for Dems. Life or death.

---

I would suggest you focus on things that have happened more recently than 15 years. You pretty much prove my point. The Democrats currrently have nothing to do with. Improving the material lives of Americans.

---

The Dems have saved our healthcare numerous times from recent attempts to end the ACA. Politics involves offense and defense. Your brand of taking the ball and going home because you don't get what you want is exactly what the billionaires want from you.

---

The billionaires support your party

Anarchistbear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

Under the Dems

Trump tax cuts remain
Israel budget, no cuts
Ukraine war, no cuts
ICE funded with vague promises for accountability
Healthcare, No Medicare for all- subsidies fo insurance companies
Tariffs remain
Lots of BS about democracy returning

---

Under the Dems, we'll still be under Trump

---

Of no consequence

---

Still consequence because if nothing happens then we slow the descent to bad things happening. Thats how the system is designed.

---

Under the Dems bad things happen independent of Trump. He's been around for ten years. Things are the same no matter who is in charge because there is general agreement between the parties.

---

If I were single I would be uninsurable without Dems. That difference by itself is life or death.

---

You're not single. Yes, one party supports insurance companies not health for all.

---

But many are. Many would be uninsurable if it weren't for Dems. Life or death.

---

I would suggest you focus on things that have happened more recently than 15 years. You pretty much prove my point. The Democrats currrently have nothing to do with. Improving the material lives of Americans.

---

The Dems have saved our healthcare numerous times from recent attempts to end the ACA. Politics involves offense and defense. Your brand of taking the ball and going home because you don't get what you want is exactly what the billionaires want from you.

---

The billionaires support your party

---

The billionaires support you

https://bsky.app/profile/thetnholler.bsky.social/post/3my77eeqhvc23

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

dajo9 said:

---

Anarchistbear said:

---

Under the Dems

Trump tax cuts remain
Israel budget, no cuts
Ukraine war, no cuts
ICE funded with vague promises for accountability
Healthcare, No Medicare for all- subsidies fo insurance companies
Tariffs remain
Lots of BS about democracy returning

---

Under the Dems, we'll still be under Trump

---

Of no consequence

---

Still consequence because if nothing happens then we slow the descent to bad things happening. Thats how the system is designed.

---

Under the Dems bad things happen independent of Trump. He's been around for ten years. Things are the same no matter who is in charge because there is general agreement between the parties.

---

If I were single I would be uninsurable without Dems. That difference by itself is life or death.

---

You're not single. Yes, one party supports insurance companies not health for all.

---

But many are. Many would be uninsurable if it weren't for Dems. Life or death.

---

I would suggest you focus on things that have happened more recently than 15 years. You pretty much prove my point. The Democrats currrently have nothing to do with. Improving the material lives of Americans.

---

The Dems have saved our healthcare numerous times from recent attempts to end the ACA. Politics involves offense and defense. Your brand of taking the ball and going home because you don't get what you want is exactly what the billionaires want from you.

---

The billionaires support your party

---

The billionaires support you

https://bsky.app/profile/thetnholler.bsky.social/post/3my77eeqhvc23

---

Bezos, Grin, Cooke and Zuckerberg supported the Dems when it suited them. They will support them again when it suits. The Dems are a corporate party who supports genocide.

dajo9 said:

---

There is a very strong cultural difference between the Anglo ethics America inherited from Britain vs. the French ethic. In America, trashing your neighborhood because you are unhappy is generally frowned upon. Not saying it doesn't happen but it almost always results in public revulsion in America.

---

For one, you'd be in big trouble with the HOA, almost as deep trouble as when your lawn gets too tall.

In France, No King protests end up with the king losing his head.

Something to be aware of.

There is a very disturbing trend being seen in early voting. Texas, Florida, Tennessee, Ohio are reporting difficulties getting the machines to accept democratic votes. The machines change them back to Republican unless the voter persists, pressing several times to get the…

— Daisy (@DaizyZeeX) October 21, 2026